Previous
Next
© Distribution of this video is restricted by its owner
00:00 | Can everyone see my, did everyone my screen? Great. I guess |
|
|
00:13 | uh any questions about yesterday that you saying that some of that three |
|
|
00:20 | modeling stuff was a little heavy. yet, I haven't had a chance |
|
|
00:25 | really go through it um deeply. hopefully this week I'll email you some |
|
|
00:31 | if I have any if you do then of course if you if you |
|
|
00:36 | to look at some of the literature I think I cite everything that I |
|
|
00:40 | about um at least anything that I a side of figure out. I |
|
|
00:46 | that. So you know you can at the you can ask me of |
|
|
00:51 | and then if you're interested you can read about that stuff so it's up |
|
|
00:58 | you. I don't really test test those methods though so I might, |
|
|
01:06 | anything I test you on will be the notes so probably you know to |
|
|
01:13 | for the exam I guess that will friday right? That will be |
|
|
01:18 | Um Over the first four lectures. everything through yesterday um which is basically |
|
|
01:27 | the all the background material, the , instrumentation, acquisition, processing and |
|
|
01:37 | you know interpretation tools like not only and depth to source estimation um And |
|
|
01:48 | and modeling um Yeah so all that will be in friday's and I won't |
|
|
01:55 | you anything that I didn't lecture on not in the notes or that I |
|
|
02:00 | talk about but I think I pretty speak. I don't I don't get |
|
|
02:07 | on tangents too much I don't But um so like to prepare, |
|
|
02:13 | mean one of the things you could , you could just like outline those |
|
|
02:16 | . So because it's gonna be, gonna let you use your notes, |
|
|
02:20 | take the test. So the test be whatever, it's supposed to be |
|
|
02:24 | hours, right? That's what they looked at. The time for Wednesday |
|
|
02:29 | like 7-9. I mean 6-9, like that. So it's like three |
|
|
02:35 | . So I thought well the first would be the same if that makes |
|
|
02:41 | . So you're allowed to use your for that. And so if you |
|
|
02:47 | have a nice outline of them, know, slide blah blah slide whatever |
|
|
02:52 | whatever I talked about this and um know, maybe maybe if there's an |
|
|
03:00 | in that group, maybe the citation that, you know, just the |
|
|
03:05 | reference to it and that way you'll able to zip through your notes |
|
|
03:11 | Um And it will be useful for . So yeah, but I'm not |
|
|
03:17 | like, you know, I mean might I might ask you a question |
|
|
03:22 | to make you think though. So anyways, yeah, don't freak |
|
|
03:29 | though. I'm not a I'm not tough greater so in any case. |
|
|
03:36 | , so no questions about any of stuff, right? You you're |
|
|
03:40 | you know all of that stuff inside out, right? Hopefully by |
|
|
03:48 | Well um but the exam isn't until . No, I feel like I |
|
|
03:56 | like everything's pretty legible. So I have to go through it just one |
|
|
04:00 | time slowly. And if I have questions, I'll let you know. |
|
|
04:05 | then. So that's the first half the class. That's all the background |
|
|
04:11 | , the stuff you need to sort have a feel for, to start |
|
|
04:18 | at data. And even though I , you know, Sprinkle in a |
|
|
04:24 | of examples specifically, you know, regard like potential and, and kaos |
|
|
04:30 | all that sort of, all the stuff. I like to try to |
|
|
04:33 | that to show, you know, these ideas are applied, how they |
|
|
04:40 | been applied. Um, I really that you need to look at lots |
|
|
04:45 | data to really get a feel for . And, and so I think |
|
|
04:51 | sometimes folks that teach potential fields, kind of focus on, you |
|
|
04:59 | theoretical parts and not as much, show, just looking at lots of |
|
|
05:06 | . So with that idea is well, okay, lots of |
|
|
05:10 | How do we look at. And this is where I talk about, |
|
|
05:15 | gonna look at different kinds of we're gonna look at today, this |
|
|
05:20 | , gonna get platform based. And afternoon we're gonna look at rift basins |
|
|
05:25 | passive margins and ocean basins. And we're gonna do the exercise. Next |
|
|
05:32 | morning, So next saturday afternoon we're look at basins that form along convergent |
|
|
05:42 | boundaries. And then um as well what I'm calling complex bases or bases |
|
|
05:51 | complex histories. So we're basically going like the Wilson cycle, the supercontinent |
|
|
05:58 | uh this afternoon will be like the apart of of super continents. And |
|
|
06:09 | saturday we'll be looking at convergence of Creek tonic blacks to form big continental |
|
|
06:18 | to form super continents. And and , you know, the complex |
|
|
06:25 | there's like other things that can happen that we need to think about |
|
|
06:31 | And then the final action will be week, a week from friday. |
|
|
06:36 | then we're gonna look at, it's of a specialized lecture. We're gonna |
|
|
06:39 | about gravity grade geometry and heat He he flow is a potential |
|
|
06:48 | And so we're gonna talk about that thermal properties. So, okay, |
|
|
06:53 | we're gonna look at, we're gonna today with super continents and plate |
|
|
06:57 | And then we're gonna look at basin schemes. Uh interpretation rules of |
|
|
07:05 | you just some ideas that you should have in your head. And you're |
|
|
07:09 | at gravity magnetic anomaly maps. And earlier when we were looking at processing |
|
|
07:16 | , I said, you know, crossed through ISIS static correction and I |
|
|
07:23 | , well talk pick that up later I have a few slides to explain |
|
|
07:26 | I meant by that. And I'm it in here in sort of like |
|
|
07:32 | sliding it in between like uh you , interpretation rules of thumb and you |
|
|
07:39 | , plate tectonics and all this geological . Um And then before we start |
|
|
07:45 | looking at all these different kinds of and putting it in here because I |
|
|
07:49 | it is kind of an interpretive uh of gravity magnetic specifically gravity interpretation and |
|
|
08:02 | is not a processing step. And will understand why I want to explain |
|
|
08:06 | . And then we look at our look at platform basins which are photonic |
|
|
08:12 | . They don't I mean they they're really they're separate from basins that form |
|
|
08:19 | response to plate tectonics. They have , they live for longer. Um |
|
|
08:25 | there they form on what would would quote stable crit tonic platforms. So |
|
|
08:33 | why this name platform, but sometimes called crustal sags or cra tonic |
|
|
08:40 | But basically they're just shallow regions on a stable plant, stable cretins, |
|
|
08:51 | just collect sediment. And anyways, start with those, Get those out |
|
|
08:56 | way, then we'll jump into the kind of soccer ones. Okay, |
|
|
08:59 | alright, so a lot of introductory , so here's here's my basic thesis |
|
|
09:05 | looking at organizing this this material in way and I think that a person |
|
|
09:15 | interpret gravity magnetic data over any sedimentary without a priority information provided that the |
|
|
09:23 | of basin is known in other all you know, is that it's |
|
|
09:26 | four land based and you have gravity anomalies over you. You can actually |
|
|
09:33 | at those data and you can in geology just because you know what kind |
|
|
09:40 | a basin it is. That's the . That's my idea. So, |
|
|
09:47 | know, as I say here, know, you can, you |
|
|
09:51 | you can you can estimate things like depth. Right? Remember we thought |
|
|
09:56 | did depth estimation. You know, basically, you know, the wavelength |
|
|
10:02 | effectively, or essentially four times the depth. And then you can infer |
|
|
10:08 | , jeez, you know, maybe sor salt or carbons, things like |
|
|
10:12 | . So, remember we looked at some intrusive intrusive analysis produced by intrusive |
|
|
10:21 | like that. So that's the idea with with the basic understanding of regional |
|
|
10:30 | and how these basins, what their is, how they form those sort |
|
|
10:36 | , you know, the processes that them. Then you'll be able to |
|
|
10:42 | any kind of gravity magnetic anomaly map say something that will impress your |
|
|
10:48 | Absolutely. That's the idea. That's goal. Okay, so let's start |
|
|
10:53 | plate tectonics and supercontinent. A lot the stuff is the review but I'm |
|
|
10:58 | take a grab meg centric viewpoint. , so we start and we look |
|
|
11:04 | this famous map. This is this is a reproduction for moore's and |
|
|
11:09 | their textbook. But these surveys were in the late fifties. Uh and |
|
|
11:14 | papers were written by mason and rafe were pioneering and what you're looking at |
|
|
11:21 | sea floor spreading anomalies. Now mesa and twists from this textbook. They've |
|
|
11:30 | touted them up in terms of how they are um in this in this |
|
|
11:38 | and these would be these would be floor spreading anomalies and this would be |
|
|
11:46 | age correlation. So you know, going back to Whatever over 10 looks |
|
|
11:54 | about 11 million years. And and this, here's the spreading center right |
|
|
12:00 | , the wanda Fuca spreading center. as you can see, everything is |
|
|
12:04 | of mirrored, right? Everything is know this gray is this gray, |
|
|
12:09 | like this is this light. It's little bit of an offset here because |
|
|
12:14 | transform. Right? So this this really sort of, he was like |
|
|
12:23 | of nails in the coffin for those rejected plate tectonic theory at the |
|
|
12:30 | Late late 50s, early 60s. what really hammered it home was there |
|
|
12:37 | a there was a special issue of . G. R. In |
|
|
12:41 | They had a bunch of papers in . Uh jim her clothes paper was |
|
|
12:46 | of those paper night uh where they ocean magnetic anomalies around the world. |
|
|
12:55 | , now gravity data especially more recently really just been incredible for identifying uh |
|
|
13:06 | basin structures, particularly fracture zones. transforms as you probably know, they |
|
|
13:13 | spreading segments in the ocean basin. the off axis trace of those transforms |
|
|
13:19 | preserved and those are called fracture They're not active. There's no they're |
|
|
13:25 | like strikes the thoughts like I mentioned but they do record the relative motion |
|
|
13:33 | the two plates. So like if curves in one direction and the other |
|
|
13:37 | it will curve in the other. will it will have like an inverse |
|
|
13:42 | to it to sort of mirror that . So you can actually you know |
|
|
13:48 | can what you do, what we in practice is we map the pole |
|
|
13:51 | for each of those little segments called poles. Okay, so This is |
|
|
13:59 | Hertz or 68. And this is this is just really incredible work because |
|
|
14:05 | we have what you're looking at is models of the geomagnetic polarity reversal |
|
|
14:14 | That's the strip of black and white where black is normal polarity present day |
|
|
14:23 | white would be reverse polarity and it's same stretch but at different spreading |
|
|
14:28 | Right? So you know the ocean open at different spreading rates. But |
|
|
14:33 | the same the same correlation. And what her killer and these other guys |
|
|
14:39 | . They took this and then and and then just above that that model |
|
|
14:48 | polarity reversals is the forward calculated response it right? Like as in forward |
|
|
14:55 | . So the profile directly above it the is the model profile for all |
|
|
15:00 | these. And then what they did they took real data and and and |
|
|
15:06 | compared it and you can see that can see what they're comparing. They're |
|
|
15:12 | one for one. But the way look at these things we look at |
|
|
15:15 | of anomalies right? So there's two in the southern indian ocean this one |
|
|
15:20 | the south atlantic and with different spreading and then in the in the pacific |
|
|
15:27 | two profiles here and what they demonstrated that the same geomagnetic polarity reversal scale |
|
|
15:39 | its forward model can use the used correlate real world data over all these |
|
|
15:45 | basins and what what how can you that unless there's something like plate tectonics |
|
|
15:52 | on. So this was really just really really important work that I mean |
|
|
15:58 | data and gravity data really contributed And to contribute towards plate tectonic theory. |
|
|
16:05 | it really advanced it with this work . Now. The famous paper I |
|
|
16:10 | it's vinyl Matthews which was 1966 I which they really postulated a lot of |
|
|
16:17 | ideas. There was plenty of there evidence but this special issue of |
|
|
16:22 | G. R. 68 was just I say nails in the coffin of |
|
|
16:27 | sync lie in theory. So it's important stuff now here's here is gravity |
|
|
16:35 | over the world. And um the areas are covered by satellite derived free |
|
|
16:42 | gravity. Uh The latest version were the latest but One of the |
|
|
16:49 | most recent versions was just released in by David Sandwell. And you can |
|
|
16:56 | all the fracture zones. So like the off axis traces, right? |
|
|
17:01 | not active, right? This is african plate. And these are not |
|
|
17:05 | a bunch of little strike slip I'll explain that very clearly when we |
|
|
17:08 | to ocean basins um this afternoon. and then you can see, you |
|
|
17:17 | , you can see the Hawaiian Emperor chain. There's all these other seamount |
|
|
17:21 | which are kind of like sub parallel , you know, this shape here |
|
|
17:26 | that shape there, that shape you know, this kind of bends |
|
|
17:29 | here, The Louisville going into the Tonga trench here. Uh And then |
|
|
17:36 | floor spreading in the southern ocean and the indian ocean of course central atlantic |
|
|
17:43 | the East pacific rise is really, goes up through here. It's not |
|
|
17:48 | well defined. And the reason is it's just a faster spreading center. |
|
|
17:52 | morphological e there, they look different like the slow spreading centers of the |
|
|
17:58 | atlantic and indian ocean and the southern ocean is a bit faster. That's |
|
|
18:03 | it's a little bit smoother as well . So remember these marine areas satellite |
|
|
18:10 | is derived by the satellite not having gravity meter in it, but it's |
|
|
18:16 | the height of the ocean's surface the surface and over. Lots of lots |
|
|
18:21 | lots of missions and stacking that data . This is what they come up |
|
|
18:26 | . So it's very beautiful. you know, I mean, you |
|
|
18:29 | definitely see the tectonic processes going on the onshore areas. Okay, you |
|
|
18:35 | do those with satellite. I you could but it wouldn't be useful |
|
|
18:39 | , you know, the the topography not coincide with the GE OID and |
|
|
18:47 | what these are are actually there are OID measurements in here and then that's |
|
|
18:55 | with some earth to modeling by the one is Earth gravity model 2008 Palace |
|
|
19:04 | others 2012. So this is free marine in bouquet uh over land |
|
|
19:13 | And of course you can see in land, you can see that the |
|
|
19:16 | ranges, how they're rooted right offset into the they're off, they're |
|
|
19:21 | setting deep mantle as well. Now low anomaly, that's not from a |
|
|
19:28 | . Well, I guess there's there's mountains there, but it's also |
|
|
19:31 | you know, there's a mantle plume which is really hot and it's going |
|
|
19:34 | be low density. So that's kind a complicated area. But the Himalayas |
|
|
19:39 | deeply rooted and other mountainous areas. can see and then where the mantel's |
|
|
19:44 | up our big broad hotspots, broad hot spots. They're big, |
|
|
19:50 | , high, high amplitude of gravity areas. Okay. So we can |
|
|
19:56 | at this with the plate boundaries in and this is not me. This |
|
|
20:01 | peter bird, he's the famous I'm not the famous one. Um |
|
|
20:08 | the gravity down these are gray And then and then there's a kind |
|
|
20:13 | a yellow shade on top of that the continental areas. So this just |
|
|
20:17 | you all the plate boundaries, you ? So this is the this is |
|
|
20:22 | south american plate right here. It the continent and it's part of the |
|
|
20:28 | atlantic ocean. The african plate includes this stuff. Right? So in |
|
|
20:35 | in the, I guess where the plate, the antarctic plate down here |
|
|
20:40 | the pacific plate out here. This the Nazca plate, This is the |
|
|
20:44 | plate. The juan de Fuca Is this little tiny one up |
|
|
20:49 | Um Yeah. And then there's a of, there's a bunch of the |
|
|
20:54 | sea plate here, there's a bunch them over here. It's just a |
|
|
20:58 | a real mess over there. well, you can also, I |
|
|
21:03 | , you can download all these shape from here, but here's just color |
|
|
21:08 | the plate. Different plates here. you can see from gravity and then |
|
|
21:14 | color filled. So what is a plate? Tectonic plate includes the crust |
|
|
21:23 | lift this fear or the upper mantle we say. Um And the little |
|
|
21:30 | Tennessee, they have 70 kilometers That's okay, I guess. But |
|
|
21:34 | little sphere tends to be about 80 or minus 10, I reckon kilometers |
|
|
21:41 | beneath ocean basins. And it can it ranges from 100 250 even over |
|
|
21:48 | kilometers thick beneath continents. So those little spherical plates. Sometimes folks |
|
|
21:56 | get a little confused or they forget they start thinking it's just a |
|
|
22:02 | just just the uh just the crystal crust that is what's breaking apart and |
|
|
22:10 | around and abducting stuff. No, the crust and the upper mantle. |
|
|
22:16 | it's very important to understand that because that's what plate tectonic theory is. |
