© Distribution of this video is restricted by its owner
00:02 | OK. Uh Welcome back, we OK. Uh We're back. Um |
|
|
00:36 | We talked about um introduction to delta processes. Uh The major constructional phases |
|
|
00:44 | the Mississippi delta, the modern the, and then the earlier Holocene |
|
|
00:52 | LA for delta, we talked about destruction of phase and the cycle of |
|
|
01:04 | construction and destruction uh as exemplified by uh of the abandoned Holocene delta |
|
|
01:16 | We then talked about how deltas can across the shelf. Which ones |
|
|
01:22 | which ones can't, how they would it and what happens when they get |
|
|
01:26 | the shelf edge. Uh And we that at that point, we have |
|
|
01:31 | least the potential for a lot of uh as well as sediment transport getting |
|
|
01:38 | into the deep water system uh thereby this shell. But I want to |
|
|
01:44 | uh today is to finish up on and uh look more specifically at those |
|
|
01:51 | and tide dominated deltas. So, let's see if we can I get |
|
|
01:58 | . Um Yeah, there we Uh So we've got wave at tide |
|
|
02:06 | river dominated deltas on uh uh Bill . Uh We've also got uh a |
|
|
02:14 | version by Ainsworth. And so, as I had mentioned a little |
|
|
02:20 | when we look at deltas, that of the problems is, uh they |
|
|
02:25 | only changed through time, but they can change rather quickly spatially. And |
|
|
02:32 | , well, I'm gonna go back the example of the Danube, uh |
|
|
02:36 | recognize that within a relatively short period time, let's say, uh 6000 |
|
|
02:45 | or less, uh we've seen uh lobes. And uh in particular, |
|
|
02:52 | would refer you to boar and Gilson's on wave influenced deltas uh for uh |
|
|
03:00 | good general overview waved on the deltas general. Um Having said that there's |
|
|
03:08 | a lot of new papers too. , uh this is a good starter |
|
|
03:14 | . Now, when we talked about early concept of GEOM morph classification, |
|
|
03:19 | went from the river to wave dominated we can look at a uh a |
|
|
03:27 | of hypothetical of pro gradation of sequences um are ba basically combining idealized pro |
|
|
03:40 | of sequences in a river and waved system. Um And I I I |
|
|
03:46 | the main takeaway here is that although are pro grading coarsening upper sequences, |
|
|
03:55 | the river dominated delta is much more lithic. It's got a lot of |
|
|
04:01 | interbedded with that pooring upper sequence. those muds are largely not preserved in |
|
|
04:09 | wave dominated delta, they've gone They may be that pro grading mud |
|
|
04:15 | or that uh sub aqueous delta. talk a little more about that |
|
|
04:20 | but the muds have been wintered away the waves. And so we're looking |
|
|
04:24 | a frankly much more, uh, a barrier island strand plain analog. |
|
|
04:34 | , and in fact, as we'll in a moment, the wave, |
|
|
04:38 | the up drift portion of a wave delta really is appropriating strand lane. |
|
|
04:44 | really can't differentiate. Now, there's a lot of examples of waved |
|
|
04:49 | delta. Some are really big, Some are smaller. Uh A lot |
|
|
04:54 | the, the work has been uh by the Brazilians. Uh And so |
|
|
05:00 | a lot of waved doin deltas in . Uh also um some important ones |
|
|
05:08 | Mexico. Uh We've had the R one of the things you might notice |
|
|
05:12 | this point is that the morphology of wave doin A delta is rather different |
|
|
05:19 | this wave dominated delta. And so is a fair amount of variability even |
|
|
05:25 | that context of the NME wave doin . And when we look at the |
|
|
05:32 | , I think you can see that whereas the modern delta is here, |
|
|
05:40 | it wasn't long ago that the river coming out here and there's a delta |
|
|
05:47 | here and there may have been another here. And this is actually a |
|
|
05:52 | loa here. And then there's been lot of reworking. You could see |
|
|
05:57 | the waves reworking, particularly these older deltas Now, this is kind of |
|
|
06:04 | the Mississippi that is when we had uh lobes, a new lobe and |
|
|
06:15 | reworking of that lobe. One of big differences here is that there's much |
|
|
06:20 | wave reworking of the distal portions of abandoned lobe. When you map the |
|
|
06:28 | as a whole, though, it's a low bait Isopack. And |
|
|
06:33 | uh recognize that within that low bait , which is where, how we |
|
|
06:38 | of begin to look at these packages a potential field or reservoir point of |
|
|
06:44 | . Uh We need to begin to about how we might um disaggregated, |
|
|
06:50 | we might uh compartmentalize it, Uh So here, it's maybe 20 |
|
|
06:56 | thick, OK. Uh But you also see it's on the order of |
|
|
07:01 | m long and it's gonna be elongated the direction or rather parallel to the |
|
|
07:10 | . Uh There's a nice study from upper Cretaceous of South Texas looking at |
|
|
07:17 | Isaacs and seeing how even within a river system over time. Uh There's |
|
|
07:25 | a lot of uh modification as well , the contour interval is about 20 |
|
|
07:32 | . And so you can see some these things are much thicker than the |
|
|
07:36 | day delta and it ranges from what she describes as uh low bait to |
|
|
07:44 | much elongate and, and this is this model came uh that I showed |
|
|
07:51 | , I believe and, and it a lot of important nuances that really |
|
|
07:57 | picked up, uh, at least picked up by me. Um, |
|
|
08:02 | I first looked at it, first of all, it does have |
|
|
08:06 | abandoned delta in the modern de, . And the abandoned delta, |
|
|
08:14 | actually probably extended over to here. , in any case, the modern |
|
|
08:21 | is sitting in here. Ok. , and if you look at that |
|
|
08:30 | delta, the direction of longshore drift , is in this direction, um |
|
|
08:40 | portion is basically a strand plane grow out this way. There are no |
|
|
08:48 | or almost no muds in that up portion of the wave dominated delta down |
|
|
08:54 | . We have a spit that's pro . OK. And we also had |
|
|
08:59 | implication of that down here uh as in that older delta. OK. |
|
|
09:06 | So there's an asymmetry of the, delta between the up drift and down |
|
|
09:14 | portion of that delta. And, that was made explicit by Dominguez |
|
|
09:20 | and others in late nineties who had that. Um The Yeah, |
|
|
09:34 | I just got those mixed up Uh Yeah. OK. That's because |
|
|
09:38 | is upside down uh that the deltas their up drift side is basically a |
|
|
09:45 | plain and in essence what the river doing as it programs out, it's |
|
|
09:52 | the longshore current. And so it's kind of like a jetty. And |
|
|
09:57 | the sediment is piling up on the drift side of the jetty, it's |
|
|
10:01 | the mouth bar but still it's programing and intercepting that longshore drift. |
|
|
10:07 | what that means is the sediment that derived from the river is actually not |
|
|
10:13 | the upper portion of the delta. setting was derived from longshore drift someplace |
|
|
10:20 | . The only sediment that's being derived the river is the down drift |
|
|
10:27 | And that consists of a series of spits and muddy interbedded areas. You |
|
|
10:36 | , the sandy spits will uh form , a barrier between a kind of |
|
|
10:42 | a lagoon and then the lagoon barrier barrier. So that was really the |
|
|
10:51 | to recognizing this asymmetry. Now, Bottari and others did, they then |
|
|
10:57 | that and began to look at the of that. Now, symmetrical wave |
