© Distribution of this video is restricted by its owner
00:03 | Okay, so, hello folks, is friday the second of september, |
|
|
00:10 | beginning the second week of instruction in seismic waves and race. And the |
|
|
00:18 | thing we're gonna do is to talk the questions submitted by the student, |
|
|
00:26 | Miss Stephanie del rio. And she , can you please explain the difference |
|
|
00:33 | the grass reciprocity thermal elasticity and the reciprocity of uh and the scalar reciprocity |
|
|
00:40 | again. So, uh let's do first thing and I'm going to find |
|
|
00:47 | right slides for that in this very which we looked at last saturday. |
|
|
01:12 | , So this is the fear expressed a formula. And let's just, |
|
|
01:17 | , and let me put it into mode. Okay, so there's the |
|
|
01:25 | and I'll explain right now what the means. We've got to places, |
|
|
01:29 | got a place a and a place be. Here's the force, the |
|
|
01:35 | vector today, and it's here's the vector at the same place sourced from |
|
|
01:41 | other place in between the dot product these are both factors. And that |
|
|
01:48 | vector dot product is equal to the one on the other end. So |
|
|
01:54 | is the vector reciprocity theorem of That's the general, not, not |
|
|
01:59 | most general statement, but most general as applied to wait. Right? |
|
|
02:06 | um so now uh this doesn't show what is the scalar? That's the |
|
|
02:14 | there. So suppose this forest vector this displacement vector are pointed in the |
|
|
02:23 | direction. Or maybe opposite forces down coming up in the same direction. |
|
|
02:30 | this uh dot part is just a product. Right? It's just the |
|
|
02:34 | of a time for length of Are you following that? Okay. |
|
|
02:42 | I need to get your nodding if following. Okay. So and |
|
|
02:47 | Oh, and then we're gonna arrange since we are the operator, we're |
|
|
02:52 | arrange for the strength of the of of the force at me to be |
|
|
02:57 | same as the strength of the force a. We could make it |
|
|
03:00 | But there's no point in that if just have the same physical source at |
|
|
03:04 | places, that's what we want to . And then in that case this |
|
|
03:08 | force magnitude cancels out on both sides the of the scalar product, |
|
|
03:15 | And then what's left, it says that you at a source and B |
|
|
03:20 | equal to um be sourced from Which means that these two day directors |
|
|
03:25 | the same and you can interchange source receiver, and it will still be |
|
|
03:28 | same. And that is the scale here and years and years in this |
|
|
03:36 | , we didn't call it that. call it the reciprocity. They're not |
|
|
03:41 | that it was really a special Uh when the force vector and the |
|
|
03:46 | vector pointed in the same direction as p ways, Right? So, |
|
|
03:50 | you're uh if you have a vertical , for example. And uh it's |
|
|
03:58 | energy down. That's the force And here comes the energy up from |
|
|
04:02 | other source. And it's coming up exactly a vertically, but it's coming |
|
|
04:06 | almost vertical. So the dot product the exact vertical component of that. |
|
|
04:13 | And uh this formula doesn't say anything the other component. The transverse |
|
|
04:19 | So the P wave as it comes , it's gonna have a little transverse |
|
|
04:23 | , cause it's not gonna be coming up, it's gonna be like |
|
|
04:26 | And so it's gonna have a small component. But we're not going to |
|
|
04:30 | that anyway, because we've got a geo fall. And and so we're |
|
|
04:35 | recording uh vertical component of the So, never mind that it's got |
|
|
04:40 | small horizontal component. Uh that's not in the Um in the statement of |
|
|
04:47 | theorem. So, uh what it is our vertical data at a source |
|
|
04:52 | B is equal to our vertical data the source. Uh so we didn't |
|
|
04:58 | , this was actually spelled out decades . We should have known better, |
|
|
05:02 | for decades we called this special case case. We called it the theory |
|
|
05:08 | aggressive policy and only um in 1997 we realize that that was a special |
|
|
05:16 | . And and uh here's how we in this context when I was processing |
|
|
05:22 | at Valen working for Amoco and exploration at Valhol, is that here's the |
|
|
05:30 | down here and over the crest of is a cloud of gas which is |
|
|
05:35 | up out of uh out of the over millions of years and it's lying |
|
|
05:43 | in the overburden. And so when p wave comes down here through that |
|
|
05:49 | cloud, uh it gets attenuated. when the P wave comes down here |
|
|
05:54 | the gas cloud is not a genuine not only is it attenuated but slow |
|
|
05:59 | , slow down. And so uh , the shear wave coming down outside |
|
|
06:05 | doesn't know about the gas cloud because outside the gas cloud. This shear |
|
|
06:09 | coming up from the conversion point This shear wave coming up also doesn't |
|
|
06:14 | about the gas cloud because it's a wave. And so, uh |
|
|
06:21 | uh yeah, so we have this here where uh because of that gas |
|
|
06:29 | in the subsurface, and because we're at converted ways instead of p |
|
|
06:35 | you get this uh non symmetry of uh of the data. So let's |
|
|
06:41 | back and look look at the cartoon . Okay, so here's this data |
|
|
06:47 | up. This is the data from shear wave source from be coming up |
|
|
06:52 | and you see it's it's perpendicular It is, it's perpendicular to the |
|
|
06:57 | the force today, of course, is going in this direction. And |
|
|
07:02 | data at a source of B is perpendicular. So this formula doesn't affect |
|
|
07:12 | data. The formula only concerns that in the data, which is parallel |
|
|
07:20 | the source because of this doctor. um the general form is called the |
|
|
07:25 | reciprocity is there. And uh that's to remind us that when we say |
|
|
07:31 | here about saying we might confuse So the best thing to do is |
|
|
07:37 | this vector reciprocity or the general And if these two vectors are parallel |
|
|
07:47 | each other degenerates to uh staler product times you and uh f cancels out |
|
|
07:58 | same as this effort. You have source is the same as your |
|
|
08:05 | And I'm seeing right now that the that I'm showing here is different than |
|
|
08:10 | formula here because here I used a symbol and here I use so thanks |
|
|
08:17 | nagging me on this, I'll go . Okay, so um and I |
|
|
08:25 | tell you that most geophysicists still do understand. Uh I would say most |
|
|
08:34 | , they say uh reciprocity there and mean scalar reciprocity don't realize it doesn't |
|
|
08:43 | the general day. Mhm. So of our game is in this uh |
|
|
08:55 | perpendicular, direct. And uh that not even mentioned up here mentioned. |
|
|
09:03 | uh uh not constrain our data in kind of situation, which is good |
|
|
09:12 | the data are very clearly non cement and either we get uh so when |
|
|
09:21 | confronted with this, you think aha I get a Nobel prize for for |
|
|
09:25 | disproving the reciprocity theorem or maybe I fired because I screwed up the data |
|
|
09:32 | and in our case it wasn't Didn't get any Nobel prize didn't get |
|
|
09:36 | , but we actually did go back read the rest of process carefully uh |
|
|
09:43 | not affect our day. Okay, now the next thing I wanna do |
|
|
09:49 | to talk about the quiz and uh I what I'd like to do, |
|
|
09:55 | Del Rio is to go over your so that you understand those questions here |
|
|
10:02 | now. And the best way to that is if you'll permit me to |
|
|
10:06 | your quiz. Okay, so let's that. So I'm going to stop |
|
|
10:11 | here and I'm gonna bring up your . Yeah, so you can turn |
|
|
10:19 | the recording while I'm fumbling around. .10. Yeah, No. |
|
|
10:30 | so we will now resume on September will resume lecture four or we |
|
|
10:40 | it off last Saturday. Actually this friday, september. Sure. And |
|
|
10:48 | left off right at this point last . So it is the convolutional model |
|
|
10:54 | waved congregation. We know that a that is composed of many mono frequency |
|
|
11:02 | and those signs and more signs. go on forever. Every one of |
|
|
11:06 | goes on forever. But they can combined using the mathematical process invented by |
|
|
11:15 | in the 19th century to make away which is localized in time. And |
|
|
11:20 | way that works as uh they reinforced short times and they cancel it long |
|
|
11:26 | . And so the resulting wave is in time in a uniform personal elastic |
|
|
11:34 | . These waves all traveled with the wage question. So it preserves the |
|
|
11:39 | shape only decreasing in aptitude during the spreading. Now when it encounters an |
|
|
11:47 | interface which we'll talk about tomorrow. it reflects without shape. And the |
|
|
11:54 | size program looks like this. This the signal which we're recording. And |
|
|
12:00 | is um uh uh the drag delta . And it's yes, here we |
|
|
12:09 | . So here's the incident amplitude. is uh the incident uh answered as |
|
|
12:14 | uh um it's the interface, it reflected. This is a scalar operation |
|
|
12:22 | and the source wave that looks like . And I mean it doesn't, |
|
|
12:28 | can't, I should say that you know, the source wave like |
|
|
12:32 | . This is some sort of localized in time. With a few wiggles |
|
|
12:36 | it maybe, but it's uh localized time, but it's arriving at uh |
|
|
12:44 | uh it's arriving at a time. actually it's arriving at a time uppercase |
|
|
12:54 | . Uh which we determined by looking our at our workstation screens. And |
|
|
13:00 | see this uh this wiggle arriving. a wiggling time. And so so |
|
|
13:08 | this is a single number, upper t lowercase T um uh who's on |
|
|
13:17 | out. And so uh how is related to uh the signal? |
|
|
13:23 | there's a convolutional operation here. And um oh miss del rio. I'm |
|
|
13:37 | going to assume that you are not um confident in your understanding of |
|
|
13:45 | Yeah, so uh that's very And so uh you think intuitively uh |
|
|
13:58 | convolution takes a function like this T. And places that function given |
|
|
14:07 | you know, slides that function along time axis to a certain time, |
|
|
14:12 | is given by uh this arrival Uh because uh delta involved with W |
|
|
14:21 | um uh the same, the same W. But it's uh it's uh |
|
|
14:30 | time uppercase T. So that is simplest case and in the real case |
|
|
14:41 | have um much more uh applications. let me let's step our way through |
|
|
14:52 | um step by step. And what have here, this formula is the |
|
|
15:00 | model of uh seismic wave propagation. this is the way almost all of |
|
|
15:09 | think about uh in twitter, we that we have a certain sort strength |
|
|
15:16 | is a scalar and but it might be the same in all directions, |
|
|
15:21 | might be different in different directions. that's why it has a theater |
|
|
15:26 | And that's multiplied oops uh to be , that includes some other effects that |
|
|
15:35 | that the operator didn't put in such as uh nonlinear behavior of the |
|
|
15:42 | surface materials. And also the interaction the free surface because uh this source |
|
|
15:49 | gonna be at or near the free . For example, if it's a |
|
|
15:54 | , it's going to be at the , if it's in a marine |
|
|
15:58 | it's uh sources told a few meters the surface. And so some of |
|
|
16:03 | energy goes straight down, someone goes and then down. And so that's |
|
|
16:08 | included in this um source strength as function of angle and it's a |
|
|
16:17 | but that gets involved with an initial . So this wavelength is determined by |
|
|
16:25 | operator and that converts this scaler into wiggle. So this part here is |
|
|
16:31 | outgoing wave. Excuse me, I it wrong. You see, there's |
|
|
16:39 | convolutional operation here. So this is a multiplication here, we have the |
|
|
16:45 | wave um as a function of And then what happens to that is |
|
|
16:54 | propagates down. And so uh here have the first convolutional operator right |
|
|
17:01 | And the way you should think about is that this unknown operator, Which |
|
|
17:09 | be complicated or it could be simple could be realistic, could be non |
|
|
17:14 | , whatever uh changes this wavelet, is uh launched into a wiggle displaced |
|
|
17:25 | time, the same wiggle displaced in and same wiggle displaced in time going |
|
|
17:33 | . And, you know, if subsurface is complicated, this is going |
|
|
17:37 | be complicated, but let's leave All the complications are all inside |
|
|
17:43 | And what physical effects are included in all geometric spreading transmission coefficient. So |
|
|
17:49 | time it passes a reflecting horizon, of it goes back up and some |
|
|
17:53 | it goes back down and the downward has this transmission coefficient in it and |
|
|
17:59 | on the distribution of velocity in the serves if it's not uniform, maybe |
|
|
18:05 | faster over here and slower over That makes the wave curve and focus |
|
|
18:10 | and all kinds of wonderful things, are less unspecified here. Also, |
|
|
18:17 | attenuate that's a real world issue and all included in here implicitly. And |
|
|
18:23 | when it gets down to the it's gonna reflect that here is a |
|
|
18:29 | operator. So uh that is oh converts this down going way into an |
|
|
18:39 | wave. Uh and then uh here the upcoming operator. And again, |
|
|
18:44 | a complicated, a whole bunch of stuff in there, we're gonna leave |
|
|
18:48 | explicitly and uh in um kind of that we're looking at. Uh there |
|
|
18:54 | many such reflectors and so we just some of them up. And so |
|
|
18:59 | example, uh reflector number one as we got here, uh certain reflection |
|
|
19:09 | for uh for Reflector # one, also uh there's transmission at that reflector |
|
|
19:19 | the the effect of the transmission that's over here, included in the download |
|
|
19:25 | and that happens with lots of reflection in uh subsurface environment, there's hundreds |
|
|
19:33 | thousands of reflections and some of them big reflections, some of our small |
|
|
19:39 | , some of them are separated in from other reflections. And you can |
|
|
19:44 | them clearly with your eyeball and some them are not. And uh if |
|
|
19:50 | there are two reflections um uh you know, separated by a thin |
|
|
19:59 | in between and the wave light reflecting one interferes with the waves reflecting off |
|
|
20:04 | other. Making a confused situation. going to figure all that out. |
|
|
20:10 | then uh when all that babble of comes back up, it's going to |
|
|
