Previous
Next
© Distribution of this video is restricted by its owner
00:00 | burned, you know. Good Yeah, I guess when you start |
|
|
00:16 | me, it doesn't let me get . I even had Thio reset my |
|
|
00:23 | , which was not incorrect. But think Zoom may have some problems |
|
|
00:29 | um, somebody has a free account also a paid for account because it's |
|
|
00:36 | same email. Okay. Anyway, here. Okay, this is where |
|
|
01:07 | we kind of left off. One I want to remind everybody before we |
|
|
01:13 | started is the first exercise is due 11th. Before lunch time, you're |
|
|
01:20 | to get a second exercise that will do the same date. A lot |
|
|
01:24 | times I give you. Ah, long deadline. Not so you wait |
|
|
01:29 | the deadline to do it. But so you have plenty of time to |
|
|
01:33 | when you condone it. So, know, the sooner you get the |
|
|
01:38 | exercise done, which shouldn't take too of you follow the instructions correctly. |
|
|
01:44 | you get that done, get it . And, uh and then we're |
|
|
01:48 | have ah, pretty simple logging Very basic. But I just want |
|
|
01:53 | make sure everybody kind of gets an of how to look at the log |
|
|
01:57 | estimated without pulling out your petro physics . And and then, uh, |
|
|
02:09 | by this afternoon I will assign your exercise, and that one's gonna be |
|
|
02:17 | November 18th. And then, the mapping exercise will come next |
|
|
02:26 | So hopefully, uh, you'll have time to do that and and I'll |
|
|
02:31 | you a deadline since there's no other after this and just so you can |
|
|
02:37 | your time, I'll give you a , actually, after the exam. |
|
|
02:42 | if you want to get it done you'll be, you can do it |
|
|
02:46 | . And, uh, I just , you know, I have this |
|
|
02:50 | difficult exercise at the end of the , and we have an exam at |
|
|
02:54 | end of the class, and because that, you have thio, you |
|
|
03:03 | , schedule your time a little bit a little bit more constraints because you're |
|
|
03:07 | about the exam and you haven't exercise the same time. So when times |
|
|
03:12 | , I usually allow people to spend little time after after the exam so |
|
|
03:17 | they can focus on exam first and finish up the the exercise But once |
|
|
03:24 | start doing the mapping exercise, the you get started on it, the |
|
|
03:28 | . It will be okay with Then, of course, next |
|
|
03:34 | we have a midterm, and that's to cover most things that we get |
|
|
03:40 | today. And, uh, I send out a study guide. |
|
|
03:47 | probably tomorrow s so that you can that. Okay with that. |
|
|
04:01 | Now, we're gonna look at some the other basic logging tools, and |
|
|
04:08 | didn't get to see it, but assuming we're being recorded. Are we |
|
|
04:11 | recorded? Maria? Yes. Yes, it's recording. Okay. |
|
|
04:18 | guess you're the host. Yeah. , So, uh, we're gonna |
|
|
04:26 | looking at the sonic log, the log and neutron logging tool. |
|
|
04:31 | uh, my buttons aren't working Okay? And one of things with |
|
|
04:42 | sonic log. Of course, it's velocity. And everybody, I |
|
|
04:46 | knows the velocities quicker and denser Here's a list out of your book |
|
|
04:53 | just lists, uh, some of different densities just to sort of illustrate |
|
|
04:59 | , um, different materials have different , and consequently, we can discriminate |
|
|
05:05 | these different materials based on the velocity sonic waves, sound waves. And |
|
|
05:14 | think you know, when you throw and gas into some of these |
|
|
05:20 | it's going to slow it down a bit. And that's another thing |
|
|
05:24 | You can see, uh, fresh is slower put, Um, some |
|
|
05:32 | in there it could slow down even . Okay, here you can see |
|
|
05:37 | sonic log and we'll talk a little more about this and the density |
|
|
05:45 | Because both of those logs, compared the reasons Tiv ity will actually help |
|
|
05:50 | get an estimate of total organic carb bye the passing method and and different |
|
|
06:02 | of that method where you're looking at that relates to density of the rock |
|
|
06:08 | the resistance re sensitivity of the rock the same time, given that organic |
|
|
06:13 | is going to be less dense uh, and absorb more energy and |
|
|
06:20 | it will slow down the velocity then there's an interesting way to look |
|
|
06:24 | resisted. It goes up for ah of organic material, so there's a |
|
|
06:29 | overlap between the density log and the ity log Trevor density log you |
|
|
06:34 | and it's different in various places, it works really well somewhere and some |
|
|
06:40 | and other places, it doesn't work well at all. And when people |
|
|
06:45 | into those types of areas, they're starting to figure out ways to do |
|
|
06:50 | arounds and still use these tools to where we have high tow low T |
|
|
06:55 | C s O. It's just a of time before this gets really |
|
|
06:59 | Uh, refined. And I uh, I'm sure the tool toolmakers |
|
|
07:05 | they haven't already done it or working , uh, even better tools that |
|
|
07:10 | be in combination Thio to calculate this in a lot of different regions. |
|
|
07:19 | . And then, of course, densely log eyes based on electron density |
|
|
07:26 | and scattered from an act of gamma , uh, gamma sources cesium 1 |
|
|
07:33 | . It was supervising a well, in Norway when they drop one of |
|
|
07:39 | down there, I don't know if would have gotten too excited about it |
|
|
07:43 | the U. S. But in they were really worried about dropping a |
|
|
07:47 | source into a well because they lost tool. But they do have |
|
|
07:55 | it's It's not a tremendous amount of , uh, element, but it |
|
|
08:00 | enoughto cause concern. If it was to get out, it's deep in |
|
|
08:04 | Well, I don't know why what be to concerning, but in Norway |
|
|
08:08 | very safety conscious, and that's kind just a little quick aside. |
|
|
08:17 | but anyway, you can see here at things. Um, it's |
|
|
08:24 | Shale could be very variable. you know, the more bound what |
|
|
08:31 | you having? It is gonna have big impact on on the overall density |
|
|
08:37 | this. And, uh and of , uh, you can see some |
|
|
08:42 | these other things like lime stones, can be with no Prasit e going |
|
|
08:50 | be very dense with a lot of or 10% porosity. Here's it's less |
|
|
08:56 | . And of course, you look here with gas and an oil and |
|
|
09:01 | sort of thing. It's even done of in most of these, more |
|
|
09:04 | less what are bearing, um, stones and lime stones. And of |
|
|
09:14 | you can see here the the low , of course, is is here |
|
|
09:19 | limestone or, you know, has prostitutes, so it's gonna have fluids |
|
|
09:23 | it have water in it. But you have oil and gas in |
|
|
09:27 | the density is going to be should a little bit less. Except for |
|
|
09:31 | . There's a there's sort of opposite effect on the gas. Excuse |
|
|
09:40 | . And so here we have, , starting out with we got the |
|
|
09:48 | log in the neutron log. Haven't about the neutron log, but this |
|
|
09:52 | much goes through the neutron log. it's basically, uh, looking at |
|
|
09:59 | density of neutron density of neutrons in in any rock whole rock mass, |
|
|
10:07 | would include fluids and and also the mass. And of course, as |
|
|
10:19 | know, hydrogen atoms, um, limited in neutron density, obviously, |
|
|
10:27 | , uh, and so you can here that you've got something, |
|
|
10:34 | limestone Here, um, that has oil or water in it. It's |
|
|
10:40 | out about the same. But down in the shale, you can see |
|
|
10:45 | the neutron ferocity is very high because there's bound water in here and that |
|
|
10:54 | scott oxygen in it, and that neutrons to the mix. And over |
|
|
11:01 | , the density log and as a uh, response there. So this |
|
|
11:10 | kind of increasing the the Newtown The process increased over here, but |
|
|
11:21 | it's pretty much on track with where should be with a density. So |
|
|
11:24 | can see here we've got a good bound water shale. Here you come |
|
|
11:28 | into a limestone and, uh normally, uh, will is gonna |
|
|
11:39 | look as though it has lower Prasit than water. But here in this |
|
|
11:42 | , you can see that it's equal we get into gas. Everything changes |
|
|
11:47 | both tools have sort of an opposite . And here you can see the |
|
|
11:56 | ferocity, which is over here for and over here for Prasit E and |
|
|
12:07 | and or oil. Then come over . You can see that the neutron |
|
|
12:16 | e really drops down to something below . And that's because it's seeing mostly |
|
|
12:25 | atoms, which, of course, really have neutrons, so it makes |
|
|
12:31 | look like there's nothing there. It's really, really low. Ah, |
|
|
12:37 | reflection. So you're not seeing, ah, the liquids that would have |
|
|
12:43 | complex Adams and them with neutrons. the neutron count because way, way |
|
|
12:49 | And of course, it makes the . You go really, really |
|
|
12:54 | so it's not seeing anything that would scatter that. So over here in |
|
|
13:00 | density log, you see, just opposite happened in gas, and it's |
|
|
13:08 | on electrons. And when you get , there's a limited amount. The |
|
|
13:13 | is a really, really hyper and so, with a low |
|
|
13:18 | you have high Prasit e calculated. this one, uh, gas fools |
|
|
13:27 | and makes it too high. Gas this and makes the process he too |
|
|
13:33 | . And those two errors or effects gas on these two tools, which |
|
|
13:40 | really well in oil and water in porous limestone or sandstone. And they |
|
|
13:47 | really well in Shales. Uh, if it's clay bound, it's water |
|
|
13:55 | plays. For example, if you Mont Marella night, that was, |
|
|
14:02 | , something that might look like it's ferocity. It might only be 60% |
|
|
14:06 | or something like that. So so have Thio take that into account. |
|
|
14:12 | . We're in a rock section that's de watered a lot, and, |
|
|
14:18 | , and also compacted as it's been time. So you're not going to |
|
|
14:23 | an 80% ferocity down here like you in Lake Turkana in more recent |
|
|
14:29 | but something that starts out like a Marella night that has, ah lot |
|
|
14:33 | water in the situation in the in deposit with us with something that could |
|
|
14:40 | even as high as as high as in, say, recent sentiments. |
|
|
14:49 | the time to get buried deeply like , this rock mass would be It's |
|
|
14:53 | Watered a lot in the process has off a lot, but this is |
|
|
14:57 | relatively high relative to what you're seeing the density log. Okay, so |
|
|
15:03 | this kind of offsetting things really a good gas indicator. So I usually |
|
|
15:08 | have a question on a test about the overlap. And again make sure |
|
|
15:14 | look at this look at the scale , ah, lot of the |
|
|
15:20 | uh, get this wrong. but here you know, the density |
|
|
15:31 | is going to be showing a much density, and therefore it peaks in |
|
|
15:40 | high, and that's the solid Then the dash line is going |
|
|
15:49 | I think there's almost nothing there returning signal that you're looking for for fluids |
|
|
15:58 | the in the in the poorest And and so it's going toe report |
|
|
16:07 | density essentially too low. And um I mean, excuse me, |
|
|
16:14 | the density Ah, too high and the process the low. So this |
|
|
16:24 | low density. This is high density . And so this is high porosity |
|
|
16:33 | it's low density, super low and this is low porosity because it's |
|
|
16:42 | reading has hired incident. Does that sense? It z sort of like |
|
|
16:48 | switch. It's left and right. make sure you look at it to |
|
|
16:51 | sure you clearly understand what's going on these things. So does does the |
|
|
16:57 | of dynasty increase to the to the opposite to the scale of neutral. |
|
|
17:07 | , here's the density log and processes up in this direction or density is |
|
|
17:16 | down in this direction. Yeah, , okay. Density is going up |
|
|
17:26 | this direction. Mhm density is going in this direction for Prasit E. |
|
|
17:34 | . Okay, so the density is up for both in that direction. |
|
|
17:39 | going down for both in this And so when you have this |
|
|
17:46 | This is the density is too which makes the ferocity low. Over |
|
|
17:55 | . The density is is too Excuse me. Too low. Which |
|
|
18:04 | the ferocity very high. Okay, densely goes up this way, density |
|
|
18:11 | up that way. Ferocity goes higher way, process goes higher this |
|
|
18:19 | and so the scales air not Some students think that the scales reversed |
|
|
18:24 | terms of density and process, but the same. They're moving in the |
|
|
18:28 | direction. Except for this one. one moves to low porosity, high |
|
|
18:34 | . This one moves to, love density, high process. Did |
|
|
18:40 | get that? And, uh, it's really simple, but you have |
|
|
18:46 | , even even though I've I look this and I automatically know what's going |
|
|
18:52 | . But when you sit and try explain it, this reversal could be |
|
|
18:57 | . Just because, uh, the these scales are basically they're not the |
|
|
19:05 | , but they're kind of the same they all it all gets, |
|
|
19:09 | more dense in this direction. It gets less dense in that direction, |
|
|
19:16 | in ferocity, goes, goes way this way. Ferocity goes up this |
|
|
19:22 | so the scales aren't reversed. Some think the scales reverse. They're not |
|
|
19:27 | . The tool of the response is because one's using density, too. |
|
|
19:35 | , look at fluids in the rock the other one's not And, |
|
|
19:39 | in A in a sense, it's more at the whole rock, the |
|
|
19:44 | , the more dense materials this the log is really looking at at the |
|
|
19:51 | of, of all the all the in the rock. And this one's |
|
|
19:54 | of looking at what could be highly by hydrogen, which has no |
|
|
20:01 | and it also your including, the thing that would scatter it and |
|
|
20:06 | the make the process. You go okay, And I think if I |
|
|
20:15 | shorten that explanation down to three it might be simpler to you, |
|
|
20:19 | I hope everybody understands. Here's another of looking at it. Here we |
|
|
20:24 | see the neutron log, and, course, they they put the |
|
|
20:31 | This one is up, ones but still dash line is usually going |
|
|
20:34 | be the neutron solid. You is to be the density. And here |
|
|
20:37 | this one, uh, it's real . It's just talking about ferocity and |
|
|
20:42 | density. And here, ferocity, could see process goes up this way |
|
|
20:47 | prosecute goes down that way. So goes up like this, and both |
|
|
20:52 | that goes down like this and Okay, But we have this cross |
|
|
20:57 | again and you can see the neutron read is, um, seeing high |
|
|
21:04 | , which is low. Prasit, here, the density log is seeing |
|
|
21:09 | density, which equals high porosity in way it's supposed to operate Here. |
|
|