|
|
11:06 | deltas don't show that up drift and drift symmetry. They show an alternating |
|
|
11:14 | of sandy and muddy and sandy and clots that are related to floods. |
|
|
11:21 | . Uh On the other hand, deltas in many places from the little |
|
|
11:30 | to the Big Danube. And uh part, some of the Nile major |
|
|
11:36 | have this solid black or largely solid uh pro grading strand plane. And |
|
|
11:44 | this is kind of a pattern of happens. Um You've got this |
|
|
11:51 | the levee is trapping the sand drift down drift. A flood comes |
|
|
11:59 | a mouth bar and some offshore those bars begin to prograde and merge |
|
|
12:09 | drift and then there's a little bit a bay head delta. I don't |
|
|
12:14 | like that term but uh a, , an area where sediment is coming |
|
|
12:21 | from the river that's between this offshore and also some pictures of that to |
|
|
12:27 | that more clear. OK. So are just some of the Brazilian waved |
|
|
12:31 | deltas, asymmetrical now, particularly big . But even the Rome, remember |
|
|
12:42 | talked about how if you only had small area of, well, if |
|
|
12:48 | trying to reconstruct that region, uh might think of it as a river |
|
|
12:54 | delta, a wave dominated delta, even a barrier island complex. So |
|
|
12:59 | look at this interpretation from the We've got a strand plane, then |
|
|
13:04 | got muddy distribute plane and then we've another strand plane or barrier island coming |
|
|
13:10 | more bee roos over here. Um And so, and this is |
|
|
13:16 | drift direction. Uh Well, it out that imagine you're looking at the |
|
|
13:25 | main mouth of the, the main of the uh Ni uh Nile |
|
|
13:34 | This is the updf side. It's all strand play. Look what happens |
|
|
13:38 | drifts. You've got this elongated barrier is trapping to form a lagoon and |
|
|
13:48 | plane here or just flip that and what you end up having is |
|
|
13:59 | big delta sitting over here and this simply the down drift portion of a |
|
|
14:05 | delta. OK. So, is just a strand plane complex or is |
|
|
14:10 | part of a larger delta? Uh These are actually to the same |
|
|
14:16 | . OK. So, uh that's importance of this regional view. |
|
|
14:22 | And the other thing to know is if the up drift side is basically |
|
|
14:29 | pro grading stram plane, then the drift side is gonna be this alternating |
|
|
14:34 | muddy, sandy muddy sequence. And that has a lot of implications |
|
|
14:40 | the reservoir heterogeneity of uh these waved deltas. And going back, that's |
|
|
14:48 | what was anticipated by this model here in the late eighties or mid |
|
|
14:58 | OK. So there was a lot insight in this model done strictly from |
|
|
15:04 | laws um that um has a lot implications for what we, how we |
|
|
15:12 | waved dominated deltas now. OK. let's look at one bulb of |
|
|
15:19 | the run as an example of waved delta. And we're gonna look at |
|
|
15:26 | portion right here. It was active about um Oh uh 2000, years |
|
|
15:36 | or more. Um I mean, less. And so we can see |
|
|
15:41 | it's pro graded downstream. And I would, I would also note |
|
|
15:47 | it's basically the sediment wedge is It's, it's eroding older stuff to |
|
|
15:53 | younger stuff, this pattern of kind down drift migration. Uh We see |
|
|
16:00 | , in the uh the Brazos River well. But the point is it |
|
|
16:05 | pro grading out And if we look it, let's uh look at |
|
|
16:09 | this is the strand plane truncated and are a series of sand ridges and |
|
|
16:19 | marshes. And these two, um me, let me go it |
|
|
16:28 | It's easier to see these two pores are indicative of the A strand |
|
|
16:39 | Um These cores here art from this here. And so we see again |
|
|
16:49 | different the same delta is in terms the vertical sequence just because of the |
|
|
16:56 | drift and down drift side. And would also add that the composition of |
|
|
17:01 | sands may well be different than the drift sands because the up drift sands |
|
|
17:07 | from longshore, drift up streams in . Uh Notice though here, the |
|
|
17:15 | the sands are also being derived from portions of the delta itself, but |
|
|
17:23 | still being derived from the up drift . So these sands down drift are |
|
|
17:32 | with that river. No sand up may have a completely different composition. |
|
|
17:39 | . Now, to give an example how that bar that's bar mouth and |
|
|
17:45 | bar, crete and forms, uh look at this example here from the |
|
|
17:51 | Washington Oregon Coast. Uh during a , we have a distributor mouth bar |
|
|
18:00 | . And then after the flood, have reworking of that well, uh |
|
|
18:08 | bar into swash bars, that is say the waves cresting on that bar |
|
|
18:14 | it to become emergent and begin to . So we've got flood and |
|
|
18:21 | Ok. Uh That's one of the we have to keep in mind that |
|
|
18:26 | the river in flood may, may completely unrelated to the waves and |
|
|
18:33 | And so there could be a significant between that development of the mouth bar |
|
|
18:42 | the formation and migration swatch bar. , uh this is looking at a |
|
|
18:52 | two cores in this area here. this is a core of one of |
|
|
18:58 | . Um Actually, it kind of like this. Uh These are those |
|
|
19:10 | down drift sides and this is a in one of the sandy ridges. |
|
|
19:16 | then this is a core in the and notice you've got this or what |
|
|
19:22 | would assume is this um like OK. So again, that |
|
|
19:42 | yeah, sorry. Here we've got core and the intervening March and that's |
|
|
19:55 | those cores are basically showing. Uh here we've got the mouth bar, |
|
|
20:02 | swash bars, they're beginning to migrate . Notice that the clone of sediments |
|
|
20:12 | moving down stream as well. And the up drift migrates in a high |
|
|
20:20 | , higher wave energy samp or situation , the down drift they accrete uh |
|
|
20:28 | they may well be a spacing of in between and then the next flood |
|
|
20:37 | . So let's look at how that happen. Here's the uh the |
|
|
20:42 | this clearly is the direction of longshore . OK? And here's your mouth |
|
|
20:49 | flood. And here are your squash and notice uh they're beginning to accrete |
|
|
21:03 | , they're moving on shore and now largely accreted and you got the sandy |
|
|
21:10 | an earlier sandy ridge and this intervening flat area. Ok. Uh Without |
|
|
21:21 | accretion at all, what little accretion occurring is uh occurring is sand up |
|
|
21:27 | . Ok. So that's what we're at as we look at this transition |
|
|
21:33 | symmetrical uh plumes to asymmetrical or even plumes where um the there's so much |
|
|
21:46 | energy compared to sediment supply uh that river simply just can't feel gray. |
|
|
21:53 | here would be an example of a plume. There's the river and it |
|
|
22:01 | which direction is the sediment moving. , it's just kind of moving offshore |
|
|
22:10 | uh in by diffusion. Here. the other hand, we have a |
|
|
22:15 | deflected plume and we have a very a deflected uh river. Uh This |
|
|
22:25 | looks like it's relatively low mud. if there was higher mud, you |
|
|
22:31 | , you'd have a little more down separation here. OK. So this |
|
|
22:37 | , my favorite um wave dominated del and one of the reasons is you |
|
|
22:45 | see very much the formation and transit of a former waved dominated delta here |
|
|
22:59 | the present way dominated delta here. . Uh That line that I just |
