© Distribution of this video is restricted by its owner
00:00 | I think it's better that they're I didn't want to see. |
|
|
00:42 | Okay. On the screen. So I'm encouraged. Mm hmm. |
|
|
00:57 | recording is happening. Yes. So to public today on to the next |
|
|
01:05 | in the book at this uh Interpolation. Another way of saying it |
|
|
01:16 | do finding. Okay. The function inter plate or fit. It's a |
|
|
01:30 | fit to accept the data. That's today functions will be polynomial. But |
|
|
01:41 | that. Later on in later lectures talked about other ways of feeling um |
|
|
01:49 | accommodation to accept the data that you . So. Mm hmm. |
|
|
02:03 | So anyway, so this is what will be. It will be about |
|
|
02:12 | keeping data today and talk about the words of doing it. And first |
|
|
02:19 | bit yes, motivations. Who Well, polynomial are quite often used |
|
|
02:27 | terms of instant computer graphics. It's case where to discourage surfaces in a |
|
|
02:35 | sized neighborhood in terms of pulling over so that it doesn't mean that you |
|
|
02:40 | a single polynomial to describe it total but to take pieces of it. |
|
|
02:46 | you often use again following on else describe. Mm hmm. The surface |
|
|
02:53 | for other for rendering what other Um and that's simple for example of |
|
|
03:04 | you may want to fit some analytic to the collection of data. So |
|
|
03:09 | this case it's just somebody took measurements his caustic attitude temperatures and general development |
|
|
03:16 | four data points. And then let's it um sometimes that is convenient to |
|
|
03:23 | analytics description of what might happen. doesn't mean that the underlying physics is |
|
|
03:32 | represented. It just means that So it could be that you |
|
|
03:36 | you get this analytic function that estimate discuss it would be at some other |
|
|
03:45 | than the four temperature subtraction initiative. you may have done that in some |
|
|
03:51 | to some other courses, probably getting the point where the enough so never |
|
|
03:58 | is what its function obviously do. The simplest possible why I was almost |
|
|
04:05 | specifically straight down between the pair of . And if you want to have |
|
|
04:10 | costed it's 8° for instance straight down five and 10. And then you |
|
|
04:15 | the straight time and seem to get eight degrees and rivalries whatever the rather |
|
|
04:21 | on the line at that point. a simple way. Maybe a good |
|
|
04:26 | way, but not necessarily the best . That's a lot. Or do |
|
|
04:32 | want to try to do something where So I have an analytic function that |
|
|
04:38 | all before measurement points. That in case may not be a sequence of |
|
|
04:44 | lines but you have something that also some curvature change and that's supposed to |
|
|
04:51 | collection of straight line segments. So comes into polynomial with straight line. |
|
|
04:57 | a simple polynomial of degree what? But then it can have other polynomial |
|
|
05:07 | . It's all four points for another case. It's not like to |
|
|
05:11 | a degree one because to be a one, that would mean that the |
|
|
05:16 | time will actually perfectly fit all four points which is not like that. |
|
|
05:23 | on. So another version is that a polynomial and as I mentioned you |
|
|
05:31 | you can do a collection of straight between this pair of points and that |
|
|
05:37 | them the principal collection of falling They won't talk about that today But |
|
|
05:44 | difficult on as spikes and there will in Chapter six we'll talk about saturday |
|
|
05:50 | of full installments instead of a Mhm Yeah. So you can also |
|
|
06:00 | but the functions pulling almost no means only set of analytic functions that is |
|
|
06:06 | for fitting to the contrary other functions actually I will say more frequently use |
|
|
06:14 | polynomial except in terms of computer garden possible. So so and the I'll |
|
|
06:26 | to that much at some future class on the issues so these functions that |
|
|
06:34 | used to um trying to model data some other function but generally on a |
|
|
06:42 | basis functions and the trajectory is too basis functions that captures a lot of |
|
|
06:56 | properties of the data that they So that means you can use found |
|
|
07:03 | in a few of these basic functions that's kind of was the basis for |
|
|
07:12 | it for compression. So in that the older the institutes cause I understand |
|
|
07:19 | and the impact standards and the point for a lot of different. I |
|
|
07:25 | make this mostly in that case it take that many. So the call |
|
|
07:30 | platforms to capture the essence of the . So that's the largest. And |
|
|
07:36 | the only thing you need to communicate the coefficients um for the basis |
|
|
07:43 | So the senator and the receiver agree what the basis function is. So |
|
|
07:47 | you get the coefficients, you can the data based on just the |
|
|
07:53 | we'll talk much more about that So just to point out that today |
|
|
07:57 | will be enormous. That's by no the only functions we used to produce |
|
|
08:07 | and the other thing one needs to if one wants to exactly ah at |
|
|
08:15 | match. So the data points that may have or for that matter is |
|
|
08:20 | try to make the simple representation of complex function if you want to have |
|
|
08:25 | . Exactly. That's the favor on . And the point is if this |
|
|
08:31 | like and this suggests the case is measurement data measurements are really perfect for |
|
|
08:38 | areas. So you may not necessarily to perfectly that's the point. Have |
|
|
08:44 | measure of goodness of fit instead of and that's uh what comes up in |
|
|
08:50 | guest tonight. So all this. I think I'm pretty much said what |
|
|
08:59 | on the next few slides in this uh documentation. But this is that |
|
|
09:04 | can get up to design. you the perfect exactly or not or if |
|
|
09:12 | want an approximate trip and then it's notion of quite simple Sylvia is again |
|
|
09:19 | make something that captures the essence of data were function and that this simple |
|
|
09:29 | whichever means you find simple belief for particular application targeting. So So what |
|
|
09:41 | said one, can you polynomial polynomial not necessarily what it says in this |
|
|
09:48 | should be an example of an exercise suffering is simple to write down simple |
|
|
09:54 | evaluate but they are not necessarily the for you approximating the second. As |
|
|
10:01 | said in the next slide, I'm to sure what may happen. So |
|
|