20:17 | the receiver and uh receiver is going not record yeah, coming wave alone |
|
|
20:30 | it's probably sitting on the surface or just below the surface and in in |
|
|
20:34 | there's a free surface nearby. And what the instrument records is the upcoming |
|
|
20:41 | plus the interaction with the down with surface. And what it records is |
|
|
20:46 | combination and it sends the combination of wire to the computer. And then |
|
|
20:52 | the computer uh gets it, somebody might be doing something in the computer |
|
|
20:59 | the data before you ever see There might be uh filtering for example |
|
|
21:07 | they might be uh scaling, they be uh putting uh offset dependent uh |
|
|
21:16 | on there. And they also might putting on their time dependent scaling. |
|
|
21:20 | that the reflections from deep deep Uh they're a lot weaker than the |
|
|
21:26 | from shallow. And so to see that somebody might have done some gain |
|
|
21:32 | so that you can see it with eyeball. And so you shouldn't be |
|
|
21:37 | at all that when you look at seismograph uh, over the side |
|
|
21:43 | that's not what I came up from , from the earth. That's what |
|
|
21:47 | up from the earth. And then oops and interacted with a free surface |
|
|
21:54 | that's what we received. And then of your colleagues or somebody in the |
|
|
22:00 | company did something with that before you saw it. So don't make the |
|
|
22:07 | that what you're seeing is the actual . It's actual information, but it's |
|
|
22:13 | not necessarily actual data because somebody's been around with. And depending on what |
|
|
22:21 | plan to go with it, you to know what was done or maybe |
|
|
22:24 | don't care. So intuitively, that's we think of. We don't solve |
|
|
22:31 | wave equation in our, in our . And so because the wave equation |
|
|
22:37 | linear, we have all these convolutions there. This is not a bad |
|
|
22:44 | actually. Um thinking about wave But also I want to point out |
|
|
22:51 | something we often forget about noise and of that is the source generated noise |
|
|
22:58 | some of it is generated from nature some of it is generated by uh |
|
|
23:06 | another um, another company during a survey nearby. That's an interesting |
|
|
23:17 | So when I was, yeah, long time ago, um, I |
|
|
23:25 | uh, I was in the North on a seismic acquisition vessel and we |
|
|
23:31 | going along and we were shooting a survey and it was not a towed |
|
|
23:38 | survey. It was an ocean bottom survey. So we had our receiver |
|
|
23:42 | there on the ground and then we sailing over there shooting in a |
|
|
23:50 | And then there came a time when shut down and I talked to the |
|
|
23:56 | , I said, what's going You're still charging us? It was |
|
|
23:59 | by a service company. I was oil company rep, you're still charging |
|
|
24:03 | for your time, but you're not . Let's get off the dime |
|
|
24:06 | And he said, we have an with the other, um, |
|
|
24:12 | um, um, services company, acquisitions company. They're operating five miles |
|
|
24:18 | here and they're shooting their own And so, uh, we're time |
|
|
24:24 | . And so we just ran out time and it's their turn and so |
|
|
24:28 | shooting and we can see their shots our receivers and it would just confuse |
|
|
24:34 | . So, so we can't shoot the same time. So I saw |
|
|
24:38 | logic in that. So for now our turn again and we shot and |
|
|
24:44 | were waiting. Well that's obviously extremely , but none of us were smart |
|
|
24:50 | at that time to figure out a solution and to just make peace and |
|
|
24:57 | share and things like that. sometimes we did something clever like that |
|
|
25:02 | the time when they were shooting, would be moving the notes. So |
|
|
25:09 | okay. The other, the other didn't mind are moving notes. As |
|
|
25:14 | as we weren't making all right. me that. Well, that was |
|
|
25:19 | long time ago now. We have ways to uh, shoot at the |
|
|
25:25 | time. So now we can shoot clever processing technology. We can shoot |
|
|
25:32 | the same time as that other company there and we know how to separate |
|
|
25:36 | , uh, their shots from And furthermore, we can shoot our |
|
|
25:44 | . We can put another boat in water and shoot um, our survey |
|
|
25:49 | two boats instead of one boat, worrying about interfering with each other because |
|
|
25:54 | know how to separate those in the . And that way we complete our |
|
|
25:59 | in half the time we got two working. Well, maybe it's not |
|
|
26:02 | big deal, but sometimes it is signal. For example, if we're |
|
|
26:06 | in the arctic, we only have months of summer time to uh, |
|
|
26:11 | operate. And so it's good if can get in there with, with |
|
|
26:16 | big operation, Your survey never minding the energy of the other's toes. |
|
|
26:22 | can separate it all out. And that is a process called oppressive seismic |
|
|
26:30 | . You know about this. uh, you should know and |
|
|
26:37 | ask, uh, ask, ask Stewart about very clever process. |
|
|
26:46 | you know, taking account of the that our sources here and that other |
|
|
26:51 | over there and so that the waves there and from this stretch, these |
|
|
26:55 | are coming from this dress. And we can separate it all out Uh |
|
|
27:02 | part of the, that's part of answer. But there's more to it |
|
|
27:05 | they. And so um guys who that out about 10 years ago, |
|
|
27:12 | won an award from the sc chief that out. And it's extremely useful |
|
|
27:19 | oil companies should be able to acquire data in that way. They save |
|
|
27:25 | in the acquisition. And also, here's the thing uh whenever they decide |
|
|
27:35 | um are we gonna do this survey not? Survey is gonna cost so |
|
|
27:39 | money. Um and are we gonna value out of that? Uh you |
|
|
27:46 | be oil down there or maybe not the chances are 5050 down there. |
|
|
27:51 | we have a certain budget for spending side of me to go after that |
|
|
27:57 | . But if our seismic budget uh uh cost half as much because of |
|
|
28:02 | clever process, then maybe we have opportunity to shoot over here and and |
|
|
28:10 | that. Whereas if the if the operations too expensive, we have to |
|
|
28:15 | that opportunity by. So there's, maybe we'll pass up an opportunity to |
|
|
28:20 | a big oilfield over here because we uh we're unsure about whether it's even |
|
|
28:29 | or not. So we're not even spend the money to have a look |
|
|
28:31 | it, so we just pass it and give that opportunity to some other |
|
|
28:36 | who comes in more efficient acquisition. spend less on the acquisition, they |
|
|
28:44 | it's worthwhile for them and maybe they their acquisition and find out there's nothing |
|
|
28:49 | that could happen, but maybe they the field. So uh in our |
|
|
28:54 | part of the fascination of it, amounts of money depend upon um um |
|
|
29:04 | like us who are during the technology we don't really understand the business. |
|
|
29:11 | what we really understand is the but our technology enables business decision, |
|
|
29:18 | can be worth billions of dollars. had two ideas in my career that |
|
|
29:29 | um, of the order of a dollars. And uh that's kind of |
|
|
29:36 | to think that you're sitting there looking equations and the implications of the equations |
|
|
29:42 | be really big bucks. Okay, , uh, this convolutional market is |
|
|
29:52 | intuitive implementation. Seismic ray theory, a seismic wave theory. You don't |
|
|
29:59 | explicitly here any. Um Oh, that is complicated. It's just uh |
|
|
30:14 | just pretty simple and straightforward and uh what we have in mind when we |
|
|
30:24 | at the gate. Almost everybody, don't know very many people, only |
|
|
30:28 | few people that I know are smart to understand the wave equation to |
|
|
30:32 | but they can understand the convolutional Great, almost everybody. Yeah, |
|
|
30:49 | of the mathematics of this, uh convolutional operator here, we can slide |
|
|
30:58 | operators around so that um group all convolutions together in here. And actually |
|
|
31:08 | I have uh uh right here, includes uh the summation is now implicitly |
|
|
31:19 | here and we we uh group all convolutions together, slide them around, |
|
|
31:25 | them right and left, and in formula, and it still works and |
|
|
31:29 | one convolution left outside, give this bunch name and call that uh |
|
|
31:35 | T. And that's this is different the this is different from W zero |
|
|
31:41 | . C. Here's the initial waiver is the final wave wave. This |
|
|
31:46 | what you see on your on your street, It's gonna be different than |
|
|
31:53 | here, here's that W0 right this is what we started off, |
|
|
32:00 | as a result of property getting down proper getting back up, we've lost |
|
|
32:04 | frequencies and lots of things that And so what you see on your |
|
|
32:09 | , uh workstation screen is a combination all that stuff and we'll just give |
|
|
32:16 | a name. And so that looks similar to what we started off |
|
|
32:20 | Uh we're gonna back up here back the way up. Yeah, so |
|
|
32:27 | is what we started off with uh looking at the uh context more carefully |
|
|
32:35 | more realistic, we end up with , which is basically the same. |
|
|
32:40 | the main thing is different, is main thing, you can see that's |
|
|
32:44 | is gotta somewhere, this is now function of time. The reflectivity is |
|
|
32:49 | function of time, function of of times. So you have in spaceship |
|
|
32:56 | here and here. Another one down . But those are yielding arrivals back |
|
|
33:02 | the instruments so that we can describe reflectivity as a function of time and |
|
|
33:08 | we recognize explicitly there's noise in Yeah, so, so let's um |
|
|
33:18 | quick quiz here says the controversial model implicitly various reflections are well separated so |
|
|
33:27 | the corresponding waivers do not relax. this true or false? Yeah, |
|
|
33:36 | right. Uh If it were true lives would be so much simpler. |
|
|
33:40 | in fact we got in the Earth have uh reflectors space close together someplace |
|
|
33:48 | apart and all of those are shedding wavelengths going back up. And if |
|
|
33:54 | separation in time between these two reflectors less than the duration of the |
|
|
34:00 | Look at those wavelengths are gonna we have to deal with that. |
|
|
34:04 | nowhere in that model did we ever ? But that didn't happen. So |
|
|
34:10 | does happen in the real world, only valid for p waves. |
|
|
34:19 | that's that's also great. No word there that we say it's for P |
|
|
34:23 | on it could be only for shear that could be for converted waves. |
|
|
34:28 | the difference lies right here. Is a reflection coefficient for p waves or |
|
|
34:35 | coefficient here waves and converted waves or ? And we left it unspecified, |
|
|
34:41 | quite correct. So now you are to take a course in imaging uh |
|
|
34:50 | this course, maybe the next maybe they went after that. And |
|
|
34:54 | um um that will be a uh business. So I only want to |
|
|
35:08 | a few things about it here because be frank, I am not an |
|
|
35:13 | in seismic imaging. And um uh would say the seismic imaging is the |
|
|
35:21 | important job for most geophysicist make an of the subsurface on the size of |
|
|
35:26 | data. And when I came into business, we had primitive ideas about |
|
|
35:31 | to do that. And now our are much more sophisticated. So I |
|
|
35:36 | to just give you a glimpse of . Um company like shell or Axon |
|
|
35:45 | at their disposal. Doesn't literally dozens algorithms for making images. Every one |
|
|
35:56 | us is different. And so they're to choose the right ones for uh |
|
|
36:01 | each application because some of them are more expensive to run and some of |
|
|
36:06 | cheaper. Uh so the oldest and is what we call an emo |
|
|
36:13 | So remember this uh picture from uniform and from elementary geometry, you know |
|
|
36:20 | this is exactly the equation of hyperbole rearranging we get we can get a |
|
|
36:27 | factor. So the ratio of the time to the uh uh oh, |
|
|
36:37 | was here. And by this doesn't , how was your break reconstruction? |
|
|
36:45 | this is this fraction is a number than one because the offset is greater |
|
|
36:50 | Z. We multiply the times of offset traces by this factor. The |
|
|
36:58 | all come in at G. this is what we say is the |
|
|
37:02 | flat. So why would we want flatten the gathers? The reason is |
|
|
37:06 | we can average the faces sample by all over the same time, thereby |
|
|
37:12 | noise and the noise to what's gonna . Uh surface waves. That's uh |
|
|
37:19 | . We'll talk about that next That's noise. We'll talk about that |
|
|
37:22 | random noise. And this process of it's called stacking and it's the single |
|
|
37:29 | effective imaging technique. And we knew this from back in the 50s and |
|
|
37:36 | 60s. So my father was a oil finder for ethical back in those |
|
|
37:41 | , knew all about this. And was the standard technique that they used |
|
|
37:45 | making an image and a seismic. this simple procedure is remarkably robust despite |
|
|
37:54 | got lots of assumptions. Here's, a listing of it. You can |
|
|
37:58 | the listing and I know that you know that none of these are |
|
|
38:04 | We assume it anyway and bass are on these incorrect assumptions. Um even |
|
|
38:13 | in many cases just this simple idea going to lead to a useful |
|
|
38:20 | Uh Let's assume that we consider many , keeping the other assumptions. These |
|
|
38:26 | assumptions here we're going to keep going have many layers. And the way |
|
|
38:32 | at each one of these uh interfaces down following Snell's law right here, |
|
|
38:38 | bends and refracts again. Same thing the way up. But the image |
|
|
38:42 | is still the midpoint as long as flat. Long. Previously we found |
|
|
38:49 | short offsets, we found uh this out formula. Uh this definition for |
|
|
38:55 | R. M. S. Philosophy um um so this is an interesting |
|
|
39:06 | . So I'm gonna post this to of you we have here the hyperbolic |
|
|
39:14 | equations both familiar with and it's got here the rms average velocity. So |
|
|
39:21 | this is defined for short spreads. We have longer spreads, We're gonna |
|
|
39:27 | more terms out. But for short , this is gonna be good |
|
|
39:31 | Now, here's the question why isn't short spread? Move out velocity equal |
|
|
39:35 | vertical average velocity instead of the M. S. So in terms |
|
|
39:42 | this picture, uh here's the down wave but really is an exaggeration |