|
|
22:21 | says that the earth is capped by sphere plates that are in relative motion |
|
|
22:28 | each other and that those plates are along their boundaries and longer boundaries is |
|
|
22:38 | of a term of art, I . I mean basically the deformation can |
|
|
22:45 | typically arranges for hundreds of kilometers. can be more, but you |
|
|
22:51 | not like more than whatever, 600 something like that. Well, if |
|
|
22:57 | count both sides, it can be of yeah, maybe 800, maybe |
|
|
23:04 | if you include both plates. Right, so that's how it |
|
|
23:10 | That's how plate tectonics works. So is, here is um there's three |
|
|
23:16 | of boundaries of course there's divergent there's convergent boundaries and then there's translational |
|
|
23:22 | , right? So here's an example a divergent boundary. Here's the status |
|
|
23:28 | , here's the litmus fair, there's crust and lower crust and this is |
|
|
23:32 | , this is a this is a of sea floor spreading center. They're |
|
|
23:38 | always ridges. I typically like to , spreading center because sometimes their depression |
|
|
23:44 | in this example, sometimes they are and their higher. But you |
|
|
23:49 | so you have in this little rift . In fact this is this is |
|
|
23:54 | I'm sorry, this is not this is a continent. But but |
|
|
23:58 | any case, the idea is that you break a content apart, you |
|
|
24:02 | , you cause a rift basin and mantle up wells and you you |
|
|
24:08 | you know, lower crust upper I'm sorry, this is a mid |
|
|
24:15 | . My bad. I just I read my I should have made my |
|
|
24:20 | . Yeah, so this is so is layer two which are basalt, |
|
|
24:25 | dykes. And layer three we typically are the gap grows and go |
|
|
24:31 | rocks are in lower crust beneath the and oceans. And then they have |
|
|
24:37 | pillow lava in here that they put were which were produced which were created |
|
|
24:43 | the the salt first erupted it and into contact with the ocean, ocean |
|
|
24:50 | , sea water. And then the sphere gets pretty thin by the time |
|
|
24:54 | get to a sea floor spreading But at the spreading center, the |
|
|
25:01 | is that once you start producing ocean , as I said earlier, rifting |
|
|
25:07 | and at the spreading center as the basin opens. The little sphere |
|
|
25:13 | you know, supposed to be zero , the crust and atmosphere are |
|
|
25:17 | Think. Okay, so we can at an example of diversion boundary at |
|
|
25:27 | at an incipient diversion boundary. So this is the east african rift, |
|
|
25:32 | is it's still a rift. It's a plate boundary, but it's very |
|
|
25:38 | . You can see that there are rifts strings, if you like that |
|
|
25:45 | off of this. It's just this zone here. This whole zone here |
|
|
25:50 | a rift zone and you can see probably on the order of 1000 kilometers |
|
|
25:55 | , but it's to both sides of plate boundary. Okay, so we're |
|
|
25:59 | down here at this very um this of this rich strand that extends out |
|
|
26:05 | in the Okavango rift and here's a image of it. And you can |
|
|
26:10 | it's kind of like it looks like kind of asymmetric with a steep side |
|
|
26:15 | and kind of a shallow side And there's some really beautiful magnetic data |
|
|
26:25 | this over this rift area. So is the first vertical derivative. So |
|
|
26:30 | what does that do? It kind just squeezes anomalies. It just makes |
|
|
26:34 | sharper. Right. And what's C. B. I mean, |
|
|
26:40 | is the first one is also the vertical derivative. Okay, and you |
|
|
26:45 | several cross sections here, but but at the data. Okay, what |
|
|
26:49 | you noticing in the data first of , you see that there's a bunch |
|
|
26:53 | features that kind of track along these boundaries. And especially down here. |
|
|
26:58 | we're going to show a map of and what these are. These are |
|
|
27:02 | folds of the rocks. And in , this is this figure to the |
|
|
27:08 | . You can zoom in. And course you have these these cross cutting |
|
|
27:13 | here. Well, these are dikes are actually older than the present day |
|
|
27:19 | . And if you look closely at map here, you can see |
|
|
27:23 | You can see it in here. the rift is down. How do |
|
|
27:27 | know that? We'll look at these . They're very short sharp wavelengths and |
|
|
27:32 | of a sudden things kind of smooth in this zone here. Right? |
|
|
27:37 | then these are actually, I think estimates to the base. I think |
|
|
27:42 | I think that's what these are. haven't, I haven't had my |
|
|
27:51 | Um Oh yeah. It says the showed the depth and meters to the |
|
|
28:01 | of the dikes obtained from the three . Euler. Right? Yeah, |
|
|
28:05 | you. Thank you. Yeah. these are depth estimates. So it's |
|
|
28:09 | it's down about 400 m on that to well, 200 to 600 |
|
|
28:16 | about a couple 100 m. It's down. But you can see it |
|
|
28:20 | the data. It's smoother. You . Can you see what I'm talking |
|
|
28:24 | here? Yes. Mm hmm. that's that's a very beautiful man. |
|
|
28:30 | if we look at this other area here, these are the folds that |
|
|
28:35 | was talking about that. I I mean, it's just beautiful. |
|
|
28:41 | show the the, you know, they're sort of plunging and then the |
|
|
28:45 | of where they have some fault geometries here as well. Too much the |
|
|
28:49 | basement taxes, what did they look ? Phones And then there's a they |
|
|
28:54 | there's a fault that goes through here then on the right here, |
|
|
29:01 | this is let's see a to a . So that's up here. So |
|
|
29:05 | we're gonna look up here at this section and that's a that's also got |
|
|
29:10 | data. That's what you're looking at . So this is the miller |
|
|
29:14 | And you can see that the basin pretty shallow basin, but it has |
|
|
29:22 | high that's running right straight through it . What does that look like up |
|
|
29:26 | ? Um, there's the correlating magnetic as well. So, you have |
|
|
29:36 | hi that's produced by, that produces gravity anomaly as well as a magnetic |
|
|
29:43 | . So, I think this this probably a reasonable idea. It's a |
|
|
29:48 | basin. So you have the broad of the basin here. And what |
|
|
29:54 | this remind you of? I showed of something else. What does this |
|
|
29:57 | remind you of for gravity. I remember, but I don't remember |
|
|
30:09 | it was, where the top the dome is uh is above the crossover |
|
|
30:18 | where it's more dense than the sediments it that same shape. But in |
|
|
30:24 | case, because this is all this a rift basin and it's all crystal |
|
|
30:29 | down here. You have to assume there's some higher density feature. And |
|
|
30:35 | saying it's a it's a it's basically composition thing. And I tend to |
|
|
30:41 | . And the reason is because it's a gravity anomaly and a magnetic |
|
|
30:48 | Does that make sense? Yes. here's a little, just a little |
|
|
30:55 | of a rift basin and some really magnetic data, gravity data is |
|
|
31:02 | I guess. Um uh that's something write home about. I mean, |
|
|
31:06 | probably better than open file. This real data. It looks like real |
|
|
31:10 | . Um So yeah, okay, convergent markets, another, you |
|
|
31:17 | another kind of plate tectonic boundary. of course, you know, convergent |
|
|
31:25 | are a bit more messy. I mean, the thing about riffs |
|
|
31:30 | ocean spreading centers is, is um, is that it's kind of |
|
|
31:36 | everything's opened up and laid bare for to examine, right? Whereas in |
|
|
31:41 | margins you got stuff just piled up top of everything. So everything is |
|
|
31:45 | up together. They're really more but there, I mean, passing |
|
|
31:50 | and foreland basins are the biggest producing on the planet. So they are |
|
|
31:55 | basins. But for me what you , of course, if you have |
|
|
32:00 | in this case it's an ocean ocean zone. When you hear people say |
|
|
32:10 | , they're talking about continent, continent , oceans don't collide, they just |
|
|
32:16 | ducked beneath them. So that's kind a yeah. So anyways, the |
|
|
32:22 | litmus fears, you know, plunging this edge of this continental crust up |
|
|
32:28 | in with this fear. And of it, you know, it starts |
|
|
32:33 | melt and there's decompression melting and you a bunch of magnets probably will create |
|
|
32:39 | sort of magmatic arc. Now this ocean ocean, it would be like |
|
|
32:43 | island art, but in this case would be, you know, like |
|
|
32:47 | like the sierra Nevada or the or , you know, the Dean, |
|
|
32:58 | like statistics taking me out. But but you know, from Mount Adams |
|
|
33:06 | rainier and uh hood and uh um those those that mountain range in northwestern |
|
|
33:17 | and and into the Canadian rockies in case. Right? So these are |
|
|
33:24 | mountain range. And then just um of that are foreland basins. |
|
|
33:29 | So they form their typically asymmetric with deepest part, right, right near |
|
|
33:34 | foothills. And then outboard is typically we call four arc basins for land |
|
|
33:41 | arc. And then and then of between them and actually ocean florida is |
|
|
33:47 | often a trench and that might be with sentiments called discretionary with wedge. |
|
|
33:54 | yeah, that's that's the sort of tectonics of it and here's here's a |
|
|
34:01 | example of that. So this is the in the Andes in um Chilean |
|
|
34:07 | they call them. And The contours the Chilean Pompeian flat slab. So |
|
|
34:16 | subduction slab is okay, here's where trenches and it's supposed to be 7500 |
|
|
34:23 | to 110, km deep. It's to sort of flatten out right |
|
|
34:30 | That's what these guys are talking about . And then there's a two D |
|
|
34:34 | model between these red tick marks and of course there's some map structures |
|
|
34:39 | some some thrust right so the thrust plunging or dipping to the west beneath |
|
|
34:48 | these other ranges. Now the Precor ra it's also called the korean |
|
|
34:55 | Um This is actually some terrain that with with where we're sitting right now |
|
|
35:05 | uh part of Southern Lawrence to part north America beneath um between us and |
|
|
35:19 | , you know florida or Mississippi and . This is a bit and it's |
|
|
35:26 | well studied. This actually came from . You'll see what I'm talking about |
|
|
35:29 | a minute. Okay so we can at that profile, it's fairly |
|
|
35:35 | So here's the koinonia, the Precor as I said and then there's this |
|
|
35:39 | Pompeo now the subduction along the western of south America has been going on |
|
|
35:49 | a very very long time. Um think the the campaign or a jini |
|
|
35:59 | is it in here was, yeah it was carbon difference. And then |
|
|
36:11 | is that right? And no no that's not right. It was older |
|
|
36:14 | that. But in any case you see that there have been successive or |
|
|
36:20 | events and pre cordelia. That was when chile and uh was was basically |
|
|
36:32 | up along the southern coast of north . Okay. And then later during |
|
|
36:39 | guns want and and when like Patagonia in the south America. That's when |
|
|
36:47 | this stuff happened. So yeah. anyways they have interpreted they took some |
|
|
36:53 | but you know there's I guess there's guess there's some earthquake activity here. |
|
|
36:57 | what this stuff is. And um see what they did with that. |
|
|
37:03 | the bottom profile is gravity as well so much the other models, we've |
|
|
37:10 | looking at the tapas, Magnetics, lines are observed data which is the |
|
|
37:17 | sometimes you see it the other way but it's typically dotted lines and the |
|
|
37:21 | is that they're supposed to represent stations ? And then the model response, |
|
|
37:26 | gravity and Magnetics and um the thing bugs me. Okay they have put |
|
|
37:34 | some densities here but not all of . Um But yeah they have put |
|
|
37:42 | some densities. The queenie is lower compared to the other ones. And |
|
|
37:46 | what's producing this low through here. have a little base in here and |
|
|
37:53 | a lot of these things seem to topographic though. But now this is |
|
|
37:59 | . So this is definitely this has be bouquet I think I land and |
|
|
38:04 | here's yeah there they have been you they've got to be putting in a |
|
|
38:10 | of different sort of magnetization. But it looks okay. Now if you |
|
|
38:15 | at those on the maps on the is magnetic data. And that's really |
|
|
38:19 | magnetic data on the right is gravity but it says vertical gradient but I'm |
|
|
38:26 | sure what the source is. It a little suspicious to me. But |
|
|
38:30 | any case you can see those structures they map on the first map. |
|
|
38:34 | can see those in here and you see that there are correlations little bit |
|
|
38:40 | on the gravity side. But that's a pretty interesting stuff. Um |
|
|
38:47 | let's talk about transform boundaries and we're familiar with the oceanic transform boundaries right |
|
|
38:54 | you're connecting to spreading centers. So is the transform the active part in |
|
|
38:59 | off axis. As I said the fracture zones, they are not |
|
|
39:03 | , right? But some transform boundaries penetrate through continental crust. There aren't |
|
|
39:11 | lot of them. Um Most transformed bonder Zarin spread our ocean basins that |
|
|
39:19 | spreading centers but there are a The san Andreas is one of the |
|
|
39:23 | ones. There's also the Anatolian the Anatolian fault which which basically traverses all |
|
|
39:30 | northern Turkey and uh and through Greece it still is still forming, it's |
|
|
39:40 | connect, you know, it's going connect into the mediterranean, there's a |
|
|
39:46 | south Anatolian segment south of Turkey and connects up with the dead sea fault |
|
|
39:52 | is another transform. And then the really famous one is the alpine fault |
|
|
39:57 | goes through the northern and southern islands New Zealand. And that actually connects |
|
|
40:03 | subduction zones of opposite polarity. So pretty hairy what's going on down |
|
|
40:08 | But we're gonna look at that, gonna look at this area here in |
|
|
40:13 | . The northern part of the san . Um SAn Andreas comes up here |
|
|
40:18 | then there's all these other faults that off these. Remember the edges, |
|
|
40:24 | of the plates are deformed and it out they're even deformed under, |
|
|
40:28 | Quite often, you'll see people draw boundaries through continents as a single line |
|
|
40:35 | that's just not the way it These transform plate boundary, all the |
|
|
40:39 | I mentioned, There's a handful of ones but they all produce broad zones |
|
|
40:45 | discrimination. I mean think about this the atmosphere here is over 100 |
|
|
40:50 | thick. So and that's like two going past each other. So you |
|
|
40:55 | the deformation what's going on. There to be really crazy to offset 200 |
|
|
41:03 | or 110 km or whatever it is of. Let this fear. So |
|
|
41:09 | are all related to the san. boundary transform boundary but they are in |
|
|
41:15 | deformation zone. Right? So let's at those. So here is the |
|
|
41:19 | map and they're basically draping these colors top of the topography just to show |
|
|
41:25 | there's a lot of interesting features So there are the white dots are |
|
|
41:32 | thoughts from gravity data inferred faults and I guess this famous Petaluma fault which |
|
|
41:40 | this gray fault right here and then and there's a bunch of exploration wells |
|
|
41:46 | are you see these circles that I'm it there appear there there are more |
|
|
41:52 | more. There's gotta be more. can't see them all. Yeah here's |
|
|
41:57 | here's 1 is 3341234. Probably find of hysteria. Well let's look at |
|
|
42:06 | let's look at the gravity. This static gravity contoured at 2.5 million |
|
|
42:13 | So this is pretty I mean it's good data to contour that that |
|
|
42:18 | But I mean you know it's a , I'm not sure what that |
|
|
42:22 | I mean it means that it means took out some regional that correlated with |
|
|
42:29 | . That's what that means. But really don't know much more about it |
|
|
42:32 | that. And I guess there's details the in the paper. Um Right |
|
|
42:39 | this is why they're inferring these faults these data line because it's all these |
|
|
42:43 | gradients in this data. So I disagree with that at all. Um |
|
|
42:49 | like there's some other things going on in general you have this broad high |
|
|
42:56 | but then there's like this this kind a low region so there may be |
|
|
43:01 | component of dip along with this this sort of defamation. And remember I |
|
|
43:06 | the SAn Andreas is out here. so let's look at the MAG data |
|
|
43:14 | the mandated. Um So one thing might notice when you compare gravitated to |
|
|
43:20 | data, gravity data always looks like a little smoother than magnetic data. |
|
|
43:25 | the reason for that is because the data are mono polar gravity All put |
|
|
43:32 | gravity points to the center of the wherever you're at. Whereas magnetic data |
|
|
43:37 | die polar. So remember our anomaly that from in the northern hemisphere southern |
|
|
43:44 | there where the where that phase shift from a peak at the pole to |
|
|
43:50 | low with the equator in between. have a pair of anomalies. That |
|
|
43:55 | of means you have two anomalies for you might have one another gravity. |
|
|
44:02 | that's why magnetic data typically looks like just got more more detail is because |
|
|
44:09 | got two for one you got you you got high low pairs in |
|
|
44:14 | Now I don't know I think this be our T. P. I |
|
|
44:18 | I imagine it is but here they those gravity falls black dots instead of |