10:07 | is kind of a very simple Kind of a nice bell curve if |
|
|
10:13 | like. And what this slow tends show is what happens to think that |
|
|
10:22 | higher degree polynomial you have the better of the data. So and this |
|
|
10:30 | just trying to show that that's not the case. So this black dots |
|
|
10:37 | equally spaced points In the interval between and one. And this application here's |
|
|
10:43 | function and the just kind of follow dots and that shows what the function |
|
|
10:50 | actually are. And then it's uh uh attend to gratefully. Normally the |
|
|
10:59 | that you don't use all the black . You just use a subset of |
|
|
11:02 | . Then the black dots are basically the case to use 40 of them |
|
|
11:08 | . Yeah, hopefully very good approximation now you're trying to make sure that |
|
|
11:13 | polynomial matches all Than 40 black dots that case. But if you do |
|
|
11:20 | to get the polynomial. So when look at the polynomial values between the |
|
|
11:26 | where you make the fitting as you see in these areas, they're highly |
|
|
11:33 | there is nowhere close to what the function that saw if you move away |
|
|
11:37 | the interpolation points. So that's one the drawbacks that high degree polynomial. |
|
|
11:45 | have a very prospect or behavior and why the reason why you may not |
|
|
11:51 | calling on me having him money. wants some other function. The betting |
|
|
11:55 | pass to the essence of this So this was kind of the preamble |
|
|
12:03 | the getting into. Yeah. The of using pulling normal approximations. Any |
|
|
12:10 | or comments on the behavior of So this is amusing polynomial for that |
|
|
12:22 | not be as effective for functions that passed. Right. Right. because |
|
|
12:29 | if they're higher than zero or then must either approach me in a deeper |
|
|
12:34 | more and right. And it's also that we'll talk about in a future |
|
|
12:43 | . So it turns out a little of this social cultural behavior is also |
|
|
12:46 | by the notion that is straightforward Take your interpolation points as equally spaced |
|
|
12:56 | in the interval. So if you it on and choose different ah distances |
|
|
13:04 | the population points, you can keep same number. But they move them |
|
|
13:08 | the village. And then you can find out that yes you do. |
|
|
13:12 | you can avoid some of the So it's just a yeah melanomas are |
|
|
13:21 | many ways great. But it tends be best when you have a limited |
|
|
13:26 | of points. So yes, you see the blue ghost that swings off |
|
|
13:32 | it never behaves as badly as the . So it tends to be that |
|
|
13:38 | of having a high degree polynomial it's sometimes better to use the daughter |
|
|
13:46 | build degree polynomial to approximate the And that's spine centers. Think I'm |
|
|
13:52 | popular and we'll talk about spines in later venture. So that's instead of |
|
|
13:57 | a high, high degree polynomial to many points to use the collection all |
|
|
14:05 | . And then we'll come back to initial collection. The first thing then |
|
|
14:12 | just to go through the exercise and , oh what? Okay. Now |
|
|
14:16 | going to look at the mechanics of polynomial approximations. And this mechanics will |
|
|
14:24 | used for the gun When we talk spines. It's just the difference is |
|
|
14:27 | spine, once they have a law from enormous. But the mechanics |
|
|
14:32 | That's right. So, um I guess that's mostly introducing vocabulary points |
|
|
14:45 | nodes. The points in this case this collection of terrorized values that you |
|
|
14:52 | in your little table and have an variable presumably to the X. And |
|
|
14:57 | dependent points up for every X. , I have a corresponding. So |
|
|
15:03 | paradigm is known as the points um you want to find a polynomial that |
|
|
15:10 | exactly for today's manager. Now the files themselves, it's known as |
|
|
15:21 | So many times you can have, know, not just single division, |
|
|
15:26 | have a surface, you can have Z coordinates every next time. So |
|
|
15:33 | are there's three the coordinate values for you want to do an approximation of |
|
|
15:40 | function value in this case. It's to have distinction. Clear points and |
|
|
15:52 | And that's the one. So now is the trivial and talking ridiculous. |
|
|
15:59 | , it's doing the interpolation of the for instance, that's the concept. |
|
|
16:03 | no wonder what you can do. that's the degree of this polynomial of |
|
|
16:08 | zero. And of course then the thing that is also simple. You |
|
|
16:12 | two points and you can do a line between two points Polynomial of degree |
|
|
16:23 | . So and of this land investment reopened it in two different ways. |
|
|
16:31 | 1 1 is this form of an . So you can see here by |
|
|
16:37 | minute X and the variable it's free access to X. one. Then |
|
|
16:45 | thing turns into zero and X one X zero. So this parenthesis becomes |
|
|
16:50 | one. So that's one This on normal evaluates the white one and you |
|
|
16:56 | plug in zero. Then this term and this becomes the one and then |
|
|
17:01 | value is Or the point of almost . So it clearly perfectly represents the |
|
|
17:09 | points that we're giving. Excellent 41 . 01 Singapore. Another way of |
|
|
17:16 | the same thing is just can't be it. Perhaps more common to look |
|
|
17:21 | this. The equation for the line in this case X660 then disappear. |
|
|
17:30 | we get the same thing again there on the polynomial zero is 0. |
|
|
17:36 | if you put in X one then this one, chancellor and you've got |
|
|
17:41 | two things so that what's left is . So it's just two different ways |
|
|
17:45 | writing the same polynomial in the sense pleased to ways of writing the polynomial |
|
|
17:55 | in the same value for any given . So in that sense they were |
|
|
18:01 | same even though they're written in two ways and that's what an important. |
|
|
18:07 | talk about that a little bit more . So that's um uh the other |
|
|
18:16 | yes. Yes. Perhaps reflect about that we have one point. The |
|
|
18:24 | has degree zero. Now we have points and the polynomial is everyone. |
|
|
18:32 | the whole the role is that if have endpoints, the degree of the |
|
|
18:40 | that to use green for its opponents of order N -1 or no |
|
|
18:47 | It can be a higher degree but we can put the higher order polynomial |
|
|
18:53 | goes around that you don't have enough to make what you need. So |
|
|
18:58 | only way you can get a unique is selected degrees at most one lower |
|
|
19:05 | the number of points. It may lower if all the points fall on |