21:14 | can see a shell response, with bound water. And here we |
|
|
21:21 | see another one where you could see , oil that looks like this. |
|
|
21:26 | can go back to this. This sandstone. But if we go back |
|
|
21:29 | this limestone, you can see there little bit closer because it's a little |
|
|
21:34 | . And, uh, but here can see in this particular one, |
|
|
21:37 | can see definitely an oil leg, you can see a gas leak. |
|
|
21:43 | , of course, here's water down and in here, Shale. |
|
|
21:50 | And this log, uh, to it simple in your mind, you |
|
|
21:55 | want to just focus on this But many of you probably have already |
|
|
21:58 | with this a lot and don't even an explanation. Okay, um, |
|
|
22:05 | here is just another example showing, , uh, that overlap again. |
|
|
22:12 | so it's indicating it's not dramatic, there's there's probably oil in this log |
|
|
22:19 | as opposed to gas, which would probably farther off the scale. And |
|
|
22:26 | you can see these air, these generated things, and it's got to |
|
|
22:32 | to be Clay in here, which sometimes called the shale. But if |
|
|
22:37 | say clay, we're usually talking about classics, which is really what they're |
|
|
22:43 | for. And then, uh, here talks about oil saturation. |
|
|
22:49 | um, if you thought this was , the computers already decided it's |
|
|
22:56 | so you're out of luck on But sometimes you can get these interpreted |
|
|
23:03 | . Uh, can their algorithms Great. But again, if one |
|
|
23:07 | , there's a little bit different, one area you're using fresher water, |
|
|
23:14 | and stuff like that, and it have a big impact, or the |
|
|
23:19 | of the formation is greater. You get all these different things that could |
|
|
23:24 | problems. But In normal circumstances, would work out perfectly. Okay, |
|
|
23:31 | here we're talking about wire line So beyond rock fluids and porosity and |
|
|
23:39 | and by the wet and jump up down and scream and shout Because I |
|
|
23:44 | it yesterday, But these air porosity permeability logs. So back here |
|
|
23:52 | if I were asked you what are three main types of wire line |
|
|
23:58 | It would be rock fluids, porosity firms. So that's 123 text. |
|
|
24:05 | what else do we use these wire logs for? Yeah, like, |
|
|
24:15 | , cake and stuff like beauties the longs for. Did you say that |
|
|
24:22 | ? I just quite hear you, wall taking, uh, so things |
|
|
24:28 | need the caliper logs for. Okay, well, we're looking kind |
|
|
24:33 | it Thies main ones. And you're . There are other tools, and |
|
|
24:36 | gonna get to the other tools, yes, there's things. Look for |
|
|
24:40 | cake on also invasion. There's a of other things there. Cement |
|
|
24:48 | all sorts of other things. But at these tools, what else do |
|
|
24:53 | use these tools for? Relation? , that's it. That's one of |
|
|
24:59 | main things. We also will look , uh, say a gamma or |
|
|
25:07 | and resistive ity combination to come up what we call log motifs and that |
|
|
25:15 | us figure out a lot of You just had sequenced fatigue, |
|
|
25:20 | And I don't know if you had shapes for your I discussed by |
|
|
25:26 | but usually he would where you have patterns with a gamma log and the |
|
|
25:32 | ity log that help you determine whether finding upwards coursing upwards, transgressive, |
|
|
25:39 | in that sense and and that sort thing. Okay, um okay, |
|
|
25:52 | here we, uh these are the that we're doing. Ah, with |
|
|
25:59 | three main tools. But with those tools, we're also gonna be looking |
|
|
26:02 | lateral continuity and variation of strata. this is really important. And this |
|
|
26:07 | important primarily for for ah, most now, because most geoscientists were |
|
|
26:17 | you can't figure out anything between a without seismic. But you don't have |
|
|
26:22 | have seismic to correlate and figure out continuity and sometimes a variation in |
|
|
26:29 | And with two wells I know if a geophysics, you may need to |
|
|
26:37 | down when I say this, but can actually pick faults with two wells |
|
|
26:41 | air close by and then you also at some of these faces. |
|
|
26:50 | Using motifs and different trends can also you define sequence boundaries and sequence sequences |
|
|
26:59 | terms of what they actually are within boundaries. And here is just, |
|
|
27:06 | , simple example of log motifs. I remember when people first started working |
|
|
27:13 | these, probably in the late eighties earnest, every oil company put out |
|
|
27:18 | chart of its own log motifs. , and this is how it always |
|
|
27:24 | . And it's never quite this And of course, if this is |
|
|
27:28 | gamma log, that's probably a pretty drop. If this was an SP |
|
|
27:33 | , you wouldn't be a pointy. an SP log might kind of fade |
|
|
27:39 | up here in an oil sand. was filled with oil up past a |
|
|
27:44 | point. You had an oil water say down here. So log |
|
|
27:50 | uh, back and forth between us SP and Gamma, you can find |
|
|
27:54 | differences, but in general, faces like this are a lot more |
|
|
28:01 | in detail. Then just one standard for each deposition environment. For |
|
|
28:08 | if I corps the middle of the , uh, it only has a |
|
|
28:14 | plug it the top and then flu shells, floodplain shells. On top |
|
|
28:20 | that, you're probably just going to a solid sandstone if you're looking at |
|
|
28:24 | point bar. This is more like a point bar part of ah, |
|
|
28:29 | a river system would look like. it can change dramatically, even though |
|
|
28:34 | within the same thing. So I even medical doctors like black and white |
|
|
28:41 | now, and that's why they don't a lot of diagnosis by looking at |
|
|
28:46 | patient or checking the patient. They most of time trying to find a |
|
|
28:51 | that will tell them the exact and it's good that we have those |
|
|
28:55 | . But sometimes diagnosis is important. important for geoscientists. No, understand |
|
|
29:02 | everything is not not perfectly responding to black and white answers for log motifs |
|
|
29:10 | a lot of other things as we've going through this. So anyway, |
|
|
29:16 | , um I guess I don't have here. I'll have it in another |
|
|
29:20 | . When we talk about it after , but, ah, a lot |
|
|
29:28 | studies that use log motifs. When look at them, you have a |
|
|
29:32 | , really hard and time and trying figure out here. You can see |
|
|
29:40 | have basically, you have a bell thing here. And, uh, |
|
|
29:45 | that, of course, represents finding . And we get finding upward sequences |
|
|
29:52 | a lot of reasons. It's not for of alluvial dominated distribute, |
|
|
29:57 | but what we get thes finding apps sequences for a number of reasons. |
|
|
30:04 | we always have to put something like in context. Uh, with Ariel |
|
|
30:11 | of the wells. In other um, if I have a rough |
|
|
30:16 | what the coastline was say back um, the Paley is seen, |
|
|
30:21 | I'm looking at appeal Palace scene I'm going to see thicker sand bodies |
|
|
30:28 | to the coast. If it's a island, I'm going to see, |
|
|
30:33 | , thicker sand bodies perpendicular to the of its flu viel system and knowing |
|
|
30:39 | little things like that, um, you a whole different suite of faces |
|
|
30:44 | be looking for to apply these motifs , uh, just looking at the |
|
|
30:51 | might look very identical and very different settings. And that's something you have |
|
|
30:56 | remember. Okay, so now we're to go to the the exercise. |
|
|
31:05 | I have your pulled up there it . While I'm going through this, |
|
|
31:13 | just want you to know this has posted. But at the back, |
|
|
31:17 | you can print these out at sheet toe work on and there at the |
|
|
31:22 | of the whole thing. But I'm to go through ones that have annotations |
|
|
31:27 | them. But the the clean ones the back you can print out so |
|
|
31:31 | can do your exercise on, then everyone can has access to scanning. |
|
|
31:37 | could scan it and send it to . And again, this is this |
|
|
31:42 | gonna be really Ah, basic. , yeah, uh, kind of |
|
|
31:50 | you do this quick Sort of a and dirty estimate. Um, I |
|
|
31:56 | some of you're gonna probably scan digitize it and try to use |
|
|
32:01 | But try, try Thio resist from that. Just try to look at |
|
|
32:07 | from really Ah, very more simple approach, um, and kind of |
|
|
32:14 | what you know about the standard responses to see, but also consider that |
|
|
32:20 | standards responses could be a little bit just because there could be variables that |
|
|
32:28 | clearly defined in the data that I'm be giving you. Okay, |
|
|
32:36 | um, so one of the first that we're gonna look at is rock |
|
|
32:41 | . And, of course, there's thing called Alfa, which is sort |
|
|
32:45 | like the shale with a gamma And there's different ways to do this |
|
|
32:53 | with an algorithm with gamma log. But I think you know, we |
|
|
32:57 | kind of use the same approach with SP log to figure out approximately how |
|
|
33:04 | that sandstone is using the gamma Okay, so this is a slide |
|
|
33:11 | showed you before. And so we're to be looking for this, |
|
|
33:16 | static SP out here. You're gonna looking for your shell baseline back |
|
|
33:23 | And why is this the shale Because because here we're hitting shale, |
|
|
33:29 | that's about as, um, positive the return gets. This is is |
|
|
33:36 | against It usually lines up pretty but it can increase or decrease a |
|
|
33:43 | bit, Sort of going up and hill for various, uh, reasons |
|
|
33:47 | terms of Konate water and everything else going on in the formation as we |
|
|
33:53 | from shallow to deep. But, , but it's easy enough to do |
|
|
33:57 | this exercise. So the way I you to do this is we push |
|
|
34:07 | and make it clear. Sorry about . But here, um uh, |
|
|
34:19 | have a log was different from a of books, but anyway, here |
|
|
34:26 | have something where you think you have here. So this would be the |
|
|
34:32 | SP right through here. And let , um let's see if I can |
|
|
34:40 | a straight line. Okay, This supposed to be a straight line, |
|
|
34:49 | bear with me. So that's your sp course. This is a really |
|
|
34:56 | , thin bed. You might never get the static SP, but you |
|
|
35:00 | kind of guess it where it should . And s O, this is |
|
|
35:04 | sand and then we come down here if you go back here, we're |
|
|
35:16 | for that shale baseline, and that baseline would come again. This is |
|
|
35:23 | to be straight. Something like uh, follow the pen. It's |
|
|
35:30 | going to come like that. So easy to put a shale baseline. |
|
|
35:35 | of course, this is showing you here where the static SP should |
|
|
35:40 | And here's where the shale Baseline And from that you can calculate an |
|
|
35:49 | so 50% Alfa should be right about . So what is that saying? |
|
|
36:05 | a 50% makes between salmon shell perfect . It's sort of in a |
|
|
36:11 | cause it's more here. But this the limit of where you get down |
|
|
36:17 | 50% and this is the limit of to 50%. But here's 75% so |
|
|
36:23 | is all the way up to And, of course, this is |
|
|
36:29 | . And so when we're looking for pay section, uh, oftentimes it's |
|
|
36:35 | to for ah, height, go and pick that 50%. And when |
|
|
36:40 | get your log, I want you color this in. Actually, I |
|
|
36:46 | you to color in this part, the 50% line with yellow meaning. |
|
|
36:56 | predominantly sand in here in this Okay, here's the 50. I'm |
|
|
37:03 | it would be. It doesn't quite , but here's, you know, |
|
|
37:08 | the 50% so show it kind of yellow in here. By the |
|
|
37:14 | you need colored pencils to do Unless you are really good with your |
|
|
37:20 | . Uh um, software. You do it that way, too, |
|
|
37:25 | this would be your 50% showing that mostly sand and probably effective ferocity. |
|
|
37:36 | then up in here, just fill in on the other side of the |
|
|
37:41 | line with whatever color hydrocarbon you think going to be in that well of |
|
|
37:47 | water, its blue or Excuse liquid. It's water, it's |
|
|
37:51 | If it's oil, it's it's gonna green. And if it's gas, |
|
|
37:57 | going to be written, okay? this is just a thing here to |
|
|
38:05 | of give you an indication of what got. Here's water. Here's an |
|
|
38:11 | water contact. And here, here's the well, water contact. |
|
|
38:18 | the top of the transition zone, this is filled with oil up |
|
|
38:26 | Okay. I don't think you're going see much of a transition zone in |
|
|
38:30 | wells on. Just remember. you're gonna be looking at the deep |
|
|
38:38 | for whether or not there's resistive ity here in the true formation. |
|
|
38:43 | the rock resistive ity true out here the outer edge of this un invaded |
|
|
38:51 | . So if you have, a deep log, it has a |
|
|
38:58 | resistive ity. What's that going to about the rock? The true |
|
|
39:03 | Uh, resistive ity. I have resistive ity out here. Hi, |
|
|
39:09 | . Iti is going to be out , right? Because this goes around |
|
|
39:12 | wellbore, so I have high resistive here. Hi resistive ity here. |
|
|
39:16 | does that normally mean? If I'm a sandstone, a porous sandstone, |
|
|
39:24 | a show, right? Okay. gonna be hydrocarbons, okay? And |
|
|
39:29 | it's if it's oil, it's gonna higher. Resistive ity most of |
|
|
39:38 | Then it would be in here. , But if I have, |
|
|
39:44 | say fresh water coming in here instead salt water, this resistive, it |
|
|
39:49 | be a little bit higher, Not just the mud filling up the |
|
|
39:54 | and displacing the liquids. But the liquids themselves are gonna be more |
|
|
39:59 | than the liquid out here. If is no, uh, oil or |
|
|
40:05 | . So, like, this is water out here and I'm pumping freshwater |
|
|
40:10 | here. This resistive ITI is going be higher than the marine water out |
|
|
40:16 | . If I put hydrocarbons in hydrocarbons will have higher resistive ity, |
|
|
40:20 | it might not be as different from is it ought to be. But |
|
|
40:25 | key to all this simple stuff is you if you see hi resistive iti |
|
|
40:33 | the deep tool, then there's probably to be hydrocarbons whether you get the |
|
|
40:39 | that we're used to seeing when we we look a deep and shallow if |
|
|
40:46 | If you're looking at a bed that know has saline water, marine water |
|
|
40:52 | it's a it's a porous bed. you seen it where the shallow will |
|
|
40:56 | a greater response than the deep and it still be oil. If you |
|
|
41:03 | oil out here, there's going to resisted it. It's going to be |
|
|
41:08 | resisted it. If you just have out here, then you have to |
|
|
41:12 | about it. But usually the resistive um out here is gonna be higher |
|
|
41:18 | it is in the section below the it and here could get pretty high |
|
|
41:24 | almost match the resistive ity out Or sometimes be a little bit |
|
|
41:28 | But but having high resistive ity in the distant tool, This this |