|
|
23:07 | is about 14:00 14:68 Christian er or uh so this basically has formed in |
|
|
23:22 | last uh 600 years prior to this was the uh main distributor. |
|
|
23:30 | was abandoned. And I want you think about how this looks compared to |
|
|
23:40 | Mississippi Delta. When we look at abandoned loads and there we had |
|
|
23:47 | we went through that cycle of uh , reworking, flooding of the delta |
|
|
23:56 | . Here, it's just truncated. mean, there's virtually no subsidence |
|
|
24:03 | It hadn't been that long, but still virtually no subsidence and nothing but |
|
|
24:10 | . There's no subsidence in part because is a low mud area. Remember |
|
|
24:16 | had Fixed up to 60 m of that was beginning to compact when that |
|
|
24:28 | was abandoned here, you have almost blood. So when it's abandoned, |
|
|
24:34 | only thing that happens is you've lost sediment supply, the waves are still |
|
|
24:39 | in. And so you have OK. So I want you to |
|
|
24:46 | thinking about how these waves or rather these different types of deltas behave and |
|
|
24:56 | as a pro grade in their constructional and as they are Barmy destroyed uh |
|
|
25:05 | their in that is as they're when abandoned and go through the destruction |
|
|
25:10 | Both the geomorphology, the map view the geometry of the settings and how |
|
|
25:17 | might affect how you would recognize these out or subsurface. OK. Uh |
|
|
25:24 | another thing to note, if we at this portion of the delta here |
|
|
25:32 | was shown here. Uh I want to look at this area here in |
|
|
25:42 | little more detail. OK. Right , you notice there's, there's a |
|
|
25:49 | of little truncation actually seeing better here large. Now, this is largely |
|
|
26:06 | symmetrical wave dominated Delphin. So we're getting a whole lot of distinction uh |
|
|
26:15 | the up drift and down drift OK. Uh But having said that |
|
|
26:21 | , there's an interesting distinction going on between what they mark as green, |
|
|
26:31 | is a mouth bar system and which they describe as a uh uh |
|
|
26:42 | , it's basically a, a OK. Now, so let's look |
|
|
26:47 | that here. Here again, we it more schematically. OK. And |
|
|
26:52 | is how, how we mm this how we look at. Um I'm |
|
|
27:08 | . OK. Yeah, I don't you, all right. Um This |
|
|
27:13 | what happens. You've got a mouth formed and they call the element set |
|
|
27:24 | is then truncated or eroded and then on both sides. That's a measure |
|
|
27:32 | the asymmetry. OK. And so that happens, bye. Flood, |
|
|
27:43 | , flood, reworking. Each time a major flood and reworking event, |
|
|
27:48 | get this kind of dispersed zone between mouth bar and the ridges. |
|
|
27:58 | I think you could, if you about it, imagine how that would |
|
|
28:06 | if you had an asymmetrical delta where maybe this was the up drift side |
|
|
28:14 | this was the down drift side and began to have more separation in here |
|
|
28:21 | the swatch bars come on. it turns out that these mouth bar |
|
|
28:32 | complexes uh can be picked up in the subsurface as well looking at |
|
|
28:40 | attributes or time slices. Uh The thing is that when you look at |
|
|
28:48 | vertical sections in the mouth bar, more heterogeneous or more muddy. And |
|
|
28:58 | the downstream section of the lobe lobes much thicker and much more typical of |
|
|
29:10 | pro grading shore face as opposed to sands in an urine or distribution |
|
|
29:18 | OK? You can look at this your leisure. So here we have |
|
|
29:24 | example of a pro grading short face dominated delta. Um Galloway doesn't show |
|
|
29:35 | of an increase in grain size once become amalgamated in what I would call |
|
|
29:42 | a uh a delta front again. These are two different ways of |
|
|
29:50 | The same thing. Galloway tends to describe the uh vertical sequences as |
|
|
29:59 | be seen in a core. Uh And then the grain size would |
|
|
30:04 | shown separate. Uh And, and others tend to combine the two uh |
|
|
30:11 | use the grain size as uh changing this direction. So that the outer |
|
|
30:20 | of this is a grain size curve then the sedimentary structures are shown |
|
|
30:27 | Um all things equal. I prefer this type of, of uh example |
|
|
30:33 | , is the one that's done most uh in part, because it's easier |
|
|
30:38 | visualize how the grain size is changing the change in upper uh with the |
|
|
30:44 | in sedimentary structures. And we can here now that there really is some |
|
|
30:49 | going on within this zone here. we have it, for example, |
|
|
30:54 | here, uh shown again uh where is a series of those accreting cycles |
|
|
31:04 | uh pro gradation events in that program delta. In fact, here's that |
|
|
31:16 | core sitting here. And what we're at is we're looking at uh multiple |
|
|
31:28 | . OK. As we're uh looking and this pro grading sequence, there's |
|
|
31:37 | big discontinuity here. Um This, is associated with a uh I'm |
|
|
31:46 | this lobe set is associated with an lobe and then the newer lobe is |
|
|
31:57 | here. And here they do suggest been some subsidence between the older lobe |
|
|
32:04 | the younger lobe. Uh In there's very little but it's, it's |
|
|
32:09 | here for, for effect. And again, are those uh cross sections |
|
|
32:17 | we, we might have seen through . OK. So the main focus |
|
|
32:24 | is this is the pro grading Sandy . OK. So here we've got |
|
|
32:31 | river dominated and here we've got wave now, but Ari made the distinction |
|
|
32:38 | storm wave influenced and storm wave Uh conceptually, that's, that's not |
|
|
32:47 | all surprised because think of that uh triangular classification um as waves get |
|
|
32:57 | and more dominant or storm waves get and more dominant. Uh You would |
|
|
33:01 | a transition and the transition you see is um the decreased influence of the |
|
|
33:14 | and the increased influence of the So by the time we're here, |
|
|
33:21 | looking at a scrambling in between, looking at a river dominated. But |
|
|
33:30 | actually, I want you to imagine this is the up drift side of |
|
|
33:38 | wave dominated delta, what would the drift side look like? Really? |
|
|
33:43 | look like this or this? It's be those packets of marsh Bee |
|
|
33:52 | marsh sandwich, marsh sandwich. So I don't think I'll ask it |
|
|
34:00 | an exam, but I would ask to think about what that core might |
|
|
34:06 | like on that down drift side. . Now, the other thing I |
|
|
34:11 | you to think about is that destruction phase um the wave dominant deltas in |
|
|
34:23 | Texas and the Cretaceous uh provided a of background. There was some uh |
|
|
34:32 | look at what happens with say a strand plane sequence or uh let's say |
|
|
34:39 | dominate delta. Well, you begin , you wrote it and you continue |
|
|
34:50 | erode it. But what you're doing you're really just cutting down and truncating |
|
|
35:00 | system. You're not seeing a lot subsidence. So the section simply is |
|
|
35:07 | up, cut out. And you say you're getting an erosional transgression, |
|
|
35:16 | also get a lot of calcite cementation at that contact just below the. |
|
|
35:23 | the, and the reason for that that during the transgression, that erosion |
|
|
35:29 | transgression formation of that wave rave there's typically a lot of uh gravel |
|
|
35:36 | , including shell material and that shell is dissolved and repre it just below |
|
|