|
|
19:10 | street. So um Yeah. And see it's all. So this is |
|
|
19:20 | at that. Right? So now a couple of names here. So |
|
|
19:25 | way of writing the polynomial is known the formulation and this way of writing |
|
|
19:31 | political is known as a good Yes, we'll talk about the constructive |
|
|
19:39 | in the event and questions on So I think an example concrete next |
|
|
19:51 | to do this thing. So it a few points straight time and um |
|
|
19:55 | what was photographed from the previous One thing uh huh was the notion |
|
|
20:06 | this brilliant. So it looks like would think perhaps that would write things |
|
|
20:15 | left to right and increasing X But in this case, you |
|
|
20:19 | this was used as the first 2nd point and it's in the lower |
|
|
20:26 | value. So that's what you find this thing do that. That's the |
|
|
20:31 | as for the two data points from previous draft. So it's one point |
|
|
20:36 | come back to later. Is that interpolations. The results should be independent |
|
|
20:42 | which order they happen to write in faith. So that's an important aspect |
|
|
20:48 | the approximations. So, um um this is just working it down in |
|
|
20:56 | of the the ground formulation has the point, That was x 1.4 minus |
|
|
21:04 | distance to the other point. So have this question like it's so in |
|
|
21:11 | denominator is the difference between The interpolation in this case that still wouldn't explain |
|
|
21:18 | next zero so that we will see both of them, but they're ordered |
|
|
21:23 | defense of they've got for the first point X ah was the next one |
|
|
21:37 | very welcome. 25 and then we the X value and the function |
|
|
21:43 | It's zero Mostel 3.7 that comes from . And the other one is the |
|
|
21:49 | point to three point. So it's pretty straightforward just plugging in X zero |
|
|
21:55 | X one and the correspondent by values this regard for relations or you can |
|
|
22:04 | in the needs of what and and of which way you write it, |
|
|
22:09 | can simplify it. Uh this for the expressions. So um any questions |
|
|
22:21 | that. Yeah. So now a bit more kind of formal and generally |
|
|
22:35 | the first simple taste with us two but in general dig out some polynomial |
|
|
22:46 | that looks like this in terms of growing formulation, in terms of |
|
|
22:50 | it kind of ends up generalizing in what we are going to use both |
|
|
22:57 | them future and past for other chapters the book but to this significant differences |
|
|
23:06 | I want to point out so and like our formulation, one of its |
|
|
23:15 | features is that they um the grinch multipliers or expressions the health. They |
|
|
23:31 | totally independent of the function doctors. you can construct this and this totally |
|
|
23:39 | of what the interpretation points are. they only need to know the |
|
|
23:47 | They need to all the nodes So you don't need anything about my |
|
|
23:54 | function. But in order to be to construct that's not true in the |
|
|
24:01 | formulations, Newton's formulation will actually have obviously part of the city of the |
|
|
24:10 | and the suppression of. So you also see it in this little two |
|
|
24:16 | version here that you have a function is so this is kind of a |
|
|
24:21 | and this is a one. So can see that coefficients in this whole |
|
|
24:26 | expression. Then in fact it becomes on the function. So in that |
|
|
24:32 | you can have two. The construction's the polynomial without knowing function values. |
|
|
24:38 | this case you can construct the polynomial you need the function. That is |
|
|
24:42 | they want it. Okay. Not . This is right. So this |
|
|
24:52 | what I said already. Mhm. So now I guess it was the |
|
|
24:59 | we're talking about that obviously the ground works and this was just well these |
|
|
25:09 | and almost Sorry? No, I ah these are what these panels are |
|
|
25:17 | and they are constructed in such a that one there at the corner of |
|
|
25:25 | for the same. No, to the index of the polynomial, then |
|
|
25:32 | one and all the other notes it's and maybe let's let's go back. |
|
|
25:43 | . It's always said So again this kind of zero and then you can |
|
|
25:51 | that it's a plug in ah Say one and the first one that becomes |
|
|
25:58 | And the X. one and the one that becomes about. So if |
|
|
26:03 | want to evaluate this next one and got to talk to me. So |
|
|
26:09 | just going to see that depending on term you have in this corner of |
|
|
26:18 | Is either zero or 1. The interpolation points. So they've got for |
|
|
26:28 | words is sincere. So when you 100 this expression and one of the |
|
|
26:38 | points, the access for which quantifying . It's only one. It is |
|
|
26:49 | . but it is at the east whole point and then the function then |
|
|
26:55 | the value is one. And so the plus P of X. I |
|
|
27:00 | too um the function value or the values, we wanted to interpolate exactly |
|
|
27:08 | that. And if you then plug a different thanks value Then this is |
|
|
27:14 | . So basically, yes. Um term in the summation is only equal |
|
|
27:22 | the function bezel. Um at the you are safe in simple. |
|
|
27:34 | Okay so yeah it's on this machine plug in any pleasure for ex um |
|
|
27:47 | is fine. It's all about an ah for the east polynomial most firstly |
|
|
27:56 | -1 terms because to take the distance the I don't know to respect each |
|
|
28:06 | or the other ones but not to because that will be division zero and |
|
|
28:12 | them from the nominator you have X the distance from X to the respective |
|
|
28:20 | contextual 13 discipline. So it's easy see regarding what thanks noble values. |
|
|
28:30 | plug in. The only point where again it's it's not equal to |
|
|
28:37 | I. Then. And one of Factors in the expression is going to |
|
|
28:44 | zero. So pickaxe through our X and visible on the screen and this |
|
|
28:52 | be zeros of the whole product. it's true for any one of their |
|
|
28:57 | except thanks bye. Because except hiring not present in any one of the |
|
|
29:06 | . So that's about it. Except then all the factors a lot. |
|
|
29:14 | that's the worry one. And it a disease that this is oh and |
|
|
29:19 | of the cardinal doctors is only one one of the nodal points and |
|
|
29:28 | Okay so mhm. So there's some what I said and then I have |
|
|
29:34 | complete example of this a little bit it looks like the different forms of |
|
|
29:41 | . So zero make it completely depends the next slide. So and the |
|
|