|
|
41:36 | more of a contrast between, um , if this was all if you |
|
|
41:43 | this was Marine and and this is gonna be marine, it's not a |
|
|
41:47 | formation. Ah, yeah, by , this is all Marine. |
|
|
41:54 | this This will have high resistive This usually will have, um, |
|
|
42:01 | resistive ity. But if you put water in there, it could be |
|
|
42:04 | than you'd expect. But if we out of the poorest thing and we |
|
|
42:09 | into the shales Ah, you know reason activity is going to drop down |
|
|
42:15 | regardless. Okay, You're gonna have higher reasons to be an organic rich |
|
|
42:22 | . But you're But you're not going , you're not going to see the |
|
|
42:27 | of thing that you see here with water coming so again, Uh, |
|
|
42:34 | of the key is if if I high resistive ity out here, there's |
|
|
42:37 | out here Whether or not there's a overlap or a lack of it are |
|
|
42:43 | even a little bit of a Depends on what the fluid is coming |
|
|
42:47 | here. Okay. And also depends the tool. The tool distance of |
|
|
42:54 | tool. The shallow is out It might not be as big an |
|
|
42:59 | . Uh, because you don't know this line actually is all the |
|
|
43:04 | You're working in a particular field for while. You get an idea what's |
|
|
43:07 | on for sure, But just, know, just looking at something out |
|
|
43:12 | the blue. Um, resistive ity here in a sandstone that you know |
|
|
43:17 | porous has effective porosity. Resistive ity here means hydrocarbons and and extremely high |
|
|
43:27 | . That is gonna mean mean natural . And because that's really holly |
|
|
43:33 | its's off the scale resistant most of . Now when I'm talking about unconsolidated |
|
|
43:40 | and more consolidated sediments, the difference a little bit less between gas and |
|
|
43:45 | that an unconsolidated sediments. It's a change out here so that the key |
|
|
43:51 | looking for when you're looking for hydrocarbons a section. Everything's gone along like |
|
|
43:55 | , and it pops out like that the poorest you know you've got hydrocarbon |
|
|
43:59 | . Okay, regardless of whether you a good overlap between your shallow and |
|
|
44:04 | deep, okay? And I'll just show you on your logs. |
|
|
44:08 | You should be looking for two. another thing that I like toe point |
|
|
44:14 | to people is when you're looking at gamma log. Um, I used |
|
|
44:22 | look at, um, you kind of drawn a line about like |
|
|
44:28 | as being 100% line, and this is a little bit shale |
|
|
44:34 | But this is sort of your the that's going to get over here for |
|
|
44:39 | sandstone. Um, and I'm calling a subtle shale streak response. And |
|
|
44:47 | I mean by subtle is is it can see that this is obviously cleaner |
|
|
44:52 | that, and this is obviously cleaner that. This is almost not |
|
|
45:01 | Here is something that I would consider obvious shell return, but you can |
|
|
45:09 | see here it's finding upwards on this , and, uh, and here's |
|
|
45:14 | a good, obvious shell return. when you're when you try to come |
|
|
45:19 | here and say you've decided that this in here, maybe down to here |
|
|
45:26 | , kind of you don't you don't don't have what would be a shell |
|
|
45:29 | . But you kind of have gamma high in these sands. And |
|
|
45:33 | have a gamma low in the And, uh, you know, |
|
|
45:38 | would know right away if I'm trying figure out what the net Prasit E |
|
|
45:42 | . Section is in this sandstone right . And this is a big enough |
|
|
45:47 | to call this a separate sandstone. in this one right here, I |
|
|
45:52 | try to figure out what this gap and subtract that many feet from my |
|
|
45:58 | Ferocity. In other words, my sand is going to be less |
|
|
46:05 | say from here Thio here. But may be picking up some net sand |
|
|
46:12 | through this section over to that but not there and not there. |
|
|
46:18 | I would have a gross sand in and then the nets sand would be |
|
|
46:24 | gross sand minus the shale streaks that seeing. And even though it's not |
|
|
46:32 | obvious is this spike down here? obviously some loss of effective porosity |
|
|
46:38 | so you might want to just sort estimate an estimate, and this is |
|
|
46:42 | hard for geoscientists to do. It's for engineers to do, and it's |
|
|
46:47 | little tough on Geophysics Studio, but But you shale out some of |
|
|
46:52 | Take a Uh huh. This looks it's in feet. So you take |
|
|
46:56 | a foot here in a foot there you see some of this gamma |
|
|
47:01 | because again here is that this is coarsening upward sequence. So down |
|
|
47:04 | it's gonna be finer. So I want to take a little bit out |
|
|
47:07 | . I might want to take a bit out here. To me, |
|
|
47:10 | is a little bit more obvious. would definitely take, you know, |
|
|
47:13 | at the scale and figure out how feet you might want to take out |
|
|
47:16 | that. And then when you come to this one, you might take |
|
|
47:20 | a lot in here. Say, is where you would pick the top |
|
|
47:23 | that sand and you can see it the log. Here, pick that |
|
|
47:27 | of the sand. You remove some porosity here because there's a shale streak |
|
|
47:33 | and there's definitely a shale streak There's a shale streak there. There's |
|
|
47:37 | some subtle, uh, shale streaks here. You might take a little |
|
|
47:42 | out over here because of that. how conservative you are would mean |
|
|
47:48 | uh, you know, maybe you only take these out over here and |
|
|
47:52 | worry about any of that. But the end of the day, there's |
|
|
47:56 | be loss of effective process e when curve goes down here like this and |
|
|
48:02 | the curve, uh, kind of around like that and like that. |
|
|
48:07 | this isn't real obvious, but it's this one is, but there's there's |
|
|
48:12 | little shell parties in here. There's little bit shelling there. You |
|
|
48:15 | the the lift log doesn't reflect anything the the overall sand. The shell |
|
|
48:22 | is going to change a little And you're gonna lose a little bit |
|
|
48:25 | effective process because it's not as clean that is. Everybody see that? |
|
|
48:32 | , hope so. So here is the exercises here, You're gonna have |
|
|
48:40 | sandstone. This is 20 increments. this is 10 each. So when |
|
|
48:47 | answer the questions, this is 10, 10. So answer |
|
|
48:52 | Uh, the questions that are asked that sense, the sand that we're |
|
|
48:59 | at. Ah, it's clearly somewhere around here. Um, if you |
|
|
49:06 | a gammel of that log, that's spiky, and it would have lots |
|
|
49:10 | little things going up here. You pick it halfway between one of those |
|
|
49:14 | spikes and the next spike that gets the top. But if you pick |
|
|
49:18 | here, you're gonna be coming way almost to your 50% line to pick |
|
|
49:23 | sandwiches. Okay, when you do net sand. But if you're gonna |
|
|
49:26 | a top on this sandstone, you go over here and look at what's |
|
|
49:29 | on with the resistive ity. And here we see that we've got this |
|
|
49:40 | on and this you see a reversal , you got your normal 16 inch |
|
|
49:50 | kind of has a high resistive But here you do have high resisted |
|
|
49:54 | in that the deeper induction log so that by itself is kind of telling |
|
|
50:02 | , uh, look down here in shale. Look down here and all |
|
|
50:06 | a sudden, Europe. So there be something going on in here. |
|
|
50:11 | , with with an issue with your system and whatnot. But here you |
|
|
50:16 | sand. You have effective porosity You can draw your share line right |
|
|
50:21 | , you know, make it Calculating you might want to put it |
|
|
50:24 | on that line right there. Or can make it come up a little |
|
|
50:27 | . And then for your your SSP , SSP is here. But then |
|
|
50:35 | gonna have you, uh, look the thin bed effect and figure out |
|
|
50:44 | the true SSP should be. But your your net in your in your |
|
|
50:50 | your liquid is based on what you on this log here, don't try |
|
|
50:53 | redraw it out to here and then Thio recalculated. Go ahead and make |
|
|
50:59 | baseline and your apparent SSB here and just calculate with the true SSP should |
|
|
51:06 | based on the thin benefit and again in that sand 50% If you decide |
|
|
51:14 | gonna be hydrocarbons because I've got resistive over here. Color it in |
|
|
51:18 | you think that resisted he might And before you do that, you |
|
|
51:23 | want to see the next log. course, Log one's gonna have this |
|
|
51:28 | list of things for you to work to answer. And so I want |
|
|
51:34 | to kind of color in that mythology the sandstone where you think you have |
|
|
51:40 | Prasit e, but leave space to left so you can color in the |
|
|
51:46 | . And now here's the second and this one is classical. |
|
|
51:53 | uh, for some reason, some have a difficult time with this, |
|
|
51:58 | I'm not quite sure. But over you can see you kind of have |
|
|
52:01 | shale line. Uh, even though is a gamma log your share lines |
|
|
52:06 | right here, but you can see shifts a little bit. It's not |
|
|
52:10 | the same, but for this sand , good. Good point would be |
|
|
52:14 | through here. This would be sort your sort of your maximum. Prasit |
|
|
52:19 | . Here you see some little divots in a divide here. These air |
|
|
52:23 | obvious you. Some people like me maybe take a foot out because of |
|
|
52:28 | going on here. But you don't to. You could draw a |
|
|
52:31 | They're not, you know, maybe a couple inches there in a couple |
|
|
52:35 | there and say, Forget it. not gonna worry about it. |
|
|
52:42 | here, you're going to see, , a little sand mass. It's |
|
|
52:50 | a little bit lower, so it's little bit a little bit tighter, |
|
|
52:53 | it's still there. But we got nice finding upwards sequence here. Motif |
|
|
52:57 | that. We don't have ah, resistive ity. Uh, decide to |
|
|
53:03 | bell curve over here because we got going on over here Now, anybody |
|
|
53:08 | the class when it gets what's happening here? Everybody says the log is |
|
|
53:14 | crappy log. It's not a crappy . Something's happening there to make it |
|
|
53:18 | crappy. Um, anybody wanna take guess as to why that's happening? |
|
|
53:29 | . Now it's not a washout. , uh, this this is a |
|
|
53:36 | , really, uh, highly resistive . And what's happened is the curves |
|
|
53:45 | . The curve scale goes all the to here, but in these |
|
|
53:50 | it's gone off scale, and it's trying to print it down here, |
|
|
53:53 | it's really quick, and it's really . So it's It's not that thick |
|
|
53:56 | a section. So, uh, logs you can see the recycling in |
|
|
54:01 | , but But when a peak goes scale here, and it's gone way |
|
|
54:07 | scale. Uh, and then it comes to here and then it's |
|
|
54:12 | way off scale here. It's getting little tighter, and it's got this |
|
|
54:16 | in it. But remember, what's most resistant thing? And this |
|
|
54:21 | uh, the fact that you can't in anything is not a problem when |
|
|
54:26 | quick and dirty. This is a , really good sign, uh, |
|
|
54:31 | obvious. And if you look at I've explained about oil and gas and |
|
|
54:35 | and what kind of responses they it should be pretty easy for you |
|
|
54:38 | pick this if you've never done it . If you've done this before, |
|
|
54:42 | should be very, very obvious to what it is. I don't want |
|
|
54:45 | tell you the answer. And, , go ahead. Where the other |
|
|
54:51 | , I say there is one right where you have the box sized rest |
|
|
54:56 | shallow right above it There. Is like a signature above the rest in |
|
|
55:02 | middle of the page. The Calgary You mean this one? Yeah. |
|
|
55:10 | is above the blue box. Where's reds? Oh, that's right |
|
|
55:16 | Yeah. Okay, that's part of curve. Okay, this is this |
|
|
55:20 | either Anant amplified resisted the or conductivity . Okay, Okay. So that |
|
|
55:27 | doesn't relate, because this, this this is coming from this direction. |
|
|
55:33 | , And this this these logs will only go to there, and these |
|
|
55:39 | will go all the way to So when this law gets too |
|
|
55:44 | it re cycles and starts back and it's so far back it Z |
|
|
55:50 | recycled a couple times and doesn't even where to plot. In other |
|
|
55:53 | of if I had all this that resistive ity might go way out |
|
|
55:59 | here on the scale. And another you can do is you can change |
|
|
56:02 | scale so you capture all of But this log was probably done in |
|
|
56:09 | area with scale that they have because wanted to see what tells them where |
|
|
56:14 | certain fluid is. And this is is this is like a bright spot |
|
|
56:19 | almost like a bright spot on seismic here. Can't get any brighter. |
|
|
56:26 | and so, uh, then here see something different happening completely. |
|
|
56:33 | uh and you know, you you're this kind of overlap. It suggests |
|
|
56:41 | completely different from here. But you really see the overlap or calculate the |
|
|
56:45 | over here because you can't see the that well. But you know one |
|
|
56:50 | , you know, because both both logs were way off the scale. |
|
|
56:56 | thing you know, out here, resistive iti is extremely high in that |
|
|
57:00 | . It's very, very high in lock. And it's immaterial whether or |
|
|
57:06 | this had fresh water coming in and it high to Okay, So, |
|
|
57:14 | , so just from a quick and thing, this should be pretty easy |
|
|
57:18 | you to answer and hear your questions that. And I say the |
|
|
57:25 | I'd even give you the top on 1. 78 50. And so |
|
|
57:29 | is the 78 50 sandstone top is there, and you might want to |
|
|
57:36 | a little higher. But this I think, is just such. |
|
|
57:39 | it's way off scale. It's taken a while to get back. And |
|
|
57:42 | can see it's recycling over here. could pick it at 68. Excuse |
|
|
57:48 | . 78 40 48 or 49 but calling it the 78 50 sand right |
|
|
57:55 | on pretty much this inflection in Okay, You could pick it |
|
|
58:03 | you know, another foot up, I've gone ahead, just so it |
|
|
58:08 | it easier for everybody just called it 78 50 sand and pick your top |
|
|
58:12 | stand there. Down here. Of . Don't use This is a different |
|
|
58:17 | this is a sand, it's a sandstone. And, uh, and |
|
|
58:22 | can also see it's getting a different ity response completely different from this. |
|
|
58:29 | , this part looks like that Okay. And there's the blank ones |
|
|
58:40 | you to work with color in and up with your nets and grosses and |
|
|
58:47 | me know what it iss Okay. that clear? Yes. So |
|
|
59:38 | By the way, I noticed a . Aziz. Usual. I |
|
|
59:46 | This is slide 41 in your We're tools number two. Uh, |
|
|
59:53 | would do a lot of cutting and I think I did it so |
|
|
59:55 | could get the arrow up there, , uh, in the slides that |
|
|
59:59 | have this says Cata Genesis again because cut and pasted it. I was |