|
|
44:25 | dots But again everything else is the san Andreas is down here and there's |
|
|
44:31 | lot of correlation. I mean you you know I mean there's there's a |
|
|
44:34 | of detail here that they're you know mean it's one of those things like |
|
|
44:39 | said you could spend a lifetime looking this data but it's really nice because |
|
|
44:44 | see that this shape here from the this bit here really can be you |
|
|
44:52 | looks a lot like this area here this is another area where it's low |
|
|
44:56 | yellow. And so that's interesting. let's look at these wavelengths. I |
|
|
45:01 | you have a broad low here but you have some stuff superimposed on |
|
|
45:06 | So there may be some shell What does the gravity look like? |
|
|
45:11 | uh I don't know I mean there two things that I think of when |
|
|
45:15 | look at this I think that. it smooth because it's just deep or |
|
|
45:20 | it smooth because there's just no And my sense is that there's no |
|
|
45:25 | . It's just just it just gives that feel maybe. I know but |
|
|
45:31 | sure looks. It sure looks suspiciously . And same with the mag. |
|
|
45:39 | they probably just don't have data over but there are some very short wavelengths |
|
|
45:46 | here so that stuff is really shallow then you have you know you have |
|
|
45:51 | longer wavelengths like down in here um here things are smoothing out this is |
|
|
45:57 | low low longer wavelength. A little . So this down and then down |
|
|
46:02 | as well so it looks like basement are going up and down up and |
|
|
46:08 | . Um There's sort of in the of these inferred faults look like you're |
|
|
46:15 | gonna have some transgression, right? tension. So it's very fascinating |
|
|
46:24 | What's next year? Okay. So is there any questions about any |
|
|
46:28 | these uh my my little sort of bag centric view of plate tectonic |
|
|
46:39 | No, not yet. I like . Okay. You are you do |
|
|
46:43 | like you enjoy this material? I do. I was like like once |
|
|
46:47 | figured out what this class was I was excited. Oh really? |
|
|
46:52 | good. Alright so we looked at tectonics but there's a bigger story and |
|
|
47:03 | and it's uh the supercontinent cycle, does this stuff work? Okay. |
|
|
47:07 | mean think about it if we accept idea that the earth is kept by |
|
|
47:14 | Pittsburgh places that are moving around? sort of begs the question, when |
|
|
47:18 | this stuff start? I mean, know I mean Earth was created 4.5 |
|
|
47:22 | years ago. Did the plate tectonics right then? Or was it later |
|
|
47:27 | ? People think plates plates started I was talking to some guys at |
|
|
47:33 | A. G. U. Um last month. In in in |
|
|
47:43 | And one guy, one guy said he thought plates started. They found |
|
|
47:50 | what did they say? They found material. The first continents formed Like |
|
|
47:58 | Wanna say 4.2 just You know not 300 million years after the Earth |
|
|
48:08 | Which is amazing to me. But people think the consensus of the you |
|
|
48:14 | the folks who worry about this they think that plate tectonics started about |
|
|
48:20 | gigi years. So so having continental forming, you know, half a |
|
|
48:28 | years. I mean I mean after earth form, you know for four |
|
|
48:39 | 4.2 or whatever it is. I That sort of works because I mean |
|
|
48:45 | if plate tectonics started 3.2 you had have the plates, plates had to |
|
|
48:49 | there first before they can start moving . So that sort of makes |
|
|
48:54 | That's pretty fascinating stuff. Um Yeah J. 2's O. Wilson, |
|
|
49:02 | Canadian geologist, he was actually anti tectonics initially. But once he once |
|
|
49:10 | was given enough data he accepted it bore. He was on, you |
|
|
49:17 | , he was on the train and was the first one of the first |
|
|
49:21 | to suggest this idea that that the know that there are these continental cycles |
|
|
49:29 | you know the continental fragments crustal you , they collide and produce these big |
|
|
49:37 | continents, then they break up and was called the Wilson cycle. And |
|
|
49:45 | there's a group of folks that they like that, that moniker they want |
|
|
49:50 | call it super kind of site. not really have a dog in that |
|
|
49:54 | . I mean some of those they claim that Wilson wasn't really talking |
|
|
49:58 | supercontinent cycles. He was talking about the central atlantic. That's actually not |
|
|
50:03 | if you read his papers. But , it doesn't matter. I call |
|
|
50:08 | super kind of cycles mostly because it's descriptive of the process. Okay. |
|
|
50:15 | we'll talk to the cycles sometimes. will use them interchangeably sometimes, but |
|
|
50:19 | really I think of them super kind cycle is probably more precise. So |
|
|
50:24 | there's the opening phase and the closing . Right? So the opening is |
|
|
50:29 | you have riffs and passive marks, ocean basins, which is what we're |
|
|
50:33 | to talk about this afternoon. And next saturday we're gonna talk about convergent |
|
|
50:40 | , which is the closing phase. that's kind of like how it |
|
|
50:44 | And this and this little circle here the same thing. You have |
|
|
50:48 | you know, you have a right? You have a collision and |
|
|
50:52 | um you know, it's kind of , it's smoothed over, it's eroded |
|
|
50:57 | it's just quote stable creatine and you rifting and it produces these passive |
|
|
51:03 | you have an ocean basin. And one of these ocean basins might start |
|
|
51:08 | get consumed by some plate reorganization. then as those as this ocean |
|
|
51:16 | you know, it gets smaller and , you have another inclusion but being |
|
|
51:21 | cycle starts over. So that's the . Um Right more more more pictures |
|
|
51:28 | the internet they showed. But these really nice pictures. So that's why |
|
|
51:33 | don't even know if this this website active anymore. But yeah, stable |
|
|
51:41 | , rift, rift, rift, margin ocean basin basin gets consumed. |
|
|
51:48 | here in this case there's an arc collides first. So this would be |
|
|
51:51 | an island arcs ocean basin, their basin there. And this is an |
|
|
51:56 | arctic that collides does collide. it does, I guess. But |
|
|
52:02 | then then Then you have a continent collision. So in this case |
|
|
52:07 | have two little slabs down here, beneath the created arc, the one |
|
|
52:14 | beneath the the created continental fragment So that's the idea. And then |
|
|
52:21 | we can zoom in on that last . You can see this is my |
|
|
52:25 | . It's a really complicated because it's a melange of, you know, |
|
|
52:31 | that are, you know, four years old. Now, what's regard |
|
|
52:38 | that dating? The oldest, So there's four eons through geologic time, |
|
|
52:45 | oldest ones Haiti in and then K. And then produce work and |
|
|
52:49 | the present day one fan fan goes , you know, to the beginning |
|
|
52:54 | the Cambrian time, Which is 5:35 30 to the present day. |
|
|
53:00 | M. A. Protozoa Eon includes neo protozoa era. Okay, santa's |
|
|
53:09 | is an error is an error. an error. The protozoa eon includes |
|
|
53:15 | new protozoa era. The meso protozoa and the patio protozoa error And it |
|
|
53:23 | from 5:30 to M. A. to 2 1/2 digging. So it's |
|
|
53:32 | two billion. The protozoa Ian is times the, the tenure or the |
|
|
53:41 | span for fans of IAN and the Goes from 2500 million years, |
|
|
53:50 | 4 billion gigi years. So that's little bit shorter than protozoa by half |
|
|
53:57 | billion years. And then The boundary Haiti in and arche in that moves |
|
|
54:05 | a little bit. It used to 3.85. Now it's four. And |
|
|
54:10 | moves it around is is the rocks the only evidence of rocks we have |
|
|
54:17 | Haiti in time, we are allowed have in Haiti time are just |
|
|
54:23 | you know uh that they find in rocks. Zircons if you don't |
|
|
54:29 | are just this really indestructible mineral That can find that lasts forever. And |
|
|
54:37 | and it can be imprinted, you with its you know, whatever its |
|
|
54:44 | going back into, I don't I think they found some archives that |
|
|
54:49 | like 4.4 which is really remarkable, in any case They see 3.85 were |
|
|
55:00 | oldest rocks they found, I rocks not just minerals and those were |
|
|
55:06 | Greenland, I believe, maybe in Canada. But then, uh but |
|
|
55:13 | the had Ian, but then they some rocks that were four billion. |
|
|
55:18 | then they moved to Haiti in boundary four because that's the age of the |
|
|
55:23 | rocks. That's the idea. So in goes from four billion to |
|
|
55:28 | 44.5. So in any case the crush, it's just Milan's just sort |
|
|
55:35 | complicated uh crust that's floating around that bits of crust going back to four |
|
|
55:43 | years old. So it's very And here's here's here's a map that |
|
|
55:50 | created by paul, Hoffman, another Canadian geologist for north America. And |
|
|
55:59 | has our key and rocks in All these Wyoming superior slave ray Harn |
|
|
56:05 | the trans Hudson or genic belt through , uh toss them. These are |
|
|
56:11 | our key and rocks and then all here are a bunch of proto resort |
|
|
56:18 | terrain, the Iava pie. The called granite rye lights in here at |
|
|
56:23 | Grenville. And these these are all rocks juvenile in the in the world |
|
|
56:32 | this stuff. Um juvenile litmus juvenile crust is crust that was created |
|
|
56:40 | mantle plumes like large in these provinces crust that was or island arcs in |
|
|
56:49 | words that were produced over ocean ocean . So in other words, juvenile |
|
|
56:57 | doesn't have any, is not so to speak, by any continental |
|
|
57:04 | . So in other words, you're gonna find juvenile crossed with our key |
|
|
57:08 | rocks in because well, you might might maybe parts of the charleston, |
|
|
57:15 | in any case it's a compositional thing it means that there there aren't any |
|
|
57:21 | rocks in there. It's all But now all of these protozoa trains |
|
|
57:28 | intruded by tons and tons and lots lots of granite. But you can |
|
|
57:33 | granted this is going back to your geology days, but you can get |
|
|
57:38 | out of a mythic melt. Bowen's steers, right? So that's how |
|
|
57:43 | works. But this is really complicated . And it's really I mean, |
|
|
57:47 | just really interesting to me this So here's a geologic map of Canada |
|
|
57:54 | it shows the trans Hudson or tho Hudson and it shows, you |
|
|
58:01 | superior crate in the slave, what just looking at. And I can't |
|
|
58:06 | can't get this thing, I can't out what its coordinate system is because |
|
|
58:10 | wanted to stretch it on top of data. I can't do it. |
|
|
58:13 | can't make it look very good. we just have to let eyeball in |
|
|
58:17 | . But here's here is um gravity . Tell me what kind of gravity |
|
|
58:25 | this is. Is it free Is it bouquet. But wait, |
|
|
58:32 | says it right down here, I'm , I should take that up before |
|
|
58:35 | ask a question anyways, is there anomalies. Okay, let me ask |
|
|
58:40 | this thing if these are, How I know that? I mean, |
|
|
58:44 | know just by looking at it, what tells me that these are ones |
|
|
58:51 | did this yesterday isn't it was like topography you're saying because it looks like |
|
|
59:00 | , not a lot of topography going . No that's not it. Got |
|
|
59:06 | backwards. Free air is dominated by . Right, because topography is the |
|
|
59:13 | density contrast. That's the second biggest contrast bingo. Well done. So |
|
|
59:22 | at this, you have ocean floor in the labrador sea and you have |
|
|
59:26 | Canadian rockies and you know, going into the U. S. Rockies |
|
|
59:32 | here. So these are mountains which going to be routed in the upper |
|
|
59:38 | . There's some Appalachians over here and this is where there's an ocean |
|
|
59:42 | The mantle is coming up and up here into baffin bay. So what's |
|
|
59:51 | , you have the mojo, the is thin here. Across the stick |
|
|
59:56 | , cross the sticker here. So map is dominated by the base of |
|
|
60:02 | crust. You can see it's just the crust is thinner. You |
|
|
60:08 | the long wavelength component of anomalies boogie is a proxy for crustal thickness you |
|
|
60:20 | that? Yes. Okay, So let's let's look here, we |
|
|
60:30 | certainly see some of the features on . Right. We can certainly see |
|
|
60:36 | of these features. Uh these train in here. But this kind of |
|
|
60:41 | by this by this we need to a residual of that. So here's |
|
|
60:46 | 20 km over continuation of the blue . And now we're a lot of |
|
|
60:52 | are really much better defined. Lots nice features in here. Uh anomalies |
|
|
61:01 | are probably tracking little terrain boundaries. are probably structural. Some are, |
|
|
61:07 | might not be the only way you do that. How would you figure |
|
|
61:10 | out? How would you figure out something in here was these anomalies were |
|
|
61:14 | by structure or compositional change? What you do? What would you would |
|
|
61:24 | your approach to try to sort that ? Um it would strengthen his compositional |
|
|
61:37 | has something to do with the anomalies . Um What you would do is |
|
|
61:45 | would model it up, you would your control any control, you have |
|
|
61:51 | , you have reflection data or refraction or well controlled or outcrop data. |
|
|
61:57 | someone, you know, maybe there's in the literature with some maps and |
|
|
62:01 | some, you know, some geologic section or whatever. You get all |
|
|
62:05 | stuff together in a big pile and sort through that and then you would |
|
|
62:10 | some models to test some of those and you would think and you |
|
|
62:14 | you know, you would be able sort out what you think are |
|
|
62:20 | which you think are compositional and those you don't know right? You also |
|
|
62:24 | the control, you don't have you know um But that's what you |
|
|
62:29 | do. You would you would model up, you could you and then |
|
|
62:33 | those models you might make a couple cross sections, then you might look |
|
|
62:37 | a map, you might make some of it, some residuals, some |
|
|
62:41 | or whatever. And you might try connect features from one cross section together |
|
|
62:47 | . And you would begin to sort develop a story or or your own |
|
|
62:55 | of how the thing what what all distributions of uh compositional changes the distribution |
|
|
63:03 | structures. And then once you do then you can start to infer the |
|
|
63:09 | , How did this thing happen? you know, how did it |
|
|
63:12 | What's what's going on here? So mean you might you're gonna have walking |
|
|
63:17 | it, you're going to have an like right over here it's a Western |
|
|
63:19 | basin. So you know, it's four land basin. So you know |
|
|
63:23 | you know the sort of the processes underpin that that basic formation and then |
|
|
63:30 | like I said you collect some control and whatever, you can if you |
|
|
63:36 | none, you have none. You still make a model but it's just |
|
|
63:38 | as well defined, but you can make a model, you can still |
|
|
63:41 | some some influences from that. so alright now here's the mag and |
|
|
63:49 | mag again look, it looks like twice as many anomalies because there is |
|
|
63:55 | is total field. It's not residual don't like to really residual eyes magnetic |
|
|
64:00 | but sometimes it's useful. So here's here's the Canadian rockies. Look at |
|
|
64:07 | short wavelength anomalies and look at how magnetic anomalies here sort of get broader |
|
|
64:13 | you go into there. So it's into the basin. Here's some sea |
|
|
64:17 | spreading anomalies over the labrador sea. you can definitely see a bunch of |
|
|
64:24 | boundaries in here. Remember remember I you that pitfall about in the gulf |
|
|
64:30 | Mexico where where we looked at and saw that uh you know that big |
|
|
64:38 | up food manic anomalies couldn't be structured they would just have throws. It |
|
|
64:43 | be unreasonable. Same thing here, got really high aptitude magnetic anomalies and |
|
|
64:52 | must be compositional. So these are related to all sorts of terrain not |
|
|
64:58 | on this map but also in other . But look at it like this |
|
|
65:02 | feature right here. This purple It's right here. It's just blue |
|
|
65:07 | blue just means what it just It's reverse lee polarized doesn't mean it's |
|
|
65:12 | low and then you have this that's slave Cragin. It's right there. |
|
|
65:17 | mean that's like bang, it's easy see that, you know, and |
|
|
65:23 | this wraps around the superior crate You can see how all these shapes |
|
|
65:28 | . So you see this shape for . That's that's this shape right in |
|
|
65:35 | . You see that? I wish could have I can't figure I want |
|
|
65:42 | cotton picking projection of that map I like it but I might have |
|
|
65:48 | do something else. Okay so let's down further south and in uh whatever |
|
|
66:00 | is Georgia and um most mostly Georgia Alabama as well. And into this |
|
|
66:14 | is the this is terrain this is we're part of the Appalachian collision. |
|
|
66:20 | ? So there's the piedmont here and there's the pine mountain that's where there's |
|
|
66:25 | basement. So that's um uh pretty studied area. And then of course |
|
|
66:31 | is the tough terrain. And then fault here called the liga liga fault |
|
|
66:39 | goes through here. Well we could can stretch that map over some uh |
|
|
66:48 | anomalies in particular. Our old friend tilt derivative. Remember this is kind |
|
|
66:53 | like an A. G. Everything's got the same amplitude and you |
|
|