|
|
39:48 | Uh for short spreads it's really going at angles like this and it's almost |
|
|
39:55 | to close to the particle. So is it? Yes, Philosophy equal |
|
|
40:02 | the average vertical velocity since since he's down almost vertical. So uh while |
|
|
40:13 | thinking about that, let me tell a story, I'm the hero of |
|
|
40:17 | story. So I love this Uh, so when I was first |
|
|
40:22 | Annika came into Amoco at age about , I've spent some time as a |
|
|
40:31 | before that, I don't know but I quickly acquired a reputation inside |
|
|
40:37 | anopheles for being a smartass. Don't how that happened. That was my |
|
|
40:43 | . So one of the senior guys to me a few months later or |
|
|
40:49 | later and he said, yeah, young whipper snappers, think you're so |
|
|
40:54 | smart, you got your fancy diplomas the wall and so on. So |
|
|
40:58 | think that the move out velocity is RMS velocity? I know because I |
|
|
41:04 | it should be the average velocity. it says here I said, |
|
|
41:09 | you know, the equation says it be the RMS loss. And he |
|
|
41:13 | , well, you just think of into italy, those equations are only |
|
|
41:17 | short offsets, all those rays are nearly vertical. So it's got the |
|
|
41:22 | intruder. So I said, you know, you could check it |
|
|
41:29 | yourself. Um, make uh, a theoretical model for the computer with |
|
|
41:37 | few layers, chase raised down their , Snell's law. And uh, |
|
|
41:43 | out the arrival time and fit it curve. And you will see it's |
|
|
41:48 | uh RMS philosophy and that was a unfair because those days and maybe still |
|
|
41:56 | , um uh senior guys didn't know to program computers. So people your |
|
|
42:03 | have to be accountable computers and you a lot better software, you have |
|
|
42:11 | like matt lives that we don't have . So that was a bit |
|
|
42:17 | But in those days uh they had out but the first handheld calculators about |
|
|
42:29 | size about the size of her phone it had of course not a screen |
|
|
42:39 | this, it had a little readout just at the top which gave numerical |
|
|
42:46 | . And uh the rest of it buttons. Uh so the first generation |
|
|
42:52 | come out a few years before that the second generation was actually program program |
|
|
42:58 | hand calculating and it costs about 1000 and the company wasn't going to spend |
|
|
43:04 | bucks. A young guy like So I didn't have it. But |
|
|
43:09 | guy was a senior technical guy and had one and he had spent some |
|
|
43:14 | familiarize himself with eating the instruction manual groups some simple programs and he was |
|
|
43:24 | by my challenge and he said, know I can do that on my |
|
|
43:27 | held attack like it was made by few attack uh Serious company back in |
|
|
43:37 | back in the 60's maybe before you were born. So uh, so |
|
|
43:44 | said okay go in and make yourself model realistic model with realistic velocities and |
|
|
43:51 | raised down there three or four layers and uh come back and tell me |
|
|
43:58 | so he did that. And it him about two weeks because he was |
|
|
44:03 | how to program and saw and uh understood that. And so he came |
|
|
44:09 | in two weeks in trump and he , look here's the result is not |
|
|
44:13 | the vertical velocity average, but it's closer to the vertical velocity and the |
|
|
44:20 | velocity. She's protecting both of So I said, how many significant |
|
|
44:29 | did you? I said was there point where you had to um write |
|
|
44:34 | intermediate results and then launch another module the program? Right, because a |
|
|
44:40 | calculator could only do a program of 20 steps. And after that you |
|
|
44:44 | to uh launch another model. And said, yeah, I had to |
|
|
44:48 | that twice or three times. So said, how many significant figures did |
|
|
44:53 | care? And he said, well carried you, you have to carry |
|
|
44:59 | . So that's crazy. We never . Yeah, but the rocks do |
|
|
45:07 | exactly. So you've got to uh the rocks. So I said |
|
|
45:13 | And so he went away and he it and he came back in triumph |
|
|
45:17 | a couple of years, a couple days later because he was getting and |
|
|
45:22 | same answer even close even closer answer the vertical verbal. I said, |
|
|
45:31 | many significant figures do you carry? said I carried before I said, |
|
|
45:39 | many have you got on this? know, I think gave 7s |
|
|
45:45 | You got to carry them all. that's crazy. But I'll do |
|
|
45:49 | So I'll do it and I'm gonna it right here in front of you |
|
|
45:52 | I'm pretty good at this. I'm gonna sit here at your desk |
|
|
45:55 | your office and I'm gonna do And after you do it, after |
|
|
45:58 | do, you're gonna announce to the lab at old dawn is uh smarter |
|
|
46:06 | all you young whippersnappers with your goddamn on the wall and you're such smart |
|
|
46:13 | , Sorry. I said, I'll do it. So he sat |
|
|
46:16 | my office in the corner of my , which looks pretty much like your |
|
|
46:20 | papers everywhere. And then the and punching away on his, he's pretty |
|
|
46:28 | at, you know, working on now for a couple of weeks. |
|
|
46:32 | rings, answer the phone. he's right here and passed the phone |
|
|
46:36 | to landline. Of course, You guys know what a landline California |
|
|
46:42 | like pass it over to Don. was sitting at my desk and I |
|
|
46:47 | off to the side and I this is for you. So you |
|
|
46:52 | . Oh yes, show her down . I'm in leon's show her down |
|
|
46:58 | . Uh so into the phone. said, I forgot my wife is |
|
|
47:03 | here to pick me up and we some personal errands that they're in |
|
|
47:07 | I forgot. And so the receptions . So immediately I knew what was |
|
|
47:14 | on. I had met this she was absolutely beautiful. She was |
|
|
47:19 | kind of woman that men's jaws dropped she walks into the room. She |
|
|
47:24 | a former model, still young, , beautiful, perfect hair, perfect |
|
|
47:30 | , perfect everything. And he, been married like 10 years. How |
|
|
47:37 | have you been married? Okay, you married? Okay, so, |
|
|
47:44 | , Stephanie already knows that after, a few years of marriage, um |
|
|
47:51 | very hard to impress your spouse Already knows all of your charm and |
|
|
47:58 | old and now she knows and she's heard all your jokes and that's |
|
|
48:03 | and it's very hard to impress a a longstanding and I'm speaking now I've |
|
|
48:10 | married for 56 years and I guarantee that it's hard to impress a spouse |
|
|
48:16 | long standing. She's gonna pick me at the end of today. I |
|
|
48:20 | she does. I hope she comes pretty confident. No, not exactly |
|
|
48:26 | , sure, sure Anyway that he been married about 10 years to this |
|
|
48:33 | gorgeous woman and I knew that he finding it hard to impress her anymore |
|
|
48:40 | he was gonna impress her by showing by humiliating me in front of |
|
|
48:45 | but old Don still has it. I hear her coming down the |
|
|
48:50 | high, high heels clacking and I my, my head out the |
|
|
48:55 | you know what? Welcome. And noticed behind her she's coming down the |
|
|
49:00 | , men's heads are popping out of looking what just passed. So she |
|
|
49:09 | and the receptionist leaves her there. I can tell she's pissed, she |
|
|
49:14 | want to be in her husband's subordinate's , she wants to get on about |
|
|
49:18 | business. Uh and so I take papers off of a chair and I |
|
|
49:25 | them aside. She sits there Don says to her, I'll just |
|
|
49:31 | a moment dear, I'm showing I'm something to leon and uh she's gonna |
|
|
49:40 | this for a few minutes only so punching away and I can see a |
|
|
49:46 | of her comes over his face and something down and says, oh |
|
|
49:55 | I must amendments here, I'll finish this to leon later. And he |
|
|
50:00 | her out of there so fast and my head spin. And and of |
|
|
50:03 | what happened was that when he did uh calculation of high accuracy, it |
|
|
50:10 | out to be the RMS philosophy, the vertical. And so he came |
|
|
50:15 | me and and so he had embarrassed in front of his wife instead of |
|
|
50:20 | . So a couple of days later came to me and he said, |
|
|
50:24 | know, I checked this 17 times since my wife was there, It's |
|
|
50:29 | correct, it's it really is the velocity. But what's wrong with the |
|
|
50:36 | comment that you can see right here if if this this if this life |
|
|
50:42 | this wave is coming down near vertically is what we assumed right here. |
|
|
50:47 | come it's not vertical average? So having heard this story, I want |
|
|
50:53 | you guys to tell me what's the ? That same question. Imagine this |
|
|
51:02 | new vertical, right? It's true that Greg going down here is traveling |
|
|
51:10 | near the vertical average. What do think? Mr wu Well, the |
|
|
51:27 | is that we don't measure this vertical . We have a well and if |
|
|
51:34 | have a vsp we we can measure but we don't normally have that. |
|
|
51:39 | we look at this reflected arrival and measure the horizontal and the horizontal move |
|
|
51:45 | . Is the dX DT Not dizzy . So as soon as we start |
|
|
51:55 | the F. UT. Then we in here the geometry of triangles and |
|
|
51:59 | bring in and stuff like that and why we get the RMS floss. |
|
|
52:05 | there's a similar um diagram. I'm show you when we get to uh |
|
|
52:12 | nice arch street in two weeks. And uh again uh Oh good. |
|
|
52:37 | . Mhm. Yeah. So the are going down almost vertical and almost |
|
|
52:49 | they travel vertically with the vertical average but we don't measure that unless we |
|
|
52:54 | a world. We don't measure is . D. T. We measured |
|
|
53:00 | movement come out. So in that you'll have a triangle which is uh |
|
|
53:10 | 45° triangle like this, but it be an acute triangle, you know |
|
|
53:14 | this. But even so uh the there uh even so you have um |
|
|
53:24 | triangles. And so you come out the R. M. S. |
|
|
53:29 | of the vertical velocity because you're measuring horizontal move out, not vertical |
|
|
53:36 | Now apparently uh in practice we don't the R. M. S. |
|
|
53:42 | V. R. M. S expressed. I'm gonna back up |
|
|
53:46 | here's the RMS as a sum of local interval velocity. And we don't |
|
|
53:53 | that when we uh when we get . So instead we regard uh uh |
|
|
54:03 | out velocity is premature. Ized by variable quantity which was called move out |
|
|
54:10 | . And furthermore these days usually have offset. So we do actually need |
|
|
54:15 | terms out which we parameter size before the abnormal move out parameter a two |
|
|
54:23 | . But even so we can flatten non hyperbolically and stack them just like |
|
|
54:27 | did before. So the fact that have layers in the earth doesn't seriously |
|
|
54:39 | our ability to make images now, course the layers are not always |
|
|
54:45 | So here's an example of a layer is dipping and you can see that |
|
|
54:48 | you have a source point here, rate is gonna uh you'll have one |
|
|
54:55 | going down here uh and hitting right and coming back here to the to |
|
|
55:01 | same source point. So if you a zero offset receiver right here, |
|
|
55:05 | gonna be uh it's gonna be reflecting of here. Well, normally we |
|
|
55:15 | not only zero offset but we have find out offset receivers but we're gonna |
|
|
55:19 | an image point. We're going to all those to make an image point |
|
|
55:24 | is here, this we're gonna image reflector at this point using the source |
|
|
55:30 | and all the receivers. And you see that this is not directly beneath |
|
|
55:35 | source, directly beneath the sources. over here. So that the image |
|
|
55:40 | has moved up debt. So here some mathematics to analyze that. I |
|
|
55:47 | want to go through this, this just high school trigonometry. And uh |
|
|
55:53 | it tells us is that the answer that imaging uh condition is that again |
|
|
56:03 | get a hyperbole but the the minimum the hyperbole a is right here instead |
|
|
56:10 | zero offset. So the the images has moved update. How much is |
|
|
56:20 | ? Uh Well, it depends upon amount of the dipping amount of the |
|
|
56:25 | and the depth to the reflector. uh this is the reason why we |
|
|
56:31 | imaging, the old fashioned name for is migration because we say the image |
|
|
56:37 | has migrated from uh just below the update by this amount here um update |
|
|
56:49 | the midpoint. So we call that you're still here occasionally. That imaging |
|
|
56:55 | this time is migration but the idea uh the image point has migrated up |
|
|
57:03 | from the middle. So what seismic do is they make fuzzy representation of |
|
|
57:11 | subsurface reflectors hopefully accurately located in space economy. And so modern imaging algorithms |
|
|
57:21 | many of the assumptions we just talked and they offer you a better images |
|
|
57:25 | at the same time that's good. the disadvantage is they rely more strongly |
|
|
57:31 | getting accurate subsurface philosophies which you don't at the beginning of uh of a |
|
|
57:39 | uh project. You've got to use data to produce the velocities to improve |
|
|
57:45 | images. And so imaging is normally generative process and we have here at |
|
|
57:53 | University of Houston, some uh great in that and uh see some instructions |
|
|
58:05 | one of those is Professor joe is to give the that imaging you. |
|
|
58:15 | , so uh so imaging as part the process process, it also |
|
|
58:22 | you know, ideas like simple filtering like that, but but he's one |
|
|
58:28 | the world's experts on this matter. I'll leave the further discussion. |
|
|
58:35 | um I have very summary of lecture , You learned how the wave equation |
|
|
58:42 | p wave solutions and those are our interest to us, how we can |
|
|
58:48 | the simple plane waves was easy to and some of them together making compact |
|
|
58:54 | , let's although each one of these goes on forever. And a lot |
|
|
58:59 | for example, when we talk about , we're going to talk only about |
|
|
59:03 | waves, although individual and uh acknowledge sum up all those solutions to make |
|
|
59:14 | reflection seismograph. Last week we talked how uh when you add a term |
|
|
59:23 | the wave equation which describes the then you get spreading waves instead of |
|
|
59:28 | waves and we uh learned a little about bri theory, just enough to |
|
|
59:37 | what it is and what it is a high frequency approximation. We've uh |
|
|
59:44 | frequency approximation, high frequency approximate Great question. Right about move |
|
|