|
|
60:04 | my way up, but this is Genesis up here and have corrected it |
|
|
60:10 | my slides. But it's not corrected your pdf. Well, how do |
|
|
60:20 | like that? Yeah, no, nothing like, um, small keypad |
|
|
60:38 | an iPad and I on a Mac air. Okay, so now we're |
|
|
60:48 | look at what? Some other and we've got other tools to another |
|
|
60:55 | three, and basically, I'm going go through a lot of this relatively |
|
|
60:59 | . Just just so you have a idea. Many of you that have |
|
|
61:04 | no many of these tools and maybe you're not familiar with, but just |
|
|
61:08 | you some examples of some of these examples of some of the things we |
|
|
61:12 | with them and a lot of the that we go through You You've already |
|
|
61:19 | the courses. You may have had seismic courses already, and so a |
|
|
61:25 | of this will be, uh, a review, But there may be |
|
|
61:28 | tools in here that you haven't heard . Uh, if you're in |
|
|
61:33 | for example, you'll you'll get into geophysics. And there's some things in |
|
|
61:37 | that the geologist won't see in any courses. So I kind of need |
|
|
61:43 | pull some of that up and explain . Okay, So for those of |
|
|
61:51 | that have been in the program for semesters, this could be your fourth |
|
|
61:56 | . Third semester, second or This is your third or fourth. |
|
|
62:00 | you had anything on pressure tools? might have gotten something from from Steve |
|
|
62:10 | . Doctor Norick. I'm pretty sure talked about this. Okay? Course |
|
|
62:17 | would have talked about this, Okay, well, here's one of |
|
|
62:22 | things that we do with some of things. Um, I guess before |
|
|
62:26 | get there, you know, there's a lot of different tools and, |
|
|
62:30 | , some of them dio a lot quick, Ah, checks what's gone |
|
|
62:37 | in terms of of. But the is running. These tools can be |
|
|
62:44 | , so a lot of times they get run. But when they do |
|
|
62:46 | , run the help. And, course, where you're gonna want to |
|
|
62:49 | these tools, it's probably gonna be a field where you're where you're making |
|
|
62:53 | lot of money, but you've got problems with pressures and production rates. |
|
|
63:00 | some things aren't squaring really well with it's a static geologic model versus your |
|
|
63:06 | or production dynamic model that you've that developed. In other words, the |
|
|
63:15 | is not fitting the production, and could be lots of reasons for |
|
|
63:20 | So sometimes you're going with these pressure to try to figure out. In |
|
|
63:23 | words, do I have, something that's creating a permeability barrier? |
|
|
63:27 | I have a big shift in and that might suggest that actually one well |
|
|
63:34 | in a separate fault block from Well, which is why their production |
|
|
63:37 | were completely different. Maybe you've got oil water contact coming up higher in |
|
|
63:42 | . Well, then another. you think they're in the same |
|
|
63:46 | but but still, at the end the day, if it's a field |
|
|
63:50 | you're making a lot of money, worth. It's almost always worth it |
|
|
63:53 | invest more money into it. If not producing a lot out of the |
|
|
63:58 | , you may not want to do . Even though you're having problems, |
|
|
64:01 | just going to go live with But that's kind of how these tools |
|
|
64:05 | . But when they work, they tell you a lot. And here |
|
|
64:11 | , um, the discovery well and their initial pressures that they have coming |
|
|
64:19 | . You can see this, but can see that there's a perm barrier |
|
|
64:23 | and you have a perf up here a perf up here. And this |
|
|
64:27 | barrier is not allowing significant flow across , and but at the same |
|
|
64:35 | maybe this is, of course, upwards sequence or something like that. |
|
|
64:39 | the flow rate happens to be higher . So you get on offset and |
|
|
64:43 | shift in your pressure and, a little graph like this. This |
|
|
64:51 | what you expected. There's no from , and this thing would just keep |
|
|
64:55 | over. But if there's a perm there, and this process is a |
|
|
65:00 | bit higher or effective processes higher here it is here, you're going to |
|
|
65:04 | a shift like that. It's also it's a finding upwards sequence, and |
|
|
65:10 | production rate would be lower here and there. And you kind of see |
|
|
65:14 | reverse of this. So there's a of things you can figure out and |
|
|
65:19 | t end of the day. You , you might not have recognized your |
|
|
65:23 | this being a significant barrier to permeability pressure equalization. So you you |
|
|
65:31 | you just figured it was gonna look this. But now you've got something |
|
|
65:35 | on with one per versus an And, of course, with some |
|
|
65:45 | your your book Drew the Shepard did your book the shepherd do the diagram |
|
|
65:53 | this with a new oil water If you're gonna move the oil out |
|
|
65:57 | here and remove that oil legged and is no longer the oil leg, |
|
|
66:03 | would become the water leg, and going to see pressures like that. |
|
|
66:05 | then the oil leg would be like . And this again. What |
|
|
66:10 | Assuming there was not a perm barrier . But if there's a perm barrier |
|
|
66:15 | in flow rates are more effective or up here than they are down |
|
|
66:20 | You would see something like that again if it was a finding upwards |
|
|
66:28 | you might see this. This leg here, right there. And this |
|
|
66:33 | over here a little bit over So it looks like something strange is |
|
|
66:37 | on in the formation. Okay. that's kind of why you do |
|
|
66:44 | So ah, lot of times you have issues like this, and a |
|
|
66:47 | of times you don't recognize anything But if you had a purpose |
|
|
66:53 | you might notice something strange is going between the preparations and, uh, |
|
|
66:59 | overall, your your flow rights might down because it z not over here |
|
|
67:05 | to this. It's somewhere between an of these these two depletion rates |
|
|
67:13 | uh, another. Another thing that affect it is, since this is |
|
|
67:17 | in this section, you're gonna be out probably more of this, and |
|
|
67:21 | gonna have less oil to produce So even if the ferocity is higher |
|
|
67:26 | lower here, you could see something this just because you're coming up on |
|
|
67:31 | oil, water contact and the thickness your your your total effective thickness in |
|
|
67:38 | aerial extent is shrinking. And so this is coming up. You're getting |
|
|
67:43 | thinner and thinner wedge effective Prasit e because the reservoir would be out here |
|
|
67:49 | this in a wedge, and you're from from 100% sand effectiveness to where |
|
|
67:55 | new oil water contact is in Zero. Okay. And and here |
|
|
68:07 | just showing kind of the same Uh, if you put another if |
|
|
68:17 | an efficient water drive and there is perm barrier, I just put it |
|
|
68:20 | here and just show you what this look like. And this could be |
|
|
68:26 | in fell to, So if what Ideo area? Yeah, and this |
|
|
68:41 | just showing you if you put another Phil well, over here pulling this |
|
|
68:45 | now, the problem is, if have multiple perps, you're gonna be |
|
|
68:49 | things out. So with multiple you're not usually going to see |
|
|
68:53 | But if you get an infield well pull it up here, that's when |
|
|
68:55 | going to get that break. So kind of explaining that a little bit |
|
|
68:58 | to you. And there we I'm having trouble with these buttons because |
|
|
69:04 | they work, and sometimes they Okay, so I've gone all the |
|
|
69:08 | through it again. And here we , back to this. Okay, |
|
|
69:13 | here we're looking at the flow You can have a flow meter like |
|
|
69:17 | , which is measuring a flow rate fluids. It's mostly water, and |
|
|
69:23 | got that what air that's going to there. But when you get into |
|
|
69:26 | transition zone and you get to, , pretty much here we're adding some |
|
|
69:32 | and adding oil, and then we to a point where it's pretty much |
|
|
69:36 | oil with Konate water in the and then you can see here, |
|
|
69:44 | , that you're getting, um, oil. So there, come over |
|
|
69:49 | . You can also see the same with the pulse neutron log. But |
|
|
69:53 | can also see with that because they're at the loss of hydrocarbons in here |
|
|
70:00 | you can see that it was like . And now we've got the hydrocarbons |
|
|
70:05 | here and on the second run, still have a log that looks the |
|
|
70:12 | . But the second run and you're have it. Uh, from |
|
|
70:19 | you're gonna have it swept out over . So here you can see the |
|
|
70:24 | zones completely taken up and you're getting and more water production through here and |
|
|
70:29 | . That's this is the transition zone , and there's oil, water contact |
|
|
70:34 | the way down here, and you're it more clearly over here in the |
|
|
70:40 | zone. The things were happening You're getting where you're moving that |
|
|
70:44 | water contact up up into here. , Uh, another thing that we |
|
|
70:52 | with wire line right logs is um See, how long have we |
|
|
70:59 | going down? We've been going over hour. An hour. Right. |
|
|
71:11 | . So how about if we take short 10 minute break right now? |
|
|
71:18 | good. And, uh, we'll back here. Let's see, based |
|
|
71:22 | my computer time, which is not what my C scout watches telling |
|
|
71:29 | Um, see, it's making about . 15. Oh, good. |
|
|
71:36 | right. Okay. Yeah. I'm back a little bit late. |
|
|
85:02 | distracted with something. Hey, Dr , um, did we ever decide |
|
|
85:08 | what day the final exam was gonna ? Yeah, that's a good |
|
|
85:13 | Um, based on what I've heard far, it sounds like everybody is |
|
|
85:19 | with doing it on the Wednesday but haven't heard anything about moving it to |
|
|
85:28 | . Does anybody want to move? want to move it to Tuesday? |
|
|
85:33 | be afraid to speak up, because it's only one person we could set |
|
|
85:38 | , so you can take it I'd like to do it Tuesday. |
|
|
85:45 | . How many? So So we we got J D. Who was |
|
|
85:51 | other person Clayton playing a coach? think that was J. D. |
|
|
85:59 | . Yeah, I think I would fun doing it to Zeta. |
|
|
86:03 | so Colonna, we got three so . How about the other seven? |
|
|
86:12 | wouldn't mind. I don't have anything Tuesday or Wednesday. I could do |
|
|
86:15 | day. So which everyone works better everyone else. You know, sitting |
|
|
86:21 | . Yeah. It would work better me. No one's good and it's |
|
|
86:30 | to be in the It's going to six thio, probably 6 to |
|
|
86:36 | It's theoretically three hour, um, slot we're supposed to give you, |
|
|
86:41 | I don't think it'll take that long I make sure that I try to |
|
|
86:48 | sure that the exam doesn't take three . It's I have had students spend |
|
|
86:54 | hours on my exams, but it's usually, uh, one out of |
|
|
86:59 | students. Okay, so we're going do it on the 24th, then |
|
|
87:07 | , any objections? Uh, just me know. Okay. 24th is |
|
|
87:14 | Tuesday. Uh, let's see. 24 is Tuesday. I would I |
|
|
87:23 | prefer to do with the Wednesday, , um, e could probably make |
|
|
87:29 | . They work. Okay. Are the person that was traveling? |
|
|
87:36 | Okay. Um, you know, keep us informed in case something |
|
|
87:41 | E I'm trialing the day before, was probably on the 22nd so that |
|
|
87:48 | just it be better for me to it on 24. The the Wednesday |
|
|
87:55 | I can make through Tuesday work, . Okay. And you probably don't |
|
|
88:01 | to take it the 23rd. Okay. So boy wouldn't work. |
|
|
88:08 | , so, Well, hopefully we do the 24th. Yeah. |
|
|
88:14 | so we'll plan on the 24th if happens to somebody like this can always |
|
|
88:20 | . Just let me know. uh, and just everybody. |
|
|
88:25 | if you find out that somebody is it later than you, you really |
|
|
88:31 | want to help them get their great . So please don't communicate what was |
|
|
88:34 | the test until you're sure everybody took test on that day. so when |
|
|
88:41 | take the test will all be together , uh and you kind of know |
|
|
88:47 | somebody's missing or not. And, , and again, if you |
|
|
88:53 | we want we all wanna remember academic . I hate to keep bringing it |
|
|
88:57 | , but I have to do it if I don't say it when somebody |
|
|
88:59 | something wrong, first question I get from the administration is Did you tell |
|
|
89:04 | not to cheat? And then I look at him like, Are you |
|
|
89:06 | me? But we're all grown so everybody please behave. And I |
|
|
89:15 | , um, do my best to the study guide to you. I |
|
|
89:20 | I've already got it pretty much But I don't like to finalize until |
|
|
89:24 | know where we get to on uh, lecture today as we get |
|
|
89:30 | today, because it's gonna be on material that we've covered the first two |
|
|
89:37 | . And if we get farther than think, it might be less than |
|
|
89:40 | we did this week. Okay, screen. And we're back here. |
|
|
89:53 | looking at the wonderful world of dip . Has anybody done a lot of |
|
|
89:59 | with dip meters. I've seen them logs, but never really worked with |
|
|
90:08 | . Okay, that's, um a of times, you know, we |
|
|
90:17 | these things and nobody ever uses But having said that, getting a |
|
|
90:25 | handle on the dip could be really in lateral wells. And it's also |
|
|
90:32 | , um, uh, that could important when the geology is kind of |
|
|
90:40 | , especially from the seismic. And show you one example I could show |
|
|
90:45 | 100 examples of when it's like, my God, what's going on in |
|
|
90:48 | seismic? We need to get a meter in there, So So when |
|
|
90:55 | needed there, there definitely needed it's an easy thing to run. |
|
|
91:01 | I think, uh, yes, anything. And we had more time |
|
|
91:05 | do more work. We would probably finding better uses and better examples of |
|
|
91:11 | use of meter logs. But they're always straightforward. The answers are not |
|
|
91:16 | . The one thing that is on logs is that the regional dip is |
|
|
91:23 | something we get a pretty good handle from a dictator, and that could |
|
|
91:28 | really important. Okay, so, , again, with the dip meter |
|
|
91:36 | . Do all these things. but it's not straightforward. You never |
|
|
91:42 | to jump in. I don't think make a lot of these interpretations without |
|
|
91:48 | having some context about the sand units the distribution of the sand units and |
|
|
91:53 | the depo centers are. Like I saying, if you have uh, |
|
|
91:59 | sand units that are running perpendicular to coast versus ones that are running parallel |
|
|
92:04 | the coast, it puts you in different context in terms of how you |
|
|
92:08 | it. So you always have to three dimensions. And the thing about |
|
|
92:15 | single, well, it's a single doesn't give you anything about three |
|
|
92:20 | It's really it's really only a You only get the vertical Ah, |