29:53 | you have a different factors and we're down all this way. Her |
|
|
30:02 | That was the first one was like was my smart. I think so |
|
|
30:09 | was. And the -5. So mm hmm. Ex miners and Sarah |
|
|
30:22 | mm hmm. Right. Right. I looked at the slides before the |
|
|
30:30 | but hopefully mm hmm. The restaurant . No. Anyway, I'm sorry |
|
|
30:45 | got confused now no one can help . This is supposed to be ah |
|
|
30:56 | somewhere now for risers for the four points to expect the ones we are |
|
|
31:05 | looking at. And then what's already confused at this point. Yeah, |
|
|
31:16 | right. Okay. You're buying Right. Right. You can start |
|
|
31:22 | the back. So this is the one. The next one is one |
|
|
31:25 | then six points. That's my next . And so they exclude the first |
|
|
31:31 | . So that's why it's for Zero. We excluded zero points. |
|
|
31:36 | they start with the first one. . So that's what it is similar |
|
|
31:40 | is to go to um the ones enterprising there um Second Novel Point Sort |
|
|
31:48 | X. one. We have it's here which is finest X. Zero |
|
|
31:53 | X. 01 minus one plus Go on with this. Just |
|
|
32:00 | There you go. A little point which the paranormal is supposed to be |
|
|
32:05 | question. Yeah. So so anyway another thing to look at and that |
|
|
32:15 | come back to the center point is this case the corner polynomial. Czar |
|
|
32:22 | um particularly to him. But you see some of them are kind of |
|
|
32:30 | So they became other ones that are hostile territory but they're always down there |
|
|
32:35 | plus and minus one and we can that that's the case it seems. |
|
|
32:43 | they have bounded isolation even though between . So that's one other good |
|
|
32:52 | The cardinal points. So how many ? So it's fairly straightforward how to |
|
|
33:01 | them. The good point again is the only depends on the nodal |
|
|
33:09 | It does not but then on the violence just gives you a way of |
|
|
33:15 | together in some sense the functional value pondering at some point between okay points |
|
|
33:25 | approximation. No no no. Okay in America example now three points. |
|
|
33:35 | see if we can write the So Again start with zero. So |
|
|
33:42 | just um The distance to the X and X two. So X one |
|
|
33:50 | minus a quarter Or -11 is the and X two is the one. |
|
|
33:57 | it's and then in the denominator you that's zero. Um Two. It's |
|
|
34:05 | song and it's zero and it's one next zero. And it's two from |
|
|
34:09 | against you. The government expression a cardinal polynomial that is designed to |
|
|
34:20 | And the function value at zero And the next time not paranormal is to |
|
|
34:26 | the function at X one. So under this will have x minus X |
|
|
34:32 | and x minus X two. And the correspondent thinks the denominator and the |
|
|
34:39 | between that. Thanks for X one should say in X zero and X |
|
|
34:48 | and X two. We got a one and similar To the other |
|
|
34:54 | So now you can write it So these are the three corner |
|
|
35:00 | Is this for capture the function value functions in the function value attacks |
|
|
35:06 | And they have these expressions and now can write down the whole pulling normal |
|
|
35:15 | . So four the function value Um that's gonna record another polynomial for |
|
|
35:26 | zero X one X two. And It's obvious so that this kind of |
|
|
35:32 | a look at the functional value was . And function earlier is too so |
|
|
35:37 | what it takes -36 and constant transfer value seven. I think that the |
|
|
35:46 | ones and it's just trying to straightforward too. Yes or no, probably |
|
|
35:53 | . Well That exactly matches the function of these three. I gotta go |
|
|
36:00 | . Okay. Mm hmm. So now the next thing I want |
|
|
36:08 | talk about community formulation. I want right. So one. Oh yes |
|
|
36:19 | the book, come on makes It's kind of incremental. So it's |
|
|
36:26 | like started the lecture things Just one . But it's a concept and then |
|
|
36:32 | points and the strength time and three will probably get a second order polynomial |
|
|
36:39 | it happens to be kind of So this is basically the kind of |
|
|
36:45 | the curse is broken and that the of the polynomial. So at some |
|
|
36:50 | you have a calling on your friend and then you have one more. |
|
|
36:54 | for this expression suppose you have a organization just it's the perfect fit thing |
|
|
37:01 | k points. Take plus one points and you add one more point and |
|
|
37:08 | you can that's the right thing done you have the following normal you have |
|
|
37:17 | it and then you add the new , that is basically taking the new |
|
|
37:24 | whole point. But if it's k one and its distance to all the |
|
|
37:30 | total points. And if you plug the value now on the polynomial at |
|
|
37:40 | no notable point, then it should the new in population at that |
|
|
37:46 | That is okay. Plus one. because so this polynomial yes, basically |
|
|
38:03 | preserves the property of perfectly matching all previous points that you have. Because |
|
|
38:13 | if you replace in this equation Xscape was one where any one of |
|
|
38:20 | previous no level points. one of terms in this one of these factors |
|
|
38:28 | this term is going to be So for any one of the bridges |
|
|
38:32 | points. Ah this extra term is to be zero. So basically says |
|
|
38:39 | interpolation property. Always construction work that done before adding this new point is |
|
|
38:46 | . And if you don't make this stick then obviously your computer. See |
|
|
38:52 | this is the question is true Then does seem to police 20.6 outfits. |
|
|
39:01 | I think that's what I guess just to say. I'm just that |
|
|
39:07 | So our business is business fallen on for the party. A simple example |
|
|
39:17 | how to do this now. five points. So they can do |
|
|
39:25 | and they didn't success the white soul this incremental or inductive way that's We |
|
|
39:31 | from one point. So the polynomial is a constant Then it's best to |
|
|
39:39 | because They wanted for X0 To be . It's actually for any extra minus |
|
|
39:46 | . And that's certainly true for the points That stuck with me now. |
|
|
39:52 | that was produced and now we want include one more point. So then |
|
|
39:59 | form is it has the previous polynomial some suitable constant. Times the distance |
|
|
40:05 | the new point through the previous interpolation this case. Now we know what |
|
|
40:13 | is. That's mine, it's And now we have the condition to |
|
|