66:57 | see how uh these terrain boundaries actually up pretty nice. There's a lot |
|
|
67:03 | things going on in here and in looking at this this derivative, this |
|
|
67:12 | is really rich. I mean it's so much detail and the pine mountain |
|
|
67:17 | see it's just low just sits down . I don't know. Um |
|
|
67:27 | Anyways yeah maybe it's this little sliver here but it certainly looks like there's |
|
|
67:36 | offset that looks the same or it similar to it. This is the |
|
|
67:43 | terrain. All of this is, any case this is kind of a |
|
|
67:49 | , a fun exercise, a fun of looking at these anomalies and how |
|
|
67:54 | can map terrain with them. so um let's just go back in |
|
|
68:02 | . We'll start with Pangea. So reconstruct that and here's kind of a |
|
|
68:07 | of it Madagascar and the Seychelles. go right in here and here's the |
|
|
68:13 | history. So north America was the to break up right here and it |
|
|
68:20 | the camp plume. There was a plume called Camp central atlantic magmatic |
|
|
68:26 | We don't really know where it I think the Bahamas are sitting on |
|
|
68:31 | of it, but that was the one and then it was shortly followed |
|
|
68:35 | um uh karoo which erupted down here south africa and that and that led |
|
|
68:43 | the break up of eastern Gondwana. eastern Gondwana is India Antarctica and Australia |
|
|
68:51 | Seychelles. This bit here, that's Gondwana. Western Gondwana is just africa |
|
|
68:56 | south America. So north America broke 1st 1 80 then eastern, then |
|
|
69:04 | Gondwana here broke it 1 70 then broke away from eastern Gondwana and it |
|
|
69:14 | sort of like left behind at 1 almost at the same time. South |
|
|
69:19 | began to break up. In fact already eruptions at about 1 35 of |
|
|
69:25 | da cunha which produced big flood basalt south America and africa right here and |
|
|
69:33 | about 100 million years and 100 million . M. A. Um Australia |
|
|
69:39 | apart from eastern from from eastern Then at 80 India and Seychelles broke |
|
|
69:53 | from Antarctica and jetted up, jetted to the north. Seychelles filed 20 |
|
|
70:00 | years after that and then Greenland, broke apart and produced the Labrador Sea |
|
|
70:06 | 53 and At 30 Arabia's. So don't have the North Atlantic in |
|
|
70:15 | I think the North Atlantic has got be. I should know that. |
|
|
70:20 | think it's I think it's in here or 100 I think I should know |
|
|
70:30 | . Oh wait a second. There's M. S. Up there. |
|
|
70:36 | yeah I should look at it. gonna make a note, make a |
|
|
70:41 | . Um Let's see one. I'll figure that out. I'll let |
|
|
71:10 | go. All right. Um Well can go back to Rhodesia Rhodesia was |
|
|
71:20 | supercontinent that uh preceded Lorenza. I that preceded. Okay and um so |
|
|
71:34 | see where this is early to right so this is rodeo nia here |
|
|
71:41 | you can see this is where chile chile was, right, this is |
|
|
71:44 | this is Hudson bay India. I south America was right here because this |
|
|
71:51 | western Gondwana and red eastern Gondwana and kind of turquoise color or just light |
|
|
71:59 | color and then Baltika which is europe was was right here. So don't |
|
|
72:09 | attention to this yellow thing. That's don't think that's right. And then |
|
|
72:12 | can go back a little bit further you can see how. Okay so |
|
|
72:16 | the la plata Amazonia Sao Francisco, cretins. These are all the Kalahari |
|
|
72:24 | , those are all right here and kind of outline south America but this |
|
|
72:28 | going back just before the collision to um claudia and the Siberia is over |
|
|
72:36 | is Siberia creighton. So this is back and just ignore that yellow |
|
|
72:44 | This is going back to early to neo proto resort and this is the |
|
|
72:49 | , this is right just before the time. And yeah I mean these |
|
|
72:55 | the the Oklahoma blockage and let me here do I have a map of |
|
|
73:00 | , I'll go back, let me go back here. So the Oklahoma |
|
|
73:05 | in sits right here and the Mississippi basement or real foot rift. It's |
|
|
73:15 | to the rough creek grabbing and then Rome trough. I'll sit here and |
|
|
73:21 | are all those are all Cambrian um are all Cambrian riffs. So right |
|
|
73:31 | the right after here these all these occurred in north America that we we |
|
|
73:37 | pretty, we really have a good so that the supercontinent that preceded Rhodesia |
|
|
73:45 | called nuna also called Columbia. It's also called other names as well. |
|
|
73:51 | and of course as you go back time, these things are less well |
|
|
73:56 | . And the, the folks that and worry about these things, you |
|
|
73:59 | , the debates are furious. Supercontinent Has really not been accepted until the |
|
|
74:09 | . So just 20 years ago. it's stuff we're still learning about. |
|
|
74:14 | really fascinating stuff. Um, but , here you have, let's |
|
|
74:20 | Let's see if we can find something looks familiar. So this says West |
|
|
74:24 | . It's Amazonia. Remember, here's superior crate town. So this |
|
|
74:31 | , this is Hudson Bay, right . That's superior. Here's Wyoming. |
|
|
74:36 | ends up ends up down here. our Iava pie. Oh, |
|
|
74:40 | never mind. This is correct. is on its side. So here's |
|
|
74:44 | Superior. There's the trans Hudson. ? So this is on its |
|
|
74:48 | you have a pie. My cell . Right? These were already already |
|
|
74:54 | to each other at this at this . So yeah. Um, |
|
|
75:08 | let me just, yeah. and then, um, This is |
|
|
75:16 | this is 1270. So that's It 1270. That's, that's still |
|
|
75:26 | I think it's still, I think still neo protozoa because I think it |
|
|
75:31 | back to 1600 I think. Got , hold on, let me look |
|
|
75:50 | . Oh, New Products are Yeah. Near Protocol goes back to |
|
|
76:09 | missile. Missile goes to 1600. this is in the medical protocol. |
|
|
76:16 | protest. Okay. So how do things, what's how does this |
|
|
76:22 | How does this stuff work? here's a nice table by Bradley or |
|
|
76:26 | nice chart rather. And it shows the super kind of, so even |
|
|
76:31 | luna or Columbia, depending on what like. There's also some people have |
|
|
76:38 | supercontinent called slavia or superior also uh . And um you know, and |
|
|
76:46 | here's the beginning of plate tectonics. what Bradley did he just correlated using |
|
|
76:54 | to try those zircons? He you know, their abundance as a |
|
|
77:02 | of time here. And you can there's peaks between the supercontinent. That |
|
|
77:07 | of makes sense because if it when broken apart, you're just gonna have |
|
|
77:11 | erosion. You're gonna have more passive because when they're all together there's |
|
|
77:16 | you know, you know, less for erosion. So yeah, so |
|
|
77:21 | have peaks between them due to more . And then you also have correlations |
|
|
77:30 | gran, it's as well as um are lower crustal, in other |
|
|
77:35 | there's there's more exposed lower crust because been drifted, right? There's a |
|
|
77:42 | of rifting going up. But what's idea? How does this stuff |
|
|
77:47 | Let me see what I got Yeah. What what they think. |
|
|
77:52 | not gonna test you on this. , I'll just tell you though what |
|
|
77:55 | think is that when the when the coalesce that super kinda it forms a |
|
|
78:02 | lid. Right. And then it heats up the mantle beneath it and |
|
|
78:09 | the mantle heats up beneath it. and and also the there's plates, |
|
|
78:15 | know, there's ocean oceanic plates abducting around it, right? So it's |
|
|
78:21 | it's a thermal lid but also there's pile of subduction of slabs beneath |
|
|
78:29 | And they use words like slab avalanche those slabs collect at the base of |
|
|
78:35 | of the mantle, you know, the top of the outer core. |
|
|
78:40 | they call that a slab graveyard. so so that they think that material |
|
|
78:48 | the fuel, it gets heated because the lid and it's the fuel that |
|
|
78:54 | a bunch of man up close, close if you will. And they |
|
|
79:00 | that those come up and those are break up the continents and then when |
|
|
79:04 | contents are all broken apart and everything's around, well everything cools down and |
|
|
79:11 | makes these, you know, and means that these fragments are going to |
|
|
79:16 | and crash into each other again and another supercontinent, which forms another mental |
|
|
79:22 | so that's the cycle. That's the what people say is the mechanism of |
|
|
79:26 | cycle, which is really very Okay. Any questions about plate tectonics |
|
|
79:34 | supercontinent cycles? Um No, I think so. Not yet. |
|
|
79:47 | so I've been Yeah, Marianne for an hour, why don't we take |
|
|
79:51 | little break and then reconvene um in 10 minutes or so something like |
|
|
79:58 | Okay. And I guess that means tell us here as well as |
|
|
80:07 | Okay, so no questions about plate or supercontinent cycles. You got that |
|
|
80:13 | ? 100%. I actually do have question. Right? Um So if |
|
|
80:19 | could go back to slide like 29 area um it made sense to me |
|
|
80:28 | other day, but for some reason I don't understand it today. Can |
|
|
80:32 | explain what you mean by like how can tell whether or not it's a |
|
|
80:35 | wavelength versus like a short wavelength because for me in my head it automatically |
|
|
80:41 | to like a crest and trough So I'm like having a problem like |
|
|
80:46 | that to like what I'm looking at far as like wavelengths are concerned. |
|
|
80:50 | that makes sense. Sure. okay, let's just look at this |
|
|
80:56 | bouquet in alleys. These these things tracing here, these are shorter wavelength |
|
|
81:02 | this broad low here. Right? . So that broad mold is a |
|
|
81:10 | . I mean if you can imagine profile across here, you got to |
|
|
81:13 | going from the high down to a and then back up again. |
|
|
81:19 | So that is a broad wavelength This is a broadway. This high |
|
|
81:25 | here, you can imagine a profile through here. It would go from |
|
|
81:28 | low to a high, right? when I say this broadway you're going |
|
|
81:35 | a high and then there's a low and then there's kind of a middle |
|
|
81:41 | , then a low here and then low here. These are these broad |
|
|
81:45 | of highs and lows are broad Just kind of envision a cross section |
|
|
81:52 | here profile that goes transect. This that make sense? So then when |
|
|
82:00 | check out those long wavelengths, all features they're here, they're just superimposed |
|
|
82:08 | top of this broad high and low . Which are just swamping the data |
|
|
82:12 | . So once we take out this low, just broad wavelength field, |
|
|
82:18 | flattens the data. As we basically all these features are on that |
|
|
82:24 | , they're just superimposed on that high low. Uh that broad wavelength |
|
|
82:30 | Does that make sense? Mhm. here has the long wavelength. Once |
|
|
82:37 | remove those, we end up, I said, we say flattening the |
|
|
82:43 | , you can flatten And even more you want to find five comin up |
|
|
82:47 | continuation, you wouldn't see like this through here. I mean it would |
|
|
82:53 | make it look, you know, would make it look like this mag |
|
|
82:56 | Almost just almost, you know, a bunch of short wavelengths on a |
|
|
83:01 | know. Okay, does that help doesn't help? So in a |
|
|
83:08 | So the colors are basically just referencing where the wavelengths are like hitting on |
|
|
83:14 | spectrum. Pretty much. Yeah. . Because I guess in my head |
|
|
83:21 | what I picture when you say like wavelength is like I'm actually picturing like |
|
|
83:25 | really long like wave, you just like a big old hump. |
|
|
83:30 | I'm just like I'm trying to break from that if that makes sense. |
|
|
83:34 | it makes sense. So I mean I I am very purposeful about the |
|
|
83:41 | I talk about these data because a of potential field, they always they |
|
|
83:47 | low, they say low frequency, ? Or high frequency, say what's |
|
|
83:54 | these features here. These are high analysis. This is a low frequency |
|
|
84:00 | I I prefer wavelength because these are data. They're not they're not a |
|
|
84:06 | series. They're not acquired in the domain. Right? So their spatial |
|
|
84:13 | , seismic data is is temporal It's a time series. Right? |
|
|
84:21 | I mean you can transform spatial anomalies the frequency domain of course and then |
|
|
84:29 | appropriate to talk about frequencies, but think it's I think too often and |
|
|
84:37 | , you know, you'll hear people high frequency now and they're not high |
|
|
84:41 | anomalies. There's short wavelength anomalous because not looking at a time series. |
|
|
84:46 | looking at a map in X and or lat and long. And so |
|
|
84:54 | that's what's throwing you off mike when keep calling it long wavelength. So |
|
|
85:00 | talking about spatial data. Not frequency . So. So what was |
|
|
85:06 | I showed that profile back here. was that at? What we should |
|
|
85:11 | at these? Look at this, mean this is look at this MAG |
|
|
85:15 | for example this MAG data has long components. There's a broad high |
|
|
85:21 | There's a broad load here. Another high down here. The broad low |
|
|
85:26 | here. Now superimposed on those broad and lows are shorter wavelength anomalies, |
|
|
85:33 | . Some very very short wave. mean super short wavelength anomalies in |
|
|
85:39 | And even like these linear features Right. But there's a there is |
|
|
85:44 | this map you can see that there broad highs and lows and then there |
|
|
85:48 | soups superimposed on those shorter wavelength Do you see that? Yes. |
|
|
85:54 | . Yeah, it's making it you're clarifying it very well. |
|
|
85:58 | So if you were to take a like going through here, you would |
|
|
86:02 | a broad high and abroad low. then you'd have all these other features |
|
|
86:06 | on top of that, on top that profile. So it would |
|
|
86:11 | so your your lobe your you go low to high to low. There's |
|
|
86:16 | there's your sort of gauzy in, know, your minimum curvature. I |
|
|
86:20 | you're not curvature, you're zero Phase . Right? It would be this |
|
|
86:27 | to high to low. Does that sense? And then and then maybe |
|
|
86:36 | that you know then anyways. So that's what I'm talking about that |
|
|
86:41 | have these broad wavelengths which are this I'm showing you here? Broad high |
|
|
86:46 | then superimposed on that you have these amounts and that's a really important |
|
|
86:53 | I'm really glad you asked me because is something that you really need to |
|
|
86:57 | when you look at these maps. remember as I said, long wavelengths |
|
|
87:02 | deep sources. Short wavelengths are shallow . Just like all geophysics or low |
|
|
87:08 | are deep sources. Because you don't seismic data is because the energy, |
|
|
87:15 | know, the high frequency energy is in the shallow part of the of |
|
|
87:19 | section. And then you just left like 30 hertz or longer or |
|
|
87:25 | But in this case its wavelengths and like this. So you have a |
|
|
87:32 | low high low you have all these broad undulations that are that are beneath |
|
|
87:38 | . Now you could make a you could do it in the frequency |
|
|
87:41 | , you could do a continuation and can flatten all this and all this |
|
|
87:45 | frequency stuff will just pop out because could you could take out all these |
|
|
87:51 | , high and low undulations in this . Can you visualize that? |
|
|
87:58 | good, good. Good. Good . That's really important to sort of |
|
|
88:03 | your head around um looking at magnetic maps is looking at it in terms |
|
|
88:08 | wavelength and um uh you know getting sort of a sense of where these |
|
|
88:20 | are sourced from, how deep they're from. So did you have any |
|
|
88:25 | questions about that material? No, was the only one that I was |
|
|
88:30 | , I don't really. Okay, . So. Alright, alright. |
|
|
88:36 | let's talk about basic classification And I'm start off with this. This figure |
|
|
88:43 | like this figures from Nyberg and Howl . And this is like um this |
|
|
88:49 | this is a Robinson projection by the . And it's just showing the spatial |
|
|
88:56 | of sedimentary basins by structural regime with charts to demonstrate based and surface area |
|
|
89:04 | of terrestrial here. This is just based basins. And then over here |
|
|
89:10 | the right, it's continental list is . So that includes marine areas, |
|
|
89:16 | where the continental crust is just beneath . That is passive marriages. Um |
|
|
89:24 | . So if we look at terrestrial , uplands, that just means there's |
|
|
89:31 | basin and I guess that's all these areas. No, it can't |
|
|
89:38 | Maybe it is. See I think missing a lot of bases here. |
|
|
89:45 | , in inter crew tonic, it's gold color. But there's michigan basin |
|
|
89:52 | Williston. There's Illinois. You there's a parent that's not, it's |
|
|
89:57 | parent, but the parent. So rift basin extension? Read? They |
|
|
90:03 | have this, they don't have the Siberia basin. So this is this |
|
|
90:08 | this is a good effort, but incomplete. I would say it would |
|
|
90:11 | my, my honest opinion. But say that the terrestrial basins, our |
|
|
90:22 | You know, uh make up 16% the land area and dividing that |
|
|
90:30 | Um Almost half of that are interpret and that's all these gold areas. |
|
|
90:39 | now they're using inter catatonic kind of . Well, they talk about, |
|
|
90:45 | know, I don't understand this, know, I think some of their |
|
|
90:48 | anyways, we'll just go with what got here. I think I think |
|
|
90:51 | would take issue with a lot of classes for land because of the western |