|
|
92:29 | access. When you do it you don't have lateral and the other |
|
|
92:33 | directions so you don't have an aerial figured out from one Well, so |
|
|
92:37 | when you get multiple wells and you , uh, being able to see |
|
|
92:43 | the depo centers are and where the Depot Center for Basin might be. |
|
|
92:49 | things like that, it helps you out how to use these other |
|
|
92:53 | including motifs ended meters, because you're it into a three dimensional context. |
|
|
92:59 | starting to make some sense. And the faces that you're looking for and |
|
|
93:04 | to discriminate are going to be a set of faces, depending on what |
|
|
93:07 | is you're seeing in some of the features on a three dimensional scale. |
|
|
93:14 | perspective When, um, excuse me we, uh, started out with |
|
|
93:23 | meters, Of course, they use resistive ity logs, so there's a |
|
|
93:28 | read on it. But they started three pads and then four pads. |
|
|
93:34 | um, Now they just have these that have channels on the pads. |
|
|
93:39 | you get up to 25 channels uh, you may have multiple |
|
|
93:44 | whereas we might have had a few before on each of these pads. |
|
|
93:50 | can anybody guess what one of the difficult things about a dip meter might |
|
|
94:02 | ? There's actually a couple of things could guess. Lateral orientation. It |
|
|
94:17 | like it might always be dipping like or right. It might be dipping |
|
|
94:21 | away, away from the log. . Okay, well, yeah, |
|
|
94:28 | you can sort that out. But sure that you understand the orientation of |
|
|
94:33 | tool when you're pulling it up is critical. So they have a way |
|
|
94:36 | doing that. And but one of biggest mechanical problems eyes. When you |
|
|
94:44 | these pads out, you can get up in the well bore and, |
|
|
94:49 | , usually a tool pusher, and often the company man, too |
|
|
94:55 | for those of you don't know, the tool pushers the guy that's being |
|
|
94:58 | to drill the well, and he more money if he drills faster. |
|
|
95:06 | so he, um, just kind make it straight and simple. He |
|
|
95:13 | no incentive to go slow. The man is the same way because he's |
|
|
95:18 | to keep the budget down because the it takes, uh, they have |
|
|
95:23 | pan rig rates. He's gonna have pay more the longer it takes |
|
|
95:27 | But he's he doesn't have the same is the company man who makes more |
|
|
95:32 | . Ah, the tool pusher is going to make any more money, |
|
|
95:35 | the company might get irritated with him it takes a long time. Eso |
|
|
95:40 | these things come out a lot of in charge of drilling it or really |
|
|
95:44 | that they have to do a dip law. But again, uh, |
|
|
95:49 | if something one of my first uh, uh, supervisors told me |
|
|
95:56 | I started working was there's two things can get out of an oil well |
|
|
96:02 | any kind of well, that we . One is money, and the |
|
|
96:06 | one is data and data could be a lot of money. So if |
|
|
96:11 | tool that you think you need and have a good reason to do |
|
|
96:13 | then it's probably a good thing to . And, uh, I've never |
|
|
96:21 | on a lateral well, so I know how these tools work and how |
|
|
96:24 | been modified, But they have been to work in lateral wells. And |
|
|
96:31 | wish I had more details on it I'm kind of kind of out in |
|
|
96:36 | woods on that, because I, , I haven't sat a well for |
|
|
96:39 | few years, although when I, , worked in the North Sea on |
|
|
96:46 | chalks, we were doing laterals, I just at that point in |
|
|
96:50 | I was working on a different aspect the analysis for the well data that |
|
|
96:55 | brought in. Okay, So here's what One of the the really neat |
|
|
97:04 | usedto look, it looked like Uh, I'm not going to |
|
|
97:09 | but it looks like a probe that might stick in you in the medical |
|
|
97:12 | the doctor's office of a smaller Mhm. I'm not gonna tell you |
|
|
97:19 | kind of doctor, but anyway, ah, the one in the doctor's |
|
|
97:25 | would be smaller than this, by way, and anyway, here you |
|
|
97:29 | see that you have these pads and course, they're going to cause |
|
|
97:32 | They could be retracted when it's when slower. But then when you start |
|
|
97:36 | it back up, you're gonna wanna that out and then just, |
|
|
97:41 | hopefully keep that thing moving straight And so you have these several pads |
|
|
97:47 | you can see here. Ah, looking at different features that helps them |
|
|
97:52 | out what the deepest. So you , um, you have this thing |
|
|
97:58 | you're trying to keep oriented. and as it's coming up, you |
|
|
98:02 | see where the dips are. Like , Here's a curve, and it's |
|
|
98:05 | little bit higher over here, and a little bit lower coming back down |
|
|
98:09 | way. So in this straight you know, the the dip is |
|
|
98:17 | towards down towards a and it's up between B and C. So, |
|
|
98:26 | this was being see, this would up dip. And down here, |
|
|
98:30 | a and B are would be more did. Okay, uh, and |
|
|
98:36 | what a standard, um sharp looked , and they're getting much more colorful |
|
|
98:43 | , and they do all sorts of stuff with it. Um, |
|
|
98:48 | um, what do you think is difference between the dark tadpoles and the |
|
|
98:57 | tadpoles that, like this Dad pull there and that tadpole right there when |
|
|
99:09 | try? Excuse me? Like, some to do with, like, |
|
|
99:16 | sand and dry sand or something. , no, it's Ah, you're |
|
|
99:21 | to make this oil, huh? , that's that's being very optimistic. |
|
|
99:26 | anyway, what this really means is the filled in ones, they feel |
|
|
99:32 | they're more reliable data points, and there could be a lot of |
|
|
99:37 | But here, this is probably cross in a sandstone, which is gonna |
|
|
99:45 | chaotic and because it looks very it might not be considered reliable, |
|
|
99:50 | in fact it might be reliable, you can't always tell and based on |
|
|
99:56 | , but based on consistency, they kind of picked the ones |
|
|
100:02 | they have an algorithm for sorting it , and there's a lot of different |
|
|
100:06 | that can cause problems. And here some of the things that they talk |
|
|
100:12 | here's increasing dip with not that, this is chaotic. Dips in a |
|
|
100:19 | body, for example, or creating . And here you have dips in |
|
|
100:24 | clay stone, but they don't seem match up with some of the other |
|
|
100:28 | . But these might be better than that are over here that air filled |
|
|
100:32 | . So sometimes, Uh, there's lot of noise, and it's hard |
|
|
100:37 | determine. However, uh, this what we're kind of looking for in |
|
|
100:43 | of how to interpret it, and is a uniformed pattern through a |
|
|
100:49 | And imagine finally layered sediments, that have lots of lamb in a |
|
|
101:02 | of beds, and they're all kind When they were deposited, they were |
|
|
101:06 | lines. So when you tilt they dip all pretty much together. |
|
|
101:11 | that would be what we call a pattern. That's uniforms. And this |
|
|
101:16 | is going to be in, in a shell because you don't have |
|
|
101:21 | betting in the shale, and you have other things going on. |
|
|
101:29 | now, another thing that can um, is you can get cross |
|
|
101:33 | and you can have also you have on a larger scale changed because you're |
|
|
101:41 | into it, something like a channel out of a channel. And here |
|
|
101:45 | dip is higher. And before we any farther, go back here. |
|
|
101:51 | , this is the dip. So Plots out in this direction from here |
|
|
101:57 | here That tells you the dip. , The little tadpole, The pointer |
|
|
102:06 | telling you which direction it's pointing So what would the dip be on |
|
|
102:12 | two tadpoles Right here? And there's nothing Thio tell you how many degrees |
|
|
102:24 | iss. But as geologists, what's the top all the time? North |
|
|
102:33 | is always at the top. uh, if North is top, |
|
|
102:37 | is what is where these to But it to resist. It's |
|
|
102:44 | 32 to resist Right there. Only now. Almost horizontal. Oh, |
|
|
102:55 | sorry. Yeah, yeah. You're this is 30 32 or whatever, |
|
|
102:59 | it's East, right? Yeah. . Okay, So the tadpole is |
|
|
103:05 | you it's east. And the position here is telling you how many degrees |
|
|
103:10 | dip it. Okay, so where is on this scale is the dip |
|
|
103:17 | the bed. Where that is pointing the direction of the bit. So |
|
|
103:24 | , this one's about 31. This might be about 33 East. |
|
|
103:30 | So when we have consistent dip like consistent dip direction, inconsistent tilt, |
|
|
103:39 | flat beds that have been tilted So there, Well, laminated. |
|
|
103:44 | doesn't have to be a shale. can have lime stones and sand stones |
|
|
103:50 | the same thing, especially if they're and been more compact and more de |
|
|
103:55 | . And we're nice layered sedimentary sequences the first place. But because there |
|
|
104:02 | places where we get layer cake And of course, you're not looking |
|
|
104:08 | this, um, in in a scale. So sometimes the dip has |
|
|
104:16 | be pretty significant for you actually to out a direction. And when the |
|
|
104:23 | is subtle, it makes a little harder to pick it out because these |
|
|
104:26 | air not too far apart. so it's, um you know, |
|
|
104:32 | I have a couple of degrees you know, within a bore |
|
|
104:38 | the difference between this maybe slighter than You could see if it was a |
|
|
104:43 | one, but but it still it works pretty well because it's very close |
|
|
104:48 | . And, uh uh, it still see pretty much an angle on |
|
|
104:53 | . But the subtle angles you when you get less than five, |
|
|
104:56 | gonna be tough Thio to really see . Anyway, this is, |
|
|
105:02 | uh a good, consistent, very layered formation set of formations and most |
|
|
105:11 | is share. Okay, here we . Okay, that's Oh, |
|
|
105:28 | My wife just interrupted me. I don't want to get into a |
|
|
105:33 | about it, but my wife just me to tell me there was a |
|
|
105:35 | on the election a few minutes So when we get done for our |
|
|
105:41 | break, we can all check it the truth anyway, Um, when |
|
|
105:47 | look at this blue upward increasing. , lot of times that means pro |
|
|
105:53 | , and I'll show you why. and, uh uh, this would |
|
|
105:59 | the red pattern. And when we excuse me, this is upward. |
|
|
106:04 | is a blue pattern. I'm I'm reading it wrong again. This |
|
|
106:09 | blue. This is red, and looking at the slide the wrong |
|
|
106:16 | But here is our upward decreasing And this is our upward increasing |
|
|
106:25 | This one is red, and this is called blue, and this is |
|
|
106:29 | green. And then down here, , sometimes it's called a yellow pattern |
|
|
106:36 | a random pattern or bag of which was very similar to to this |
|
|
106:42 | in here. Okay, so let's what that kind of looks like Here |
|
|
106:50 | , uh, some beds that have structurally tilted, but they were laid |
|
|
106:54 | like layer cakes in the structural tilting picked up on the amount of dip |
|
|
107:01 | the angle of the dippy inconsistent. that's kind of what you see |
|
|
107:06 | Here. You see, the dip increasing. So something is causing this |
|
|
107:13 | to increase in this direction. what What would that look? What |
|
|
107:20 | we look at yesterday? That could something like this? Roll over in |
|
|
107:26 | car. There you go. That's Oh, good. I didn't put |
|
|
107:34 | on there. There. Yeah, a rollover. Anne Klein could do |
|
|
107:36 | . Ah, growth fault. Could have several, uh, places where |
|
|
107:41 | might see something like this. here's Here's another one showing upward |
|
|
107:49 | And let's see what it says back on this thing. I just want |
|
|
107:54 | see if it makes sense with what going to say. Yes, it |
|
|
107:59 | . Okay, um, if if don't have, um, a growth |
|
|
108:06 | , we might get something like It looks like pro gradation. In |
|
|
108:10 | words, you've got the layered shales here. Limited dip like the the |
|
|
108:17 | set beds. But as we go the top set beds, you're going |
|
|
108:21 | start, uh, seeing something like . And then, of course, |
|
|
108:26 | going toe fill in with the sand across the top, but the shells |
|
|
108:32 | top of that are going to show like this. You're gonna end up |
|
|
108:36 | shells flat down here, and we're going from a lot too flat. |
|
|
108:41 | you're gonna with sand stones on the , that air flat up here on |
|
|
108:44 | Nation. And but the programming shales front of it, like pro delta |
|
|
108:51 | , are gonna are gonna look a like this. Okay, then, |
|
|
109:00 | time you get something like this, is a significant break in, |
|
|
109:05 | this could be a nonconformity of faults erosion. All surface or again, |
|
|
109:09 | toe of pro gradation may look something that, too, when you get |
|
|
109:13 | here and you go to the bottom beds and you really have to be |
|
|
109:22 | interpreting this, I think you you use use the dip angles and |
|
|
109:28 | you try to figure it out. , an angular un conformity. If |
|
|
109:33 | gonna be one in an area you're and you probably have an idea of |
|
|
109:36 | it's gonna happen from a least the d size maker, maybe even from |
|
|
109:41 | and mag. But here you have angular un conformity. You can see |
|
|
109:46 | dip am of the overlying beds is different from this one. So what |
|
|
109:51 | was we had these beds laid down . Uh, it rotated and got |
|
|
109:58 | , and these were laid flat on of it. And then it rotated |
|
|
110:01 | a little this way to get these to dip down in this direction. |
|
|
110:06 | any time you see that, you there's a lot of erosion that's gone |
|
|
110:12 | . And that's often what happens when have an eroding surface that's tilted. |
|
|
110:18 | going to see an angular un conformity this, covered up with beds that |
|
|
110:22 | flat line after that, rotated the time and got eroded. And then |
|
|
110:27 | tilted again, back this way of the whole structure has later on tilted |
|
|
110:34 | another direction. Okay, and here showing you a channel and there there's |
|
|
110:47 | not too many real examples of recognizing . But if you're in the |
|
|
110:54 | you know, if you know you a flu viel system, you can |
|
|
110:57 | can look at this kind of thing you can see you have this tilted |
|
|
111:02 | that got incised. Uh, you a low stand happening, and you |
|
|
111:08 | see the dips changing right here. is a good, good candidate. |
|
|
111:13 | going over here is being possibly a boundary. So it could help |
|
|
111:19 | even with with something like that. here you could have an incised valley |
|
|
111:24 | a low stand, cutting into something structurally tilted a little bit before the |
|
|
111:28 | stand. And, uh and then you have, uh, beds here |
|
|
111:34 | if, uh, later on tilted little bit more, actually, just |
|