40:17 | also the new points. So somehow one x equals one Day one at |
|
|
40:26 | was one is supposed to be my tsunami thing was plugged in and this |
|
|
40:31 | so I've got to write it in opposite order was minus five plus |
|
|
40:36 | Times X equals one. Then the should be three. So how do |
|
|
40:41 | have an equation? It's just is the computer see then we now have |
|
|
40:48 | pulling over the congress to park and we just keep repeating that I |
|
|
40:57 | So it can start from to you . That was the thing we have |
|
|
41:01 | we want to The next point x two. So now we have the |
|
|
41:05 | polynomial. Now there are the term then this one and then in terms |
|
|
41:10 | the factor is the product of the between them. And then um Kalla |
|
|
41:17 | or the X values too. Each of the previous interpolation. That was |
|
|
41:22 | the factor because this guarantees that this disappears for any one of the previously |
|
|
41:29 | points. So in this case for see what plus You're plugging in at |
|
|
41:37 | . And it's one and the expression zero or zero. So that just |
|
|
41:41 | the X. And the next time the X. One this one. |
|
|
41:47 | now we have also the condition and new polynomial P two should have the |
|
|
41:53 | minus 15 if they can gain XP minus one. So now we have |
|
|
41:59 | conditions are not known to see from . Yes. And so we can |
|
|
42:03 | it in and it should be solution minus force. And now you have |
|
|
42:08 | Newport. We also know that in the degree increases by one each |
|
|
42:16 | But now we have three points of ingredients two years before the at |
|
|
42:23 | Then the number of points for And that means you keep the |
|
|
42:30 | All right. And I don't do the steps but testimony is all said |
|
|
42:35 | done and I have five points the order polynomial. And that means you're |
|
|
42:41 | . And it turns out to be will be specific to the fourth. |
|
|
42:50 | so but this is one way right the hole. No money. You |
|
|
42:57 | write it in this kind of honor nested formal talked about turning up uh |
|
|
43:03 | then just evaluated. That's one way you can also Right then. And |
|
|
43:11 | other negative forms of the form is necessarily but it's the same principle. |
|
|
43:18 | the same polynomial. Then call this . You picked value of this polynomial |
|
|
43:26 | in this way or this way or way is all the same. It's |
|
|
43:31 | different way of writing it. But principle it's the same for you know |
|
|
43:38 | it may not be obvious but they where to take this expression for instance |
|
|
43:45 | unravel. All the multiplication is hidden the parenthesis and collect the terms of |
|
|
43:53 | powers of X. You got an that looks like this. So this |
|
|
43:58 | kind of perhaps symbols. Common way writing the polynomial, different powers of |
|
|
44:05 | with the different topical efficient for And if you have it in this |
|
|
44:10 | can sort of fairly easy to see this this expression is a nested version |
|
|
44:16 | this 3X. That comes from the order and then you have the |
|
|
44:22 | So that means this expression is multiplied X. So the third to get |
|
|
44:26 | right answer. Yeah, they are . And then The -70 seconds or |
|
|
44:32 | , you know, I didn't tell in terms of so just again, |
|
|
44:38 | ways of right things all along. is values for exactly the same. |
|
|
44:50 | hmm. No. Now the next of clients are totals in some different |
|
|
44:58 | . Okay. But I think the is actually following this Warner's idea and |
|
|
45:04 | more complicated his shoes and have to they get the coefficients of the book |
|
|
45:14 | the standard procedure to and remember from newton formulations, the coefficients are dependent |
|
|
45:20 | the function the construction that was So, um, also, so |
|
|
45:36 | was just the general form. It a previous slide and one can essentially |
|
|
45:44 | do it step by step. So can start during the evaluation that was |
|
|
45:56 | some of the previous slides and get one of the conditions and use it |
|
|
46:02 | get more and more of the conditions or evaluated in the nested form once |
|
|
46:08 | have the coefficients best unravel it from innermost expression in his domestic point that's |
|
|
46:19 | we did early on in her previous . Um one thing that they will |
|
|
46:25 | back to ah towards the end of class today if I get there are |
|
|
46:30 | ones next time is if you look now this expression that is basically multiplying |
|
|
46:39 | coefficients. Um so this is the of does not have the function values |
|
|
46:47 | it. Um They they have behaved differently compared to the cardinal pulling owners |
|
|
46:55 | the laboratory expression. So as I commented by one of you more |
|
|
47:03 | Right so the higher order polynomial you see that it's got to be |
|
|
47:07 | Ah that's so nicely. Okay substitution up the lower order ones are I |
|
|
47:14 | behave but the highest degree then they become difficult to be able to potentially |
|
|
47:20 | America what? So this is just simple routine as domestic evaluation center. |
|
|
47:32 | . To the same in terms of homeowner So now the thing that has |
|
|
47:39 | principal also fairly simple just following the that they actually live in the examples |
|
|
47:47 | at one Point. Ah that is because of the the constant districts afterwards |
|
|
47:55 | there function value you want to approximately first point and once you have that |
|
|
48:01 | can move on as they did they one more point. Now you know |
|
|
48:04 | one and then you can evaluate the from the next equation and jim |
|
|
48:12 | So um brother mhm. To you kind of have wherever you are |
|
|
48:21 | so this is something that you have previous conditions and figure out this |
|
|
48:27 | take the new functions. Uh There's difference basically everything except the new coefficients |
|
|
48:36 | you're trying to value. So this is done and moving to the left |
|
|
48:39 | side and then divide by this thing and then finds out the partition. |
|
|
48:46 | that's kind of one way of doing . And there is another way that |
|
|
48:53 | described in the book, has certain that will use later on. So |
|
|
49:00 | something um Yes, yes, I so. It's mhm Yes um known |
|
|
49:13 | divided difference and that's the and describing idea of the differences. Obviously this |
|
|
49:25 | that these coefficients and they don't polynomial kind of food as a function of |
|
|
49:37 | the previous or previous including the current point. In fact both the local |
|
|
49:46 | the X values but also the function is remember this is supposed to |