|
|
90:55 | bases of four land is a bunch four land bases here. These are |
|
|
90:59 | lands. So they've got those signified . But yeah, I think there's |
|
|
91:07 | things that are incorrect. These guys be from europe or something like |
|
|
91:11 | But yeah, and then the red extension allow rift basins and the purple |
|
|
91:19 | strike slip. So like trans intentional professional basins. So that's the distribution |
|
|
91:26 | basins according to neighbor and how and regard to continental atmosphere. Now, |
|
|
91:35 | have to include passive margins which are these bright yellow areas and those make |
|
|
91:41 | 46% um basins um On the And of course of all bases |
|
|
91:51 | you know, whatever what continental, ocean basin. And once you include |
|
|
91:56 | viruses, you go from 16% to of the continental territory, the continental |
|
|
92:03 | the sphere. And um titanic sinks . Uh it's now 18 4 lands |
|
|
92:11 | 10 back arcs are. Yeah, mean that's a really loose. I |
|
|
92:18 | think of these back arc basins at here. So, yeah, maybe |
|
|
92:23 | gonna change my my preference for this in any case they say this |
|
|
92:30 | Um It's interesting to think about this . Um It to be, to |
|
|
92:39 | honest, you could probably ask 10 that think about these things. Um |
|
|
92:46 | you would get maybe, you 15 answers. So. So |
|
|
92:55 | moron, you moron. Basic So, here's a really good paper |
|
|
93:02 | Alain at all in this um in journal. The citation is the |
|
|
93:11 | Well, the references included in the . And this is a kind of |
|
|
93:15 | summary of of Dickinson Reading and Well, Kingston and all this was |
|
|
93:25 | group from Exxon and how they classify basins. So, Dickinson, um |
|
|
93:35 | know, they they they they decide the substrate, is it oceanic or |
|
|
93:42 | ? Or they use this word I don't like that word in talking |
|
|
93:46 | crust, but you see it a . Usually what they mean when people |
|
|
93:52 | transitional, what they usually mean is it's it's thin the continental crust and |
|
|
93:59 | transitional part is just thickness from continent ocean. That's what they typically mean |
|
|
94:05 | that. And Dickinson then. Uh think he just passed away a year |
|
|
94:12 | two ago. But they also talked within proximity to the plate margin, |
|
|
94:17 | it interior or is it uh Or it? You know, along near |
|
|
94:22 | plate margin? And what kind of boundary is it divergent covers that are |
|
|
94:28 | . Now, reading did something quite . Ocean basins, rifting margins, |
|
|
94:34 | continental margins are trench suture belts. would be where two continents collided. |
|
|
94:42 | . This would be the interior basis strike slip. So you can see |
|
|
94:47 | is a transform boundary. This fits two kind of are related to the |
|
|
94:55 | . Um And these could be type if you wanted to sort of, |
|
|
95:02 | know, kind of connect the dots these. And then Kingston and other |
|
|
95:08 | two papers in 83. And they actually devised a special nomenclature for all |
|
|
95:17 | things, but they have, what they have? 1235. Is there |
|
|
95:22 | here? And there's nine here. was continental and oceanic. Right? |
|
|
95:29 | they're dividing it by sub strata and they're talking about interior. So there's |
|
|
95:36 | interior parts interior fresher. That's a continental margins side, that's an internal |
|
|
95:44 | , March. So that's what like , that would be, where would |
|
|
95:49 | be continental. It would be inter would be this one for that. |
|
|
95:54 | up to rent. So that's that's strike slip early. That would be |
|
|
95:58 | long and transform and or transfer sometimes say. And then Trent. So |
|
|
96:04 | is a this is um an ocean uh uh plate margin basis. And |
|
|
96:14 | ocean basis. Right, So oceanic , continental, trans ocean trans oceanic |
|
|
96:22 | continental wrench oceanic fractures. Oceanic So um Creighton ization is a really |
|
|
96:32 | word. Um but base informing deposition sequences and basin modifying. So |
|
|
96:40 | are important concepts to think about when thinking about basins and how they |
|
|
96:46 | And we also, you also have think of them in the context of |
|
|
96:49 | tectonics, which also what makes you about supercontinent cycles and how all that |
|
|
96:55 | fits together. So the idea is the basins, you know, they |
|
|
97:00 | form in response to plate motions and that stuff. And um of course |
|
|
97:07 | and lots of other things. So a lot of things to consider. |
|
|
97:14 | now this is their review of Bali Snelson, which was an important |
|
|
97:18 | I think it's 1980s 1988. And Nelson divided bases into three main |
|
|
97:26 | They called rigid with a stable atmosphere with sphere outside of a contractual mega |
|
|
97:34 | , which means parachutes, jewel and megacities, which is episode. So |
|
|
97:39 | look at these. So the first , uh there's two types within two |
|
|
97:47 | , those related to the formation of crust and those related on pre Mesozoic |
|
|
97:54 | literacy basically they're talking about paleozoic crustal and they're saying that most crustal stags |
|
|
98:00 | paleozoic. It's actually not necessarily That is absolutely, it's absolutely factually |
|
|
98:09 | . So um yeah. Okay. the other one is, let me |
|
|
98:18 | write riffs, oceanic transform falls oceanic so atlantic type passive margins. So |
|
|
98:29 | is this is they're saying it's stable it's and that's related to the word |
|
|
98:37 | , passive margins are passive because there's plate boundary there. It's just the |
|
|
98:43 | is as it says here, it's it's the boundary between oceanic and continental |
|
|
98:49 | which is not a plate boundary. just a change in the composition of |
|
|
98:53 | crust. That's where the oceanic crust indeed a created at the spreading center |
|
|
99:02 | the divergent margin. But the butt axis as the ocean floor, you |
|
|
99:08 | as the ocean basin opens up and that boundary between the continent, the |
|
|
99:14 | , it's no longer a plate boundary I was describing earlier when I when |
|
|
99:20 | were looking at those global maps of , magnetic gravity data and the and |
|
|
99:26 | tectonic plate data. So so So um yeah I guess in that |
|
|
99:34 | it's stable and and even rigid. now the second one rigid with a |
|
|
99:40 | outside. So deep sea trenches, deep uh kind of okay uh rab |
|
|
99:50 | , this is a weird character but just talking about the oceanic trenches so |
|
|
99:56 | subduction zones, four deeps forties buried grab and no blocks dominate but |
|
|
100:05 | type. Uh I'm not exactly Let's talk about this man. I |
|
|
100:11 | work it out from Benny a social for art. So this is like |
|
|
100:17 | continent subduction. We have four. , all the circum pacific on the |
|
|
100:24 | the western margin along the pacific, all those back art ocean basins like |
|
|
100:29 | in board of Japan is the sea japan. That's a back arc |
|
|
100:35 | And there's a whole bunch of those of basins along that margin. So |
|
|
100:43 | backyard basis, the continental collision, , Western care, a western. |
|
|
100:49 | ? So so the when africa collided now Africa is moving north into europe |
|
|
101:00 | it's closing what was once the ocean the only remainder is the mediterranean. |
|
|
101:08 | that's episode Natural. Oh I So these are basin margin basis related |
|
|
101:17 | absolutely great. Right. X. , okay. Now I know what |
|
|
101:22 | are. So episodes are these are are located near plate boundaries, near |
|
|
101:28 | margins. So in the case of ocean continent, they're like little back |
|
|
101:33 | in between continent continent collisions. It's africa colliding with europe and the caucuses |
|
|
101:42 | the Alpine's um that sort of defamation um even extension. All the great |
|
|
101:50 | California stuff. That's all related to subduction. So that's what that's |
|
|
101:55 | So these must be intra inter So deep sea trench. Oh on |
|
|
102:04 | floor. Okay. Yeah this is weird stuff. Anyways, let's just |
|
|
102:09 | on. So here is a review Pinkston. This is the Exxon group |
|
|
102:15 | this is a very nice chart. a remake. I'm going to show |
|
|
102:18 | the original one. It's okay so go type of substrate, then you |
|
|
102:22 | continent, ocean and then when you to then it's divided by type of |
|
|
102:26 | , type of motion diversion, trance conversion, same thing. And then |
|
|
102:32 | relative to the plate boundary is an , external interior or external and there |
|
|
102:37 | hope interior margin, interior margin. . And then you can break it |
|
|
102:41 | different kinds of basis, Protonix failed rift, continental rift and then |
|
|
102:46 | all these little kinds of basins in . But it all sort of makes |
|
|
102:51 | . And you divide it by the of crust. Then you divide it |
|
|
102:54 | the kind of boundary and then you you put where its position is with |
|
|
103:01 | to that boundary. Okay now ingersoll Busby have a really nice book called |
|
|
103:10 | called sedimentary plate tectonics and sedimentary basins something like that. But then there's |
|
|
103:17 | actually give a lot of examples of examples of modern examples, which is |
|
|
103:22 | cool. Alright. So they have diversion settings to inter plate settings, |
|
|
103:27 | convergence settings. And they have some , you know, abc and they |
|
|
103:33 | that down and they have examples. what they think he might disagree but |
|
|
103:38 | matter, I mean which is But this is what they think. |
|
|
103:42 | they have modern day examples and you ancient, you know fossil basins if |
|
|
103:47 | like. Um And that goes There's 1/4 transform settings and hybrid. |
|
|
103:54 | is similar to what I'm talking about I say complex settings. Right? |
|
|
103:58 | again, so this is really kind fun. You can examine these and |
|
|
104:04 | a have a have a look at . We might bounce back here after |
|
|
104:08 | down here a little further. Um they made this little chart which is |
|
|
104:13 | interesting. So along the left they it into our favorite divergent basis related |
|
|
104:22 | divergent plate motion, basically the convergent motion and then transverse, right. |
|
|
104:28 | current plate motion. And here's all basic types continental rift, oceanic rift |
|
|
104:33 | ridge proto oceanic down here, oceanic for our backyard. Um Trans intentional |
|
|
104:41 | trans rotational. Very nice. now then what they've done is they've |
|
|
104:46 | all of these according to how they're the mechanism the dominant important and |
|
|
104:54 | So crustal thinning, is that Little spherical uh mantle uh thickening, |
|
|
105:02 | sentiment, ology, sedimentation, century loading tectonic, super crustal loading, |
|
|
105:10 | crustal loading in face stress. And and then of course the color color |
|
|
105:15 | . So there you have it. that's amazing. I mean it's |
|
|
105:19 | And then and then if you look , they have um their their generic |
|
|
105:27 | for classification. So they have mantle . Uh dynamic topography. Now they're |
|
|
105:35 | a little bit of geodynamic. So atmosphere stretching and cooling and with a |
|
|
105:41 | if lecture. Alright, so think that. This is like atmosphere temperature |
|
|
105:48 | thinning and thickening versus structure bending. . And then so there's those that |
|
|
105:55 | on continental atmosphere and those that are oceanic atmosphere. And here you have |
|
|
106:00 | these same sort of basins that we are in the other classification systems. |
|
|
106:06 | I guess you could make a master of some kind of weird four dimensional |
|
|
106:13 | then diagram sort of thing to figure where all these things, but I |
|
|
106:19 | know how important it is. so here we have left the sphere |
|
|
106:24 | and cooling again. Coming down to . Here's mantle circulation popping down here |
|
|
106:29 | here's flex your due to loading. , continental atmosphere, oceanic atmosphere. |
|
|
106:34 | there's some that are closely related. of course there are these are all |
|
|
106:38 | by sediment loading, uh diminishing from to bottom, here on the |
|
|
106:46 | So, once again, there's all labels, all these different kinds of |
|
|
106:49 | . You can kind of like what say, connect the dots between |
|
|
106:53 | I think there's one more even more diagram, but it's really fascinating. |
|
|
107:00 | , this is actually two diagrams and there's this one here on the |
|
|
107:04 | the box, but let's look at one on the right, which which |
|
|
107:08 | which kind of surrounds it. from the top, it's it's the |
|
|
107:13 | cycle. So this is a nominal span of supercontinent cycle. They have |
|
|
107:18 | million years. That's pretty good. mean, I would say whatever, |
|
|
107:24 | to 600 million years would be like nominal supercontinent cycle. So they're saying |
|
|
107:30 | time zero of the cycle coming up like I guess 1 70 something like |
|
|
107:35 | , we have a continental rift proto . And then, and then you |
|
|
107:41 | an ocean basin form here, passive where these failed rift now failed rift |
|
|
107:47 | means the rift form, but it produce an ocean basin. Okay. |
|
|
107:52 | then you have intercourse tonic basins which ever, which are remember these are |
|
|
107:59 | claim that they are not Related to tectonics and by their duration here, |
|
|
108:06 | at this, it goes 200 million . And uh I can tell you |
|
|
108:11 | there's a cra tonic sag in India lived it collected sediments from 7800 million |
|
|
108:19 | ago to 700 million years ago. other words, in the mid protozoa |
|
|
108:26 | too. Late Kallio, late It collected sediments for a billion |
|
|
108:37 | So yeah, they they just they not connected to the super kind of |
|
|
108:44 | . And then the length of the of passive margins and then uh have |
|
|
108:51 | . These are sticking out here. , I guess at the end of |
|
|
108:54 | , you have these continental strike slip , I guess ocean basic kind of |
|
|
108:58 | and down here, you have arc oceanic crust. So those form towards |
|
|
109:03 | end when you're braking when um you , you're you're creating the last bits |
|
|
109:09 | the last fragments of art train, guess, to the edge of the |
|
|
109:15 | of the super of the supercontinent. those produced these kinds of bases |
|
|
109:21 | So from the bottom, you can inter inter uh incubation, continental inflation |
|
|
109:28 | , starts to grow in the Then there's rifting and breakup. And |
|
|
109:32 | is how it breaks apart subduction and . So that's a supercontinent cycle. |
|
|
109:40 | you can see the platonic basis lives all this stuff. So, on |
|
|
109:44 | right again, our time span now from, I guess it's a log |
|
|
109:50 | in time from .1 to 1000 million , a billion years. And you |
|
|
109:56 | see, so they have platonic just . It lasts from You know, |
|
|
110:02 | saying from whatever, 300 million to whatever, 600 million, I guess |
|
|
110:07 | , I guess. Where would it's log anyways. Um the rift basins |
|
|
110:12 | live as long passive margins and ocean have about the same. These are |
|
|
110:17 | to the cycle. And that's for for conversion, uh trenches Live maybe |
|
|
110:27 | million years trench slow, you up to 10 million for our inter |
|
|
110:33 | . You can see how long these live. And then, so these |
|
|
110:37 | sort of their idea. So, is a lot of work, I |
|
|
110:40 | , you know, there's a lot stuff going on here. Here's here's |
|
|
110:45 | original chart. Again, these are guys from Exxon. And so they |
|
|
110:49 | some identification parameters. There's a kind oceanic the tide. Right? And |
|
|
110:55 | over here the type of past plate . So they're trying to trying to |
|
|
111:00 | , you know, some historical uh into it. Right. And then |
|
|
111:06 | a basin cycle. Okay, so again continent ocean basins completely formed on |
|
|
111:14 | across basically continental. And then you is it uh is it divergent or |
|
|
111:21 | the same thing? Um And then margin. Interior margin. So this |
|
|
111:26 | all summarized by Alan and Alan. then this is where Alan stops with |
|
|
111:30 | these different names and everything. But here's what Kingston also did. They |
|
|
111:37 | to these theoretical model basin types. then they just come up this |
|
|
111:43 | So I. S. Is an crustal sag I. F. Interior |
|
|
111:47 | , MSs margin sag cet et Right. So they come up this |
|
|
111:53 | normal because they're going to build a and it's also based on the |
|
|
111:59 | So they're talking about um transgression So you have their basic three stage |
|
|
112:07 | from transgression regression. Transgression. So if it's if it's a sag it's |
|
|
112:15 | internal sag. Yes for example I is an interior it's a continental |
|
|
112:20 | Platonic basin. You could have you a would be I. A. |
|
|
112:26 | would be I. S. It's a regression to regression. And |
|
|
112:32 | be this part here would be S. 3 to 1. And |
|
|
112:37 | it would be I. S. . Right. And then if it's |
|
|
112:41 | . And then if you're on the on that it's tilted as nonconformity. |
|
|
112:45 | might have something like that. Okay this this stage formulation is combined with |
|
|
112:53 | nomenclature uh into like something like this like uh through the gulf of Mexico |
|
|
113:01 | you have, you know, you to enter your fractures, you've solved |
|
|
113:06 | your sag. And then MSC margin margins because it's an ocean margin after |
|
|
113:11 | ocean after the gulf of Mexico opens . So it's a rift then of |
|
|