|
111:39 | at it. The dip on this is just a little bit less than |
|
|
111:43 | dip on that unit. So it's to tell what they're trying to draw |
|
|
111:47 | . But maybe maybe these beds, , didn't tilt until those beds |
|
|
111:54 | But the dip here is a little less than what it is there. |
|
|
112:00 | which is odd, because when you at this, um, it looks |
|
|
112:05 | they're pretty much the same. But , you're seeing a little bit greater |
|
|
112:10 | . Uh, right in this, upper part here, you're gonna get |
|
|
112:14 | a flat line again. These these cartoons are not 100% accurate. But |
|
|
112:19 | we see that red pattern. uh, and of course, |
|
|
112:24 | what's happening is you're on, you , kind of you get the clay |
|
|
112:30 | of channel. It's going to be up here. And then it's gonna |
|
|
112:33 | increasing with a dip into the center the channel on this rather than just |
|
|
112:39 | one channel, This could be a channel belt, so there could |
|
|
112:42 | like, channel deposits actually in and you'll see this kind of |
|
|
112:46 | It could be actual sand unit in on the sand unit in here. |
|
|
112:50 | each one of these could be channel . Excuse me. Channels within one |
|
|
112:55 | built. Yeah. Okay. Here just showing you a pattern you could |
|
|
113:01 | . Uh, here. You're getting much the typical drag. Roll over |
|
|
113:10 | a normal fault. And you can how that changes the dip here, |
|
|
113:15 | . And it's pretty dramatic when you the fault. Can. Here is |
|
|
113:24 | a example. Cartoon again. here we have flatlining sandstone shales, |
|
|
113:31 | they're well bedded. Uh, they together as a unit. There's no |
|
|
113:37 | . All tilt in here or de dip in here. There's there's simply |
|
|
113:42 | graphic dip or structural dip. And this is showing you the structural |
|
|
113:47 | and down here, showing you some positional dip going on. That's causing |
|
|
113:52 | nightmare over here and try to tie one of these to each of |
|
|
113:56 | I'm not sure you'd be able to it out, just looking at the |
|
|
113:59 | . But But you get the We have cross trough stratification Any time |
|
|
114:05 | have cross trough stratification say that a . It gets really tongue time. |
|
|
114:11 | But you can see here that the can be very chaotic. Uh, |
|
|
114:15 | not really showing you what happens to things because because there's like, |
|
|
114:21 | the dip in one of these troughs not gonna be like this. Like |
|
|
114:27 | like. The pattern is showing. going to be more like that more |
|
|
114:31 | that. So it keeps changing as move from one cross dropped to the |
|
|
114:37 | cross drops. That's pretty, pretty chaotic. And then we go back |
|
|
114:41 | a nice screen pattern which here has . We had sand stones in there |
|
|
114:46 | were nice and flat line. Here have a limestone unit that may have |
|
|
114:51 | surfaces above and below, but it's state sort of in layer cake fashion |
|
|
114:56 | then has some structural component thio dip here. But no de positional component |
|
|
115:06 | , Here's one of the examples of you might need a dip meter. |
|
|
115:12 | got this nice slice of a three seismic line, and you have this |
|
|
115:18 | list of life in there. And wants to tell everybody What Analyst |
|
|
115:29 | Come on. Geology majors. That's kind of a funny camera John |
|
|
115:35 | roughly on the list of it is huge mass of of rock that slumped |
|
|
115:43 | of a high or something. It's a gravity flow debris flow. |
|
|
115:48 | it's a gravity flow of some type deposit where you've got lots of things |
|
|
115:54 | rolling down in here. And so looking at the seismic trying to figure |
|
|
115:58 | what's going on. You gotta dip in there. It could be very |
|
|
116:02 | in helping you figure out what's going with with the betting in there. |
|
|
116:06 | know, you have some betting out and betting out here that you can |
|
|
116:09 | of follow. That's something really strange going on in there. Um, |
|
|
116:15 | you get really strange responses, it always be something that might be related |
|
|
116:20 | hydrocarbons, of course, but in case, there's some slumped blocks And |
|
|
116:26 | a lot going on in front of reflector and behind this reflector that could |
|
|
116:31 | some dramatic dip changes because you're going get a lot of de positional dip |
|
|
116:35 | here and not just structural dip. , And here is, uh, |
|
|
116:43 | know, the other ones had would had a few channels in each one |
|
|
116:47 | these, uh, four pads. , but now they've got the of |
|
|
116:57 | , they've got the caliper logs and got the pad sticking out in the |
|
|
117:00 | log to figure out where you got . And And the other thing |
|
|
117:06 | uh, and the old times we anywhere from just one sensor on this |
|
|
117:13 | they set up to 25. If gonna have four pads, it's gonna |
|
|
117:17 | to be uneven number. And if had three pads, it's gonna have |
|
|
117:19 | be something other than 25. Could uneven number or an odd number, |
|
|
117:25 | not 25. So now they have lot of channels on each one of |
|
|
117:34 | , uh, pad so you can things at this scale and not just |
|
|
117:40 | way over here and way over You're also seeing close up on a |
|
|
117:46 | scale changes from here all the way there and you can see there offset |
|
|
117:52 | that it's It's like trying to get as movable seismic out of this or |
|
|
117:57 | . But you're you're getting a really handle on what's going on this way |
|
|
118:04 | this way over. That's seventh. 22.8 inches across this pad here. |
|
|
118:12 | these things have gotten more and more through time, of course. |
|
|
118:18 | uh, and one of things that you to do, of course, |
|
|
118:23 | look at sedimentary structures and helps you all sorts of false that have offsets |
|
|
118:32 | fractures that don't. And and it give you a pretty clear image of |
|
|
118:38 | versus cross bedding. You can see dip and you can see deposition. |
|
|
118:44 | can see regional structural dip and de dips. Okay, so here |
|
|
118:51 | uh what one of the earlier ones like. This is in black and |
|
|
118:54 | , and you go around to the pads and you can actually wrap it |
|
|
118:58 | like this and get in idea. of course, it's dipping in this |
|
|
119:03 | . Here, this'll looks like regional , and then you've got some de |
|
|
119:07 | dip, perhaps, uh, coming there. And so it's pretty, |
|
|
119:15 | , pretty interesting. It almost looks a piece of core coming out of |
|
|
119:19 | ground. And you put it like . And here's another one, |
|
|
119:24 | comparing it to a core. And course, you know, it was |
|
|
119:30 | . We want a core, but dip meter works pretty good if you |
|
|
119:33 | get a core. And how many you have worked on doing sort |
|
|
119:38 | ah, standard core in A in Well, has anybody worked on anything |
|
|
119:42 | that? E mean, I've seen . Okay, Yeah, of |
|
|
119:52 | as geologists. Hopefully everybody that's a major is seen a core. And |
|
|
119:57 | would hope even the geophysics have, maybe you have it. But getting |
|
|
120:02 | core is a lot of work. I was sent to a well, |
|
|
120:09 | to pick a contract jewel boundary in well where we did not want to |
|
|
120:16 | another $8 million to drill another And of course, if you go |
|
|
120:21 | through a formation and you think you've the interval that you're government requirement has |
|
|
120:31 | that you need to cut. You to do a side track more or |
|
|
120:35 | to get past to some fresh, rock because you can't you can't |
|
|
120:41 | It's something that's full of mud cake drilling fluid. You have to move |
|
|
120:46 | the side. So it's It's a thing to do a corner. If |
|
|
120:50 | you decide upfront, you know exactly that is. You can drill the |
|
|
120:54 | . I may have already mentioned but when I was, someone was |
|
|
120:59 | to drill a core for the University Houston across the Cretaceous Tertiary boundary. |
|
|
121:04 | , between the midway in the camp north of Houston. Here they used |
|
|
121:11 | D seismic, and they missed it 1200 ft. So they got a |
|
|
121:14 | of the midway and nothing on So if they really, absolutely, |
|
|
121:21 | legal reasons had to get a core that thing, they would have had |
|
|
121:23 | drill another core. And something like happened in a well in Azerbaijan before |
|
|
121:29 | pulled me to go out there and and pick that point. And they |
|
|
121:35 | , um, $8 million on Um, if you drill a core |
|
|
121:39 | going to cost you $3 million. went out there and was able to |
|
|
121:43 | the strata graphic point for them where was, which pretty much indicated that |
|
|
121:51 | gotten to the contractual depth that were to drill to for the country of |
|
|
121:58 | and and consequently, we didn't need spend $3 million to drill a core |
|
|
122:04 | all, and that that would be everything worked. Well, if it |
|
|
122:08 | work well like the other, it could have been a Muchas eight |
|
|
122:12 | . So for a flight over to and my own private helicopter ride, |
|
|
122:18 | , I was able to save them t least $3 million just paying for |
|
|
122:24 | couple of tickets. And I didn't a lot on that trip because the |
|
|
122:28 | wasn't that good on the rig. we don't get paid. We don't |
|
|
122:32 | charged for food. I don't think the rig. So I don't think |
|
|
122:34 | was much much of a food and I did get taken out to |
|
|
122:39 | nice restaurant. Ah, it was of underground and where the the silk |
|
|
122:46 | used to come through and and, many, Ah, many thousands of |
|
|
122:53 | ago, 2000 years ago or Or maybe maybe just 1600 years |
|
|
122:59 | they had traders gone through there and had a little restaurant. There was |
|
|
123:04 | of, ah, what was, , pathway between buildings that were now |
|
|
123:11 | , covered up with with history and And that was that might have been |
|
|
123:16 | , but other than that, it pretty cheap compared to the three million |
|
|
123:20 | drill a core and the eight million you had to drill a second |
|
|
123:24 | which happens quite often, so getting image log that looks like this could |
|
|
123:29 | a lot of expense. You can , well, problems with image |
|
|
123:33 | but usually it's not gonna cost you near $3 million. And you get |
|
|
123:38 | that looks almost like structure. Excuse ? It looks almost like a core |
|
|
123:44 | itself, and you can see a of actual geological features in this |
|
|
123:51 | Uh, just, uh, I'm somebody else picked this out, so |
|
|
123:55 | don't have to show you why. know it's like this, but it |
|
|
123:59 | showing you obvious betting, and you see there's sort of a consistency to |
|
|
124:04 | betting in the red. And so pretty much how you would identify the |
|
|
124:11 | that you're seeing. And you can just looking at the rock. You |
|
|
124:14 | see it. So you got a signal on dip. Wherever this pad |
|
|
124:18 | up dip and wherever these pads are , dip structurally. But then go |
|
|
124:24 | and look at the deposition. All that you're getting here. And what |
|
|
124:29 | you think little things like this might ? They don't label this on |
|
|
124:39 | I think this is absolutely incredible. do you think these little blips are |
|
|
124:46 | here? It looked like something just of changed. Um, and what's |
|
|
124:56 | on here is because those pads air close together, they're seeing places where |
|
|
125:02 | know they might have a consistent Then there's all all of sudden something |
|
|
125:07 | a hole there where they don't see dip it all. And it's not |
|
|
125:12 | of that plugged by the way. if if you can imagine, there |
|
|
125:16 | , ah, hole cut into the here you might get something that looked |
|
|
125:21 | a gap, right? In other , it's basically there's no dip |
|
|
125:29 | And so you're seeing it pop up that. So what do you think |
|
|
125:32 | of these funny features are that air across the street? Igra fee by |
|
|
125:40 | . Very good. That's probably exactly it iss. And if we're looking |
|
|
125:45 | the shells and again, I know can get these tools into a lateral |
|
|
125:52 | . I don't know how it mechanically . I don't know if that if |
|
|
125:56 | have crawlers on them or what, it was probably a lot more expensive |
|
|
126:01 | a straight hole tip meter Or just deep, slightly deviated whole, |
|
|
126:07 | wire line, uh, type But, um, you could put |
|
|
126:12 | in a lateral on. You go a shale and you see a lot |
|
|
126:16 | this, uh, model Look to . It probably does mean bio Turbay |
|
|
126:22 | . And it probably does mean, , a lot of the organic material |
|
|
126:28 | here has been ingested. And the that I was telling you about that |
|
|
126:34 | into the midway, uh, the reason it was drilled in that area |
|
|
126:42 | people were looking at the midway is source rock for completely new play area |
|
|
126:50 | the state of Texas, which already a lot of oil all over the |
|
|
126:54 | . And and even Floyd C. was interested in this. But perhaps |
|
|
126:59 | I even figured it out, he it out. But the dark shales |
|
|
127:03 | the midway on that part of Texas heavily bioterror baited. And, |
|
|
127:11 | the water was deep at that probably at least, uh, 300 |
|
|
127:19 | not 600 m deep. And but was oxygenated. So you had a |
|
|
127:26 | of, uh, bio Turbay Shin on and Bio Turbay Shin means there's |
|
|
127:33 | in there eating the organic material that were hoping would have turned into oil |
|
|
127:38 | gas. But when there's that, , biotic activity, uh, you |
|
|
127:45 | , it's sort of a no So what looked like really dark source |
|
|
127:53 | ? Uh, shells. We ran analysis on it, and I think |
|
|
127:59 | highest we got in there was 0.5 toc, which is not going to |
|
|
128:05 | much for you, especially in something might be not as mature as we |
|
|
128:10 | normally wanted to be. In other , it would be sort of that |
|
|
128:13 | early oil window and not through the part of the oil window, so |
|
|
128:20 | pretty much nixed it. And so a pretty important thing. Now, |
|
|
128:25 | you're drilling laterals, you're usually drilling a place where you kind of know |
|
|
128:31 | oil there and again. That's because you figured it out from a straight |
|
|
128:36 | . It had so much in it there must be something there that we |
|
|
128:40 | drill laterally. But But then, you start to exploit away from that |
|
|
128:46 | discovery, rather than in, are conventional stuff where we look at |
|
|
128:53 | big picture and come in and focus on the prospects, this thing you |
|
|
128:57 | out with a, Well, you , Scott oil and gas. It's |
|
|
128:59 | come out of the ground and you to figure out where that good trend |
|
|
129:04 | in the distance. Uh, running of these things in exploratory mode might |
|
|
129:08 | worth it, but again, a of times we don't even try |
|
|
129:12 | But when we start trying to maximize and a lot of the unconventional resources |