59:54 | And uh this is a crucial thing uh waves are going around inside the |
|
|
60:01 | all the time from our own sources from other sources from natural sources, |
|
|
60:06 | earthquakes on the other side of the , everything. And it's crucial that |
|
|
60:11 | uh they superimposed on one another and disturbing each other, they just slide |
|
|
60:19 | through Then after we finished with the we talked about share waves and converted |
|
|
60:25 | and the convolutional model and then briefly to make a seismic image from these |
|
|
60:32 | . So that is um the end the lecture on last saturday. So |
|
|
60:42 | is a good time to take a . Um So let us come back |
|
|
60:49 | Here at 30 minutes after the hour we will take up the next topic |
|
|
61:01 | far. We were talking about body which are waves traveling inside the body |
|
|
61:07 | a lasting material. And now we're talk start talking about what happens when |
|
|
61:12 | a surface somewhere and that with uh the surface. So um of course |
|
|
61:21 | going to be important for reflections. even before we get to reflections, |
|
|
61:26 | want to type out waves which are with the surface in a way of |
|
|
61:32 | um like they don't reflect it and away from the surface. They stay |
|
|
61:37 | to the surface. So this is pretty mathematical flash. But I've made |
|
|
61:45 | as simple as as I can and think it's I think it's useful to |
|
|
61:53 | how this and the surface changes I mean I know you look at |
|
|
62:00 | simple equation, the wave equation which we had written over there and we |
|
|
62:05 | the solutions and that's that. What be easier. Well you're about to |
|
|
62:10 | out that uh any kinds of solutions that equation and the ones which involve |
|
|
62:18 | surface is gonna be um particular interest us because we have all kinds of |
|
|
62:25 | , not only um um layer batteries the air, but actually the most |
|
|
62:31 | surface is the free surface where we our instruments. That's the most important |
|
|
62:37 | because that's the biggest um uh I mean above it we got air |
|
|
62:45 | , we got rocks. So everywhere we got rock, Rocks on the |
|
|
62:50 | or maybe water on one side and . And so surface for the biggest |
|
|
62:56 | is the service. So uh let's about surface waves which are localized near |
|
|
63:03 | surface. So the end of this , you will be able to explain |
|
|
63:09 | that same wave equations have solutions which along the surface of the year. |
|
|
63:16 | a special type here which is invented a guy named Lord Really and we'll |
|
|
63:22 | those in some detail. And uh there's similar things, other services. |
|
|
63:29 | lots of uh of related applications. then you're gonna find out that because |
|
|
63:35 | this surface velocities turn out to have surface waves have velocities depend upon |
|
|
63:45 | So when we add together a bunch fourier components, uh different foreign components |
|
|
63:54 | different philosophies, any other frequency. uh that's that's a crucial aspect, |
|
|
64:05 | real world right? There's another class service where it's called Love ways |
|
|
64:13 | Already did we mention the guy named ? Yeah. So Love and really |
|
|
64:20 | uh contemporaries. No another type of . The cylindrical surface which corresponds to |
|
|
64:31 | world. And so we call those boys because for mysteries. So let's |
|
|
64:39 | first start talking philosophy. Oh, a differential equation, like the one |
|
|
64:46 | we have written down over there, tells how things change. But you |
|
|
64:51 | want to know the solution uh has , you wanna know how it |
|
|
64:58 | you want you want to know the , not how things change. So |
|
|
65:02 | means it starts off at a boundary then it changes away from that |
|
|
65:07 | And so uh that that boundary is be in the final um uh the |
|
|
65:15 | answer. And also we're going to boundaries in time. So we have |
|
|
65:19 | conditions as well as uh boundary And so these conditions we're gonna use |
|
|
65:26 | uh evaluate the various constants which appear these um solutions for example uh in |
|
|
65:37 | mhm. Uh Look at the simple equation and look at the plane wave |
|
|
65:44 | in there out in front, there's an amplitude counts. And so we |
|
|
65:49 | to evaluate that constant using idea using boundary conditions and the initial, we |
|
|
65:58 | have to do that before but now do. So the first example of |
|
|
66:07 | boundary conditions influence our data is The reason why that's so important is |
|
|
66:13 | always have our instruments at or near free surface which is a humongous um |
|
|
66:20 | boundary because there's nothing above because of surface there. Additional modes of sound |
|
|
66:29 | which we haven't talked about yet and source generated and they show up at |
|
|
66:35 | receiver and so in many cases they the most the most energetic um part |
|
|
66:44 | data on our records. So normally regard this as a noise and we |
|
|
66:51 | it but first of course we have understand so what are the boundary conditions |
|
|
66:56 | the free surface? So the first is that the sheer the stresses all |
|
|
67:06 | at the free service. Not not component of stress but all components of |
|
|
67:11 | that have a three or two threes among their industries. And it's true |
|
|
67:16 | at the surface which we're going to is Z equals zebra, but there |
|
|
67:24 | other components of stress. For tau 12 doesn't have a three in |
|
|
67:29 | . So that doesn't have to be zero because because the um because the |
|
|
67:41 | surface is perpendicular to three directions, why we have a three here and |
|
|
67:48 | here and three here among the boundary and of course uh stress tensor has |
|
|
67:56 | be symmetric. So this 31 is same as this one. So what |
|
|
68:04 | means all the forces on the horizontal At the service, R zero at |
|
|
68:09 | Times. And the reason for that statement there in english is if there |
|
|
68:16 | such forces then the surface would accelerate not only accelerate down, but it |
|
|
68:23 | it would blow up. We have acceleration. Yeah, first thing first |
|
|
68:32 | is uh really, so let's consider traveling in the one direction, like |
|
|
68:40 | see on the left of this three is pointing downwards and in two directions |
|
|
68:46 | so Miss Del Rio is the two pointing into the screen or out of |
|
|
68:51 | screen if you want to walk up the screen and hold your hand. |
|
|
68:59 | there Your yeah, it's 123-123 into screen. Alright now we're going to |
|
|
69:21 | look for solutions uh which are traveling and have displacements only in this |
|
|
69:30 | So if there's a displacement out of plane, uh that's not the kind |
|
|
69:33 | solutions we're looking for displacement direction is be some arrow like that in this |
|
|
69:42 | , the progression of the wait gonna exactly horizontal. So there's a picture |
|
|
69:50 | really. He looks kind of pleased himself, doesn't. I think he |
|
|
69:55 | a member of the british House awards it was such a such a um |
|
|
70:06 | respected scientists. And in his they didn't have a lot of technically |
|
|
70:15 | companies, they didn't have uh the Science Foundation is going to give grants |
|
|
70:23 | research. And I think that in era in order to do research, |
|
|
70:28 | had to find a wealthy sponsor. sponsored the research out of philanthropy. |
|
|
70:34 | I think his family did it. think he was born into a wealthy |
|
|
70:41 | . So here's a picture taken from and gelder and it looks pretty, |
|
|
70:45 | not a very good copy of the . But you can see in here |
|
|
70:51 | all this stuff is in here and are, this is low velocity and |
|
|
70:56 | . Why do I say it's low because it takes a long time to |
|
|
71:00 | a short distance. So these these of data here are traveling slowly because |
|
|
71:06 | takes a long time to go a distance and you can see right here |
|
|
71:10 | see a reflection. Can you see here is a reflection here and no |
|
|
71:14 | it extends. Maybe it extends right here, maybe that's the same |
|
|
71:17 | But obviously you can't see much of because of all these norms. So |
|
|
71:24 | you want to do is get rid it so we can see the reflections |
|
|
71:32 | . Okay, now the stresses are by Hook's law and we wrote Hook's |
|
|
71:35 | on the blackboard earlier today we use uh symbols for the indices, but |
|
|
71:43 | comes to the same thing. And , I'll remind you again that when |
|
|
71:47 | see a repeated index, like that means we're summing summing over M |
|
|
71:52 | N. And when you see an parenthesis, you better see a similar |
|
|
71:57 | of unmatched parentheses on the other side the equation that specifies which component |
|
|
72:06 | Mhm Yeah, previously we said that uh these stresses carl zero at the |
|
|
72:17 | . And so when you uh uh first one, we're looking for cow |
|
|
72:24 | . So we put a 13 right , it's the same uh same iJ |
|
|
72:29 | as it is here, same 13 as it is here and then we |
|
|
72:34 | have to sum over all the M M. And so uh when you |
|
|
72:38 | this some because we're insisting that that only looking at displacements in the plain |
|
|
72:45 | the figure, that means that all strains except for these are zero. |
|
|
72:51 | in this son, the only two terms of these same thing with 23 |
|
|
72:57 | 33. Yes. Now we're gonna one more thing. Uh This is |
|
|
73:06 | strength of the 23 strength. And this implies that some of the displacement |
|
|
73:12 | be in the two directions. So since uh since we're gonna look for |
|
|
73:18 | really waves, we're gonna assume that are zero for the study of |
|
|
73:27 | So then we're uh we're left with equations here. I choose to not |
|
|
73:41 | them. Yeah, so those terms going to lead to love ways. |
|
|
73:47 | since we're intent here upon studying really , uh that's not what we're looking |
|
|
73:54 | . So uh that's a later we're just gonna say, study of |
|
|
74:02 | are going to be easy. now look at this equation here, |
|
|
74:07 | as we had on the previous uh . And uh you recognize that epsilon |
|
|
74:15 | is same as epsilon 31. So that gives you two here. And |
|
|
74:23 | definition of epsilon three is epsilon Is this thing here with a one |
|
|
74:30 | and a symmetrical set of displacement And the english name for C. |
|
|
74:38 | . And also for C. 1313 the sheer marginal commute going through that |
|
|
74:45 | logic down here, we have these terms coming up and this is the |
|
|
74:52 | of thing. I'm gonna uh if need to puzzled by these logical |
|
|
75:02 | I'm gonna pass on for now that take that up with Mr wu |
|
|
75:10 | Okay now you see this boundary condition both the shear stress and the normal |
|
|
75:20 | . And because of that the solution be neither pearl free nor divergence. |
|
|
75:26 | how we took the wave equation for weights. And we so we Select |
|
|
75:33 | the partner has zero curl and all . A P. Wave. And |
|
|
75:37 | selected out the part that has zero . Call that a share wave. |
|
|
75:42 | can't do that here because of those conditions that I just showed you. |
|
|
75:53 | , Mr helm Holtz is still on job and he he says that the |
|
|
75:58 | will have girl free part and a free apartment. Uh These are gonna |
|
|
76:06 | together. How can they travel together I know you're looking at this and |
|
|
76:13 | that's the P. Wave and that's sure way. But we need for |
|
|
76:17 | things to travel together. So let's the next line we'll remind you |
|
|
76:26 | we call the curl free part uh the gradient of a vector of the |
|
|
76:33 | of a scalar because um um No uh there's uh back to identity which |
|
|
76:43 | talked about on the first day says if you have the gradient of a |
|
|
76:48 | , The curl of that is the . And so that means part of |
|
|
76:53 | um This is going to be the here. That's part of it is |
|
|
76:59 | be the greatest of a scalar potential similar part of it is going to |
|
|
77:04 | the curl of a vector potential. both of these are gonna travel at |
|
|
77:10 | same speed. How can that be you know this one leads to a |
|
|
77:15 | wave and this leads to a shear that's in the absence of surface. |
|
|
77:22 | we're gonna have this surface in our . So the surface is gonna make |
|
|
77:26 | to travel together and they will be api way nora share wave really. |
|
|
77:35 | the curl free part is gonna be this wave equation and the divergence free |
|
|
77:41 | will uh I will be this wave . You see, what is the |
|
|
77:46 | here? We have the scalar potential and the vector potential here, we |
|
|
77:51 | V. P squared here and the squared. And these are body wave |
|
|
77:57 | . Even though the wave is gonna up traveling with the really way these |
|
|
78:03 | still the material parameters which appearing in equations. So I want you to |
|
|
78:09 | of these as elastic parameters. Think this one as uh Moro and think |
|
|
78:15 | this one as well. Uh We're find these solutions for fine for side |
|
|
78:25 | in a way which travels horizontally only a really wave velocity. Okay, |
|
|
78:36 | we're asking here which components of of do we need here? Uh the |
|
|
78:44 | of sign is given by this expression this is just the definition of the |
|
|
78:50 | operator operating on a vector which we sign. She's got three vector components |
|
|
78:59 | it's got all these derivatives here. this is the X- three derivative of |
|
|
79:04 | two components of plant. Now, a really way we're going to uh |
|
|
79:13 | that everything in the two direction is . So that's zeros. That's uh |
|
|
79:21 | because I only want to look at web solutions. So by definition, |
|
|
79:27 | about how about this? Is it from this if there's nothing pointing in |
|
|
79:32 | two direction, that means uh there's driven to direction either. That gives |
|
|
79:38 | a here same reason that gives the here. So um the only component |
|
|
79:48 | need is side to a component. one here and this one here. |
|
|
79:53 | , so sai is gonna point out the screen or maybe into the screen |
|
|
80:00 | that's okay. Uh the way the is gonna stay in the screen in |
|
|
80:06 | 13 component and the 13, The of the screen is going to involve |
|
|
80:13 | two on. Okay, so so write out this term explicitly in terms |
|
|
80:24 | the components we need. So this with three components. Here's the first |
|
|
80:30 | . It's got the gradient of five respect to X one. And then |
|
|
80:35 | back here, there's the one we minus side two divided by X. |
|
|
80:41 | uh derivative of X. So that's term similarly. Uh For remember we |
|
|