35:45 | in the top of whatever it is being truncated. And that could |
|
|
35:51 | concretions or it could be an actually consistent. Uh And it can certainly |
|
|
36:01 | as a, a um majors top in terms of that better sort of |
|
|
36:10 | material uh potential reservoir downdraft. here's one of the tricks though, |
|
|
36:17 | is the best reservoir in this grading sequence? It's in the upper |
|
|
36:24 | face. What is the first to removed if you just are dealing with |
|
|
36:32 | , the your face. So you preferentially removing your best reservoir and you're |
|
|
36:42 | beginning to bioturbated it as is being . So we've got a, a |
|
|
36:55 | between the transgression that just be it a transgression and subsides that at least |
|
|
37:05 | the potential of that oh uh that face, high permeability potential reservoir to |
|
|
37:17 | . And so we kind of see issue here. We, this would |
|
|
37:20 | an example of what we talked about a uh pro grading or uh short |
|
|
37:28 | where, where we've got uh these and we've got transgression, regression, |
|
|
37:36 | regression. And, and let's look what that looks like as one |
|
|
37:45 | Ok. Um These are pro grading and so it's basically the a portion |
|
|
37:57 | here one of the shazam. And this is a, a programing event |
|
|
38:06 | each of those has the potential for and vertical changes in reservoir quality. |
|
|
38:14 | . And eventually we can get down individual beds within those deposits. |
|
|
38:27 | All right. Yeah. Um So let's look at what's happening down |
|
|
38:36 | . There's a lot of stories to told from here to hear. |
|
|
38:44 | Uh Here, of course is the he still here. Is that narrow |
|
|
38:52 | uh plume. Uh Here's the sediment to fly a bay and coming out |
|
|
39:01 | there, that sediment we can see the finer material is being dispersed down |
|
|
39:09 | and the course material is also hugging coast. We have a zone right |
|
|
39:14 | here. Uh That's actually Nier We'll come back to that in just |
|
|
39:20 | moment. But what I want to on is that when we look at |
|
|
39:28 | satellite imagery, we realized that there sediment being dispersed all the way down |
|
|
39:37 | Mexico from Mississippi. OK. when we look at this portion of |
|
|
39:45 | down drift delta plain, it's called sheer plain. We see that it |
|
|
39:50 | of a series of distinct Shane, are basically uh referred to linear sandy |
|
|
39:59 | separated by mud flats. OK. so this is an example of what |
|
|
40:06 | they look like on earth. Uh a little, you can, you |
|
|
40:11 | kind of see the strand plane pro if you took a cross section through |
|
|
40:19 | , uh, it would look like . So we've got little sands and |
|
|
40:27 | . Now, one of the important here is notice that this sand is |
|
|
40:33 | , it basically does not extend offshore we kind of predicted for that down |
|
|
40:49 | portion of I'm, yeah, the drip portion way do a delta is |
|
|
40:55 | just right here and it's surrounded by . And the reason it's truncated is |
|
|
41:03 | it's formed by the reworking of a sands or a muddy uh programing title |
|
|
41:19 | . And so it's a transgressive feature on the back March and it's winnowing |
|
|
41:32 | the, the finer material leaving behind a little sandy ridge and then there's |
|
|
41:41 | pro gradation that flows. Ok. this basically is a, reflects a |
|
|
41:48 | of time when you, you have pro grading sediment supply and a shut |
|
|
41:55 | of sediment supply and reworking. you might think that's flood, non |
|
|
42:01 | , but in reality, these are in time that it reflects more the |
|
|
42:11 | of the up drift delta, the drift Paleo Mississippi delta. Ok. |
|
|
42:20 | when we look at that, we've a, a delta here and we're |
|
|
42:32 | right here when this delta is we get a lot of mud down |
|
|
42:39 | . Now, what's gonna happen when shifts here? Well, you know |
|
|
42:47 | story of how that delta will be and it'll begin to subside. I |
|
|
42:56 | repeat that. But what's gonna happen this area? You've shut off the |
|
|
43:01 | shore grift of sediment. But, so it's going to begin to |
|
|
43:07 | So now that it's shifted over you have abandonment over here in that |
|
|
43:16 | flat, which had progra it out now eroding as well. And so |
|
|
43:24 | gonna give you that thin strip of . The sheer now the delta come |
|
|
43:31 | over here. It's close. The is coming along the the coast and |
|
|
43:41 | pro grading again. So those same that we saw with globe abandonment or |
|
|
43:48 | say, formation, abandonment, abandonment back and forth, left and |
|
|
43:55 | is causing cooperation, reworking, reworking of the down drift in your |
|
|
44:02 | . Ok. Ok. Um We that in a lot of major |
|
|
44:09 | Um I saw it on the uh on the uh the delta uh Yukon |
|
|
44:17 | . Uh This is the plane, is the, the modern delta at |
|
|
44:22 | . Um And you can see that little better here. These cheers are |
|
|
44:32 | older. The youngest Chiers are only about here. And so we have |
|
|
44:42 | abandoned river courses coming down here from Yukon as well. So we this |
|
|
44:51 | drift sheer of muds and interbedded really . Cheers or sand ridges is a |
|
|
44:59 | feature in, sorry. Pardon Uh large muddy deltas that now |
|
|
45:10 | we've looked at this transition. Uh this is looking at some of |
|
|
45:21 | I'm sorry, the Isopack that we get. Uh I wanna focus. |
|
|
45:29 | we're gonna leave the effective wave domination look at the role of tide. |
|
|
45:37 | among other things, just notice the in ice pack shape. OK. |
|
|
45:43 | going to these elongated zones. And does his finger like. And |
|
|
45:56 | is this both the modern? Did you take bird delta and these |
|
|
46:08 | tide dominated deltas at first blush have kind of a similar digitate is a |
|
|
46:19 | as we'll see, they're totally different . Now, we alluded to |
|
|
46:26 | In fact, we described this uh where we looked at a, an |
|
|
46:32 | , a tide dominated estuary. Uh saw that V shaped funnel, we |
|
|
46:39 | that meandering to straight portion upstream and saw the transition or rather the intermixing |
|
|
46:48 | river dominated processes and wave and tide processes. The tides being the dominator |
|
|
46:58 | we sold it as the river influx relative to the marine influence. Uh |
|
|
47:09 | get a shift and we get pro mud flats and we get accreting and |
|
|
47:19 | . Uh uh well down stream accreting vertically accreting uh tidal ridges as |
|
|
47:29 | Ok. So this would be an of a high dominated built here. |
|
|
47:39 | And you can kind of see why on people wondered is it really even |
|
|
47:44 | delta? Uh But it is, is. Ok. Uh This is |
|
|
47:48 | Fly River, which is uh one the, the main examples. Uh |
|
|
47:54 | so uh we're gonna look at present title processes and how high dominated deltas |
|
|
48:06 | both in the modern and in the en uh ancient environments. And one |
|
|
48:15 | to remember is that these things evolve into another. A tide dominated estuary |
|
|
48:23 | common during a rising sea level. sea level is stationary, then the |
|
|
48:29 | can begin to prograde and it transforms from a tide dominated estuary to tide |
|
|
48:37 | about delta. So where are our tidal ranges? Well, they're down |
|
|
48:45 | in uh uh Indonesia and uh Australia in, here in Korea. Uh |
|
|
48:54 | got a lot up in the Bay Fundy around uh UK, et |
|
|
49:05 | And here are the major rivers, sorry, major river deltas. The |