113:15 | a sag. And right okay and kind of basin is called. And |
|
|
113:21 | . S. Dash 22 1 dash . C. Dash. I mean |
|
|
113:26 | S. Dash 321 slash L. . Slash I. S. Dash |
|
|
113:30 | slash I. F. Dash And everybody knows what kind of a |
|
|
113:35 | that is. You're starting to get hint for like contempt for these sort |
|
|
113:42 | things. I mean it's just like got way too much time on your |
|
|
113:46 | . Um Not to be outdone the sick. This woman, her name |
|
|
113:52 | Miller on this problem and she decided do some Ai work. This is |
|
|
113:57 | 1993. So this is really early of artificial intelligence and of course you |
|
|
114:04 | you have the same thing, you a knowledge base and you and you |
|
|
114:07 | your data into the training set and control set. I mean the training |
|
|
114:13 | and the testing set and you have ways to tone that and you know |
|
|
114:19 | whatever. You have your knowledge database you generate you generate that and you |
|
|
114:25 | into some this is part of your , your your your own categorization and |
|
|
114:30 | did quite similar but she broke it strategic graffiti and tectonics. So structure |
|
|
114:37 | sedimentation into the basin type. So photography, you know major units, |
|
|
114:45 | and then deposition and unconfirmed is fed a structure the structure of the tectonic |
|
|
114:53 | events and then you know, localized events and then age with a logic |
|
|
114:58 | . And then of course basic rock and then basic structures and incline incline |
|
|
115:05 | that. Those are super class class and attributes. Alright, so you |
|
|
115:11 | all that into your into your engine it goes down here and makes a |
|
|
115:16 | of decisions and it finds an answer says bingo, this is it |
|
|
115:21 | this is the answer. So that that idea. Um And there's even |
|
|
115:27 | classification systems. This is nota actually him this summer last summer and He's |
|
|
115:35 | four art basins which are which form the edge of subduction zones. |
|
|
115:41 | And they're really interesting because you could uh you can have compression right where |
|
|
115:50 | compression but you can actually have extension what happens is if the slab, |
|
|
115:54 | the sub ducting slab it can become , it can be, you |
|
|
115:59 | it's it's in it's in the in mantle. Well, if the plates |
|
|
116:07 | above that, the overriding plage can pull away And that can cause extension |
|
|
116:15 | the four art. So he's decided there are you can have different types |
|
|
116:22 | the two. The two variables are amount of loading. If there's a |
|
|
116:28 | bunch of sentiment punching, pulling then you can have a bunch of |
|
|
116:33 | in a convergent or a bunch of and extension or you can have, |
|
|
116:38 | know, be neutral where the loading extension are sort of our sort of |
|
|
116:45 | . But in any case you can that. Right? So there's the |
|
|
116:50 | classification stuff can get pretty crazy. , so let's talk about interpretation. |
|
|
116:58 | here here is how I look at basin classifications stuff I think of it |
|
|
117:05 | terms of there are there are the elements of based in forming elements. |
|
|
117:13 | the forces involved. Whether it's extension are the substrate, the type of |
|
|
117:19 | , whether it's continental or oceanic or transition. This mobile zone. This |
|
|
117:26 | the zone of you know where the occurs when plates collide or plates, |
|
|
117:33 | know are breaking apart that sort of bondage deformation zone. It's continental |
|
|
117:42 | And then um is it is the just one off or is it multi |
|
|
117:49 | ? Is there many of them. then with these ideas, these three |
|
|
117:55 | in forming elements. you can say you can you can actually come up |
|
|
118:00 | three groups. You can say six in three groups. And you can |
|
|
118:06 | continental extension, continent compression. Mobile extension, mobile compression, oceanic |
|
|
118:12 | oceanic compression. And then you know can stack on top of that whether |
|
|
118:17 | single or multi faith. So Right and then trans dimensional transgression they |
|
|
118:27 | you can just borrow elements from these fill that in so they still fit |
|
|
118:32 | here. So this is the way look at that. Let me see |
|
|
118:35 | . Um Any questions about that. one basic classification and two. My |
|
|
118:45 | here what I think are the things we should really especially with regard to |
|
|
118:50 | Magnetics. This is the way we be looking at these things. |
|
|
118:55 | No questions yet. Okay okay. as I said with with regard to |
|
|
119:07 | magnetic data um What what what do um um What are the things that |
|
|
119:18 | can see with them? What do tell us? Well with magnetic data |
|
|
119:24 | can you can interpret basement now it be super basement elements, inter basement |
|
|
119:32 | and sea floor spreading anomalies. You also interpret volcanic in the sedimentary section |
|
|
119:39 | in some cases very shallow salt because salt is dying magnetic sentiments do have |
|
|
119:46 | mag magnetism. And so the contrast that can produce some subtle anomalies sometimes |
|
|
119:53 | but um tell me the difference between basement and intra basement. I'm assuming |
|
|
120:09 | is over the other. I'm actually sure. Super basement is structural a |
|
|
120:19 | or a black or a fault block something is up and something is down |
|
|
120:26 | basement is compositional. It's a rock changing rock type. It may be |
|
|
120:32 | , but the composition changes such that produces an anomaly. So remember that |
|
|
120:39 | profile I showed you uh would have last yesterday in the evening where I |
|
|
120:45 | you that magnetic profile over that a simple cross section where I had an |
|
|
120:50 | basement uh magnetic change that produced a high amplitude anomaly. And then they |
|
|
120:56 | the two structural things that produced a amplitude anomaly. Those two little structural |
|
|
121:02 | are super basement. And then one that produced a big anti anomaly that's |
|
|
121:09 | basement as well as the change in crystal type. On the right hand |
|
|
121:15 | of that model, that was inter as well. Okay, that makes |
|
|
121:20 | . Intra composite. Okay. Interest super. So with gravity |
|
|
121:26 | you can do the same thing inter versus super basement. Now, gravity |
|
|
121:32 | has some special things going on. are some densities and cemetery rocks that |
|
|
121:36 | really notable one salt as we discussed , carbonates can be pretty high density |
|
|
121:42 | then hydrate and hydrates are like They're very dense. And as we've |
|
|
121:48 | discussing very long wavelengths can be You can matt crustal crustal variations in |
|
|
121:56 | . Right? Because remember the blue data is dominated by the contrast at |
|
|
122:01 | base of the crust. So it's long gravity anomaly. Very long way |
|
|
122:05 | gravity anomalies can be related to crustal variations. And this is it. |
|
|
122:13 | is pretty much I mean there are specialized things with some specialized data but |
|
|
122:18 | gravity and magnetic data, these are things you can find and you can |
|
|
122:21 | for. So if someone says can map you know, can I map |
|
|
122:27 | know on lap of these classic this uh a sequence on you know on |
|
|
122:36 | of this other classic sequence. The is no sorry I wish I could |
|
|
122:42 | I can't you know. So there's are really what we use the data |
|
|
122:50 | Now. I'm gonna talk about this called nine uniqueness which you see all |
|
|
122:55 | time. Especially with regard to gravity magnetic data. First of all, |
|
|
123:01 | not the data that's not unique. data is just a passive measure. |
|
|
123:06 | can't be it can't be 198. just just a passive measures. Just |
|
|
123:11 | . The 19 is with regard to interpretation of gravity, magnetic data. |
|
|
123:18 | in fact this is true for all , even wire line data. You |
|
|
123:22 | , I mean you could ask five interpreters you know that spend their days |
|
|
123:29 | logs past each other to find, know correlating wells And you'll get, |
|
|
123:35 | know, 10 opinions on different different you know, resistive. Itty curves |
|
|
123:42 | example. But this is the classic is from Nettleton and it's the one |
|
|
123:49 | I really have to take issue And I and I get in an |
|
|
123:53 | with my colleagues. So I mean I'm sort of fighting city hall |
|
|
123:57 | But but this is the classic 19 says that these sources can all produce |
|
|
124:05 | anomaly. And that is absolutely true homogeneous sources, but that's not |
|
|
124:11 | I mean the world is not like , right? In reality In the |
|
|
124:17 | and there will be little in homage 80s in this, in this this |
|
|
124:23 | sheet here and those in homage in will produce short wavelength anomalies that will |
|
|
124:28 | superimposed on this broad feature. And those anomalies that tells you the source |
|
|
124:34 | shell. Likewise. Or similarly this lens We'll have in homage in 80s |
|
|
124:43 | that. And those in Hama genetics produce these intermediate wave economics that will |
|
|
124:48 | superimposed on top of this broad So so that's why I say, |
|
|
124:56 | know, um this this idea that which which which is it just kills |
|
|
125:04 | because there are people who who are about their gravity and magnetic data |
|
|
125:11 | And in the abstract they will well the gate is not unique. |
|
|
125:14 | I mean, you know, um don't you just say don't read my |
|
|
125:19 | because it's a waste of your Um you never see someone who interprets |
|
|
125:24 | data and say well our interpretation is unique. They never say that you |
|
|
125:30 | they state with with you know with that you know were these download these |
|
|
125:36 | ? Lapping sections are you know, you know, a regression in the |
|
|
125:45 | blah blah blah. So so You obviously I feel strongly about this but |
|
|
125:51 | in mind lots of people would just care about this. But to me |
|
|
125:56 | really unfair that this this label of Eakins gets hung around the you |
|
|
126:02 | hung around the necks of people who these data and they do it to |
|
|
126:07 | as well. It's which says something not sure any case. Alright, |
|
|
126:13 | now we're at the critical slide. is really important. If there's nothing |
|
|
126:16 | take away from all these hours that sit here talking about this stuff. |
|
|
126:21 | is the stuff that you should really remember. And this goes and |
|
|
126:25 | ties back to to this slide as . What you can what you what |
|
|
126:30 | can actually interpret. These are two important slides but this is really this |
|
|
126:34 | is very important and here's here's the you should look at these data. |
|
|
126:39 | with regard to gravity it is generally in other words, structural highs are |
|
|
126:46 | produced anomaly highs and structural lows are related to anomaly lows but remember except |
|
|
126:55 | very long wavelengths, except for very wavelengths, that's pretty much true with |
|
|
127:02 | data. Um with magnetic data, , you want to look at it |
|
|
127:08 | terms of wavelength, As I've been , long wavelengths are produced by deep |
|
|
127:14 | . Short wavelengths are produced by shallow . Now with regard to wavelength um |
|
|
127:21 | typically proportional to source depth. so long wave, as I |
|
|
127:26 | long ways, short wavelength shall um wavelengths greater than 800 kilometers in general |
|
|
127:34 | be related to mojo topography or basically changes in the crust. Okay, |
|
|
127:44 | with wavelengths less than that, you begin as a rule of thumb, |
|
|
127:49 | to infer that those are produced by and then of course this this relation |
|
|
127:57 | is something you should always remember, is about four times a source |
|
|
128:02 | Okay. That that you should know with regard to amplitude, so |
|
|
128:09 | that's that's those are produced by the in the density or the magnetic |
|
|
128:15 | they're produced by the rock property not structure, although they can be |
|
|
128:23 | to that, but they're generally related amplitude. Yeah, they are related |
|
|
128:27 | the rock property. So, with to gravity anomalies, If it's less |
|
|
128:36 | , say 50 mg. Um if if it's um I'm sorry, if |
|
|
128:44 | greater than 50 million gallons, it's produced by with ology by density contrast |
|
|
128:51 | the rocks or mobile topography. Um if it ranges from 10 to |
|
|
128:59 | and these are the ones we These are the ones that are produced |
|
|
129:02 | structure. So 10 to 50 million . You're in the range of interpreting |
|
|
129:07 | structures unless you know otherwise, I'm to show you an example later where |
|
|
129:12 | is the case where there are anomalies big but they're not structural and then |
|
|
129:18 | anomalies. I mean if you if date is really good and remember we |
|
|
129:23 | at some data that was very good those cars topography ease in in England |
|
|
129:30 | the Bahamas. But those are produced small structures and density contrast. Um |
|
|
129:37 | you need to have really good data good sampling to interpret those the same |
|
|
129:41 | with those small anomalies for magnetic with amplitude. Again, hundreds to thousands |
|
|
129:47 | nana testers. Those are gonna be a logic boundaries. This is that |
|
|
129:51 | I mentioned tens of nano Teslas or are produced by basement structures. So |
|
|
129:58 | of gammas or nana. Tesla's tens millennials. Those are the anomalies that |
|
|
130:04 | like, the ones we want to because those are those are helping us |
|
|
130:08 | structure. Okay. We like the ones too because they show us, |
|
|
130:12 | know, uh you know, compositional and sometimes, you know, crustal |
|
|
130:17 | changed, but this is the breakdown amplitude. So wavelength tells you how |
|
|
130:25 | amplitude tells you uh what type I . So this is uh any questions |
|
|
130:34 | this? Not not yet, I mean, I'll have to read |
|
|
130:40 | it again, but like right now seems confusing. You gotta get your |
|
|
130:43 | around this. This is really I mean, it really really, |
|
|
130:46 | is important. Um Let's see, me do this. I start to |
|
|
130:53 | and we'll see where we're at. I take like a three minute break |
|
|
130:56 | quick? Oh yeah, we'll take break. Let's take five. |
|
|
131:00 | I'll be right back. Hey, Alright, so let's let's talk about |
|
|
131:07 | a sissy and this you might remember had this slide up when we're talking |
|
|
131:11 | gravity processing, grabbing corrections, latitude free bouquet correction. But then I |
|
|
131:20 | out as a static and ecstatic And because I think it's I don't |
|
|
131:29 | , well I think a lot of , but I don't think it's really |
|
|
131:33 | nice or static correction. Let me why. Okay, of course you |
|
|
131:39 | are familiar with the idea that, know, the crap model where he |
|
|
131:43 | says the crust is uniform and it changes in density versus the area model |
|
|
131:51 | it says that, you know, crust is uniform density and it just |
|
|
131:57 | just changes um in thickness based you know, this kind of like |
|
|
132:03 | our communities principle of, you buoyancy, right? Um And in |
|
|
132:10 | they're both probably right. I mean crust is a dense is a little |
|
|
132:15 | more dense than continental crust, but , you know, it's pretty, |
|
|
132:21 | know, we all know that continents rooted etcetera etcetera. So, so |
|
|
132:25 | , you know, that's the there's lot of words here, but that's |
|
|
132:30 | just what I'm saying. This is All right now, let's look at |
|
|
132:35 | gulf of Mexico. Again, we at gravity data before these are boog |
|
|
132:39 | gravity anomalies. So they've been you know, they the correction, |
|
|
132:44 | know, attempts to minimize the effect um topography. Now there's there's these |
|
|
132:53 | in the gulf coast um that are the order of 80 to 100 kilometers |
|
|
133:00 | . There are also some big structures there. Right? This is the |
|
|
133:03 | texas basin, this is the Mississippi basin, this is the Sabine |
|
|
133:09 | this is the Wiggins arch. So updated RTR structural highs and the bases |
|
|
133:16 | of course structural loans. Right? But look at this, the east |
|
|
133:22 | basin produces a gravity low, which would expect. I mean that's very |
|
|
133:26 | . A basin produces a low but Mississippi salt basin produces big gravity high |
|
|
133:33 | setting up let producers gravity high, is intuitive structural anomaly. But the |
|
|
133:40 | arts produces this gravity law. What heck is going on here? They're |
|
|
133:44 | right next to each other. What's here is that the crust up here |
|
|
133:53 | of follow if you follow my Um a cursor, the cross north |
|
|
133:58 | this sort of region is thicker and stronger and it can support these |
|
|
134:07 | It's strong enough and thick enough to these basin and uplifted structures. But |
|
|
134:14 | crust down here close to the the continental margin actually, which extends |
|
|
134:20 | out border here, but the crust here is thinner and it can't support |
|
|
134:27 | structures. So these structures are compensated in other words, the arches rooted |
|
|
134:39 | the upper mantle. So it's its its buoyancy, it's the |
|
|
134:45 | And the upper mantle, the mantle up beneath the Mississippi salt basin, |
|
|
134:51 | is what's producing this high. The density upper mantle of 3.22 lower crust |
|
|
135:00 | is is really swamping the signal here up here, the cross is sticking |
|
|
135:07 | . So the basin is producing a loan structure needs to signing up gravity |
|
|