80:51 | two components zero since we're gonna look for reading so at the surface Sheer |
|
|
81:04 | is zero and uh this is uh definition of uh wrapped up shear stress |
|
|
81:25 | given by you times what's in the 11 and now you want not everyone |
|
|
81:43 | you want. What is that that given right here. one is this |
|
|
81:49 | in terms of the potentials? So they are Similar for you three in |
|
|
81:54 | of the potentials. Similarly for the normal stress and see different differences |
|
|
82:05 | Uh particularly we got lambdas and M's of you. Okay now um if |
|
|
82:16 | were mathematicians we would have uh elegant to solve these equations. Being |
|
|
82:24 | What we're gonna do is we're gonna the solution and you're gonna and then |
|
|
82:29 | gonna verify the guests and you can confidence in me. I am going |
|
|
82:34 | make the right guess but I still to show you that. That's |
|
|
82:38 | Let's let's assume here that the guest five is a plain white and the |
|
|
82:46 | for sign too is a plane wave got here subscript zero but I keep |
|
|
82:52 | two here because just to remind you this to now look inside here these |
|
|
82:57 | wave uh exponents, we got the omega but we have different wave |
|
|
83:06 | And but both of these in order this thing to solve the uh curl |
|
|
83:13 | wave equation. We gotta have a where A. Is equal to omega |
|
|
83:17 | v square. That's a condition on length of K. In terms of |
|
|
83:23 | . And remember V P squared. should think of that as just an |
|
|
83:27 | parameter. M overall. Uh It's the velocity of anything. The wave |
|
|
83:33 | not, the velocity of particles is the velocity of the wave. The |
|
|
83:38 | is gonna end up traveling VR. similarly for this wave vector which we |
|
|
83:44 | h, the length of that is to omega and B. S. |
|
|
83:51 | solve the problem, we need to decide these two spectral coefficients and the |
|
|
83:57 | of the this was our solution for for the shear stress we have the |
|
|
84:07 | stress is zero at the surface. in terms of these potentials, this |
|
|
84:13 | what it looks like. And so our guest uh from from the uh |
|
|
84:19 | page this derivative is gonna produce AK and K three. That comes from |
|
|
84:27 | uh differentiating side um in one direction three directions. Uh Because of that |
|
|
84:35 | number here, when you differentiate uh thing with respect to X one, |
|
|
84:41 | get uh the same potential appearance as and now multiplied by K one. |
|
|
84:48 | again with this one, you get by K three. Similarly. Over |
|
|
84:53 | we got uh derivatives of side And we get an H three and |
|
|
85:00 | three C. This is a three a three. This is one and |
|
|
85:03 | because we have 13 here and we three years and that's similarly for the |
|
|
85:14 | . So if we uh collect terms and uh we'll find them. This |
|
|
85:24 | just a single equation, But inside is really uh 50 times exponential. |
|
|
85:36 | so we expand and collect terms and and uh notice here that uh we |
|
|
85:42 | only from the dot product of K X vector. Uh we have only |
|
|
85:50 | these uh this is uh the only left because uh there might be a |
|
|
85:56 | two and the next to uh but uh K two is going to be |
|
|
86:03 | . Uh assume that every all the is in the plane and got X |
|
|
86:10 | equals zero because we're at the surface with only uh X one. So |
|
|
86:18 | is gonna be a way of traveling the X one direction, you |
|
|
86:24 | Yeah, here's uh the trivial So the trivial solution here, we |
|
|
86:30 | can find a solution just set near zero. So that worked terrific. |
|
|
86:37 | we call that the trivial solution. that has an important consequence. There |
|
|
86:43 | no really way at the surface of ocean. And uh that's one reason |
|
|
86:48 | marine data are usually easier to process landing, they look much better. |
|
|
86:53 | they don't have a railing reasons. it's simply because that comes directly out |
|
|
86:59 | this by assuming if new equal that's a solution that works. So |
|
|
87:05 | it happens in the oath no So then assuming that is not to |
|
|
87:13 | what we can uh divide by Then you find out the E. |
|
|
87:20 | . Makati and left this. Now going to assume this is true everywhere |
|
|
87:26 | the surface. So it must mean that a one is equal to |
|
|
87:33 | This uh everyone is different from H . This thing can't be true for |
|
|
87:38 | X. So we must have that equal to H one. And then |
|
|
87:46 | need to use the uh both of are equal to omega over quantity which |
|
|
87:53 | going to call the rarely velocity and or minus depends on whether the wave |
|
|
87:58 | going right or left. And you that we didn't see anything in here |
|
|
88:01 | a source uh source happened somewhere. around the surface waves are coming along |
|
|
88:09 | we're analyzing how they go uh moved here to there without worrying or caring |
|
|
88:16 | the source. And then once we K. One equals H one, |
|
|
88:24 | we can cancel out light out those And well after with this solution |
|
|
88:31 | So what are the unknowns here? unknowns of the case and the 50 |
|
|
88:37 | the size 02. And the ratio the of the spectral components is in |
|
|
88:43 | , in terms of the um of wave vector components. Buy this for |
|
|
88:53 | Now, we're not done here. know that K3 square uh K three |
|
|
89:02 | plus K one squared plus K one is a square. So we should |
|
|
89:06 | subtract K one square for both And so this expression length okay, |
|
|
89:14 | given by mega Vp and the length and he one component we just decided |
|
|
89:27 | gives the really philosophy, that's this a similar thing for H. |
|
|
89:33 | S. Here said a V. . Here we have the same or |
|
|
89:36 | philosophy here. This previous argued so that um uh conclusions you can see |
|
|
89:47 | the the scale of potential which is like this in terms of K one |
|
|
89:53 | K three explicitly, it's like this now we want to separate out um |
|
|
90:00 | a three component and all the K component omega over pr vega. And |
|
|
90:10 | um that's just implementing everything we just . We do a similar thing for |
|
|
90:18 | too. And look this is this very similar to what we have |
|
|
90:24 | So that means that this side two is going to be traveling at the |
|
|
90:29 | speed as the 50 component. It's five component. And look here out |
|
|
90:37 | again it's not an exponential factor which different. Now let's think about |
|
|
90:54 | Ah this part is obviously wiggling away it wiggles away hearts. This is |
|
|
91:02 | be we're going away um radically. uh what happened to the omega? |
|
|
91:13 | Well um you can ask uh what to the omega up here. |
|
|
91:22 | uh rega yeah, being started out , multiplying everything, Here's multiplying |
|
|
91:38 | And so Omega Times T. No, I think I have a |
|
|
91:51 | here. Yeah, I have stayed , I didn't do this. Uh |
|
|
92:03 | was a great mistake. So I there would need, maybe I think |
|
|
92:14 | omega should be out here. As matter of fact, this is such |
|
|
92:17 | bad mistake, I'm gonna fix it right here. So don't turn off |
|
|
92:21 | the according, let's just fix this right here right now, what I'm |
|
|
92:29 | do is I'm going to, I think I'm gonna have to stop |
|
|
92:43 | . Uh we are gonna have to the, stop the recording when I |
|
|
92:48 | sharing. Will stop the recording. , go ahead. Okay, so |
|
|
92:56 | while the recording was off, we some mistakes here and now it's |
|
|
93:02 | It's got the proper behavior of the positioning of all the omegas in |
|
|
93:09 | And now we're going to uh to with making further progress that we're going |
|
|
93:17 | decide just exactly what this uh piece our is in terms of things uh |
|
|
93:23 | terms of material properties, stars, not uh advancing. So let's see |
|
|
94:13 | , this is okay, now we're now we're going to share this. |
|
|
94:39 | that works okay. So remember all of we got this far by |
|
|
94:47 | looking only at the shear stress boundary right here, shear stress boundary |
|
|
94:53 | Remember we had another boundary condition on normal stress. So from the previous |
|
|
94:59 | that was given by this and using logic as we did before, we |
|
|
95:04 | that and collect in terms of simple just like we did before. Um |
|
|
95:11 | And furthermore, using this relationship between minus lambda gives us a two mu |
|
|
95:21 | then using the ratio of the spectrum we got. Uh two pages |
|
|
95:25 | three pages earlier, that ratio which is the ratio of spectrum right |
|
|
95:31 | , here's that ratio spectrum and then more algebra simplifies like so collecting |
|
|
95:38 | Like so and uh now what I do is make this adjustment in |
|
|
95:47 | This m over immune is in terms body wave velocities, that's V. |
|
|
95:54 | squared over the square. And the uh the density is canceled out. |
|
|
96:01 | one square uh is uh omega squared B. P square. And so |
|
|
96:11 | three P squared here cancels this P squared, cancels out this V |
|
|
96:15 | squared here. And then left with squared over the S square followed by |
|
|
96:19 | these components. And if we collect further you can go over this later |
|
|
96:25 | yourself. And uh uh we're gonna in this case, one square by |
|
|
96:33 | over V. R squared here and and here And then we remember |
|
|
96:41 | We have these these expressions for the wave numbers K3 and yes. And |
|
|
96:49 | all that in there, we finally this equation for the railing, wave |
|
|
96:56 | . And what is this equation? , it's zero equals this collection of |
|
|
97:03 | of velocity and see the VR is here. Yes, this is a |
|
|
97:08 | wave. We asked velocity and um this other stuff. And uh so |
|
|
97:16 | what is the unknown in this Well, the unknown is VR everywhere |
|
|
97:22 | uh V. S which we assume know since we're doing this for a |
|
|
97:28 | medium with a known share velocity and the p velocity over here. So |
|
|
97:33 | an equation for video. Here's an thing. The omegas have all |
|
|
97:40 | We're gonna back up a little bit you see, you see omega's here |
|
|
97:44 | . But that's the key. They're . So you can divide them all |
|
|
97:48 | . So you're left with no dependence omega. So that's really um an |
|
|
97:56 | point. Uh It says it's uh way this is an equation for the |
|
|
98:03 | doesn't depend upon uh frequency. So says the way that uh um really |
|
|
98:14 | velocity in this case, does it on frequency non dispersing? Well, |
|
|
98:23 | probably know from looking at raw seismic that there's plenty of uh dispersing really |
|
|
98:32 | in that data, but we They're not dispersing. So what's wrong |
|
|
98:39 | ? Uh The answer is that this only applies to the simplest case. |
|
|
98:45 | In a realistic case with many layers gonna get this person. So let's |
|
|
98:53 | at this and this is awkward to all these square roots in here. |
|
|
98:56 | so let us uh take the square that equation. And uh wow, |
|
|
99:04 | what it looks like. So now become known as here, VR and |
|
|
99:10 | as a ratio with the S. here it is with as in a |
|
|
99:14 | with VP. And it's 1/4 order . See it's uh four third |
|
|
99:19 | V. R squared C. Uh imagine um squaring this all out reading |
|
|
99:26 | to the fourth power. The Uh The highest term is gonna have |
|
|
99:33 | be our to the 8th. That's 4th order, wow. And here |
|
|
99:40 | highest order is E. R. . Well, when you do |
|
|
99:47 | The lowest order term is a -2 the fourth power, which is |
|
|
99:53 | And on the right hand side you all this out. The lowest our |
|
|
99:57 | is a plus two actually plus I'm 16. And it's the |
|
|
100:04 | And so these these low order terms . So if you just cancel out |
|
|
100:10 | these low order terms then you have V. R squared in every single |
|
|
100:17 | . There are no terms independent of once this term cancels this term, |
|
|
100:24 | means you can divide by v our and get a third equation and |
|
|
100:28 | R squared. So that's that's good . But even so, cubic equations |
|
|
100:34 | really complicated. You probably know in mind or you can remember easily figured |
|
|
100:39 | what is the answer for the quadratic or the uh highest power of the |
|
|
100:45 | is square. But the high that probably don't know cubic equation of, |
|
|
100:51 | highest power of the unknown is to third power. But other people have |
|
|
100:59 | on this and they conclude that normally is normally a little bit less than |
|
|
101:05 | . S. So these these waves traveling to the right or maybe to |
|
|
101:10 | left or the combination uh with the V. R. Which is dependent |
|
|
101:18 | V. P. And D. . Both bodyweight VP and friday Ds |
|
|
101:23 | the wave is traveling with VR and traveling with a little bit less than |
|
|
101:29 | . S. So uh clever thing do is to uh take this result |
|
|
101:38 | and say okay I'm going to uh that VR is a little bit less |
|
|
101:44 | B. S. And I'm gonna the difference between VR es where is |
|
|
101:50 | quantity zeta, which you can tell a non dimensional quantity and put that |
|
|
101:56 | put zeta into the previous incident, out VR here with uh zeta and |
|
|
102:06 | taylor expand the quantity. Keep only first order. Uh So when you |
|
|
102:11 | that it leads to this equation here that's pretty simple. Any of us |
|
|
102:16 | really understand that. And you put here uh Stephanie's favorite favorite number for |
|
|
102:23 | velocity ratio of E. S. . E V. P. Is |
|
|
102:25 | half. So you square that and get 1/4 divided by at multiply times |
|
|
102:32 | gives you a number one. And that has subtracted from three gives you |
|
|
102:36 | two and two times four is So uh divided into one. So |
|
|
102:43 | and 18 to see how that works . And uh using that approximation |
|
|
102:52 | S. Is uh related. Pr , by this formula push it has |
|
|
103:01 | graph like this. So here's the of V. R. O. |
|
|
103:04 | . S. Starting as a function V. P. To be. |
|
|
103:08 | this is the body wave velocity And this was uh Stephanie's favorite |
|
|
103:15 | But uh you know, in the surface the velocity ratio repeatedly gets |
|
|
103:25 | And here's the way to think about . As you get close to the |
|
|
103:30 | , the rocks become less and less as the VP gets less. VP |
|
|
103:37 | never less than the philosophy of Now, as you get closer to |
|
|
103:44 | service. Uh these less and less rocks have smaller values of V. |
|
|
103:49 | . But they don't have any lower . You can have yes, to |
|
|
103:54 | arbitrarily small. So ratio gets can to be large. So here it's |
|
|