|
|
49:12 | in black or solid are tide dominated . So we've got them here in |
|
|
49:23 | macro tial area in Australia. We've them here in the macro tidal zone |
|
|
49:27 | the Gulf of um California. we got him here in the |
|
|
49:33 | the Amazon. It's just a locally dominated area that's a, a that's |
|
|
49:43 | from the geometry of the shelf. , here's the Amazon with this big |
|
|
49:49 | , here's the, with the big , the fly, uh and the |
|
|
49:54 | Sea. OK. Um All we'll skip this story right now. |
|
|
50:01 | here's an example. Uh P me the Gulf. Uh a yeah, |
|
|
50:10 | delta plane wide mud flats, funnel distributors and these elongated veg mud flats |
|
|
50:26 | into elongated subtitle bars, subtitle chan . Ok. Uh So here we've |
|
|
50:35 | the, and, and delta and turns out that it's somewhat misleading to |
|
|
50:45 | about. This is the tie dominated . This is actually the modern Thai |
|
|
50:53 | delta today. This is the abandoned . And what we're looking at is |
|
|
51:02 | drift accretion. Here's an accreting but all of this here here, |
|
|
51:09 | have that old delta and here's an older. We've got a disconnect. |
|
|
51:17 | we begin to look at the whole plane. It turns out that much |
|
|
51:23 | what we think about as the wave . I'm sorry, the tide dominated |
|
|
51:32 | are these elongated estuaries, some of are completely disconnected. Now, these |
|
|
51:38 | slightly connected still, but you can they are not as dominant. We |
|
|
51:47 | particularly see that with the Ganji So much of the here is the |
|
|
51:53 | act of Delta. OK. This the abandoned delta. There's still sediment |
|
|
52:03 | down here. But the title influence is much different than the title influence |
|
|
52:16 | . So this is abandoned, this active and again, when I say |
|
|
52:23 | , there's still sediment coming out. is not because you hear, but |
|
|
52:33 | have a very different morphology of the flats and rivers. If we look |
|
|
52:42 | that abandoned river, it's basically tidal channels So here we actually |
|
|
52:50 | what I would argue is an a that has formed on the abandonment of |
|
|
52:59 | Ganji tide dominated delta. Now, still see sediment coming out and I'm |
|
|
53:06 | come back to this later. But area here is typical uh both of |
|
|
53:20 | thi dominated deltas. But this surface morphology here uh tends to be |
|
|
53:30 | typical of the abandoned plane, abandoned plane. OK. Uh Here we |
|
|
53:37 | again, active delta, abandoned the , active delta, abandon delta. |
|
|
53:53 | . Here we've got reworking of the front into barrier islands and a lot |
|
|
54:03 | channels all along it. Here. we have the pro grading delta. |
|
|
54:12 | , we even see it with the here's a modern or it's a tie |
|
|
54:20 | mixed Hyde river delta. And here have down drift mud and sediment reworking |
|
|
54:33 | bearing that abandoned Ali or no. , in a purely fluvial system, |
|
|
54:46 | getting here and then we're gonna have delta mouth or the trip mouth bar |
|
|
54:51 | right here. Yeah, that's, know, it deep and it, |
|
|
54:57 | , it gets deeper and deeper until hits the mouth board in an |
|
|
55:04 | Mount bar is still way over but we're actually getting shallow channel in |
|
|
55:14 | showing way upstream of the, the and that is because of the landward |
|
|
55:26 | influence. So we have a net appreciate in this zone here because of |
|
|
55:38 | tide and the decrease in tidal a energy now they'll change in a |
|
|
55:45 | But the long term effect is to this accretion significantly upstream of the river's |
|
|
55:57 | . Let's look at the Colorado The Colorado river comes down here and |
|
|
56:04 | it takes a little bit of a and it forms what's sometimes referred to |
|
|
56:09 | an inland delta as it gets into , this a distribution fluvial system is |
|
|
56:15 | it is. But notice that here's salt Sea, the salt and sea |
|
|
56:23 | largely filled around The early 1900s. a big flood ended up diverting the |
|
|
56:37 | and flooding this region, the flood on what was called the All American |
|
|
56:42 | . So they were siphoning off water irrigate the agriculture in this area |
|
|
56:50 | Uh The river tried, the river change its course, eventually got it |
|
|
56:54 | come back here and it presently goes Mexico and enters in the Gulf of |
|
|
57:07 | to form this tide dominated delta. , the only problem is this delta |
|
|
57:16 | presently beheaded and it's beheaded. Not because the river itself was diverted, |
|
|
57:29 | the water was diverted. Uh This the decrease in water with time to |
|
|
57:40 | 1960. There was a little bit a spurt here but basically zero water |
|
|
57:45 | flowing down to the Delta. It's being diverted for irrigation most for the |
|
|
57:52 | . In fact, there's a what is returned is so salty to Mexico |
|
|
57:57 | there's a desalinization plant at that spot try to freshen up the water. |
|
|
58:02 | the Mexicans continue to complain to us they're not getting their share of the |
|
|
58:08 | river water. We're complaining to them real bravo and our share of that |
|
|
58:15 | to the River Grande such as international . But we clearly show that this |
|
|
58:23 | system now is defunct. The good is we can at least look at |
|
|
58:31 | you like the relic tide dominated And what we see offshore are these |
|
|
58:40 | tidal sandbars? They're out in We see this big elongated bar here |
|
|
58:50 | this one here. It was the flats on either. So now if |
|
|
58:58 | draw a cross section through here, can kind of envision how that V |
|
|
59:07 | upper end of the Gulf of California would look like before I do |
|
|
59:13 | Let me just remind you that these those Tidal bars. This is the |
|
|
59:21 | that would be right here because this the main one that separates uh the |
|
|
59:27 | major distributors. And then as we further offshore, we see these smaller |
|
|
59:36 | , linear sand bars. Ok? here's the flooding, the transgressive flooding |
|
|
59:44 | the bay. Here's our alluvial Uh We've got she and pro delta |
|
|
59:55 | that are then begin to be interspersed these subtitle deltas. We've got mud |
|
|
60:05 | that are beginning to come on shore we have these distribution channel fills, |
|
|
60:15 | you. So we've got, if like four major faces to flat, |
|
|
60:23 | I'm gonna call it pro delta linear ridges and estuaries. We pretty much |
|
|
60:38 | what tidal plants look like. But about these rene distribution channels in the |
|
|
60:46 | title sandwich? Ok. Well, they're, they're pretty different and, |
|
|
60:53 | , and that's, this is really of the criteria that we use uh |
|
|
60:58 | reconstruct these systems. The distribution channels have an erosional base. They are |
|
|
61:11 | to slightly finding upwards until they're And there's a series of events that |
|
|
61:22 | that channel as it programs, it up. The linear title ridge is |
|
|
61:32 | pouring upwards system until it's a emerges become a title slap. And of |
|
|
61:43 | , it's punctuated by that uh muddy . Uh The sands get thicker as |
|
|
61:54 | get near the top. Yeah. these are our two in members. |
|
|
62:01 | you like the dominant sandstone faces of tide dominated delta. And we see |
|
|
62:09 | in, in the ancient uh as . Here's a sand ridge or sand |
|
|
62:14 | that different people uh have interpreted but interpreted as le or sand ridge course |
|