|
|
49:51 | So this just stresses the facts and and the general notation instead of having |
|
|
49:58 | proficiently doesn't display just simple that doesn't the dependence on nodes and function values |
|
|
50:09 | that use this kind of notation instead shows how these professions is actually dependent |
|
|
50:17 | um all the interpolation points that you been working on until that point. |
|
|
50:22 | that's what I'm going to be seeing some of the coming slides. Um |
|
|
50:29 | . In terms of the simple it's A K. But it's also |
|
|
50:34 | dependencies in a different way. Alright, bye. Okay. |
|
|
50:43 | Okay. And this notion of dividing on the bottom side until they come |
|
|
50:52 | . But I think first of what call the direct evaluation, which was |
|
|
50:57 | what was used in the previous So now take the successive points and |
|
|
51:04 | before day zero was 3. The equations 13 and takes a constant |
|
|
51:11 | Next turn ah uh expand. So difference between these two which is a |
|
|
51:20 | of five. So that's what for proper science. So just keep going |
|
|
51:24 | you get a one a zero a a two. And now in this |
|
|
51:28 | of organization that meets That one is and one Class. Now with two |
|
|
51:34 | 1 and four. And the coefficient a two was a one was punished |
|
|
51:43 | . And then we have the state symbol to get a three and a |
|
|
51:47 | or a two, sorry, and was etcetera. So it's just linking |
|
|
51:53 | notations. Very complete example. But same procedure as before. Ah |
|
|
52:05 | Okay. Well, yes. So think the only point of this particular |
|
|
52:11 | . Yes, essentially. Um looking the product in disease and in this |
|
|
52:21 | it may be the case of the index is lower than lower index of |
|
|
52:27 | . Starch. The world starts on standard assumption that the survivor, I |
|
|
52:34 | basically what? So it doesn't divide into service. And that was the |
|
|
52:41 | of do we agree that it's this the product of and one is one |
|
|
52:48 | so against agreed again increases by one every no point. So I'm going |
|
|
53:00 | let's see what's going on with this . Okay, so now the soviet |
|
|
53:06 | of divided differences. So here's something a one uh first of 080. |
|
|
53:19 | the next term is to compute a Therefore X 1 0. And |
|
|
53:27 | but it is getting these two nodal . Yeah. And a zero was |
|
|
53:33 | fact that felt like sarah. so in this sense, what part |
|
|
53:39 | beginning this notion of providing difference as is basically expressing the slope of the |
|
|
53:47 | between 2.60. They forget zero on . And but so for me |
|
|
53:58 | it's kind of nice late there aren't want to talk about association. |
|
|
54:07 | I can think of this again. just, it's the second they can |
|
|
54:12 | to me about it and they will be used for food finding or otherwise |
|
|
54:16 | approximation of the derivative as a So that's kind of the difference gives |
|
|
54:25 | something of emotional stop. Mhm mm , okay, that's what's that. |
|
|
54:34 | then it's been out and go back say, oh come forward. And |
|
|
54:39 | think the next to his expression then can rewrite it. So manipulate this |
|
|
54:48 | and that's what they have. This The best for the slope of the |
|
|
54:54 | between these two points 10 0 and their corresponding function values. And this |
|
|
55:01 | now the slope which means ah X and X two solvents. Thanks for |
|
|
55:08 | space stone, first between the First points and then take steps on between |
|
|
55:13 | 2nd 2 points. And then So that's the difference between the two |
|
|
55:19 | down slopes And then divided by the now between the two endpoints. So |
|
|
55:29 | it's that's why this notion again divided you take in this case difference between |
|
|
55:36 | slopes between the neighboring segments if you if you were to have straight line |
|
|
55:42 | and then take kind of the average these. So this is also why |
|
|
55:52 | about America differentiation and approximation of This is kind of the way also |
|
|
55:57 | time construct an approximation of the second derivative of the curvature. So that |
|
|
56:05 | like to me it helps a little have intuition of looking at interpreting what |
|
|
56:13 | kind of this question tried to model capture. So, so this is |
|
|
56:26 | I guess I didn't manipulate this expression everyone wants to follow what I |
|
|
56:30 | I have to come from one to thank you. So this is something |
|
|
56:37 | they have now trying to do this I guess is what's going to happen |
|
|
56:44 | . So I started lately that was using this petition together square brackets is |
|
|
56:51 | and points On interpolation. So that just one and the next one is |
|
|
56:58 | jam packed two points of one under and that was going to stay forward |
|
|
57:04 | didn't have before and we get a that's the famous. Mm hmm. |
|
|
57:11 | then the next one here I guess just keep doing it the same thing |
|
|
57:16 | the expression that was derived in terms the divided difference notion and yes, |
|
|
57:26 | eventually To this now 8-7 and mhm , hopefully. So when we did |
|
|
57:39 | more direct version and not trying to it uses divided different notion of deriving |
|
|
57:47 | . Um as you can see when get the same results, it's a |
|
|
57:50 | way of getting to it that disposes a little bit more of properties of |
|
|
57:58 | points are related to the subject because notion of first and secondary looking for |
|
|
58:04 | trying to tell the truth curvature and this blindly thinking about the point should |
|
|
58:11 | corrected. Mhm I don't see what is more no. Mm hmm. |
|
|
58:28 | . Um that perhaps shows a little again the defendants and the expressions of |
|
|
58:36 | is Yeah and right, zero Day which is like a two with the |
|
|
58:45 | for the truck. Um so let's . So this is. Yeah. |
|
|
59:00 | so if one does start this expression ah Finding the coefficients from 1 to |
|
|
59:12 | other. Ah yeah. In fact is. And to show that it |
|
|
59:20 | on this particular form. So a bit talk about of the figure a |
|
|
59:33 | . This is certainly in that case was just looking at the slopes between |
|
|
59:37 | adjacent segments and then taking Kind of average between the endpoints zero and 2 |
|
|
59:45 | that face. So the broadcast the of these functions, You can see |
|
|
59:54 | differences here that shifted by one. They started and they started zero. |
|
|
60:02 | it's kind of intuitively communities But taking two segments but now they're over that |
|
|