104:00 | ratios as large as five. And see where those. So this is |
|
|
104:04 | near service unconsolidated rocks. And for like that the railing. Wave velocity |
|
|
104:11 | to be say within five or so the show and philosophy. And you |
|
|
104:19 | see it's never gonna uh never gonna to uh one but it's uh somewhere |
|
|
104:27 | 90%, of uh huh. If wave body blocks is a good number |
|
|
104:36 | railing results. Okay. So having solved me off in terms of this |
|
|
104:46 | small parameter Rosetta, let's put that into the expressions we have for uh |
|
|
104:53 | vertical wave numbers A three NHC. working through the algebra you find that |
|
|
105:02 | three is a pure imaginary number. imaginary number. It has no real |
|
|
105:09 | to it. And you can say same thing about H. And it's |
|
|
105:13 | different functions of zeta. But they pure numbers. Now that has an |
|
|
105:23 | consequence. seven Remember that we had functional forms for the potentials where we |
|
|
105:31 | out the uh horizontal travel bit. that's the same for both of these |
|
|
105:37 | uh functions that they had different exponential out here. And now we know |
|
|
105:44 | K3 is a imaginary number. So here it is. And so um |
|
|
105:55 | me write this expression as uh um this part here and call that the |
|
|
106:07 | value of K three. The eye still out there. Yeah. And |
|
|
106:12 | same thing with the age. We're choose a negative sign here. Why |
|
|
106:19 | we do that? Because right here gonna uh we're gonna put This expression |
|
|
106:29 | K three right here And this are that are is going to make a |
|
|
106:41 | . And uh and this is gonna a plus one for that. So |
|
|
106:47 | if we choose the minus sign We end up with this minus times |
|
|
106:55 | K3 times seen. And that says exponential factor is going to be decreasing |
|
|
107:04 | amplitude as Z increased. Z equals . The amplitude is 50 as the |
|
|
107:15 | . Uh as you go down into end of the ground, this factor |
|
|
107:22 | gonna make the amplitude smaller and And you see it's not wiggling |
|
|
107:26 | The wiggling comes from the eye. I hear anymore because this I got |
|
|
107:34 | by this I Same thing for side . So they decay exponentially exponentially with |
|
|
107:45 | . And this is why we call particular wave solution surface wave because it |
|
|
107:51 | itself near the surface. So how does it reach? Well, uh |
|
|
107:59 | can um big these estimates. And and here is uh um washing the |
|
|
108:10 | squared and the wavelength of the railing , the the wavelength of the corresponding |
|
|
108:18 | . Your wave. And so you see that K three reaches down into |
|
|
108:22 | medium about six wavelengths. And um H three uh vertical component of the |
|
|
108:34 | uh is smaller because zeta is less one area of the spirit of |
|
|
108:43 | less than one. So this one at a different rate, the other |
|
|
108:50 | . And uh so uh putting that , you're saying that um wave reaches |
|
|
108:59 | only a fraction of a wave. right here. So this part is |
|
|
109:17 | part is real and it's moving in X direction huh, spanish uh which |
|
|
109:50 | go back here. So these um is the real part. This is |
|
|
110:01 | vertical component of the wave number and a pure imaginary quarter. Remember further |
|
|
110:09 | we said that the horizontal component who is a real note? It's given |
|
|
110:15 | omega over VR. And so the park is the horizontal uh component of |
|
|
110:23 | way back in the real norma And vertical component of the wave network is |
|
|
110:27 | imaginary number. So that's what this right here. The imaginary part of |
|
|
110:34 | wave vector. The vertical part is parallel from the real part, which |
|
|
110:38 | the horizontal part. So they call an in homogeneous wave. That's what |
|
|
110:45 | mathematicians say, because manufacture has two and the world partners not parallel to |
|
|
110:59 | . It's easy to confuse that with homogeneous equations or with non homogeneous |
|
|
111:07 | but this is awake and it's an homogeneous wave to a mathematician because of |
|
|
111:14 | feature of it. Now, if have the elastic wave a question which |
|
|
111:27 | um what we're dealing with elastic wave . It only allows in homage ingenious |
|
|
111:35 | where the imaginary part parts are perpendicular the real party here. The other |
|
|
111:41 | are possible with an elastic media. example, if you have an insinuated |
|
|
111:46 | , it's going along in this it's going on, it's decaying with |
|
|
111:53 | . That means that uh yeah uh has an imaginary part this uh in |
|
|
112:03 | direction also. And so uh if have a genuine nation, the imaginary |
|
|
112:10 | of the way back can be pointed any way it wants depending on |
|
|
112:15 | So for the elastic favorite patient, it's in a homogeneous, the two |
|
|
112:21 | have to be perpendicular like you Yeah, the exponential decay with |
|
|
112:30 | weaker lower frequencies, since both these components depend on homemaking. So uh |
|
|
112:40 | has a real practical consequence for earthquake . Uh they know that earthquakes are |
|
|
112:49 | to be making surface waves as well body waves and they can measure these |
|
|
112:54 | waves as a function of frequency on other side of the world. And |
|
|
113:02 | know that the high frequency waves are only reach down a little bit and |
|
|
113:06 | low frequency waves are gonna reach down lot further. And so by examining |
|
|
113:12 | frequency dependence of velocity of surface they can unravel the velocity structure of |
|
|
113:21 | earth, deeper velocities. Uh deeper of the only affect the low frequency |
|
|
113:28 | . Low frequency surface wave and shallower of Earth's subsurface affect growth. Here's |
|
|
113:43 | understand anything. If you consider a of very low frequencies. You can |
|
|
113:50 | talking about wave propagation of solid of and talk about the loads of free |
|
|
114:00 | , the oscillation of the earth. think of, think about a bell |
|
|
114:06 | a bell in your hand, Bella's here, you whack it and it |
|
|
114:13 | and it keeps on ringing and the belt is vibrated and ringing and sending |
|
|
114:22 | sound waves into the air, but ringing. There's no more waves propagating |
|
|
114:26 | the belt. It's just oscillating by . And so those are called the |
|
|
114:33 | of free vibration of the belt. each bell has its own before your |
|
|
114:38 | . The people who make the bell to make it so that it's made |
|
|
114:43 | of a good material like brass instead lead. Nobody wants a lead bell |
|
|
114:47 | there's too much intent and intensity continuation lead. So you get a good |
|
|
114:53 | like brass. And depending on the the size and the thickness of the |
|
|
114:59 | , it has a tone. And in a turkey car, they'll have |
|
|
115:04 | bells, each with their own They play tunes on those simple |
|
|
115:09 | And uh um what you're hearing is free, the free corporation of the |
|
|
115:16 | . And the tone that they're, tone that you hear is called the |
|
|
115:22 | mode of oscillation of, well the mode and it has higher harmonics. |
|
|
115:30 | maybe you can also hear those uh in the Earth? See if I |
|
|
115:38 | a slider corresponding the in the Um When a when a big earthquake |
|
|
115:47 | it sends waves through the body of earth and also send surface waves around |
|
|
115:52 | earth. And after they've made a circuit of the earth and they're all |
|
|
115:58 | whole earth is vibrating together. And I measured the uh frequencies of |
|
|
116:09 | free oscillation of the earth. And what are uh last velocities at |
|
|
116:20 | And so um take a take a . I'm going to ask mr you |
|
|
116:26 | is the approximate period of vibration of greatest mode of the earth? So |
|
|
116:37 | an earthquake happens in Taiwan uh waves around the earth and we can measure |
|
|
116:44 | in christian, we can measure vibrating hours. Gave me bigger thing. |
|
|
116:51 | the period of the greatest mode of here? Oh yeah that's not |
|
|
117:09 | In 19 days. I'm not sure you get that. Where did you |
|
|
117:14 | up in 19 days? Just a just to guess. Okay well you |
|
|
117:21 | do better than that because you know in 19 days um uh the earthquake |
|
|
117:26 | dissipate the attenuation will kill it off the bigger biggest earthquakes, they don't |
|
|
117:33 | for 19 days. So it turns uh I think it's not easy to |
|
|
117:39 | um um Well have you seen a a grant from uh seismographs? What's |
|
|
117:51 | lowest frequency you see in a seismograph a distant earthquake? Yeah. |
|
|
118:03 | Think of it in terms of Okay. Uh so 100 seconds is |
|
|
118:11 | to correspond to a mode of oscillation reaches down a few 100 kilometers. |
|
|
118:20 | mode is about an hour. So mode is for oscillation of the earth |
|
|
118:27 | this. And then there's other modes to different oscillation like this. Many |
|
|
118:34 | uh votes. And those are all by spherical harmonics with different industries. |
|
|
118:42 | mode is called 00 modes and for like this and it normally doesn't have |
|
|
118:49 | lot of energy but it's the lowest . You can never measure an earthquake |
|
|
118:57 | about a correspondence to a period of an hour. So uh of course |
|
|
119:03 | never see these modes of free oscillation uh hydrocarbon data instead of what we |
|
|
119:12 | uh surface waves. And so this a few um animated gift made by |
|
|
119:21 | Russell. Um I don't know but can see um that the amplitude decreases |
|
|
119:31 | depth and you can see the wave moving from left to right. And |
|
|
119:37 | I see that every individual point is in elliptical motion and it's called retrograde |
|
|
119:44 | it's going around counter clock seeing from sort of. And so I think |
|
|
119:51 | is sort of cool. So um would measure it at a kind of |
|
|
119:57 | like this And that's what you can look at this Too long your eyeballs |
|
|
120:13 | to cross now as we derived The really uh really way of velocity |
|
|
120:23 | non dispersant. No think what it . If you have an equation where |
|
|
120:36 | velocity is a function of frequency, does it know the difference between high |
|
|
120:44 | and low frequency? It's got to in the equation something that so that |
|
|
120:51 | knows that it is 10 is 10 high frequency or low frequency. It's |
|
|
120:56 | to have some characteristic frequency physical parameter gives a characteristic frequency and then all |
|
|
121:05 | other frequencies get compared to that or equivalently have a characteristic length. And |
|
|
121:12 | all the other frequencies have corresponding wavelengths those wavelengths are either long or |
|
|
121:19 | characteristic length. So in our problem , when we did there is no |
|
|
121:25 | frequency which you can define from the properties and there's no characteristic length. |
|
|
121:34 | however, if you had a layer somehow in the layer thickness would be |
|
|
121:41 | characteristic length. And so that would that when the consequences of that got |
|
|
121:48 | through all the equations would find that different frequencies have different wavelengths and they |
|
|
121:56 | know whether they're long or short compared this uh layer thickness. And so |
|
|
122:02 | didn't have any of that in this but in the real er uh it |
|
|
122:06 | . So uh we don't want to into that uh level of detail, |
|
|
122:11 | immediately you can see that the different dispersion, the frequency dependence comes from |
|
|
122:20 | Blair in there and and maybe it come from something else also, but |
|
|
122:27 | we'll get into that later. So the question. So we already derived |
|
|
122:38 | penis wave equations in less than four it was simple, I would say |
|
|
122:43 | they were simple, but really waves complicated, we slogged our way through |
|
|
122:48 | and uh I think probably right now quite confused about that derivation, but |
|
|
122:58 | you go through it on your own using the um materials which are in |
|
|
123:05 | blackboard, I think you'll see that all works out pretty straightforwardly and comes |
|
|
123:10 | with this equation, that's the third equation. But uh um uh made |
|
|
123:20 | uh simplification by assuming small zeta and know, it can all work out |
|
|
123:27 | uh reasonably, but it was a work to get there. So why |
|
|
123:34 | it so complicated we got here uh um is this true? Um MS |
|
|
123:43 | rio, did we new, did need a new wave equation? |
|
|
123:52 | what was it? I showed you wave equation that with a K vector |
|
|
123:57 | p waves. And uh I shouldn't wave equations for p waves. And |
|
|
124:04 | was curl free again, I said wrong, it was a wave equation |
|
|
124:09 | the wave factor, we call it . And that was curl free. |
|
|
124:14 | showed you another one which was divergence , but those that was all old |
|
|
124:19 | for us. We did not, need a new wave equation. So |
|
|
124:25 | . Is definitely true. And she uh true also. Um Let's see |
|
|
124:36 | um. Uh How about the trap travel in the X. Direction? |
|
|
124:48 | polarizing the xy plane. Okay so that's true but that doesn't answer the |
|
|
124:53 | and she is also true that it answer. Yeah. Now uh surface |
|
|
125:01 | important. The whole thing was that the problem was it was difficult because |
|
|
125:07 | had bounded english. Is this the condition? Well it's a trick question |
|
|
125:17 | that's true for some of the stress but not for all of them was |
|
|
125:22 | true for those stress components which have three among their industries. And so |
|
|
125:28 | example how 12 was not uh was in there. So that one is |
|
|
125:38 | . This one true or false. that one's true. This one tour |
|
|
125:52 | us girl. Free part has wave K. Dever industry part has wave |
|
|
125:58 | H. So did they propagate with philosophies? Well they don't they both |
|
|
126:09 | with the same velocity of er um Even though even though the wave vectors |
|
|
126:17 | different, They have the same horizontal K. one equals h. one |
|
|
126:23 | they differ in their vertical departments. 1 to ever falls. Oh they |
|
|
126:42 | uh Well I guess the equation is well formed but the wave travels in |
|
|
126:51 | horizontal direction and uh the real parts K. And H. Uh mike |
|
|
127:00 | do that uh K. One One R. Reel. And they |
|
|
127:07 | VR and they're pointing in the horizontal , imaginary parts. This one true |
|
|
127:17 | false. That's false. Because it . That was a trick question. |
|
|
127:22 | was an easy trick question. This is more difficult here. Um uh |
|
|