135:15 | . So, if I were to across the ice, a static anomaly |
|
|
135:21 | this. Okay, so in the , by the way, gently dips |
|
|
135:26 | the top of this From 300 m the coast. Right, and ice |
|
|
135:32 | static anomalies are calculated from topography A function of topography. Right? |
|
|
135:39 | you say that, you know, elevated topography is going to produce a |
|
|
135:44 | in the mantle is gonna, you , that's the idea. So you |
|
|
135:48 | that to its logical conclusion over all over all topographic wavelengths, then, |
|
|
135:57 | know, for an area as big this where it's all pretty flat. |
|
|
136:03 | not gonna change anything. The ice static anatomy will look a lot like |
|
|
136:07 | yet. This is compensated. This not a society has not been corrected |
|
|
136:14 | , right? This this it's not done here. That's why I think |
|
|
136:21 | someone does it, you don't really what you're getting because you don't know |
|
|
136:27 | you don't know what they're unless they you the D. E. |
|
|
136:32 | And they show you the regional Whenever I see, I want to |
|
|
136:37 | what they did what they took What was the regional component? |
|
|
136:41 | so that's why I'm not crazy about correction. It's just they just a |
|
|
136:48 | , you know, but the process do a kind of thing because I |
|
|
136:52 | think you're really correcting for. There too many, you know, dynamic |
|
|
136:57 | associated with the crust and basin formation um I think it might even, |
|
|
137:08 | think it's more honest to do like a continuation filter or residual than or |
|
|
137:15 | limited data or whatever. But this aesthetic correction. One, it's not |
|
|
137:21 | correction and two, you don't know the heck they did. I mean |
|
|
137:24 | says that The topography is gonna I mean sure we correct for topography |
|
|
137:29 | who says the topography is related to structures in the subsurface that you want |
|
|
137:33 | learn about. You know why why that data into your into your gravity |
|
|
137:40 | anyway. That's my soapbox about that . Okay, so we're gonna talk |
|
|
137:48 | crustal sags and they're separate, remember separate from supercontinent cycles. There sort |
|
|
137:55 | a tectonic, if you like. And They're, yeah, they're called |
|
|
138:02 | things and they're typically on the order 300 km wide and there circular and |
|
|
138:09 | in many cases And they're pretty shallow general, like three km and |
|
|
138:16 | you know, they're just just just , you know, down warps in |
|
|
138:21 | crust that collects sentiments. But no knows how these things form, which |
|
|
138:26 | pretty interesting, isn't it? That way it always works? The simplest |
|
|
138:30 | geometrically is something that no one knows far there are actually like 11 different |
|
|
138:36 | for how these basins. For a named George Klein published a paper back |
|
|
138:41 | 80 78, something like that where reviewed 11, 11 different theories for |
|
|
138:47 | these basins were in general. You group them into like, is this |
|
|
138:51 | a thermal, is there some heat beneath it? Or is there a |
|
|
138:56 | in the rocks that produced that Or is there some sort of, |
|
|
139:03 | know, um listen, is tina density variations into it or the old |
|
|
139:10 | magmatic under plating and cooling of And pulling it down. My favorite |
|
|
139:16 | is thermal. I think it's just be related to heat. That's |
|
|
139:20 | that's just where I'm going on this just because the other ones just seem |
|
|
139:24 | little too exotic to me, you ? Um I mean, there are |
|
|
139:29 | anomalies everywhere. So I kind of that. Alright, so here's the |
|
|
139:36 | basin which is a crustal sag and shaped shaped like this um this little |
|
|
139:42 | , that's where I grew up in . And then here's some fizzy a |
|
|
139:48 | elements. So there's the, what's here on dome. This is the |
|
|
139:54 | dome, the uh, I guess something, something park dome, there's |
|
|
140:01 | an old bridge, definitely the arch in the cases physiognomy and this is |
|
|
140:07 | on top of it. Here's uh gravity anomalies. So, um these |
|
|
140:18 | are not really helping us and understanding base in january. They are. |
|
|
140:23 | mean, there are some smooth anomalies here and there's some shorter wavelength anomalies |
|
|
140:28 | around over here and in here, shorter wavelengths. So, you do |
|
|
140:33 | the sense that, you know shorter here, but you do get the |
|
|
140:36 | that it is a little bit Just looking at gravity data alone. |
|
|
140:42 | magnetic data, that's a better help data is usually better about this. |
|
|
140:47 | all rocks have mass, but not rocks have magnetic susceptibility. Not all |
|
|
140:54 | are magnetized in a way that, know, that makes them whatever closely |
|
|
141:02 | . But here, you can see definitely getting longer wavelengths in the center |
|
|
141:05 | the basin here and some really short chatter around here. But then kind |
|
|
141:11 | intermediate wavelengths through here. So long , intermediate wavelengths. Short wavelengths. |
|
|
141:18 | you see those? Yes, So, Magnetics is the tool for |
|
|
141:28 | . It's a tool for mapping terrain it's a tool for estimating basement depths |
|
|
141:34 | and thicknesses. Okay, here's the geology. So the colors are these |
|
|
141:41 | and brownish colors. These are all pre Cambrian, rather pre Cambrian rocks |
|
|
141:50 | key in and protozoa and then the to purples are paleozoic green is |
|
|
141:58 | And then I don't think there's any era rocks. So these are eras |
|
|
142:05 | these are aliens by the way. pre Cambrian is not an error or |
|
|
142:10 | ian. It's just just what people . All right. And you can |
|
|
142:16 | us a basin because you're getting into you're getting into younger rocks from the |
|
|
142:23 | in, right? I'm sorry, rocks from the inside out. |
|
|
142:28 | younger rocks. Yeah, I said . Right. Yeah. So these |
|
|
142:31 | younger rocks and then as the base shaped like a bull. So that |
|
|
142:36 | the if you're gonna flatten flatten a like layers, half of an |
|
|
142:42 | then the outside ones are gonna be older ones and they're gonna be rimming |
|
|
142:45 | . So this is shaped like a and here's some structural contours on the |
|
|
142:52 | of this artificial limestone called the Trenton the michigan Illinois. And the |
|
|
143:00 | So the Appalachians. The foreland michigan and Illinois basin are crystal sags |
|
|
143:06 | based. And these are in feet sure. So that's 10,000 ft |
|
|
143:12 | 2500 ft and so on. The dome, Cincinnati dome friendly arch, |
|
|
143:22 | are all connected. The Kankakee we looked at the algonquin arch and |
|
|
143:28 | we looked at um and there's the all these features here, all these |
|
|
143:35 | graphic elements. Alright, we can can lay that on top of the |
|
|
143:40 | and we're not gonna get a lot joy out of that doesn't only show |
|
|
143:43 | a whole lot of stuff. Um can land types of gravity. |
|
|
143:49 | the gravity is sort of useful but not really, you're really gonna |
|
|
143:54 | you're really gonna have to model this up with gravity. You really want |
|
|
143:58 | learn something about the subsurface here with to gravity data. But with magnetic |
|
|
144:05 | , that's pretty good actually because you see the Whelan's getting deeper into the |
|
|
144:11 | into the michigan basin. You getting broader into the, into the |
|
|
144:17 | basin here and then you know, wavelengths getting smaller sort of intermediate lee |
|
|
144:27 | then where those domes are and it's just outcropping just just high, |
|
|
144:34 | know, short wavelength chatter. Now , this, this stuff up here |
|
|
144:39 | just flat because there's no data because is pretty ugly out there. Well |
|
|
144:46 | look at the basement terrain. so there's the basement structure. But |
|
|
144:51 | there's the terrain of that structure. , remember these are like this is |
|
|
144:57 | Grenville front that came in a billion ago. These other terrain, the |
|
|
145:01 | rye light um that's, you older, 1.3 billion years ago. |
|
|
145:09 | then Superior. Remember that's our So that's very old. So you |
|
|
145:14 | photos are created and then, you , the Grenville was at the, |
|
|
145:18 | know, about a billion years And then here's how that looks at |
|
|
145:24 | of the gravity. That's nice. at that, that big anomaly going |
|
|
145:28 | the summer here. That's that's uh completely different. That's actually part of |
|
|
145:35 | mid continent rift, which comes up , wraps around and ends up going |
|
|
145:40 | through through the mid continent, you see how it does it here |
|
|
145:46 | And then the different other terrain is they that are that are here. |
|
|
145:55 | then looking at it with the So, the magazine a bit more |
|
|
145:58 | , you can still see this, , you know, the mid continent |
|
|
146:02 | in here, but it's not as not as well defined as with |
|
|
146:05 | So, it has a definite density to it. And then the |
|
|
146:10 | Um you know, the gravity data really helping us as much. You |
|
|
146:17 | see these these speeches in here. mean, you do see this thing |
|
|
146:20 | you once, once you learn where is, you go, I see |
|
|
146:24 | a you can kind of trace it here. You know, you can |
|
|
146:28 | of trace the boundary of this high here with this this year. So |
|
|
146:32 | can't see it once you sort of into its general location. All |
|
|
146:38 | Uh So this is a Cambrian through currencies substance history of the michigan |
|
|
146:48 | Right. Um So michigan basin paleo . So this is about paleo |
|
|
146:57 | Um And according to them, the magnetic pole is at 52 degrees |
|
|
147:04 | 111 east. So where we Do I have any coordinates here? |
|
|
147:09 | the pole is is west of here just slightly north of here. The |
|
|
147:19 | paleo Mag pole. It is similar those recognized for the carbonates in Ontario |
|
|
147:25 | york state, suggesting that the michigan were re magnetized in the late paleo |
|
|
147:31 | . Rock magnetic characterizations suggests that the magnetization is carried by a single pseudo |
|
|
147:41 | domain mega type. What do they , art calculated from? Okay, |
|
|
147:47 | they're saying the paleo Mag magnetic paleo are similar to the paleo magnetic directions |
|
|
147:54 | in the ordination threatened carbonates from the basin. So let's see this is |
|
|
148:04 | the evolution of the basin. So saying it was a trough shaped open |
|
|
148:09 | the south. Then it was a basin where the center base and then |
|
|
148:16 | to think the basin tilted to the . Then it was that a broad |
|
|
148:22 | that abroad centered basin, narrow I guess that just means it's kind |
|
|
148:26 | like level but there's this basin center broad, narrow basis center is narrow |
|
|
148:33 | center abroad and then it tilted again the east again. So this is |
|
|
148:38 | these guys are saying based on paleo data. All right now. Uh |
|
|
148:46 | this is some from your uh this highs and basement trains. Yeah, |
|
|
148:55 | , so this is in southern southern . So they sampled the lime stones |
|
|
149:02 | um uh you're saying as again as said late re magnetization at around 3 |
|
|
149:11 | to 3 to 2 92 M. . So that's that's or division. |
|
|
149:18 | let's see. So they did that and these folks did it in Ontario |
|
|
149:28 | they want to use what are we ? So this is the reconstruction of |
|
|
149:37 | . Okay, I need to I to look at these. Um |
|
|
149:42 | Okay let me let me get back you on that failure may suffer. |
|
|
149:48 | , so here's the different terrain from and others and so there's granite. |
|
|
149:53 | sick exclusive rocks, Medicine, Cherie Messick intrusive. Remember this is where |
|
|
149:58 | a rift, this is an old area. So you have, you |
|
|
150:03 | uh nice granule. It's there's also structure here. There's a little structure |
|
|
150:12 | . Okay, so here it is top of the gravity again, zooming |
|
|
150:16 | and and I guess what, he's at this linear here and say okay |
|
|
150:22 | could be a train, this is maybe possibly a change in the composition |
|
|
150:29 | thing down here. And he's alright, he's looking at these anomalies |
|
|
150:34 | he's interpreting a different terrain here. does it look kind of magnetic? |
|
|
150:40 | ? I think it makes a little more sense into my medic data. |
|
|
150:43 | definitely a boundary here, definitely a here. You know, you can |
|
|
150:48 | see, even though it goes from high to a load, it's still |
|
|
150:53 | . And then um so basically this using magnetic data. Remember we can |
|
|
151:01 | it for sourcing for estimating source depth wavelength, but we can also use |
|
|
151:07 | to map terrain. Remember high aptitude , hundreds to thousands of nana |
|
|
151:14 | Those are indicating with a logic In other words, rock composition |
|
|
151:21 | So you can draw a line here you can say ah this is a |
|
|
151:26 | in composition, this is a different type. Maybe this is an old |
|
|
151:31 | , who knows? But it certainly like it's a difference in rock |
|
|
151:35 | J. Also, you can see wavelengths are really getting smaller going up |
|
|
151:43 | versus the wavelengths over here where they're of broad. This is kind of |
|
|
151:47 | center of the base, same thing . All of a sudden you have |
|
|
151:51 | big high amplitude anomalies. This is change in rock type. So this |
|
|
151:54 | a train boundary. And also you also just talk about the data character |
|
|
152:01 | general, right? I mean you definitely see a difference from here to |
|
|
152:07 | to here. This area looks quite and the same thing down here. |
|
|
152:12 | area, right? Looks quite different uh other places. So that's what |
|
|
152:20 | that's how you can you know, interpret, using interpret to reigns using |
|
|
152:28 | data. Magnetic data is good for steps and terrain. Okay, so |
|
|
152:35 | some contours and it's based on this well penetrations, these diamonds, there's |
|
|
152:43 | magnetic estimates like Warner or what have ? Probably slope. This is |
|
|
152:49 | So these points are probably basically that's slope. And then uh basement magnet |
|
|
152:59 | contour. Okay, I just don't about that. So. Right. |
|
|
153:02 | this is the general this is contoured uh thousands of feet. So it's |
|
|
153:09 | to 13 over 15,000 ft deep here 5000 ft to the basement around the |
|
|
153:16 | of it here. What does that like under gravity data? Well, |
|
|
153:21 | kind of interesting. I mean, of all this anomaly here looks like |
|
|
153:25 | is a structural component but the rift over kind of files these contours. |
|
|
153:32 | that's really interesting. And but in um I guess if you kind of |
|
|
153:39 | your eyes and turn your head you might you might see how this |
|
|
153:43 | in there. Let's see what it like the magnetic data. And |
|
|
153:48 | this is this is I think this really looks pretty good actually. I |
|
|
153:53 | um there's an anomaly. So this is not just compositional and structural as |
|
|
153:59 | . Which is possible. But you really you know unless you unless you |
|
|
154:02 | data that helps you with that then know that's not a good idea. |
|
|
154:08 | they've got they've got whatever for well down here. They got some death |
|
|
154:13 | . So that's pretty good. All Now let's get back to this. |
|
|
154:25 | . Can we go back to slide three and 84? Can you explain |
|
|
154:32 | ? Like to me the the gravity better. So can you explain why |
|
|
154:38 | magnetic looks better as compared to the ? You mean in terms of the |
|
|
154:44 | ? Yes. Because you you said you like the way the magnetic looks |
|
|
154:48 | lot better. And and I guess just like focusing on the middle part |
|
|
154:52 | to like to me it looks a better. So yeah. So you |
|
|
154:59 | see the wavelengths here are broader and . Do you see that than around |
|
|
155:04 | here and over here. Do you that? So this is where that |
|
|
155:15 | Archie Algonquin arch comes through. This is the the edge of the |
|
|
155:20 | dome and some other, I can't the name of that dome up |
|
|
155:24 | But there's another, you know, basement up here. And so these |
|
|
155:29 | wavelengths, it's just this chatter, almost looks like it's noise. |
|
|
155:34 | There's so many anomalies and that's because basement is very, very shallow. |
|
|
155:40 | then as you get deeper into the , these wavelengths tend to start to |
|
|
155:45 | out because it's just getting deeper. when we look at gravity, you |
|
|
155:51 | really get that sense. You do of I mean, there's some short |
|
|
155:54 | like anomalies out here, you But but really the gravity looks a |
|
|
156:02 | bit more monotonous. I mean, certainly does. I mean, regarding |
|
|
156:06 | rift that's booming. That's that's just out. You can see that really |
|
|
156:11 | . But aside from that, you , do we have a basically a |
|
|
156:15 | basin here? And you would expect see short wavelengths on the rim. |
|
|
156:21 | wavelengths in the center. And you be able to talk yourself into that |
|
|
156:26 | this. But it's I mean, not at all that obvious. You |
|
|
156:30 | what? Whereas but with the I mean, to me, it |
|
|
156:36 | sticks out. You have all these long wavelengths surrounded by these short |
|
|
156:41 | There's a basin in there. You , maybe it's complicated because, you |
|
|
156:47 | , you have some intermediate wavelengths sneaking here. So maybe there's some structural |
|
|
156:51 | going on here. But overall this a big basin and is surrounded |
|
|