60:08 | but they're shifted by one and then kind of the average by the lion |
|
|
60:14 | the total distance covered by all the that's the way you get. Can |
|
|
60:23 | coefficients? So, so if you one of the proficiency investments, take |
|
|
60:30 | difference between these two proficient and divide transformer. Mm hmm. What? |
|
|
60:47 | . and uh I guess one this one and that kind is used in |
|
|
60:54 | of it. So I said, is that? And made the comment |
|
|
61:01 | on today. And there was that very first example of X0 and two |
|
|
61:05 | in a straight line between and I but this and do it In increasing |
|
|
61:15 | of importance. six zeros. That there was 1.25 and 1.4 and then |
|
|
61:21 | x four tasted before the X mm One that was 1/25 cents X zero |
|
|
61:29 | zero. And the lower right hand X. One Y. One Closer |
|
|
61:34 | the X. equals to zero. the straight line between the two doesn't |
|
|
61:39 | on which order it happened. So is just trying to explore that which |
|
|
61:46 | you happen to label the points. should get the same and that's what |
|
|
61:52 | invariants trying to say the the procedure all of these things. That's the |
|
|
61:58 | thing. Regardless of they have put labor reform and what's so I'm not |
|
|
62:12 | . So what's the difference formula and example here. And then I think |
|
|
62:18 | have it actually kind of a real of how to do these things. |
|
|
62:24 | we need to do this divided different . Weren't convinced to happen. Find |
|
|
62:29 | simple steamer and like the council and of these point is historic kind of |
|
|
62:41 | four. And such other points. then you have the corresponding function |
|
|
62:48 | So in this case yeah you can with them all the interpolation In this |
|
|
62:56 | like 0 - 60 in the correspondent values. And then you take this |
|
|
63:01 | differences. So now you take them wise and bear wise and then they |
|
|
63:05 | to the next column that's opening up difference between events and divided by the |
|
|
63:12 | range of all the time. So just what I'm going to do. |
|
|
63:19 | , So basically we got 30 this . You use these two points. |
|
|
63:24 | get the next one here. You're to use these two points. That's |
|
|
63:29 | . And then you keep going the of this to have at least divided |
|
|
63:34 | and invested the slope between reversal The next one we want to try |
|
|
63:39 | get one more to get captured curvature then the best can take Again, |
|
|
63:46 | adjacent shifted by one and the They won't have the distance between the |
|
|
63:53 | points. And then again in the months from now the best they have |
|
|
64:00 | the coefficients in the polynomial company. than this for the simple steel. |
|
|
64:11 | , so that's what sin. Ah , no. I think that being |
|
|
64:21 | concrete example. Next let's stop and if there's questions. So, so |
|
|
64:34 | see first. Not using expressive. , let's see what I am. |
|
|
64:47 | we have the difference right between um hmm. Function value as on the |
|
|
64:56 | points. It was zero and So this is uh, function function |
|
|
65:04 | . And the distance between them was . Um Sorry, it's um |
|
|
65:15 | and nine. So I'm just gonna retracted it and then you take success |
|
|
65:20 | neighboring points and the distance between It was zero and three halves. |
|
|
65:26 | this one and then another 10. then you move on to trying to |
|
|
65:34 | the bracketed ones the next. So basically the difference between these two |
|
|
65:40 | comfortably used um to this one and one and the extreme points industrious. |
|
|
65:48 | you don't have to And similar for next one is between expanding nicely. |
|
|
65:57 | you guys can keep doing nothing for head on ingredients side. Yeah. |
|
|
66:05 | now let's they want one has the is actually going to use and the |
|
|
66:14 | for the hard work. I thought would have been the next slide. |
|
|
66:18 | this is just taking what the yeah that these were here. The function |
|
|
66:25 | is on the table and this is using the schema, I don't know |
|
|
66:33 | on the previous slide and these are this chapter once and then you can |
|
|
66:40 | down so this is a gun. coefficients for this is the constant. |
|
|
66:45 | is a proficient for the first longer . That was Yes, it's Sarah |
|
|
66:50 | that's one and that is the next order ah coefficient in the new Kampala |
|
|
66:58 | . All shows up on the diagonal . So, but in order to |
|
|
67:03 | the diagonal the investor needs to and back and have the kind of triangular |
|
|
67:10 | and figure out what's included in order get those points. So what kind |
|
|
67:16 | property from the left in this then I had it. So then |
|
|
67:22 | have it and then you can write , they got an expression for the |
|
|
67:29 | , but it's just sort of divided . If one has this kind of |
|
|
67:34 | sets up its service simple and straightforward figure out. You gotta take the |
|
|
67:41 | between the function values and the distance and all points for those function values |
|
|
67:49 | uh yeah uh to progress basically between points, the first one is the |
|
|
67:56 | value itself, The next one that on the difference between these coordinates and |
|
|
68:02 | fairways. And then they get to one mr defected from the students and |
|
|
68:08 | for the distance from the holding. , by construction. So the order |
|
|
68:16 | which you happen to write down is don't have to order them in terms |
|
|
68:20 | you know Professor the increasing or decreasing family, they can write them down |
|
|
68:26 | several water and it still comes Okay, so um now this is |
|
|
68:41 | the sooner called it down there and it. So so this was, |
|
|
68:49 | the doctor has a pseudo code to the coefficients based on adoption values. |
|
|
68:54 | And then earlier we talked about the of using this next the corner first |
|
|
69:02 | have to complete proficiency and then they for whatever experiment they want, right |
|
|
69:10 | . And this has pretty much been I've said three things. Oh, |
|
|
69:19 | let's see um yeah, I'm gonna kind of an example here. Any |
|
|
69:28 | so far on this. Sure, little bit more complicated. Again, |
|
|
69:33 | cost function. Um the construction involving the trunk and now it's an example |
|
|
69:46 | computing an approximation of the same function a polynomial. And then this gets |
|
|
69:54 | . Let's and so the idea is you for this example that you introduced |
|
|
70:02 | number of points um or I understand Points between zero and 1.6875 that they |
|
|