|
|
129:17 | we have right now, we may some people drilling wells. It might |
|
|
129:21 | something like this in what you could even though it's not a frontier |
|
|
129:26 | It could be frontier exploration in different of these massive shale bodies that people |
|
|
129:33 | not drilled yet and accidentally found that was a lot of oil. But |
|
|
129:38 | might go poking around like they did the midway. We know there's a |
|
|
129:41 | shale there, but we don't know there's any potential for production. They |
|
|
129:45 | out really quickly in that area. no potential for it at all. |
|
|
129:50 | whether you drill the core or whether drilled well and did a image log |
|
|
129:56 | have probably helped a lot and sort sorting out the the total organic |
|
|
130:01 | And, of course, using the method in here with the cross plot |
|
|
130:05 | resistive ity and another density tool like density log where the sonic log, |
|
|
130:10 | might be able to get some indication how good the source rock isas. |
|
|
130:16 | , okay, so, um, thing we're gonna look at a sidewalk |
|
|
130:20 | and cores. Um, and of to me, this This is, |
|
|
130:31 | I hate to keep saying this, geologists know that this is really |
|
|
130:37 | you know, in other words, get our hands on it. It's |
|
|
130:41 | a it's not a cat scan. , this is like when you cut |
|
|
130:47 | open and you see the tumor. , the beauty and the value of |
|
|
130:55 | remote sensing tools that we have, size mint, is remote sensing the |
|
|
131:01 | of remote sensing in medicine and and is, you can see things without |
|
|
131:07 | into the ground or poking into the too much. So there's a big |
|
|
131:12 | there. So those tools air definitely . But when when a medical team |
|
|
131:18 | do a biopsy, uh, they a lot more reassurance that they know |
|
|
131:23 | they're looking at in the same with , when we can actually get a |
|
|
131:28 | , we actually have rock. We a good idea what it really is |
|
|
131:34 | looking closer at the photography on doing geochemical analyses on it, not |
|
|
131:40 | fluid stuff, you know, you run a fluid test, pull fluids |
|
|
131:43 | and figure out an awful lot and there you're getting your hands on |
|
|
131:46 | as well. And, uh, getting, uh, things that help |
|
|
131:53 | figure out the deposition environment and the at the same time. You |
|
|
131:58 | the Biota that Aaron there oftentimes can you whether you're looking at a Marine |
|
|
132:04 | or a non Marine section, which away we'll tell you if a feature |
|
|
132:09 | channel that, uh, might be viel is flu viel and not a |
|
|
132:15 | turban type channel. In other if I see deep water, deep |
|
|
132:21 | , if anybody sees deepwater, bio around the channel versus non Marine and |
|
|
132:33 | a lack of any kind of thing it, you know that even though |
|
|
132:36 | might have sedimentary structures that are the one with the deep water fossils |
|
|
132:41 | it is going to be probably something do with the turbidity current, a |
|
|
132:46 | fan and turbo tights. Whereas if all non Marine, it's probably going |
|
|
132:51 | be a river and S. that's really critically important. And of |
|
|
132:55 | , the age is important, because doesn't seem like much, you |
|
|
133:00 | , we call things Eocene and paleo those air huge chunks of rock. |
|
|
133:05 | today, in terms of age, , we can see, uh, |
|
|
133:12 | in the rock record as small as years, and that could end up |
|
|
133:18 | a, uh, some sort of stand. Maybe not a sequence |
|
|
133:23 | but definitely Ah, low stand all sorts of things like that or |
|
|
133:29 | event. And and then, of , it helps tie in with |
|
|
133:34 | and you're gonna have a correlation And I'm going to give you the |
|
|
133:39 | bio straight up front. And of , analyzing the water can often help |
|
|
133:46 | a lot of things and in terms what your contrast is between your real |
|
|
133:51 | one is a contrast between your formation and your drilling fluid salinity something that |
|
|
133:59 | helps a petro physics a lot. there's other things that relate thio, |
|
|
134:03 | , Thio, salt masses and and it relates thio things that relate to |
|
|
134:12 | the rocks as well. Okay, corn analysis standard core analysis really looks |
|
|
134:20 | the same things that we're looking at the logs, process and permeability. |
|
|
134:26 | , and here, rather than using tool to calculate it, you can |
|
|
134:31 | at it, but again, it's . Trying to measure Prasit e and |
|
|
134:36 | permeability can be difficult because in terms permeability, you have tow push something |
|
|
134:42 | the rock and get a flow rate of it, and and what you |
|
|
134:46 | through and how you push it through be, um, mhm biasing factor |
|
|
134:53 | terms of what your results are. usually you can get good permeability and |
|
|
134:58 | ferocity because people have been doing this century now, I think, and |
|
|
135:05 | but those are some of the key you look for. But then you |
|
|
135:08 | in there and the geologist gets in , and he describes the sedimentary features |
|
|
135:12 | the fractures are and where discontinuities are often. If you have a |
|
|
135:18 | you can see it pretty clearly in core, and you may also be |
|
|
135:25 | to recognize uh, significant fractured that there is offset, even though in |
|
|
135:32 | court you're not going to see that offset, it may literally suggested, |
|
|
135:37 | you might be able to pick up and afford to okay, another tool |
|
|
135:42 | really important, um, are the cores. And that's because again, |
|
|
135:48 | have these tools going down and you , you kind of have thio. |
|
|
135:57 | is kind of a There's different types sidewall core tools, ones and unconsolidated |
|
|
136:04 | or like, shotgun shells. And , I haven't run one of these |
|
|
136:08 | in a while, but I think still look the same. Uh, |
|
|
136:13 | probably could get I probably could get colored picture for you, But But |
|
|
136:17 | , the ah, you have these shotgun shell sized charges, uh, |
|
|
136:26 | these things and cups and the charge the cup into into the formation and |
|
|
136:33 | has a little cable that holds it that when you pull this out, |
|
|
136:36 | have all these things kind of hanging by cables after they've been shot. |
|
|
136:44 | , of course, you can sequence , um you drop it down the |
|
|
136:47 | and and at a certain depth they shooting these things from the bottom to |
|
|
136:54 | top so that they hang down and the way the other ones and and |
|
|
136:59 | sediments. A lot of times, , there's Samant. Marilyn Night in |
|
|
137:04 | formation is probably going to stick in cup. Uh, and you guys |
|
|
137:09 | don't know what a film little film Cans looked like, but probably have |
|
|
137:14 | laying around here somewhere. But they're the same size as a Kodak film |
|
|
137:20 | used to be, uh, for , for a typical, uh, |
|
|
137:26 | that we used to make in the . And also typical pictures, Not |
|
|
137:30 | frame negatives, but the regular of millimeter size negative Xander slides. So |
|
|
137:40 | cans would go in there they come , pull it up here. Things |
|
|
137:43 | get messed up. But the key , though, is that with the |
|
|
137:47 | cores, we will end up with piece of rock. Uh, sedimentary |
|
|
137:54 | could be messed up, all sorts things that you can see. And |
|
|
137:57 | course, you wouldn't be able to in this, but you would have |
|
|
138:00 | would have your hands on a piece rock. And, uh, again |
|
|
138:04 | these things I'm talking about right now what geologists consider Riel data, and |
|
|
138:11 | had a bunch of geophysicist tell me this data is not really data. |
|
|
138:17 | the seismic is the rial data, the seismic tells you large scale properties |
|
|
138:23 | the rocks, but their averages every of the way there averages. But |
|
|
138:28 | is telling you is really fine tuned . I'm looking at the rock. |
|
|
138:33 | not looking ATT's something that indicates the on a broad scale, but I'm |
|
|
138:40 | at in a very fine scale with rockets. Thes would be pulled out |
|
|
138:45 | certain death. You tell them you I want one. It 8933 |
|
|
138:51 | Ah, and then you go down column where you might want it, |
|
|
138:56 | they pull the deepest one out and they come up the thing and |
|
|
138:59 | pulling them out. And that's how works. Now, in addition to |
|
|
139:02 | ones that have the little cable, do have ones that are have a |
|
|
139:06 | mechanical, uh, diamond case cup the diamond edge of the cup can |
|
|
139:15 | of drill into into the more consolidated sections. When you're doing that, |
|
|
139:19 | air a little bit more expensive, and you can have more issues with |
|
|
139:24 | as well that they dio retract when pull it up. Okay, here |
|
|
139:30 | , um, just showing you when do have a core. If you |
|
|
139:35 | a sidewalk where you just kind of kind of hit or miss. If |
|
|
139:39 | have a solid core, you can drill in different orientations to see structural |
|
|
139:47 | from different perspectives from all three axes thats useful tool. And you can |
|
|
139:54 | those cores and you can push fluids in different directions to kind of see |
|
|
140:00 | direction you have. The best uh, on effective porosity. And |
|
|
140:09 | is getting back Thio the log motif , uh, that we were talking |
|
|
140:14 | before we were just looking at the logs. And here is something that's |
|
|
140:20 | typical for Sandstone. Here is something for a sandstone, but this one |
|
|
140:29 | is coursing upwards. So we often that's going to be regressive. This |
|
|
140:36 | is gonna be, of course, . So we're getting its shadowing upwards |
|
|
140:44 | getting We're going from near shore to water. So we're getting finer grain |
|
|
140:50 | potentially going from, uh, deep too shallow water. And that's why |
|
|
140:57 | coursing up. That's why that would regressive and transgressive. But here's the |
|
|
141:01 | . Bar on the point bar is transgressive or re aggressive. It za |
|
|
141:06 | of a meandering stream and it gives this kind of pattern. And in |
|
|
141:13 | way, uh, this is filling in this in this direction. So |
|
|
141:18 | a way, you had to call transgressive or regressive. It's actually |
|
|
141:23 | but you have a regressive sequence that's upwards. And so that's why you |
|
|
141:28 | to be real careful with what you're to explain with motif locks. You're |
|
|
141:33 | in offshore settings and you know the you working on. We're offshore. |
|
|
141:38 | can do this transgressive and regressive thing you're in a lake or in a |
|
|
141:44 | on sometimes, even, uh, Barrier Island complexes, you have to |
|
|
141:50 | real careful about calling something transgressive or up front, because things could |
|
|
141:57 | Here is something that you might see a good turbidity flow sequence or turban |
|
|
142:04 | . Okay, since we're logging it's Iraq. Iraq makes it not |
|
|
142:07 | submarine fan, but a turban tied is showing you what a channel sand |
|
|
142:13 | look like. An here. it's interesting because here's the channel, |
|
|
142:19 | here's where it was deepest. And where it's full and and here's the |
|
|
142:27 | bar deposit, and this is what usually use thio just to help us |
|
|
142:32 | channels meandering streams. And this could a Mannering stream here, but the |
|
|
142:39 | of it's gonna be filled with coarser stuff because the foul leg is probably |
|
|
142:44 | . Looks like the point bars over , because here's a slope on |
|
|
142:48 | This is a steeper slopes. So thing is cutting into this side and |
|
|
142:52 | over on this side, This is Rial Point bar over here. That's |
|
|
142:56 | this would be. And so you're to see that somewhat finding upwards sequence |
|
|
143:01 | here. And of course, if gotta log over here, it would |
|
|
143:04 | even more dramatic than it is But even when you're working in a |
|
|
143:09 | all Channel Sands, they're not gonna like this and, uh, distribute |
|
|
143:13 | Mouth Channel, for example, is much where you've got this straight laminar |
|
|
143:20 | just like a jet shooting out uh, if you take the Mississippi |
|
|
143:25 | where this tributary channels are in the , bars are right in front of |
|
|
143:30 | . You have sort of a jet going straight through, and the distributor |
|
|
143:35 | air very straight. They don't meander that's where the ah, the ocean |
|
|
143:42 | the water, the base level finally there's one direction to get this water |
|
|
143:46 | of here, and it's that And so you're gonna have As it |
|
|
143:51 | in, you're gonna have a Of course load. And of |
|
|
143:53 | it doesn't fill in. What happens the sediment loads in here and it |
|
|
143:57 | into the mud. Eso This isn't an incision, it's a distributor Eri |
|
|
144:03 | . But it's but it's a Aly uh, through time or die |
|
|
144:08 | sinking in the shells that it was out into. So distribute Terry Channel |
|
|
144:13 | gonna look for the most part, gonna look like this. Where a |
|
|
144:17 | bar in a meandering stream. that's deposition Lee up tip somewhat is |
|
|
144:24 | look more like this or the flank one of these larger channels Might start |
|
|
144:28 | a little bit like a point point . But to get a point |
|
|
144:32 | you have to have meandering so that have a cut side and you have |
|
|
144:37 | point bank side to get that kind a deposit. So it's good as |
|
|
144:44 | can be. You have to be careful with interpreting them. And I've |
|
|
144:50 | young geologists going in making these kinds interpretations with with flu beall sediments and |
|
|
144:57 | have to be really careful because you have something that looks more like this |
|
|
145:02 | of those Marine, uh, Marine Barrier Island. Regressive, transgressive sequences |
|
|
145:09 | you could see. Okay, any on that? Okay, now, |
|
|
145:16 | my here. I'm gonna skip Uh, I'm not going to read |
|
|
145:21 | , but you can look at these this gives you some or, |
|
|
145:27 | indication of what these things can look . And it's interesting, uh, |
|
|
145:38 | , you know, it's all over board. And if you look at |
|
|
145:41 | , you can see there's things that non marine and marine. And if |
|
|
145:45 | have bio strategic afi down here and here in the shales Ah, a |
|
|
145:50 | of times you don't get it in sand because because it's, ah, |
|
|
145:54 | destructive thio shells. And of you're gonna winnow out a lot of |
|
|
146:00 | the fine grain, uh, things might be in there even if it's |
|
|
146:05 | coastal or marine environment. So you you'd be looking at the shells. |
|
|
146:10 | if it's encased in marine and or encased in, um uh, non |
|
|
146:19 | stuff or a lack of fossils, could tell the difference between whether it |
|
|
146:24 | be a title sand or one of other sands. And same with |
|
|