|
62:22 | from bottom says, here's the transgressive , stone bottom set bar slope, |
|
|
62:29 | crest, the bar crest until it's is gonna have the most uh reworking |
|
|
62:39 | both tides and waves. And you're have in here, things like a |
|
|
62:44 | bundles, reactivation surfaces, et Oh OK. This was originally interpreted |
|
|
62:52 | a pro grading sandwich. Uh but people began to look at it in |
|
|
63:00 | detail, they realize that these are elongated features from river sources in this |
|
|
63:08 | . Ok. Mohawk is a significant . It's been studied a lot in |
|
|
63:15 | because it's tide dominated, but in because it's a humid source area. |
|
|
63:21 | , what does that mean? first of all, it's in the |
|
|
63:24 | of Moha of uh moan straits. it's got very low wave issues. |
|
|
63:33 | not much fetch. On the other , it's an area where the tides |
|
|
63:38 | accelerated as they come through the So it's got a high wave, |
|
|
63:46 | high tides, but low wave it's in a humid drainage area. |
|
|
63:52 | so you tend to have rainfall all round, which means you don't have |
|
|
63:58 | hydrologic flood and non flood cycles. That means you tend to have no |
|
|
64:05 | . You know, remember levees are when the flood overs spills the |
|
|
64:10 | You don't have displays. You don't a lot of avulsion. Ok. |
|
|
64:15 | the climate in the source area uh a major impact on the pluvial and |
|
|
64:27 | processes uh downstream or in the system , and downstream. I don't know |
|
|
64:34 | I was gonna do there. We it. OK. So this is |
|
|
64:37 | it look looks like in terms of the green on the left is the |
|
|
64:46 | as the uh red on the Uh That's a false color image or |
|
|
64:53 | infrared. But basically we've got these um dis tributaries. Um They're all |
|
|
65:05 | active and in part because remember what said about lack of floods, you |
|
|
65:10 | to have lack of, of uh all shows. Uh You do get |
|
|
65:15 | switching due to bar accretion. Uh you get a lot, you have |
|
|
65:21 | lot of these deltas, I a lot of these distributors continue to |
|
|
65:25 | active as they're progra offshore. You a wide delta plane uh and you |
|
|
65:32 | these little triangular shaped mouth bars. those mouth bars started here and then |
|
|
65:50 | become elongate. And as this these will become, these will merge |
|
|
65:56 | become elongate as well. So up here, we've got a distributor channel |
|
|
66:09 | here we still got channel, but little bit of lateral migration or bar |
|
|
66:18 | . And here we're getting a pro up bar formation case. Now, |
|
|
66:29 | we look at this, there's actually referred to as a sub aerial delta |
|
|
66:36 | , there's a zone of deposition and delta front way out here. And |
|
|
66:46 | a lot of these delta males are disconnected from the channel. Some are |
|
|
66:54 | next to the channel and some are offshore. And so this has to |
|
|
67:01 | with the tides that are forming this in during which the sediment is pro |
|
|
67:11 | . There was a lot of work on describing the transition from the offshore |
|
|
67:17 | river dominated deltas. The wave forget about the from wave dominated is |
|
|
67:27 | shore face. High wave energy, grained sediments moved offshore and down the |
|
|
67:38 | delta. Over here, a lot mud, it's a low gradient offshore |
|
|
67:46 | it begins to fail. Uh by uh in the pro delta river diving |
|
|
67:56 | we get less and less mud because more and more wave energy. We |
|
|
68:02 | that increase steepness of the shelf or near shoulder. Now, there's a |
|
|
68:07 | here, a radiant pro delta means wave attenuation. And so wave energy |
|
|
68:19 | getting progressively less as the as the programs. On the other hand, |
|
|
68:25 | we have removed the fine grain we increase wave energy. So there's |
|
|
68:32 | feedback between the relationships of the sediment offshore and the amount of wave |
|
|
68:46 | Now, when we looked at the Delta, it it was different, |
|
|
68:49 | had a very flat surface until about m, almost 20 km offshore and |
|
|
68:56 | it was steep. Uh that has do with the dynamics of ice. |
|
|
69:02 | not gonna get into that, but turns out that that is much more |
|
|
69:10 | of a high dominated delta. Uh being um this is the moca right |
|
|
69:21 | in the moa if you were to uh the depth and distance, this |
|
|
69:30 | the Mohawk delta been meaning to do for Yukon and I keep forgetting to |
|
|
69:34 | it. Uh So if we yeah, sediment across the shelf. |
|
|
69:42 | gonna see that the tides are pushing lot of that sediment offshore. And |
|
|
69:49 | gonna be one of the characteristics of Thai Doin deltas this zone of bypass |
|
|
69:57 | that is forming this broad flat. here's the Mekong dealt. OK. |
|
|
70:11 | Now, these black ridges are like cheers beach ridges and it, it |
|
|
70:20 | has that um morphology that is of Laird uh channels. Fact, the |
|
|
70:39 | shape looks a lot like the but it, it's rather different. |
|
|
70:46 | the if you draw a cross section here, you would see a very |
|
|
70:53 | kind of delta and delta and what have now cheese. Oh No, |
|
|
71:12 | not cheese. What you say. oh See, it is kind of |
|
|
71:23 | book out um coming in and down front that Yeah, what else? |
|
|
71:47 | , I've got a quick example. . Um Now the point here it |
|
|
71:55 | to enlarge that is that the delta actually formed changed as it filled in |
|
|
72:10 | early stage, which is around It was like the, it was |
|
|
72:20 | Thai dominated do in its later It actually became much more of a |
|
|
72:28 | bait, dealt with the effective waves much greater. And what that means |
|
|
72:38 | that if you were to try to the early maha, it would have |
|
|
72:45 | right here if you were to plot later moha, it plants over |
|
|
72:54 | So this delta has changed through time though it hasn't changed its location. |
|
|
73:02 | . So what's happened? Actually, don't remember, but I can tell |
|
|
73:06 | what I think happened. And that that that transition from rising sea levels |
|
|
73:13 | sea level, high stand meant that 25,000, from 6000 to 25,000, |
|
|
73:21 | still had the tides being the main , sediment supply was having trouble establishing |
|
|
73:32 | pro gradation, sediment supply finally was to allow that delta to prograde more |
|
|
73:43 | waves became the dominant process. So the transitions are numerous. The |
|
|
73:54 | of deltas from shelf edge deltas rising level to bay head, deltas and |
|
|
74:03 | , wave dominated estuaries. Pro grading into mid shell, shallow deltas, |
|
|
74:09 | shelf deltas, shelf deltas. What story. But it's important to think |
|
|
74:17 | those transitions. OK. Now, do you look for in, in |
|
|
74:26 | ancient or a th dominated delta or that the diagram of workers if you |
|
|
74:38 | to try to quantify the relative impact relative importance of waves, rivers and |
|
|
74:47 | because almost no delta is an end . All of those, those three |
|
|
74:56 | impact them to different amounts when you at the signature of the sedimentary |
|
|
75:02 | So what are the, is the of tide generated deltas and tide generated |
|
|
75:09 | ? Well, uh ring costs. Tangential four sets and reactivation surfaces, |
|
|
75:23 | lithic strata and double mud drapes and rhyth mites I mean, those are |
|
|
75:29 | things that you would would see. , you know, here would be |
|
|