70:16 | to have the exact representation. And we kind of tried this. That's |
|
|
70:21 | good is it by looking at what's difference between the same function the polynomial |
|
|
70:29 | other points than the interpolation points. I picked a few points between the |
|
|
70:34 | points and have a look at what pulling over value and what is the |
|
|
70:38 | value that gives you something? They estimating the error in the approximation for |
|
|
70:44 | points of the population. So remember supposed of the bell curve in the |
|
|
70:52 | of the lecture And and the purple isolated the lots in that case the |
|
|
70:57 | between the polynomial and actually function value some places were quite dark. So |
|
|
71:05 | is kind of a standard checked when tried to figure out the paranormal. |
|
|
71:08 | this was something that says that this looks at it from this place for |
|
|
71:14 | example that we're I guess the point between each barrel insulation points of |
|
|
71:21 | the four times as many the violation as interpolation points, it turns out |
|
|
71:29 | not every loss one of these That was not too bad. Just |
|
|
71:36 | single position influence in terms of divided the test points. If you like |
|
|
71:48 | three points in between the interpolation it doesn't mean that any one of |
|
|
71:53 | three points was actually one of the for if you have taken 100 |
|
|
71:59 | they would have not gotten a larger different sampling in this case someone needs |
|
|
72:08 | , mm hmm. Okay. My is never get a chance to talk |
|
|
72:15 | that. So this is the saying the thing I'm trying to say and |
|
|
72:19 | is over. Is that the different way you're right velma in a sense |
|
|
72:26 | mean it's a different falling over in sense that regardless of what was written |
|
|
72:32 | , if the value is to the value requirement. But any X values |
|
|
72:38 | about this. The forum looks But argument seems to a polynomial to |
|
|
72:45 | the same boring America approximations and around . If you have infinite position you |
|
|
72:56 | get this thing and this is what says. And it's just a simple |
|
|
73:01 | . The argument is supposed they were different for the same interpolation points. |
|
|
73:06 | will be their friends and okay, they may actually difference. But it |
|
|
73:13 | if you look at taking the difference these two points, it's the agreed |
|
|
73:20 | difference is also having The same degree either one of the two. But |
|
|
73:26 | also means that this polynomial, The polynomial is zero, it's all the |
|
|
73:34 | . And since any paranormal cannot have roads are busier and more points ah |
|
|
73:46 | the I guess one degree less of paranormal degrees. So that means effectively |
|
|
73:51 | forces the coefficients in the polynomial is in the proper way and to be |
|
|
73:56 | same. So because of the number routes, because the difference polynomial is |
|
|
74:01 | . As all the speculation points, forces us to the pediatricians in the |
|
|
74:09 | up a lot of sense. And I guess, I don't know, |
|
|
74:17 | just have this as into two the lecture. So I just said in |
|
|
74:26 | beginning of all enormous are by no the only functions one use. So |
|
|
74:31 | general what problems to do is to some combination of some as mentioned basis |
|
|
74:40 | . Just fired on the stones. there's some linear combinations of things 19 |
|
|
74:47 | maybe approximate or it perfectly represents a of points like we did today. |
|
|
74:56 | was trying to have the funding over equally. They function by the closing |
|
|
75:03 | points. Um but one and potentially to pick any other type of function |
|
|
75:16 | gave the example of the compression. You're better anyone else or if zero |
|
|
75:26 | pretty much almost identical to the function . Um That for the rest of |
|
|
75:32 | thing as a restaurant and you get basis function. So if you have |
|
|
75:39 | example where they sine function. So if your function F is in |
|
|
75:48 | trigger event of functions sine and cosine your basis function happens to be signed |
|
|
75:53 | call sign, They only need one function and the coefficient just needs to |
|
|
76:00 | the magnitude and face right except on head. And then they have |
|
|
76:06 | It takes quite a few terms to the variable approximation of the project and |
|
|
76:13 | can get it. Take a serious gives you an idea of what the |
|
|
76:17 | you need and the polynomial. But the places function wouldn't is that it |
|
|
76:22 | a trick function and a couple which just been treatments. So so normally |
|
|
76:31 | ends up doing it. The general we have a bunch of coefficients then |
|
|
76:41 | to the value of the basis activities, population points ends up being |
|
|
76:46 | matrix arrived in the question for each of the double points um correspondent function |
|
|
76:53 | unpardonable points. So then to find professions, you have to solve the |
|
|
76:58 | of equations and I will talk more that lady And here's a little bit |
|
|
77:09 | in principle I can think of the as the basis functions being what's known |
|
|
77:15 | the more no meals. That is various parts of that. Mhm So |
|
|
77:21 | have first the constant and x itself X square. So these are the |
|
|
77:27 | basis functions Uh That was effectively used I was just calling over approximation. |
|
|
77:36 | here we can see the behavior of . Well, normal is only into |
|
|
77:40 | became 11 very nicely and some not much and couple more minutes. So |
|
|
77:50 | in this case if one looks at Manami als um So here's the questions |
|
|
77:56 | Uh constant, the first degree 2nd so on. And for the different |
|
|
78:02 | points and the correspondent, its values you get the matrix of this type |
|
|
78:07 | is known as the Mhm. Then mold matrix. And it turns out |
|
|
78:11 | that's not something you really want to with. Unfortunately the constant tends to |
|
|
78:16 | that this matrix is very conditioned sort things. Getting numerical accuracy in doing |
|
|
78:21 | this way. It's not so And we'll come back to that in |
|
|
78:27 | future lecture. So there's something for . And so here we saw the |
|
|
78:33 | Poland almost. That is also true but it's about the oscillation and that's |
|
|
78:40 | true for the newton. And then all males in the interval is starting |
|
|
78:44 | headbutt. Not so good. Next we talk about other basis functions and |
|
|
78:52 | want to get a drink functions. that's when you're on the other polynomial |
|
|
78:59 | nice behavior. seven. That's two great questions. Okay, thank |
|
|
79:19 | so much. Thank |
|