146:28 | Here we have flu viel here we a point bar that's gonna have some |
|
|
146:34 | influence that's gonna have marine influence. streams and flew audio channels probably won't |
|
|
146:42 | Sands won't and, uh, come here. It looks a little bit |
|
|
146:47 | . And we're seeing, you this is still the same finding upwards |
|
|
146:51 | . Ah, but here Ah, coming up with something. That's Delta |
|
|
146:58 | something that's a turban. I'd Those aren't even next to each other. |
|
|
147:02 | then there's the custom sands. That's marine, and that's Ah, |
|
|
147:06 | custard is lake And And what is called? I can't read this one |
|
|
147:14 | these. I have my computer glasses , but I can't read up to |
|
|
147:19 | things. Okay, Proximal deep sea like like a fan Delta or something |
|
|
147:25 | that. And these air, all things. And it really helps to |
|
|
147:32 | , uh, sort of an overall d picture on the large scale in |
|
|
147:36 | frontier area, or even an expiration , or even a production and development |
|
|
147:41 | . Knowing what the context of these are is very, very important. |
|
|
147:46 | strategic AFI and what but the deposition systems of the strategic fee are A |
|
|
147:51 | of times have been figured out in and projected in the deep water. |
|
|
147:56 | but you also can have changes as go from on short offshore. So |
|
|
148:00 | helps to have bio strata graphic data help you distinguish between these things. |
|
|
148:06 | here is, uh uh And I'm I'm not gonna go into this because |
|
|
148:12 | I start talking about this, it'll into a really long discussion. But |
|
|
148:15 | your own, you can look at and one of the things that's obvious |
|
|
148:22 | , for whatever reason, they already that this is a title complex |
|
|
148:28 | And so it really helps, discriminate, Uh, these different motifs |
|
|
148:33 | one faces to a next, and know that it's gonna be the kind |
|
|
148:37 | things that you see when you have barrier island which they show here, |
|
|
148:42 | this would be a secondary barrier. it is so hard to find anything |
|
|
148:48 | the literature that even talks about a barrier. But when I was in |
|
|
148:52 | Carolina, Miles Hayes, who I say is arguably the best coastal geo |
|
|
148:58 | ist that ever lived or will Hey was there and he talked about |
|
|
149:01 | barriers all the time. They didn't very many figures that pointed them |
|
|
149:06 | but but so I really like this because we start talking about de positional |
|
|
149:12 | , Or have you ever worked with on hurricanes? It's really important to |
|
|
149:15 | the difference between a primary barrier and secondary barrier and basically the primary |
|
|
149:22 | One is going to take the brunt , ah, waves, wind and |
|
|
149:27 | like hurricanes. And this one back gets less impact from that. |
|
|
149:34 | but I knew I was going to saying too much, but this this |
|
|
149:39 | back here, If you have a hurricane, you're going to see a |
|
|
149:44 | back here on this one. You see an erosion all surface, but |
|
|
149:48 | deposition deposits deposits on the primary when have a big hurricane. And many |
|
|
149:56 | around the world, including many of that air getting funding from NSF, |
|
|
150:01 | the signal is all right on the side of these barriers, and they |
|
|
150:06 | realize that a real major hurricane is leave nothing here because it's going to |
|
|
150:11 | wash straight over top of that barrier like it did Boulevard Peninsula and starts |
|
|
150:17 | dumping stuff back in the secondary Which, which of you think about |
|
|
150:22 | Galveston area? This was This is we would call land over here, |
|
|
150:26 | this would be the bay. so I've said too much about |
|
|
150:31 | And but take a look at those while you get to it. And |
|
|
150:36 | . Of course, when you um, when you get core logging |
|
|
150:41 | you can get some real data, can start tying into your riel to |
|
|
150:45 | log responses, and it makes your thio interpret the log where you don't |
|
|
150:51 | a core a lot more useful. the actual exercise of integrating these data |
|
|
150:58 | where you have a core doesn't only help you figure out what's going on |
|
|
151:03 | that particular core interval. It also you in that area where you have |
|
|
151:08 | lot of the same, uh, related to the pressure realities, |
|
|
151:15 | the type of fluid that you might using in the drilling fluid, all |
|
|
151:19 | of things. They're gonna be oftentimes an equal basis. So if you |
|
|
151:25 | over a cord section how all these things, they're going to respond. |
|
|
151:30 | hopefully you can get a reservoir in to figure out when you have different |
|
|
151:35 | of in Norway, for example, don't know if they still do |
|
|
151:38 | but when I was working and up at least 2000 and six, |
|
|
151:43 | they pretty much demanded that if you into a new reservoir block, you |
|
|
151:47 | to core it. And consequently, had lots, of course. And |
|
|
151:51 | had lots of ways to compare real data real fluid data with with these |
|
|
151:59 | that we use that are looking at ity and density, uh, from |
|
|
152:05 | clever methods. But you're able to the quality of this tool or excuse |
|
|
152:11 | , not the tool quality doesn't change the responses don't change. But the |
|
|
152:17 | could mean something a little different, different variables. And when you know |
|
|
152:21 | most of the variables are here, you can Thai and sort of, |
|
|
152:28 | , standardized. What's going on Relative What's in the rial rock on |
|
|
152:32 | really good interpretations. It's like a way to calibrate the tools with rock |
|
|
152:38 | the fluids that might be in that . And here's some core samples just |
|
|
152:46 | you things that can change. Did see this slide with Johnny Bowditch |
|
|
152:54 | That's okay. I think you And did the heat. I guess |
|
|
153:00 | was no way for you guys to look at Coors. Was there other |
|
|
153:06 | than the images? Yeah, because when he teaches the class, he |
|
|
153:11 | these core boxes. I I think chorus there still at University of |
|
|
153:17 | So if we ever get out of , uh, this terrible epidemic, |
|
|
153:21 | is pandemic or whatever, which is even worse right now, it's really |
|
|
153:26 | . Over 1000 people a day are now, Um, one of the |
|
|
153:32 | that we can do is maybe for of you there that haven't graduated |
|
|
153:37 | or if you have graduated at some in time, I can pull pull |
|
|
153:41 | cores out for the people having class maybe, uh, try to remember |
|
|
153:45 | let people know that took the but didn't get to see if we |
|
|
153:48 | pull out John X scores and go them in person. Uh, but |
|
|
153:53 | , I have to find out if really still have them. I know |
|
|
153:57 | after Janek went thio Thio, what the heck is a school? |
|
|
154:05 | , which is a really good by the way, in Canada before |
|
|
154:09 | went there and he got a really deal to get to go up |
|
|
154:12 | But But long after he was up already, we still had those core |
|
|
154:16 | , and I think we still probably . But I don't know that for |
|
|
154:20 | . And I do have my core the midway that didn't make it to |
|
|
154:23 | Cretaceous tertiary boundary, and it could that to you to which would be |
|
|
154:28 | interesting thing as well. But here , just from a picture the fact |
|
|
154:34 | it's going from sort of white, is probably courts rich sandstone to the |
|
|
154:41 | . You can kind of see, , what's happening? Of course. |
|
|
154:47 | , when you get a close look it and you have a log that |
|
|
154:50 | go with this, uh, and some idea of the context you could |
|
|
154:56 | , figure out that some of these Delta Front sand stones where you're getting |
|
|
155:01 | , San san and, uh, deposits here on then here is, |
|
|
155:12 | , something where all of a sudden get a flooding, Uh, thinking |
|
|
155:17 | he says delta front so you could ah, distribute Terry mouth bar. |
|
|
155:20 | be some of the bigger deposits. some of it could be in front |
|
|
155:25 | that in front of the D V the distribute Terry mouth for Delta |
|
|
155:29 | sand stones. And then you ah, sea level rises and you |
|
|
155:35 | this flooding surface. And, or sea level doesn't rise. The |
|
|
155:41 | know, most of the the sediments , um on a delta sink all |
|
|
155:46 | time, they subside a lot. I still think, um, those |
|
|
155:51 | are worried about sea level rise, underestimating the incredible amount of subsidence that |
|
|
155:58 | on in the Delta deposits. In words, Mississippi Delta. If sea |
|
|
156:03 | didn't go up or down, it be sinking anyway. However, based |
|
|
156:10 | tool that I'm not sure how they it, the the actual sea level |
|
|
156:16 | , um, is supposed to be six or seven times greater than subsidence |
|
|
156:22 | right now. But subsidence is not not a number that's consistent everywhere, |
|
|
156:28 | I don't quite understand how other they're that out. If you have thes |
|
|
156:33 | sand stones loading ah shell, for , you're gonna have significant subsidence. |
|
|
156:39 | it's where the sand stones are that have the deposits that can defend against |
|
|
156:44 | hurricane more so than some of the except some of the marshes will have |
|
|
156:50 | lot of route good stuff in And so if it is equivalent to |
|
|
156:57 | sandstone is being deposits on the levee in the in the sub bakeries and |
|
|
157:04 | aerial floodplain, uh, the grasses help defend it, too. But |
|
|
157:08 | you're in this phase, whether it's sandstone or the shells, it's pretty |
|
|
157:12 | . But when? But it actually . Uh, and you just have |
|
|
157:17 | Marine Shales coming over the top of . They're more easily disrupted by the |
|
|
157:23 | , even though they are sticky. don't have, ah, the heft |
|
|
157:29 | the sand stones. And they don't the binding capacity of the Routed, |
|
|
157:35 | , uh, flood plains that air this tributary channels and and distribute Terry's |
|
|
157:42 | not the ultimate channel, but the that air moving out on the |
|
|
157:47 | So, uh, that's really a thing to measure. I think, |
|
|
157:51 | a general sense. And there's actually where these mud stones, when |
|
|
157:57 | sandstone sit on top of them, pop up, uh, a za |
|
|
158:04 | 200 ft above sea level. As matter of fact, um, s |
|
|
158:09 | I don't think they're considering the fact there are places where the Marine |
|
|
158:13 | actually, because these air pushing down one place, these get popped up |
|
|
158:16 | a diaper in another place. Eso that issues kind of tough. But |
|
|
158:21 | looking at this core, we can the sands. All of a |
|
|
158:25 | we go to Shales. So this , uh, Deltek deposits, Obviously |
|
|
158:30 | several different faces. We have a surface here, and now we're into |
|
|
158:35 | flooding surface here. Now we have Shales, so it's, uh, |
|
|
158:40 | a transgressive setting. Okay, so going. So we're finding upwards here |
|
|
158:45 | a transgressive setting, not in a stuff. Okay, here's a core |
|
|
158:53 | I worked on in South Carolina when actually figured out where the Cretaceous tertiary |
|
|
158:58 | waas Um it was mapped in South for 70 to 100 years in the |
|
|
159:06 | spot, and I went in there figured out that it was in the |
|
|
159:09 | spot. But then I had to all these, uh, auger holes |
|
|
159:14 | look for outcrops and and got some data from the, uh, U |
|
|
159:19 | Geological Survey. Got to figure out it was. But in the process |
|
|
159:23 | that, I worked on a of course, that were above and |
|
|
159:27 | that boundary. And this is a want to guess what these lenticular, |
|
|
159:33 | and pleasure bids are. When we talking about sedimentary structures, we had |
|
|
159:44 | diagram that went kind of like from to from from more sandy toe less |
|
|
159:53 | . And we have the clay wisps , and we have particular sands up |
|
|
159:58 | . Uh, do you remember two the primary de positional settings that we |
|
|
160:03 | thio to interpret this by marine? , there these air. Uh, |
|
|
160:18 | answer is that to this air, gonna be marine influenced. So there's |
|
|
160:32 | marine fossils in here, so narrow down to that, so we won't |
|
|
160:38 | won't be saying this has something to with a levee or distribute or a |
|
|
160:46 | play. What could it be? one wants to guess. Right? |
|
|
161:03 | , 11 face, Uh, one of a bomb. A sequence might |
|
|
161:07 | something like this, but this isn't sequence. The first thing that most |
|
|
161:16 | interpret thes as our title. The thing that they interpret these as our |
|
|
161:24 | storm deposits that sometimes we know and a wave base on the muds and |
|
|
161:32 | and kind of window and create some deposits. And then there's other places |
|
|
161:37 | there is limited sand. If For example, if this got deposited |
|
|
161:41 | another storm came by, it um, reactivate this and drop the |
|
|
161:50 | window out the sand because the other would stay floated and you might get |
|
|
161:54 | sand bed that would look like this else. So these these, |
|
|
161:58 | um could also be storm deposits. if it's a storm deposit, what |
|
|
162:04 | be an easy way to tell the between a storm and a title |
|
|
162:10 | And two slides ago, I gave a clue. The green size we're |
|
|
162:25 | to figure out what what this Is it? Is it a |
|
|
162:28 | Oh, I'm sorry. I'm The grain size. Okay, |
|
|
162:32 | we can have a lot of the grain size issues. Um, |
|
|
162:37 | that's not the answer I was looking , but, uh, a lot |
|
|
162:42 | times when you are offshore, you're have less coarser grains. So So |
|
|
162:47 | you're saying actually could could help You might have more finer grain court |
|
|
162:54 | out here if it was anywhere near . You've got that on the beach |
|
|
163:00 | , so it wouldn't help there. if you're off the Atlantic Coast, |
|
|
163:05 | size might work. But what would pretty quickly is that the fossils in |
|
|
163:10 | are going to probably be very open fossils, whereas the fossils that you |
|
|
163:16 | find in a title system are gonna things that suggest brackish water conditions or |
|
|
163:23 | a full marine setting. And so another way that you'd be able to |
|
|
163:28 | those two things. And I think getting time to take a lunch |
|
|
163:37 | And it's definitely time to take a . Eso Let's go and take a |
|
|
163:45 | break. It's now 11 38. , uh, how about if we |
|
|
163:55 | back around 12. 28? Is about 50 minutes? Yeah, it's |
|
|
164:05 | make it about 12. 28. back or make it 12. |
|
|
164:08 | Make it even 12. 30. . All right. Yeah, that |
|
|
164:15 | good. And if you look at slides ahead of time, you can |
|
|
164:20 | , You can ask me questions about . Thank you. Thank you, |
|
|
164:29 | . Maria, I'm here. Can hear me? Do you want me |
|
|
164:33 | stop the recording? I'll go ahead pause it a |
|