127:30 | regular wave has a curl free part a diver industry part. And but |
|
|
127:35 | travels with with its own velocity R. And so uh does it |
|
|
127:41 | with the velocity between body wave velocity . P. And V. |
|
|
127:48 | Yeah that's false. Even though it intuitively that should be true. But |
|
|
127:52 | proved that is false. The railing travels with the velocity is less than |
|
|
127:57 | . S. Which of course is than V. P. So uh |
|
|
128:00 | would think that uh well here's a way to think about is traveling |
|
|
128:04 | And it's got the uh the curl park tangled up with the divergence free |
|
|
128:10 | . So it can't travel with Or V. S. Either |
|
|
128:13 | But you would think that would travel velocity which is intermediate. But no |
|
|
128:18 | travels with the velocity less than S. Okay now let's see how |
|
|
128:25 | doing for time. Um Yeah well let's talk about other surface waves traveling |
|
|
128:37 | the plane and one of them is with us. And uh so regular |
|
|
128:44 | really waves Schulte did Schulte waves. so what Sheltie waves are an extension |
|
|
128:51 | rarely waves as seen on ocean Seismic data for salty waves. The |
|
|
128:56 | half space is liquid, not So that means that's gonna modify the |
|
|
129:03 | condition. Uh like really waves, motion is confined to the 1 3 |
|
|
129:10 | . And the boundary conditions are Kant as stress, not vanishing, a |
|
|
129:14 | continuity as stressed at the c force the sea floor. You've got rocks |
|
|
129:20 | water above and um uh and a wave propagating along that surface as called |
|
|
129:29 | sulky wave. And we can handle just like we did with really |
|
|
129:38 | but the analysis more is more The results are similar velocity is less |
|
|
129:43 | the share velocity decays exponentially away, going downwards and going up. That's |
|
|
129:51 | action point. Uh really there's no at all in the airport. Mr |
|
|
129:57 | , he's got a wave that's gonna only P wave components in the in |
|
|
130:03 | water of the interstate, but it's going to be traveling with p wave |
|
|
130:09 | is going to be traveling with Schultz wave velocity. And I'm uh I'm |
|
|
130:14 | one of the first year physicists who um in the modern era Who uh |
|
|
130:23 | about these things, Schultz. He his work probably say shows he lived |
|
|
130:29 | be 63. He probably did this when he was like 30. So |
|
|
130:36 | about wartime. Um and then people really pay much attention. I never |
|
|
130:44 | about multi ways until I saw them I saw them on ocean bottom seismic |
|
|
130:50 | . And I was one of the people to look at the ocean company |
|
|
130:54 | company Ocean bottom seismic data. And enough, we saw these travel these |
|
|
130:59 | traveling very, very slowly, like uh 200 m per second. I |
|
|
131:06 | really slowly. Yeah, but we see them in our data. |
|
|
131:11 | what is that? And uh, looked it up in the textbooks and |
|
|
131:18 | up these really type waves, surface traveling on the interface between the ocean |
|
|
131:25 | and the subsurface ocean rocks. And travel with a velocity, uh very |
|
|
131:32 | velocity because the body wave velocity and body wave velocity in a near surface |
|
|
131:46 | bottom of the sea is very low incidentally, that's the reason why you |
|
|
131:53 | see too much conversion of energy where wave is going down through the |
|
|
131:58 | It's the ocean for most of it , most of the energy gets |
|
|
132:03 | Very little gets is like uh very gets converted. And so uh, |
|
|
132:14 | because of the properties of the because blood is so muddy basically. |
|
|
132:20 | and so that's why most of the energy that we see on converter waves |
|
|
132:25 | from the conversion of the reflection, conversion on the sea floor down. |
|
|
132:31 | so uh, I think I told that the first people who looked at |
|
|
132:36 | wave later, they wouldn't statoil and didn't understand that point. And uh |
|
|
132:45 | thought they analyzed their data, convert way of imaging of their reservoir and |
|
|
132:51 | got a passable image a better image for uh the ways but they analyze |
|
|
132:59 | it in the wrong way, embarrassed in public um because they didn't understand |
|
|
133:16 | . So here's another type of uh type ways their internal surface ways where |
|
|
133:25 | a layer boundary with rock below. walked about typical reflecting boundary because that's |
|
|
133:33 | that's because that's the surface, it another type of surface wave. And |
|
|
133:41 | one is named after Stoneleigh. And what, how is it different? |
|
|
133:46 | It's got rocks above and rocks below as before the motion is confined to |
|
|
133:52 | 1ft plant. And uh under our continent continuity of stress and also |
|
|
134:02 | of displacement because it's solid over And so that's another type of |
|
|
134:09 | We can handle it just like we before. Uh and the analysis just |
|
|
134:14 | before. I can have a picture . So this comes from Sheriff and |
|
|
134:18 | dark. And uh this shows that for for a model which they did |
|
|
134:30 | Sheriff in and were graphing as a of the ratio of sheer module light |
|
|
134:37 | the upper medium in the lower And as a ratio of the densities |
|
|
134:41 | the upper and lower medium. We get um um solutions in certain areas |
|
|
134:47 | this graph, for example, here here and so in those cases the |
|
|
134:53 | the two layers differ strongly and uh that's complicated, rarely measure these. |
|
|
135:02 | is it? We don't measure them because we rarely have instruments at that |
|
|
135:08 | . How would you do it? only way you could do, you |
|
|
135:11 | have a borehole and right uh next where the borehole intersects a boundary and |
|
|
135:19 | want to have a strong brand, supposed to have salt below and sandstone |
|
|
135:25 | . You want to put a few your PS two PSP tool right |
|
|
135:31 | you can see uh you can measure wise on this boundary, but nobody |
|
|
135:39 | does that. Uh you know uh you're doing that you're introducing into the |
|
|
135:45 | the cylindrical borehole. And so your is going to have a lot of |
|
|
135:50 | home surface waves in addition to uh . And then Stoneleigh uh made contributions |
|
|
136:02 | boho science as well. And so we'll hear more about that later. |
|
|
136:08 | this is uh an amusing type of , but not one that really ever |
|
|
136:14 | up in our business. Okay, uh Love Ways. We have time |
|
|
136:20 | to uh talk about love waves. so I said I said, love |
|
|
136:26 | the contemporary Really And so uh really the in plane displacement. And love |
|
|
136:33 | the out of plane displacement. So we have the same pictures we had |
|
|
136:38 | . Now we have the two accesses pointing out of the uh pointing into |
|
|
136:45 | screen and um you know this word uh this 1 3 plane is called |
|
|
136:56 | sagittal plane, you know this Uh it's not used too much, |
|
|
137:05 | sometimes it is and now you know is uh it's the plain of the |
|
|
137:13 | . So so we're gonna be looking uh solution to the wave equation with |
|
|
137:21 | the same boundary conditions as we had . But now we're looking for Love |
|
|
137:26 | solutions instead of really Texans. so uh this uh generate a wave |
|
|
137:34 | that you need across light source. then to observe, you gonna have |
|
|
137:41 | . Now usually we have only vertical and vertical view funds. So because |
|
|
137:46 | that, well, everyone has to very little attention in our business Up |
|
|
137:53 | maybe 20 years ago and then maybe years ago. And since then we've |
|
|
138:00 | um uh putting out three components So we see these all the |
|
|
138:09 | So let's do a brief analysis. stresses are given as before by Hook's |
|
|
138:14 | . And the boundary conditions are the as we had by Hook's law. |
|
|
138:19 | we're going to assume that all these terms are zero because those are terms |
|
|
138:24 | contributed to the grayling equations. And we want then uh left with only |
|
|
138:32 | term coming from the 23 stress. because these uh these terms are the |
|
|
138:40 | by symmetry. So there's the uh non trivial boundary condition is on the |
|
|
138:50 | stress. And uh so here here's equation. So The common name for |
|
|
138:58 | last 10, the stiffness tensor Elma mute. So here is uh rounder |
|
|
139:06 | right here. And this is uh gonna assume that this thing is zero |
|
|
139:12 | assumptions. So we're only left with term. And that's the love way |
|
|
139:18 | conditions at the surface. This is true at the surface. What |
|
|
139:24 | These are only this is only a wave boundary conditions. So solution will |
|
|
139:31 | fact be divergence trained. So I'm have a wave equation. It's exactly |
|
|
139:37 | we had for the shear wave body . And now we have the surface |
|
|
139:41 | contend with. Look here we have one component continuous. So we don't |
|
|
139:52 | that shear wave after potential. We talk about the displacement itself is the |
|
|
140:00 | itself. And there's the equation and sum of the two person L. |
|
|
140:07 | , reminded looking for low wave not body wasters. Just think of |
|
|
140:16 | as you over bro, we're not these love waves are not going to |
|
|
140:23 | with this cheer wave philosophy as We're going to just make a guess |
|
|
140:30 | , we're gonna guess the plane wave and the wave vector has this uh |
|
|
140:35 | square of uh the square of the of the wave vector related to |
|
|
140:40 | S. In this way. So need to determine these two components. |
|
|
140:47 | , in any way they can be . But because of the surface we're |
|
|
140:52 | find constraints on these, we found boundary condition. This has 3 3 |
|
|
141:02 | . uh Gr Immediately musical zero. it's a solution. Because the left |
|
|
141:12 | of this zero, so that means no love waves in the marine |
|
|
141:17 | That's good. That's part of what marine data so lovely to work |
|
|
141:22 | We we can assume that the amplitude zero uh Again it's a solution but |
|
|
141:31 | improves implies no way at all. the empathy of zero or we can |
|
|
141:35 | that H three equals zero which implies H one uh is uh omega three |
|
|
141:44 | . So this is just an ordinary way if H three equals zero. |
|
|
141:49 | what we found is uh this part not going to be zero, this |
|
|
141:53 | oscillating i is not zero. So the only three solutions are these |
|
|
142:00 | So no way, No love way at all. So except that why |
|
|
142:10 | we have the uh mr Love didn't up at this point. He |
|
|
142:16 | okay, I got just this trivial here. Let's do a more interesting |
|
|
142:25 | , let's put in their elect So got an upper medium and a lower |
|
|
142:30 | and the layer boundary is right here the upper surface is up here, |
|
|
142:38 | equals minus D. And uh uh three equals minus dates for X. |
|
|
142:48 | is getting bigger and bigger as you down now uh in each uh layer |
|
|
142:56 | we're gonna have different wave equations because got different philosophies. Here's V. |
|
|
143:01 | . One, here's the S. . And so we're gonna have a |
|
|
143:06 | is an equation for this is the equation where the unknown is um uh |
|
|
143:14 | wave vector in the upper medium. love wave displacement in the upper medium |
|
|
143:21 | here the unknown is the love wave in the lower media. We're gonna |
|
|
143:26 | match match solution right here at the using those boundary conditions that we just |
|
|
143:32 | about. So under conditions are uh of stress uh across the upper boundary |
|
|
143:45 | in the air distressing zero. So gonna have Uh huh. Oh this |
|
|
143:54 | here uh we have to have specialist you were in the air also gonna |
|
|
144:00 | to be distressed at zero at this . And the stress is given in |
|
|
144:06 | way in terms of schumacher's of the layer and the gradient of the |
|
|
144:19 | Always displacement in the Opera lane. down in the lower layer we have |
|
|
144:27 | of stress and displacement. So here's corresponding uh depression. Far out Or |
|
|
144:39 | . So we're talking about the 3 stress. So here it is |
|
|
144:43 | the upper medium and here it is the lower medium and these two have |
|
|
144:46 | be continuous across this boundary. Same here for the displacement displacement has to |
|
|
144:53 | continuous. See it's it's um under are concerning stress and displacement not stress |
|
|
145:02 | strength. Why do we have displacement there instead of strength? Well if |
|
|
145:08 | we don't have continuity of displacement that that we're gonna have tearing of the |
|
|
145:14 | . So that's an earthquake. We we don't want to look at earthquakes |
|
|
145:18 | , We want to look at the waist. So that's not. So |
|
|
145:22 | gonna have we're going to assume that displacement is continuous and the stresses. |
|
|
145:30 | we're gonna guess a solution with these solution is gonna have free parameters And |
|
|
145:37 | gonna determine those parameters using these three . 1 2. Okay, so |
|
|
145:46 | the upper media, let's again we're do the geophysical thing, guess the |
|
|
145:52 | and prove the guess so. We're guess that uh there's gonna be uh |
|
|
146:01 | waves propagating in this media and we'll them L. One minus and |
|
|
146:07 | One plus both of them are gonna displacement uh out of the screen. |
|
|
146:14 | so uh uh you're gonna both have same wave vector, the same |
|
|
146:21 | One here and the same H. here. And the only difference is |
|
|
146:27 | the sign right here. That's a that means it's upcoming and that's |
|
|
146:32 | That's down going great. What is wave vector H. It's got a |
|
|
146:39 | . The square of the length is by Omega over v. square in |
|
|
146:44 | to solve the local wave equation. . About the lower meeting. |
|
|
146:53 | only a down going way. There's be no waves coming up from uh |
|
|
147:00 | the center of the year. Why this one coming up? Because it |
|
|
147:04 | off of here? No reflector down ? And so there's only a down |
|
|
147:09 | way. So I've got a minus here, same as this minus sign |
|
|
147:13 | . I noticed we have a different factor here. K. and uh |
|
|
147:20 | through K is given by Omega and two. That's the sheer velocity down |
|
|
147:26 | . And uh this solution here has match with this solution here. Thank |
|
|
147:34 | . So it's got seven Parameters. count them Amber through here. That's |
|
|
147:44 | one, the other amplitude and then third amplitude. And then all these |
|
|
147:49 | vectors H H one, H K. One, and K seven |
|
|
147:56 | . Yeah. So we're gonna make max these boundary conditions here and |