75:35 | ripple and doom scale pros strata. bone Prosta remembering that that's not formed |
|
|
75:43 | a flood a cycle, but by of time, blood dominant om uh |
|
|
75:54 | sigmoid contacts. Uh That's basically our bund. OK. We've seen that |
|
|
76:02 | of course, if you recall that bundle uh can be eroded to form |
|
|
76:10 | reactivation surface. So, reactivation surfaces form during the subdominant flood cycle. |
|
|
76:18 | title cycle hetero lithic strata. Uh . But having said that we can |
|
|
76:28 | them in any environment that's alternating fast slow. So what we'd like to |
|
|
76:38 | is also bidirectional transport, particularly when have the ripples for sure. |
|
|
76:44 | But hetero xstrata are common, but are also, as we see, |
|
|
76:49 | find them in the deep deep sea well. Uh Double mud drapes are |
|
|
76:54 | part of the title bundle story. we're looking at tidal bundles, we're |
|
|
77:03 | at reactivation surfaces. We're looking at mud drapes. These are, that's |
|
|
77:08 | part of the tidal sedimentation story. finally, those idle couplets thanks related |
|
|
77:20 | that would be the inclined hetero lithic . OK. Go oh, hang |
|
|
77:29 | . Uh do something here. Well, I just uh forgot to |
|
|
77:38 | something. Um Let's just go to . Ok. Here are here is |
|
|
77:47 | pro grading tidal ridge or pro grading be pro grading mouth if we look |
|
|
77:57 | this, we see we can look a general package in here and that's |
|
|
78:05 | bed set. And within the bed , we see transitional faces. That's |
|
|
78:21 | that we're going to describe our show another moment. So we have these |
|
|
78:29 | that are progressing out. These are sandstone rich facies, these are the |
|
|
78:36 | rich faces. It's and eventually it to cease to prograde and the mud |
|
|
78:49 | or hetero lithic species began to take . So, what are those? |
|
|
78:54 | , that's what somehow got super composed faces five, which is this |
|
|
79:04 | thick sequences, sandy bars on the of the grading tide dominated delta. |
|
|
79:17 | , and we're gonna go from five 4 to 3 to 2 to |
|
|
79:26 | So three and 2, I'm four and 3. Uh You're going |
|
|
79:34 | cross strata to hetero lithic straddle and I'm sorry. Yeah, down |
|
|
79:46 | we're getting isolated thick cross strata. down here we're getting a hetero lithic |
|
|
79:53 | again. Ok. So I wanted try to explain that a little |
|
|
79:59 | but here's face. She's wanted two strata. Here's five, your best |
|
|
80:12 | And in the Middle three and relatively thick sands and hetero lithic |
|
|
80:24 | And so here's how those bars, look as a form of set and |
|
|
80:35 | bars themselves are separated by periods of bar degradation. And so when we |
|
|
80:43 | to look at those pro grading mud of that costing up, which be |
|
|
80:54 | , uh imagine that you were looking that mud draped surface. So |
|
|
81:03 | we basically took that grape surface, it out and looked at how continuous |
|
|
81:11 | mud was. What you would see that it's pretty continuous on the lower |
|
|
81:18 | and it gets more and more discontinuous the upper part. So what is |
|
|
81:23 | is the continuity of that baffle that barrier that gets more and more discontinuous |
|
|
81:33 | you get higher and higher up on program set. Yeah. So this |
|
|
81:43 | kind of a useful summary for these title bars. We see them in |
|
|
81:54 | , tide dominated estuaries and tide dominated . The tide dominated SWS are typically |
|
|
82:02 | . The deltas are typically regressive. what do you get in these regressive |
|
|
82:11 | ? Right. Well, you get stacking. First of all, that |
|
|
82:18 | the lower bar and I'm gonna have , here's the bar. So this |
|
|
82:30 | the, the bars and sea level rising. What that means is the |
|
|
82:45 | sets are preserved and the bars aren't up to the surface, they're being |
|
|
82:56 | because it's an estuary still, it's by Landward oriented paleo the title generated |
|
|
83:09 | it's pretty well, the sands are well sorted. The bars tend to |
|
|
83:14 | a little thinner and the bed sets a little thinner and you get the |
|
|
83:23 | low angle sigmoidal trough or cross the . But so how would that differ |
|
|
83:33 | a system where you've got sea level . Well, look at the top |
|
|
83:45 | the bar, the top of the tends to be eroded. Uh You're |
|
|
83:55 | more fluvial or basin where paleo currents because the river processes are, are |
|
|
84:03 | dominant. Uh The sediment in the is more poorly sorted. You get |
|
|
84:09 | pro gradation stacking, the bars are . You get a lot of trough |
|
|
84:15 | tabular pros strata related to the increased of the fluvial system. OK. |
|
|
84:25 | let's look at some case studies and there are several in Venezuela. Um |
|
|
84:34 | has many giant fields and many of are wedged just south of Columbia. |
|
|
84:47 | in what is basically a a for that formed during the collision and, |
|
|
84:55 | deformation. Oh South America. So have a, a series of thrust |
|
|
85:09 | that are forming a, an elongate , uh all along Venezuela from west |
|
|
85:17 | east. And we've got a fluvial that's an axial drainage system depositing, |
|
|
85:30 | in the Mara basin with pluvial and sediments into the open marine. So |
|
|
85:38 | a cross section, we kind of how that would be both a transgressive |
|
|
85:49 | a regressive system. So this, the way down here would be the |
|
|
85:55 | where we think the the tops of bars would be preserved if it's a |
|
|
86:02 | dominated system. And it is, then these areas here would be where |
|
|
86:08 | uh more regressive systems would be. this is a description of the reservoirs |
|
|
86:20 | right here. OK. Uh Here's tide dominated deltas and here's our rene |
|
|
86:27 | complexes and our proximal, the distal sandwiches. Those sandwiches being down |
|
|
86:40 | It depends. So, and here have, here's the are a series |
|
|
86:48 | channels and these are inter channel uh flats. These are the channels coming |
|
|
87:02 | like this. And then in here have these tidal ridges and mouth |
|
|
87:18 | And this is one interval with the sand and san channel sitting in |
|
|
87:31 | And we can see we've got kind an elongate low associated with this particular |
|
|
87:39 | channel would be this with you. , it turns out if going back |
|
|
87:45 | the max notice how these melt many of them are sitting at the |
|
|
87:52 | of that sub aqueous delta but are to the tidal flat in other, |
|
|
88:00 | a rene channel that continues offshore, are sub aqueous levies and then here's |
|
|
88:07 | mouth box and here's the same scale system for the Orinoco or rather |
|
|
88:28 | And, and if we go back those estuaries in the Amazon, we |
|
|
88:37 | that the channels are coming out, elongated and they had this kind of |
|
|
88:50 | or shoe like bar Some distance offshore this case, 20 km offshore |
|
|
89:10 | very different. I mean, very to those elongate bars. They had |
|
|
89:23 | mohawk, the scale is different, is two km that's 20 km, |
|
|
89:29 | it's the same process. And so we have are these linear ridges better |
|
|
89:40 | you like the tales of these mouth . And this is a vertical section |
|
|
89:50 | cores showing what those linear sand ridges like bursting upwards. OK. Here's |
|
|
89:59 | of the core. Uh This is lowermost part and here that's going from |
|
|
90:09 | delta hetero lithic to sand. And this is the part that been here |
|
|