156:57 | you know, base I mean shallow . And yeah, there's some complexity |
|
|
157:02 | here. There's definitely, you the stuff you can sink your teeth |
|
|
157:05 | it really investigate this and model it and do whatever, Right? I |
|
|
157:10 | it's lots of fun stuff you can with this but in terms of just |
|
|
157:14 | at it. It's just first Yeah, I can see this basically |
|
|
157:18 | data. I hope that you can know that makes sense I guess to |
|
|
157:22 | like it looked worse but it's good it looks worse because then you can |
|
|
157:27 | a lot more that's going on. that makes sense now. Right? |
|
|
157:32 | . Exactly. These these this I I'm sure there is noise in here |
|
|
157:36 | but but this a lot of this just it's really this is just very |
|
|
157:41 | basement and once you zoom. I , you know this is why land |
|
|
157:45 | data. It's not very good because get so close to these sources. |
|
|
157:49 | just got it's just swamped by the . Okay, thank you. So |
|
|
157:55 | the here's the Magnetics again. And . So you see in this country |
|
|
158:02 | mapping a little structure. There's some here. Right? So it's going |
|
|
158:05 | . So yes, so this is little structural high. It's not |
|
|
158:10 | you know, 500 ft. So it sits right on top of |
|
|
158:15 | , gravity not only which also sits top of this magnetic anomaly. So |
|
|
158:19 | is this is a case we have big anomaly that also has a structural |
|
|
158:25 | to it but that's the exception. I have rules of thumb. It |
|
|
158:31 | mean it's always like that but it there are guides of ways to think |
|
|
158:36 | the data, okay, now this going back to our paleo mag stuff |
|
|
158:45 | let's see there's a model, here's two D. Model over southwest michigan |
|
|
158:52 | They called the southwest michigan geophysical Smg a Singa may also be produced |
|
|
158:59 | a rift related to this. so they're saying that there's an anomaly |
|
|
159:03 | here, right, where's that That's down here. They're saying there's |
|
|
159:07 | anomaly down here that's related to this . Where is it? Yeah, |
|
|
159:15 | an army down here, it's related to that and here's a little cross |
|
|
159:22 | they made to it. So this through the mmr the mid michigan, |
|
|
159:27 | is the rift that we're looking See all the contours. I'm saying |
|
|
159:31 | one is right down here and you're it's producing an anomaly. 2.9 density |
|
|
159:38 | .7. So that's not a bad . Let's look at the gravity, |
|
|
159:43 | this anomaly here, I'm sorry, this anomaly. So they're saying even |
|
|
159:48 | there's some the contour is in there they're saying this anomaly is related to |
|
|
159:53 | . So there the rift may have complex, right? So even though |
|
|
159:58 | looks like it bends here, there be a bit of a component |
|
|
160:01 | I don't have a problem with that's fine. Um Yeah it is |
|
|
160:07 | big anomaly. Well it's the seats mg, that's a pretty good |
|
|
160:11 | But this one here this is $60 . That's just a big anomaly |
|
|
160:20 | Um Right and they actually shot a court line across. Um It's the |
|
|
160:25 | think it's like the very first co line. You know what co corp |
|
|
160:30 | ? No so core korps was the was the U. S. Whatever |
|
|
160:37 | program carried out in the 70s and I think. Where they shot these |
|
|
160:42 | long offset long time sections all around country. South Georgia riff that this |
|
|
160:52 | other areas Anadarko basin um In uh think in the east Texas bass. |
|
|
161:00 | they shot one and Yeah an East one through east Texas. And and |
|
|
161:07 | anyways They also shot this line through , well the McClure 1-8 sparks and |
|
|
161:16 | McClure one dash hey Sparks drilled this , they drill down in through the |
|
|
161:22 | the way through the basin and into into that rift segment. Those matric |
|
|
161:29 | . Okay. Um And they actually a borehole gravity survey of it which |
|
|
161:37 | very cool. So they drilled five . They drove through almost a kilometer |
|
|
161:45 | , wait a second how much? Cambrian they drilled through looks like 500 |
|
|
161:52 | 500 m of of that rock. um So they drilled through 1600 m |
|
|
162:02 | classic and uh read classics. Heavy , especially with English rocks near the |
|
|
162:11 | michigan whatever near Ithaca michigan. And Borehole density survey indicated 2.77. This |
|
|
162:21 | 2.77 Uh plus or -105 for the beds. And then according to Vander |
|
|
162:30 | and Watts, this would be the famous rob Van de Vue and the |
|
|
162:34 | more famous Tony Watts that his body the base of the borehole, maybe |
|
|
162:40 | altered lava flow. And its mechanization likely to to be entirely secondary. |
|
|
162:46 | they don't think it's uh during the the Cambrian time. So they think |
|
|
162:53 | it was re magnetized after after the continent rift form. Alright, so |
|
|
163:03 | that's all good and fun. So here's our bouquet gravity and here's some |
|
|
163:07 | lines and cross sections that I did here. And I actually have two |
|
|
163:13 | . Models through each for each of . And I'm gonna show you, |
|
|
163:17 | think I'm going to show you And B. Because I have actually |
|
|
163:23 | . So here's Model B, two . Pride. So this goes, |
|
|
163:28 | you have, okay, I have stations, those are these inverted |
|
|
163:33 | And there's two numbers, there are I believe. So the first number |
|
|
163:40 | depth to crystalline basement. Second number to the mojo. So it's 1.2237 |
|
|
163:46 | two. And when there's just one , that's just basement. Right? |
|
|
163:50 | they all intersect here at this basement station where the basement is 2.83 kilometers |
|
|
164:00 | Questions. The basic gets deeper up . 4.5 - 41.1. And we |
|
|
164:08 | have two mojo re fractures in in . So we also look at B |
|
|
164:13 | B. Primed A. And everything here. So here's my real simple |
|
|
164:20 | model. B. Two B. . Uh There's a there's a mojo |
|
|
164:25 | down here, basement here and then here. And then this is the |
|
|
164:31 | of lines A. And D. C. Alright, so let me |
|
|
164:38 | let me just quickly I have this open. Let me see. I |
|
|
164:42 | so now I don't know if you able to down but were you able |
|
|
164:45 | download this stuff yet? Not My husband, he actually has a |
|
|
164:50 | computer. So he's gonna download I'm really happy about that. That's |
|
|
164:58 | . I have the in the instructions I sent you. I said you |
|
|
165:01 | to settings, uh manage menu and will pop up this little thing and |
|
|
165:09 | do this extension and you'll click on one here and then. And that |
|
|
165:14 | load. Did I just unload Oh man. No, I |
|
|
165:24 | Okay. All right. And that load this menu. Gm says profile |
|
|
165:29 | . And I always go new And I always got a new model |
|
|
165:33 | I go down here to run GMC . So I run it. I |
|
|
165:38 | the modeling software outside of this main . And this is all we're gonna |
|
|
165:42 | . We're not going to use the program that has a bunch of maps |
|
|
165:46 | databases and stuff in it. Um worry about that, don't ever click |
|
|
165:52 | , don't do that. Um And here's here's this, here's the GMC |
|
|
166:01 | program. So I'm gonna open up that model, it's in michigan. |
|
|
166:13 | , I'm Gonna Open Up B two Prime. I'm Gonna Open Up This |
|
|
166:20 | . Let me open up this Uh Let me see. Maybe I |
|
|
166:24 | this one and we'll see what Okay um yikes that's Oh I |
|
|
166:33 | let me close this, let me it to the other one. I'm |
|
|
166:40 | Open up the other one. It be exactly what you have there. |
|
|
166:46 | not dog on it. Look at , there's the gravity profile. I |
|
|
167:02 | I have the mag profile there So like all the other ones gravity |
|
|
167:05 | the bottom bags on top. I've gravity profiles, maroon. This is |
|
|
167:11 | bunch of dots. They're just real together. Same thing with the |
|
|
167:15 | So I have this color different. don't really like the color patterns but |
|
|
167:20 | is um this is uh can right here in auto scale what we're gonna |
|
|
167:29 | looking at. And just to show can this little hand says move move |
|
|
167:35 | point, you can move a point you want, you can grab this |
|
|
167:42 | , you move a point and this sort of like I always when I |
|
|
167:47 | I work with clients, I like do these modeling on the fly in |
|
|
167:52 | because it's like so manager friendly so can grab this one here and move |
|
|
167:58 | model there and that can also create point here and kind of do that |
|
|
168:05 | that business greater point here. so now I'm kind of right now |
|
|
168:11 | have a bunch of misfits over I can actually zoom in on |
|
|
168:16 | I'm just giving you a little demo the software if you don't if you |
|
|
168:20 | you're okay with that, look at , that that's not nice. Um |
|
|
168:27 | , so all right, and you you can then um you know, |
|
|
168:36 | can add points. I'm gonna add point. You can add a moon |
|
|
168:40 | the same time too. So you , you know um Then I can |
|
|
168:52 | you just and you just move them adding Okay enough of that and then |
|
|
169:12 | you've got the view. So you also do things like change the density |
|
|
169:22 | the fly. So let me so for example this this this eyeball |
|
|
169:26 | the examined button and you can click a source and it will tell you |
|
|
169:31 | about it, it will tell you you know the colors will tell you |
|
|
169:35 | density, it will tell you the , right? Susceptibility and then if |
|
|
169:42 | turn on this two or three quarter it will tell you, you know |
|
|
169:47 | far in and out of the plane goes and what the density in and |
|
|
169:51 | of the plane is. Um uh can also do things like hit this |
|
|
169:58 | . C. Thing and that will up another little window and um You |
|
|
170:06 | and it has a slide bar and can set the limit on the slide |
|
|
170:10 | and make this 3.3.3 for example. then you can grab that slide bar |
|
|
170:17 | in real time you can adjust the to make it fit in real |
|
|
170:22 | So that's kind of fun. That of blows people away. So |
|
|
170:28 | I just thought I'd give you a preview of of the software before we |
|
|
170:35 | for lunch and we can go back the presentation if you like. I |
|
|
170:42 | we're wait, that's this afternoon. just what I just did. |
|
|
170:48 | Um Oh I have one more study we can of the congo basin. |
|
|
170:55 | another, it's another crustal sag. can just do that very quickly and |
|
|
171:00 | we'll break for lunch. But I want to show you. I just |
|
|
171:04 | to show you like a little bit the software to kinda kinda get you |
|
|
171:07 | you excited about if that's possible. I get you excited about the modeling |
|
|
171:13 | any case. Um Congo basin is younger one is formed in the late |
|
|
171:18 | and into the Triassic. This is I'm saying that they're not just pre |
|
|
171:23 | basis because of this one here. They have yeah, they have into |
|
|
171:32 | cretaceous even. Um Right. And is a study. This is uh |
|
|
171:37 | is actually kind of like goes into these basins for um They estimated density |
|
|
171:43 | from sediment. Then they subtract that a process we call gravity stripping or |
|
|
171:49 | stripping. It can be perilous because just you can end up producing analogies |
|
|
171:55 | that. And then they decided that um that that there was crustal necking |
|
|
172:05 | thinning of the crust beneath this So they're saying that there's structural things |
|
|
172:10 | on to this base in formation. , so on the left are the |
|
|
172:16 | air. Now remember that has that topography in it. And so but |
|
|
172:22 | area is pretty flat actually. Um think right. What we're looking |
|
|
172:28 | we're looking at this is a geologic but there's no there's no what are |
|
|
172:35 | contours? These contours are the base thickness I think. Okay, |
|
|
172:40 | alright, so and then and then the right is there um uh calculated |
|
|
172:48 | from the basin from the sedimentary So they subtracted that what the residual |
|
|
172:58 | subtracting that is is well, I'm , the calculated gravity attraction of the |
|
|
173:07 | is on the right, Okay. the residual gravity is calculated by subtracting |
|
|
173:13 | from the sentiments um is what it like on the left. That's the |
|
|
173:19 | And so they're saying um subtracting Yeah that's the same right? The |
|
|
173:26 | on the right is the same. subtracting from the right from the free |
|
|
173:31 | , you get this one this one's the left and you have this big |
|
|
173:36 | anatomy in the center. And then did a model cross section, a |
|
|
173:40 | D. Cross section. So let just make sure I'm not confusing. |
|
|
173:44 | this is a surface geology map and showing young rocks towards the center as |
|
|
173:50 | would expect for for a basin With the older pre Cambrian rocks reminiscent |
|
|
173:57 | like the michigan basin. Then on left are the free air anomalies and |
|
|
174:03 | the right is the gravity response of basin rock. So I don't have |
|
|
174:09 | map of the sedimentary rocks. I they're quite like this map here. |
|
|
174:14 | then this would that thickness of sediments produce this gravity response Which is very |
|
|
174:23 | . It's let's see it's maybe 20 gallons on that order. This is |
|
|
174:28 | interval Is 10. It's 30 bucks mg I guess. And so they |
|
|
174:37 | that the map on the right from map on the left and that |
|
|
174:43 | this map on the left. so that ranges, that whole range |
|
|
174:48 | customized. 40 mg roughly. Okay then they took a cross section through |
|
|
174:56 | this line here and they did a D. Model on that and that's |
|
|
175:01 | you're looking at here. This is of complicated. What they did was |
|
|
175:04 | tested they tested the contribution from of combinations of necking. In other words |
|
|
175:14 | thinning here uh versus equivalent elastic thickness . Okay so basically elastic thickness calculations |
|
|
175:26 | on the the whatever the topographic the steering model. So the observed data |
|
|
175:37 | the black line And from the equivalent thickness calculations going from 10 to 100 |
|
|
175:49 | on the left and death of That's how in other words thinning of |
|
|
175:56 | crust. They did 5 30 10 30 10. So the two reps |
|
|
176:04 | 5 30 10 on 10 and 100 last evening. So they had to |
|
|
176:10 | depths of E. T. And each of each one of those two |
|
|
176:16 | did three flavors of necking and they The necking of 10. So that's |
|
|
176:26 | top one the red one for both these and E. T. Equivalent |
|
|
176:32 | thickness of the little sphere um of . The red is the best combination |
|
|
176:41 | that's this red one here. And from that this is the shape of |
|
|
176:46 | basis. So there's supposed to be structural high in the middle of the |
|
|
176:51 | that they have modeled. I guess strikes to the northeast northwest rather. |
|
|
176:56 | that you have two basic depot centers what you're saying. Uh this is |
|
|
177:02 | geodynamic work. And again so this the structural high they have this this |
|
|
177:09 | the anomaly that they're trying to And I think we can look back |
|
|
177:18 | going through here. Yeah. I know maybe maybe maybe I'd confused you |
|
|
177:25 | this. But this was this was paper like I said what they were |
|
|
177:30 | was trying to estimate the process how basins formed. And they figured well |
|
|
177:37 | they remove the sediment layer then they'll have the crustal layer and they can |
|
|
177:41 | the crustal layer. And there's two of doing that geo dynamically. You |
|
|
177:46 | estimate the equivalent elastic thickness. Um just calculating fletcher. And then you |
|
|
178:00 | and then they did the model was testing the response from necking. And |
|
|
178:07 | just did that by I guess adjusting horizons here in a forward sense. |
|
|
178:14 | they have the ah yeah yeah yeah . Where's the other one of these |
|
|
178:17 | where's the where's the E. O. Red light? Oh look |
|
|
178:23 | that. You see this one you the thin lines. Oh yeah okay |
|
|
178:32 | is really interesting. So the necking thin a thin neck and a thick |
|
|
178:42 | thickness prisoners big this big blue thick one at the other end. Okay |
|
|
178:55 | thick neck. 30. And they um E E. G. Produces |
|
|
179:03 | one the stine blue one. So both with a a thick neck. |
|
|
179:13 | sorry wait a second. No it's . Right think right. That's both |
|
|
179:20 | five uh kilometers necking. So a thin neck. five km of |
|
|
179:27 | Thin necking. Was it thin or elasticity? That's just blue. And |
|
|
179:36 | the thick neck 30 is green thick and and thick elastic thickness. It |
|
|
179:46 | produces this just this depression here which you know like the other but thick |
|
|
179:58 | and thin E. E. Produces this one. So the elastic |
|
|
180:06 | it really has. Um It basically enhances everything, doesn't it? But |
|
|
180:13 | totally inverts for red. The intermediate medium necking, the intermediate necking compared |
|
|
180:22 | the then and thick elastic. The lines goes from producing a low high |
|
|
180:33 | to a high low high. I don't know. I don't know |
|
|
180:37 | this is proven. And then here just the response to all those things |
|
|
180:42 | here again. What is this one here? I'm not sure what this |
|
|
180:50 | not here. Alright, so I'm gonna test you on this one if |
|
|
180:57 | want. I can send you the . It's kind of interesting but it's |
|
|
180:59 | lot of geo dynamics. Um yeah in any case it's 1142. Um |
|
|
181:08 | we reconvene at 12:30. Okay, sounds good to me. All |
|
|
181:14 | |
|