|
|
148:03 | . Um all different access. We've to have uh that the horizontal components |
|
|
148:10 | Ace in the same. So that the love, weight loss. The |
|
|
148:17 | of the logic is similar to what did, but more complicated. And |
|
|
148:21 | at the end of that complicated analysis is given as the solution of this |
|
|
148:27 | . It's a pretty messy equation. here, it's got square roots and |
|
|
148:31 | on. It's got tangents. And got uh here's the layer length, |
|
|
148:36 | ? A layer thickness right in And it's got VL as a function |
|
|
148:41 | a ratio with DS two. And a ratio with GS one. You |
|
|
148:46 | see any VP in here anywhere, you? So that's a complicated |
|
|
148:53 | So what you can see is in high frequency limit, it's got to |
|
|
148:57 | a high frequency limit is the sheer in the upper medium. And the |
|
|
149:01 | frequency limit is uh your velocity of lower limit. And I think you |
|
|
149:07 | see that for yourself by assuming that omega is either very high or very |
|
|
149:17 | . Um We're gonna re parameters that we did before saying, the love |
|
|
149:23 | velocity is given by the stairway of ever media where the zeta correction. |
|
|
149:31 | we're going to assume that zeta is . And then we're going to, |
|
|
149:36 | we said before, like a taylor of zeta and come up with |
|
|
149:53 | And what happened to the frequency? , frequency is uh he's inside |
|
|
150:03 | frequency is, oh, Washington times frequency frequency is inside. And what |
|
|
150:20 | is the ratio of this wave So, this layer fix. So |
|
|
150:28 | didn't have that in the railroad We didn't have a characteristic length like |
|
|
150:34 | have here. And para length in problem is the thickness of the |
|
|
150:41 | which is characteristic of the model. if that thickness is uh it's an |
|
|
150:48 | thickness, then everything simple, everything away. And it turns out to |
|
|
150:53 | uh really way Philosophy, simply equal the body weight. Philosophy. |
|
|
151:01 | Here here's some uh some characteristic occurs a function. This gives the really |
|
|
151:09 | velocity as a ratio with the upper share boss. You see, it's |
|
|
151:18 | going to be a bit bigger than and as a function of frequency it |
|
|
151:22 | like this. And uh so this for uh a layer of thickness of |
|
|
151:30 | 10, that's 10 m and 20 and 40 m. And these are |
|
|
151:39 | higher velocity. You see, you that we're assuming that V. |
|
|
151:43 | One is less than B. S . I think that's true if I'm |
|
|
151:50 | . Mr would you remember uh if PS one is greater than V. |
|
|
151:55 | to do we still have a Okay, good. Anyway, |
|
|
152:01 | we we could decide by looking at equation, but I think we won't |
|
|
152:04 | that. Yeah. Yeah. The vectors have this character that uh VL |
|
|
152:23 | , the wave is going in this , but uh the wave is going |
|
|
152:30 | upwards and downwards reflecting uh in in pattern as traveling with um body wave |
|
|
152:38 | , V. S uh but it's traveling um horizontal. The horizontal component |
|
|
152:45 | that is Yeah. And um Uh Oops, hello, it decays |
|
|
152:57 | . Exponential with depth alone. This is trying the way back to the |
|
|
153:09 | of the way back to K. is consequences. Okay, thanks. |
|
|
153:17 | . So let's uh take a good for files, it is likely that |
|
|
153:24 | might observe love waves on the vertical of a fearful or false. Of |
|
|
153:31 | , because we're love wave is gonna uh horizontally problems. Okay, so |
|
|
153:39 | for uh for loved ones. How dispersion In the earlier discussion, Railway |
|
|
153:49 | did not depend on frequency, but love wave velocity did. So, |
|
|
153:54 | why. Say it again. In really discussion, there was no characteristic |
|
|
154:00 | or any characteristic wavelength so that a frequency omega would not know whether it's |
|
|
154:07 | high frequency and low frequency in layered . These layers provide cashless links, |
|
|
154:16 | dispersion always occurs. And surface waves really waves and love waves. And |
|
|
154:25 | fact we saw explicitly that it was very positive dispersion. Now, what |
|
|
154:36 | the consequences of dispersed? If if a wave is traveling, disperse |
|
|
154:46 | fully? High frequencies are going to to different philosophies and the low |
|
|
154:52 | So that means that wave let's change shape, right? So if the |
|
|
154:59 | is changing shape, it's not quite what we mean by the velocity. |
|
|
155:09 | If the waves, if the waves all the same, then the wave |
|
|
155:13 | retains its shape and if it's got uh it looks like a with the |
|
|
155:19 | peak which is maximum, then the of that peak gives the velocity of |
|
|
155:24 | way. Pretty clear. If the that is changing shape as it |
|
|
155:30 | It's not quite clear what we mean the velocity. In fact, there's |
|
|
155:36 | , there's two, wow, two , two velocities which we can get |
|
|
155:47 | . And so to get there. uh rewrite this expression here for uh |
|
|
155:55 | a scalar way, but this is solitary function and we'll call that omega |
|
|
156:00 | minus cake. We're gonna call that phase of definition. So here it |
|
|
156:06 | in the I five and five is function finds a function of frequency, |
|
|
156:12 | and space. This expression satisfies the equation. If uh velocity and the |
|
|
156:23 | equation is given by this ratio omega K. You came in the definition |
|
|
156:31 | the face. This is true whether not the velocity of various worth |
|
|
156:38 | We proved that this expression satisfies the equation with material property V squared if |
|
|
156:49 | only if vehicles omega over K. to make that proof, we did |
|
|
156:54 | have to specify whether or not he with. So if we were in |
|
|
157:01 | live expression here, uh you see this uh link carries you back to |
|
|
157:08 | right to the right equation in the election, but we're not gonna go |
|
|
157:12 | . And since uh we're not um up inside the uh all this learning |
|
|
157:24 | , we're gonna call this same ratio for us meg. Okay, is |
|
|
157:32 | gives the phase. Lossy for any for your component with frequency omega in |
|
|
157:39 | west. That's the faithful action. velocity of phase occurs where this derivative |
|
|
157:50 | of face with respect to omega is by this expression here. Uh Here's |
|
|
158:00 | definition face. We take the derivative that respect to omega. And so |
|
|
158:05 | here, out of the first time get in and out of the second |
|
|
158:09 | we get minus decay. The omega X. This point it moves with |
|
|
158:20 | velocity X over T, which is same as D omega DK. |
|
|
158:26 | um because X. So this is here, uh X over T equals |
|
|
158:37 | omega DK because of this. And uh we identify that uh this point |
|
|
158:46 | maximum value of phase moves with the velocity defined in this way, which |
|
|
158:52 | course is different from this one except some special case. Um where if |
|
|
158:58 | was uh omega was given back uh , in a in a special case |
|
|
159:09 | no consequence were the same, but real materials there uh always different. |
|
|
159:18 | we don't have to say at this what causes this variation in this state |
|
|
159:24 | in some cases uh wave vector K upon omega and we will learn more |
|
|
159:31 | this in the uh eighth lecture about elasticity. Once an important ideas about |
|
|
159:42 | this should be non-0. So uh is the definition of, of group |
|
|
159:53 | or more precisely group slowness. And put right in here for K. |
|
|
159:59 | put the definition that we found Found previously K. In terms of |
|
|
160:04 | and phase velocity work out the implications this using chain rule calculus. And |
|
|
160:12 | find the relationship between uh group slowness face slowness. Is this difference right |
|
|
160:23 | ? Using taylor's approximation. We can these uh minus one. Said group |
|
|
160:31 | is given by phase philosophy with the depending on the frequency dependence of the |
|
|
160:38 | loss. So uh this derivative could either positive or negative. And so |
|
|
160:46 | say that if it's uh if that is negative, we call that normal |
|
|
160:52 | . I'm not sure I know why is uh label is there? But |
|
|
161:01 | seemed normal, unusual for somebody and they call that normal dispersion. If |
|
|
161:08 | lack of this creation is negative, means for higher frequencies it goes |
|
|
161:24 | Um that's not that's not usual for wave types. That's the definition. |
|
|
161:31 | when high frequencies go slower uh that the normal dispersion. If high frequencies |
|
|
161:38 | faster that leads to inverse dispersion. , now let's uh uh let's see |
|
|
161:49 | consequences here, I have two slacks uh sign function and you can see |
|
|
161:58 | your eyeball that this one is a bit shorter uh wavelength than this. |
|
|
162:06 | , now when you combine the two , you get this and you can |
|
|
162:12 | that right here the two super pose reinforce and then they reinforce negatively. |
|
|
162:18 | then as you get over here they of cancel each other accuracy right over |
|
|
162:22 | . These two cancel each other And then uh further along here they |
|
|
162:28 | back in sync again. So the peak travels with the phase velocity. |
|
|
162:38 | you see this red line lines up peak here and here and here is |
|
|
162:44 | same peak that travels with phase The peak of the envelope travels |
|
|
162:54 | So this green line is going through maximum of this waiver here. It's |
|
|
163:02 | you know what I mean? Uh I say the envelope just make a |
|
|
163:06 | curve here, connecting all these peaks then another smooth curve uh connecting all |
|
|
163:12 | cross that's called the envelope. And the green line is uh goes through |
|
|
163:19 | uh peak of the of the envelope and the peak of the envelope here |
|
|
163:26 | the peak of the envelope here. that's a different philosophy, that's the |
|
|
163:30 | philosophy. The different frequencies travel with velocities. The wave of changes |
|
|
163:42 | So here's uh here's a wave moving right to left as it moves along |
|
|
163:49 | uh oh x to higher. And these change points right in here. |
|
|
164:13 | you see this little uh nick right , that's the same neck here and |
|
|
164:18 | same neck here. And so those those phase points all travel with the |
|
|
164:24 | phase velocity. The envelope travels with group loss. And so as the |
|
|
164:32 | goes along, looking at the The little knick point right here is |
|
|
164:35 | the beginning of the of the of wavelength and then it's sliding backwards through |
|
|
164:42 | wave it and then it goes back the back end. Call that a |
|
|
164:49 | break slides backward to the envelope. uh what is changing shape? That's |
|
|
164:59 | example of of a change shape because phase philosophy is less than the group |
|
|
165:12 | . Now here you've seen this uh before from Sheriff and guild art and |
|
|
165:19 | um uh it's a messy picture but gonna uh show you these are all |
|
|
165:27 | the surface waves in here and they they're traveling with a maximum uh maximum |
|
|
165:34 | philosophy is given by this. You out here you see far offset short |
|
|
165:39 | you see a reflection and uh service are mhm. Within this ban of |
|
|
165:55 | . And you can see in here a lot of uh what we call |
|
|
165:59 | us um And so you don't see outside of these limits. Action in |
|
|
166:06 | minimum. Within each. Uh Within these limits you do see linear |
|
|
166:18 | out separated by frequency. So uh . I have frequencies here and the |
|
|
166:27 | frequencies. So see with your Um dispersion. Well this might be |
|
|
166:44 | to you but there's an intimate connection dispersion and attenuation And we will address |
|
|
166:54 | connection in less than nine. Not . So how about this? For |
|
|
167:08 | ? That statement. True or Yeah, that's true. That's |
|
|
167:17 | That's the definition about this. In false. There was dispersion in our |
|
|
167:23 | of blood ways because the layer thickness a standard or characteristic different wavelength behaving |
|
|
167:32 | according to whether it's short or long this standard. Is that statement |
|
|
167:41 | Lots of words there. But uh that's uh that is logically true. |
|
|
167:50 | get dispersion because some wavelengths have some have wavelengths long compared to the standard |
|
|
167:58 | others short agreements. And here's the of that. In our simple discussion |
|
|
168:04 | railways, there was no no time in the problem to provide a frequency |
|
|
168:10 | and no length parameter to divide. politics also. Yeah, supposed to |
|
|
168:26 | looking inside me correct or the way doesn't change this way was traveling with |
|
|
168:32 | velocity where the group velocity is less a lot less than this year. |
|
|
168:36 | velocity about equal. A lot more none of the Yeah, about |
|
|
168:43 | Yeah. So um now in um excitement data, you always have a |
|
|
168:50 | . So you always have dispersion. so that means that high frequencies are |
|
|
168:56 | be traveling with different velocities and low but inciting data. Normally you only |
|
|
169:02 | a limited bandwidth. You don't have frequencies and uh, cycling sequences in |
|
|
169:11 | same data set. So anything is you look at, it always happens |
|
|
169:16 | there is a limited man. And that limit fan, you might not |
|
|
169:20 | able to see with your eyeball the effects, they're probably in there, |
|
|
169:25 | they have to be teased out You won't see them easily with your |
|
|
169:32 | normally in most datasets. Because uh the man with his limited, you |
|
|
169:39 | see dispersion actually, you will see generation, you'll see that uh high |
|
|
169:46 | go away and uh low frequencies but you you probably won't see much |
|
|
169:52 | the way of dispersion. Okay, this makes bigger topic. So I |
|
|
170:00 | this is a good time to And this is just pointing out that |
|
|
170:04 | going to carry these ideas about surfaces the more we have the cylindrical |
|
|
170:10 | So that's a cylinder. That's the . There's bound to be surface waves |
|
|
170:15 | with it because it's too because it's , we're going to call them to |
|
|
170:20 | ways and they're going to have different because of the cylindrical geometry. So |
|
|
170:25 | just useful to remember that Not all are flat, most important, non |
|
|
170:31 | surfaces. Uh Okay, so that's good place to start to stop and |
|
|
170:40 | call it a day for today And resume in the morning at 8:30. |
|
|
170:47 | right. And you're gonna supply the |
|