90:22 | this is from in Spain. Uh is from um Venezuela and this is |
|
|
90:35 | summarized by Galloway, I think Galloway of ripped a lot of what he |
|
|
90:43 | uh based on this particular model. it's, it's also takes into account |
|
|
90:50 | models. So we're beginning to see similar these things are and how different |
|
|
90:57 | are from the chin where we have channels, a gratings and then finally |
|
|
91:08 | in the band of. And this is kind of the alloys look |
|
|
91:14 | , it looks awfully similar in part I think it's probably based on, |
|
|
91:18 | this work. So when we think the title sand ridges, we think |
|
|
91:24 | coarsening upward sequences. When we think rene channels, we think of somewhat |
|
|
91:31 | but finding upper sequences. So if we go back here, we're |
|
|
91:38 | call this grossly finding upwards. Whereas it's upwards. And so we've got |
|
|
91:56 | channel complex. Here's another one here here. We have a grading |
|
|
92:04 | Stan Bridges as this as this basin Philly. Now, if we continue |
|
|
92:15 | that same basin, here's a cross . We have folded mountains that are |
|
|
92:21 | that for basin, it continued to a basin into the mayo. |
|
|
92:27 | here's the fats again. We still a river coming in here. |
|
|
92:38 | we're into the heavy oil belt of uh Venezuela. Here's the paleo |
|
|
92:45 | Here's the fold and thrust belt here this is what's referred to as |
|
|
92:50 | as a or art. Yeah, a arch. Orland arch, I |
|
|
93:00 | . Or what is it, what's it called? Can you remember |
|
|
93:04 | you've got loading and then you've got , an arch that forms by the |
|
|
93:11 | . So you got this arch on one side of the for basin and |
|
|
93:18 | got the fold and thrust belt on other side, say it again and |
|
|
93:25 | , it, there's a name for arch which is a structural arch. |
|
|
93:34 | anyway, I forget its name. isn't a structural geology but it, |
|
|
93:41 | is topographically high. And so we're some rivers flowing into there as |
|
|
93:46 | The main river, the axial river the mayo is coming here and there's |
|
|
93:54 | big v shaped trough is causing tidal in the mayo in the western, |
|
|
94:04 | sorry, the eastern part of Venezuela well. Ok. So if we |
|
|
94:08 | at that area, the paleo geography something like this, there's kind of |
|
|
94:15 | tide waved dominated delta here, going a tie dominated delta here and notice |
|
|
94:24 | got some barrier islands here that we with the maximum uh tidal amplification and |
|
|
94:34 | wide tidal flats here. So These two large fields, heavy metal |
|
|
94:49 | Uh And uh this one is more a tide dominated delta. This one |
|
|
94:58 | more elongated Estan chance. And if look at the Isopack, that's what |
|
|
95:06 | look like. Um And what we is in yellow, we have sandy |
|
|
95:19 | channels, green, muddy, contributory . Why Rene Baout dos? |
|
|
95:33 | And if we look at this, . Ok. Yeah, let's go |
|
|
95:40 | more. Uh I'm sorry. Uh is All right. These are three |
|
|
95:51 | reservoir units. So what we're looking is a progressive change with time in |
|
|
96:00 | fields. Early on, you're looking a basically a sandal, the distal |
|
|
96:11 | of sandy braided stream or braided river . I little with time, it |
|
|
96:22 | a tide dominated delta and as it to, with time, it becomes |
|
|
96:33 | tide dominated delta and urine complex with lot of shade. So we grade |
|
|
96:42 | amalgamated braided streams to meandering streams, influenced mouth bars to and climb meandering |
|
|
96:51 | of tidal influence. OK? From sandwich portion to a muddy portion. |
|
|
97:03 | it turns out 65% of the oil from that lower system, down |
|
|
97:13 | which was is largely in the fluvial , But 35% of that oil is |
|
|
97:21 | uh heavy oil I should add is here in more tie dominated delta |
|
|
97:32 | And I'm just gonna paraphrase this. best production is coming from the fluvial |
|
|
97:39 | portion. The upper delte dominated portion is pretty good in the very top |
|
|
97:49 | that torsion uh is pretty poor. , if we look at the modern |
|
|
98:00 | , basically, we've, we've what looked at in the, in, |
|
|
98:04 | the previous two examples in this is pale Orinoco blowing down this Orland basin |
|
|
98:15 | the Iliac to the Miocene to the scene implies to see said long lived |
|
|
98:25 | system because it's structurally controlled in those parameters are keeping it in the same |
|
|
98:36 | . Now, if we look at the late Miocene to the Picene, |
|
|
98:43 | turns out that we've got a transgressive that's tide dominated a tide dominated system |
|
|
98:56 | a tide dominated delt system. In words, this system going from my |
|
|
99:04 | pliocene is going, we see transgressive regressive cycles. So we're looking |
|
|
99:17 | if we looked at a wave dominated system, we see waved dominated estuary |
|
|
99:24 | wave dominated delta. Now, if look at the modern delta, we |
|
|
99:39 | both tide dominated and more wave dominated in laterally adjacent. And this happens |
|
|
99:52 | the paleo or as well, we areas that were predominantly tide dominated, |
|
|
100:01 | are going from tide dominated estuaries to dominated deltas and laterally evil waved dominated |
|
|
100:12 | that were going from waved, dominated to waved dominated deltas add that system |
|
|
100:22 | into the press. So within the , we've seen significant changes with time |
|
|
100:35 | the legacy on and in, in development of reservoir faes, particularly in |
|
|
100:47 | title ridges and estuary channels, uh allowed major giant oil oil fields not |
|
|
100:58 | fall just as in sign if we to far, go farther upstream. |
|
|
101:03 | that same system, we would Pardon me? Alluvial fans, here's |
|
|
101:15 | river. There are these high dominated pro grading up here. We've got |
|
|
101:28 | fans coming in merging with that ax . This is kind of analogous to |
|
|
101:39 | you might get in the the end the uh Himalayas turns out these Louisville |
|
|
101:47 | are have amazingly high porosity and permeability there are oil fields right here. |
|
|
101:58 | had deleted that as a case study because of time. It turns out |
|
|
102:03 | should have just moved it here. we've got oil fields within this Orland |
|
|
102:10 | . With this being the arch, a cross section basically arch. And |
|
|
102:25 | the face she is from Alluvial fans deltas and then by the time we |
|
|
102:34 | in the my scene uh rated deltas to dominate deltas as well. So |
|
|
102:51 | seen All of this change in one , but over a long period of |
|
|
103:00 | . And yeah, this is in just a second. Um If this |
|
|
103:10 | Colombia and Venezuela, there's a big area here like Cabo is right |
|
|
103:25 | This is both a compression and trans uh series of thrusts that occurred as |
|
|
103:38 | plate boundary. As the Caribbean Plate migrated um to the west relative to |
|
|
103:45 | South American Plate. He formed this this basin in this arch Trinidad sit |
|
|
103:56 | here. In fact, some of sediments uh from the paleo or had |
|
|
104:03 | caught up within the uplift. This trend there. But we see paleo |
|
|
104:13 | , pardon me? Uh in this and thrust belt in Trinidad um that |
|
|
104:20 | part of this axial system. So deposit and then, well, |
|
|
104:28 | So that's a continuation of this. . Um It's no uh time to |
|
|
104:41 | . Uh We've got deltas to It's let's plan on getting back at |
|
|
104:46 | . OK. And we can stop |
|